
Asim Munir wants to be guardian of the Middle East. He's fated to fail at home
For months, the killings continued, scholars John Braithwaite and Bina D'Costa have recorded . Afsana, who sang at wedding ceremonies to support her refugee family, was murdered in 2010. Ghazala Javed, another popular 24-year-old Pashto singer, was shot dead in Peshawar in the summer of 2012.
The night was cold, eyewitnesses would later remember, when the men arrived at the home of Pashto folk dancer Shabana in Mingora, a city in Swat district. They hammered on the door until she came out. They ignored her mother's promises that she would never allow Shabana to sing and dance again and dragged her toward the Green Square. There, her body was found the next morning, riddled with bullets and her throat slit from end to end. She had been covered with a shroud of banknotes and her music CDs.
Following days of talks last week, though, the TTP refused to pull back into Afghanistan. And helicopter gunships, artillery, and drones began hitting insurgent strongholds once again. A large number of people are back in refugee camps.
The jihadists who used terror to stamp out the region's unique syncretic culture now hold real power—and have no intention of giving up their sharia-ruled emirate without a fight. The question is: As Field Marshal Asim Munir offers the West the partnership of the Pakistani military to fight distant battles against the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, can he still win what's been called Pakistan's own Vietnam?
Emirates of mud
Looking back, the 2008 peace agreements were fated to collapse. The agreements were, journalist Daud Khattak has noted, signed between the Pakistan Army and the jihadists, excluding the traditional tribal leadership. The TTP's ranks were swelled by a new generation of prospectless young people, their guns an instrument to seize lands and extort money from businesses. Each emirate of mud ran on revenues it could seize through terror, and the TTP set itself up as the guardian of a mini-state.
From the outset, the TTP stamped its authority on the region, marginalising the state. Girls' schools, an estimated 27 of them, were dynamited. Another 65 boys' schools were also levelled, as well as two colleges. The tenuous gains Bajaur residents had made were wiped out in less than six months.
The TTP also moved rapidly to cash in on the spoils. Extortion replaced the normal tax structure. Among the key elements of Operation Sherdil, launched in 2008, was to separate the jihadists from their sources of income in the local economy. The plan worked, Braithwaite and D'Costa show—it worked disastrously well.
Egg and poultry farming in Bajaur collapsed, with livestock being left for the stray dogs as owners fled. Thousands of shops in Anayat Kalli were burned down in artillery exchanges, as fighting between the military and the TTP escalated. Fruit orchards, which grew oranges, plums, peaches, apricots, and persimmons, had to be abandoned. The marble business, another important source of livelihood, collapsed.
The TTP retreated into Afghanistan—only to return after the Islamic Emirate took power in Kabul in 2021. This time, Pakistan's ISI hoped, the Islamic Emirate would rein in the TTP. Turned out, it either couldn't or wouldn't. The cycle of violence erupted yet again. Local negotiators, who struggled to persuade both the TTP and the army to leave the area, were ignored by both sides. And the renewal of military operations has sparked off yet another refugee exodus.
Little evidence exists that the strains between the military and the population are being contained. Last month, soldiers opened fire on protestors who had gathered at a military camp to voice anger over the killing of a seven-year-old girl in a mortar strike. Local soldiers responded by killing seven unarmed protestors, a leaked video established.
Also read: Munir wants Pakistan military to be taken seriously. He was impressing Imran's supporters
Roots of terror
Like so many insurgencies in India and its neighbourhood, the jihadist rise in Bajaur was facilitated by the state. Following the march to war over Kashmir in 1947, tribals from the region were recruited to fight against Maharaja Hari Singh's forces. The military, civilian authorities, and religious scholars, all supported the effort, scholar Husain Haqqani has noted. These groups were also supported by the government of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who saw Islamists as a tool to undermine President Mohammad Daoud Khan's Left-leaning government in Afghanistan.
This process, according to scholar Hussain Asaf, marked the emergence of a 'a dialectical relationship between Islam, Pakistan and the military. Without Islam, Pakistan would not have been able to come into existence; without Pakistan the military would not be able to exist; and without the military, Islam and Pakistan would be threatened. In perpetuating such a state, the military was perpetuating Islam.'
The policy, however, had unintended consequences. A new class of conflict entrepreneur emerged in what was then known as the NWFP (North-West Frontier Province), today Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Equipped with Western arms and funded by Saudi Arabia and the CIA through the ISI, this new class of political leader swept aside traditional tribal hierarchies.
