Voices: Wes Streeting has won the spending review – but will he blow his winnings?
She could announce the winners of the competition for public funding over the next three years in reverse order, with David Lammy, the foreign secretary – who has lost a big chunk of his foreign aid budget – going first, followed by Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, and Steve Reed, environment.
The last to be summoned, as the ABBA soundtrack switches from 'Money, Money, Money' to 'The Winner Takes It All', would be Wes Streeting, the health secretary, who has been allocated spending increases of 2.8 per cent a year more than inflation over the three years from next year to 2029.
Arms in the air, in a sequinned jacket, as glitter falls from the ceiling, Streeting would take his place next to John Healey, the defence secretary, at the top of the line of winners and losers.
Sadly, the announcement of spending plans for the rest of this parliament will be less showbiz. Reeves will try to generate a bit of excitement, and maybe even some waving of order papers, by spinning the big and welcome increase in capital investment – although she has already cannibalised some of her good news stories with her transport infrastructure announcement last week and the go-ahead for Sizewell C nuclear power station today.
The problem with the capital projects, though, is that they will not start until 2027 at the earliest, so they won't have delivered anything except feelgood press releases before the next election.
Whereas the big increase in day-to-day spending on the NHS is the kind of vote-winning largesse for which Labour MPs are desperate. In the absence of glitter and balloons, the waving of order papers will be compulsory on the government benches at this point.
But wait: who is this, coming to spoil the party? It is the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), performing its constitutional role of puncturing inflated government claims. Labour, having used the IFS to attack the Conservatives at fiscal events over the previous 14 years, will find that the tables have turned (even if the Treasury insists that this is not a 'fiscal event' – it is merely allocating a spending total set at the Budget).
Max Warner and Ben Zaranko of the IFS have written a paper for the Oxford Review of Economic Policy entitled 'Future challenges for health and social care provision in the UK'. It contains some startling facts, such as that, by the middle of the next decade, the NHS will employ 10 per cent of the entire workforce of England.
It also contains a striking table showing the increase in the number of doctors and nurses employed in the NHS since 2019, and the increase in treatments. There are 18 per cent more consultants, 32 per cent more resident doctors (who were called junior doctors in the old days, a year ago) and 23 per cent more nurses and health visitors, which are huge increases in just five years.
But the outputs from such dramatic increases have been disappointing. Hospital admissions have risen by just 9 per cent (except A&E admissions, up 2 per cent), and outpatient appointments have increased by just 12 per cent.
The IFS authors comment: 'The large fall in NHS hospital productivity since the start of the pandemic complicates the picture.' They say there are two scenarios for the future: 'The optimistic view is that there is substantial scope for 'catch-up' improvements in productivity: merely returning to pre-pandemic levels would represent a considerable improvement. The more pessimistic view is that the pandemic has permanently lowered NHS productivity, because of the ongoing impacts of Covid-19 on patient health and complexity and changes to working practices or expectations.'
They tentatively conclude that there are recent signs that NHS productivity is recovering, but the loss of capacity is still alarming. Despite the huge amounts of extra spending devoted to the NHS since the election, and promised for the next three years, no one in the think tanks that specialise in the health service thinks that Labour's targets will be hit by the next election.
Will Streeting, the lucky winner of the spending review showdown, be able to convince the voters that he has spent their money well?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns
The Treasury is reportedly exploring options to raise additional revenue from inheritance tax ahead of the autumn budget. According to The Guardian, officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to fill, amid similarly controversial pushes for a 'wealth tax' by some Labour MPs. Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. Last week, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) predicted Rachel Reeves is now set for a £41.2 billion shortfall on her 'stability rule' in 2029-30 and has been left with an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge not to raise taxes. She will need to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget to plug the gap, Niesr cautioned. In July, some Labour Party figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, called for a wealth tax. Ms Reeves has not ruled out the possibility of a new wealth tax but has been eager to highlight that she will stick to her commitment not to hike tax for 'working people'. However, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismissed the idea. 'This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax,' he told GB News. 'But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy… that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. 'Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. 'There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Treasury ‘considers inheritance tax reforms' to fill £50bn spending gap in budget
The Treasury is looking to raise more money by tightening the rules around inheritance tax, it's been reported. Amid growing pressure regarding the state of the UK's finances ahead of the autumn budget, the chancellor needs to address a black hole left by Labour U-turns, higher borrowing and sluggish economic growth. Economists have warned that Ms Reeves must raise taxes or tear up her flagship borrowing rules to fill a £50bn shortfall in public finances. According to a report in The Guardian, the Treasury is now looking at options on inheritance tax like changing rules to restrict the gifting of money and assets. Under current rules, unlimited amounts of money and assets can be gifted to relatives and friends which avoids inheritance tax, provided that it is gifted at least seven years before the benefactor dies. Money given less than three years before is taxed at the full inheritance tax rate of 40 per cent, while gifts given between seven and three years has a 'taper relief' tax, which is between eight and 32 per cent. The Guardian reports that the Treasury is considering a lifetime cap to limit the amount of money an individual can donate outside of inheritance tax, as well as reviewing rules around the taper rate. 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more,' a source told the newspaper. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' However, it has been reported that no substantive talks at a senior level have occurred about inheritance tax, and no decisions have been made. Reeves has already ruled out increases to income tax, national insurance and VAT, while inheritance tax brought in a record £6.7bn in 2022-2023. However, recent analysis that showed wealthy investors are leaving the UK because of measures such as the abolition of non-dom status has caused nervousness. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