From 1979, as refugees flowed into Bajaur to escape the Soviet intervention, the ISI set to work recruiting fighters from the camps. Later, in 1989, the leaders of seven Islamist parties met at Maidan in Lower Dir and formed the Tahrik-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi—organisation for the defence of the Prophet's law. Sufi Muhammad of the Jamat-e-Islami was appointed head of the new coalition.
This coalition, scholars Kiramat Ullah, Muhammad Ayaz Khan, and Tariq Anwar Khan have written, marked the end of the traditional chiefdoms of Khar, Nawagai, and Pashat. It also choked the activities of pan-Pakistan political parties. Instead, the jihadist campaign in Afghanistan became the axis of politics in Bajaur. The killings of local residents in air strikes as well as General Pervez Musharraf's turn against the jihadists, later led these jihadists to take on the state.
Faqeer Muhammad, the most prominent of these jihadist leaders, took control of the movement in 2008. A military operation forced him out—if at great cost to civilians—but the TTP was soon back, again staking claim to control of its little emirates.
Also read: With nuke lunacy, Asim Munir joins Pakistan's Hall of Generals who swapped brains for bluster
An arc of fire
Since 2008, new democratic movements have sprung up across the region, seeking an end to the use of death squads, extrajudicial executions, and massive force by the military. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa saw the rise of the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement, which sought greater democratic rights and freedoms with the constitution of Pakistan. The military crushed it, though, fearing that the democratic movements might undermine the jihadist proxies through which it ruled the region.
For Pakistan's military commanders, the jihadist allies were still partners—partners who might need to be coerced and disciplined, as the British had done in the colonial period—but allies nonetheless. The first 30 years of British rule in the Northwest, historian Elizabeth Kolsky records, saw more than 40 punitive expeditions in which crops were destroyed, livestock slaughtered, and entire villages burned to the ground.
This is a strategy Pakistan is also pursuing in other violence-torn borderlands. The government has succeeded in having the Majeed Brigade—the most aggressive of the insurgent groups fighting under the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) umbrella—designated a terrorist group, but that hasn't changed reality much. Fierce fighting has been reported against Baloch groups operating from across the border in Iran's Zhob. The Pakistan Army claims 50 BLA personnel were shot dead in the latest operations, while nine of its own personnel fell in combat.
Lacking political legitimacy and a genuine political constituency, Field Marshal Munir is fated to fail, just as his predecessors did. To contain insurgencies in 2009-2010, Zahid Ali Khan estimated that Pakistan committed some 1,40,000 army and Frontier Corps personnel. Those aren't sustainable numbers if Field Marshal Munir also has ambitions to emerge as the guardian of the Middle East.
Finding a way forward needs the Pakistan Army to demonstrate not just tactical skills, but also a political will that ties leaders at the centre into meaningful alliances with representatives of the burning borderlands. There's little in the Pakistan Army's history, though, that suggests it has the imagination for such an enterprise.
Praveen Swami is contributing editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indus Waters Treaty unjust, blood & water can't flow together: Modi
PM Modi NEW DELHI: PM Modi rejected Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan as 'unjust and one-sided', reiterating India's position that "blood and water cannot flow together" and asserting that India will "no longer tolerate nuclear blackmail". In his I-Day speech Friday, the PM lauded Operation Sindoor and the role played by armed forces, while outlining India's "new normal" that, he said, will "not differentiate between terrorism and those who nurture terrorism". Modi declared from Red Fort that IWT is not acceptable to India as the country's farmers suffered unimaginable losses because of the treaty, backed by World Bank. "The waters that belong to India will be used by India, for our farmers alone. We would no longer tolerate an arrangement that deprived its farmers. India has endured this for decades. We will not endure it any further. In the interest of our farmers and the nation, this agreement is unacceptable to us," PM said. He said Operation Sindoor, which saw India bombing terrorist headquarters in Pakistan and POK, reflected the anger and frustration that people felt after Pahalgam terror attack. "Terror headquarters hundreds of kilometres inside enemy territory were destroyed. Terrorist infrastructure was turned to rubble. Pakistan is still having sleepless nights. There was so much destruction there that even now there are new revelations coming out,'' said Modi, alluding to the disclosure by IAF last week that six Pakistani aircraft were brought down in the military conflict in May. "For a long time, nuclear blackmail had been going on but this will not be tolerated anymore,'' the PM said. Modi stressed that India will continue to give a befitting reply to enemies of the nation. PM said the country saw the wonders of 'Made in India' in Op Sindoor. "The enemy was shocked at the kind of ammunition that was destroying them within seconds." "In past 10 years, we set our target to become self-reliant in defence sector, and today we are seeing the results," Modi said.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Pak national on long-term visa held for cheating on wife
1 2 Hyderabad: A 33-year-old Pakistani national, on a long-term visa in Hyderabad, was arrested by Banjara Hills police on Friday for allegedly cheating on his wife. According to cops, the complainant caught him red-handed with another woman in the latter's flat at Banjara Hills. Based on her account police registered a case under Sections 299 (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), 85 (husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty), 318(2) (cheating), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the BNS. The accused, who works at a private company in Hi-Tec City, married the complainant in 2016. They were both colleagues. At the time of marriage, the woman was a divorcee with a nine-year-old daughter from her first marriage. "She was of a different faith but converted to her husband's religion," said a police official, adding that the couple lived in Langar Houz post their wedding. They have a seven-year-old son. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad "About three months ago, due to marital discord, the couple started living separately in two flats within the same apartment complex at Netaji Nagar," the official added. Recently, the complainant suspected that her husband was having an affair with a woman living in an apartment on Road Number 12 of Banjara Hills. On Thursday night, she went to the flat and caught her husband red-handed. Alerted by the complainant, Banjara Hills police arrived at the scene. As the couple resides in Langar Houz, the complaint was subsequently referred to Langar Houz police. "Currently, the accused, his brother and their mother are on a long-term visa. We are collecting more details. The accused has been arrested, and he will be produced before the court," said B Venkat Ramulu, inspector, Langar Houz. He added that the accused has applied for Indian citizenship, which is in process. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Pakistan's Ayub Khan sought US help to annexe Kashmir after Indus Treaty in 1960
A new book reveals Ayub Khan's attempt to gain US support for capturing Kashmir after the Indus Waters Treaty. Khan linked water rights to territorial claims. He warned that US aid to India would be wasted without resolving the Kashmir issue. Kennedy offered a compromise, but Khan insisted on securing water resources. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Following the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960, the then Pakistani President Ayub Khan sought US President John F Kennedy 's support to capture Kashmir from India, a new book on the treaty has 'Trial by Water: Indus Basin and India-Pakistan Relations ', author Uttam Sinha, an expert on international water issues and IDSA senior fellow, recounts how, in July 1961-months after signing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)-Khan arrived in Washington, already bristling over America's generous aid to a reception in his honour at Mount Vernon, tastefully arranged by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, Ayub's displeasure was clear. In protest, he had suspended CIA's covert flights from airbases in East Pakistan, which supported Tibetan rebels, as well as U-2 flights over China from West Pakistan.A private garden walk with Kennedy thawed the frost. Ayub agreed to reopen the airbases; Kennedy, in turn, promised that the US will not supply any military equipment to India, according to the later in the Oval Office, Ayub, like a campaign general, spread out maps to press Pakistan's security concerns. The first showed Indian troop deployment-of the 1.5 million soldiers, only 15% faced China, while 85% were positioned against Pakistan. The second detailed 80,000-90,000 Afghan troops on the western border, armed with Soviet-supplied equipment. The third mapped Pakistan's thin defences against both neighbours. Throughout, Ayub insisted that without Kashmir, "Pakistan would be up the gum tree" if attacked from India or Afghanistan, Sinha pointed out in his and his advisers doubted the alarmism but recognised Kashmir as the litmus test of Indo-Pak peace. Kennedy proposed a compromise that the then Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru might accept. Ayub's answer was calculated. India could keep Jammu, but Pakistan needed "some miles" across the Chenab to secure water resources . His logic was simple-if the Indus Treaty gave Pakistan rights to the western rivers, and those rivers flowed from Kashmir, adjoining territories should belong to suggested Nehru, politically spent and out of touch with Kashmiris, was now ready for settlement. Without resolving Kashmir, he warned, US aid to India was wasted. Kennedy countered that US assistance was aimed at keeping India free from communist influence, not to buy loyalty, Sinha pointed out in his the meeting closed, Ayub made one final ask-if Kennedy's effort to sway Nehru during the latter's planned November 1961 Washington visit failed, and Pakistan returned to the UN over Kashmir, would the US back it?"Yes," Kennedy replied - an episode that, as the book makes clear, showed how deeply water and territory were entwined during the Cold War era's South Asian book also recalls how Nehru faced internal criticism over the IWT. He was described as an umpire in a cricket match-was how one MP described the PM during a fiery Lok Sabha debate on the treaty in November and December 1960. The charge, recorded in the book, captured the frustration of parliamentarians who believed India was giving away too much, too the treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, and debated in the House on November 30, the mood was anything but celebratory. Criticism came from across the political spectrum, including even the Congress benches. Ashok Mehta of the Praja Socialist Party famously called it a "second partition."