A 'security circus': How JD Vance's visit to a sleepy Cotswolds village sparked anger
Locals are tired of closed roads, vehicle searches and constant security presence, while protesters told the vice president to 'go home'. Protesters are set to gather close to a manor house in the Cotswolds where US vice president JD Vance is holidaying with his wife and three children. Demonstrators are expected in the Oxfordshire town of Charlbury, where a heavy police operation has been put in place to protect Vance and his family. Vance travelled to the picturesque area on Sunday evening (10 August) after spending two nights in Chevening House, Kent, with the UK's foreign secretary David Lammy. Locals in nearby Dean faced with road closures, sniffer dogs, ID checks are frustrated by the constant security presence, with one comparing the "over-the-top" spectacle to a scene from Men in Black. What is JD Vance doing in the Cotswolds? JD Vance is holidaying in the tiny hamlet of Dean with his family. They are staying in Dean Manor, a Grade II listed Georgian home that is hidden behind a 15-foot stone wall and surrounded by six acres of gardens. While this is a summer holiday, Vance has already met with the foreign secretary, and is also expected to host shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick on Tuesday (12 August) at his Cotswolds retreat. Vance and his family are expected to travel to Ayrshire in Scotland later in the week, where they'll stay for five days, according to the London Standard, with police planning their own security operation for his visit. Why is JD Vance facing protests? Protesters are gathering in opposition to what they describe as the "genocide-enabling" US regime's support of Israel's onslaught in Gaza. "JD Vance is a hideous moral vacuum and the British public want nothing to do with him," Stop Trump Coalition spokesperson Zoe Gardner told the Huffington Post. 'It is nauseating to watch ministers' displays of fake friendship with this authoritarian, anti-democratic, genocide-enabling US regime." Beyond Gaza, protesters are understood to have a broader range of grievances including LGBTQ rights, the climate, inequality and Ukraine, according to the New Statesman. The so-called "Vance not welcome party" is scheduled to start at Mill Field from 4pm, according to the Oxford Mail. In an email to the newspaper, one activist said: "It's not a mass demonstration but we plan to make ourselves heard, show the Vance meme image that we know the thin-skinned Vance can't stand, and 'dance against Vance'." Speaking to the Oxford Mail on Monday, Jonathan Mazower, said residents objected to Vance's visit "because of who he is", with some putting up signs around Dean saying "go home" and "fascists not welcome here". The charity worker said the Trump administration 'is attacking so much of what our democratic societies hold dear' and that Vance "represents the worst excesses of the American far right". This isn't the first time Vance has been met with protesters while on holiday. He was faced with hundreds of pro-Ukraine demonstrators during a ski trip in Vermont in March, following his clash with Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. The vice president was also heckled during a family visit to Disneyland California in July. Locals fed up of 'American security circus' Cotswolds residents faced with vehicle searches and traffic diversions are growing tired of Vance's trip to an otherwise tranquil part of the British countryside. All entrances to Dean – two roads and three public footpaths – have been blocked off, with a heavy police and US Secret Service presence stationed at a large marquee. Only residents of the hamlet are allowed in and out, dog walkers are diverted, and those entering are subject to car searches by security. Many locals are reluctant to speak about the visit due to security concerns, but Andy Graham, a local councillor for Charlbury, said the heavy presence of guards in black suits and sunglasses felt "a bit over-the-top". 'The trouble is when you get security on such a scale, it tends to be a bit initiatory. It was a bit like the Men in Black had arrived on a film set in Chipping Norton and Dean yesterday," he said. 'We understand that people do need security, but I think they haven't been discreet about it. And I think that tends to generate more concern than is necessary. Roads have been closed up." Cllr Graham questioned the level of resources used by Thames Valley Police, claiming the force "should be doing other things", and was "disappointed" that authorities didn't keep him "in the loop". "I don't need the details because they can't do that but giving us a bit more of a steer so that I could reassure my constituents a bit more would have been good. I'm just a bit miffed about it I suppose. Stephen Bubb, a 72-year-old retiree, said he has "no objection" to Vance coming to Britain for his holiday. "What I object to, is the over-the-top American security circus that is causing significant disruption to us," he said. "You know, I think the Americans could learn a little from our own royal family. Our royal family manages to get around the country with minimum security, minimum disruption to people's lives." A couple, both US citizens living in the UK, said they attempted to visit the town of Dean because they were curious about the area where JD Vance had chosen to stay. 'We were being nosey. But the security wouldn't let us past the blockade," one of them said, having told guards that they weren't there to visit anyone and only wanted to check out the cafes. 'I'm saddened in a way that the Cotswolds will be on the radar of Americans and particularly MAGA type Americans," she added. Software salesman Miles Walkden, 57, said that plenty of famous people stop by in the area, and that it doesn't usually affect locals "too much". "To be fair, I don't think there's many people who like JD Vance around here... I don't like him, but he's a guy on holiday with his family, so I feel a bit like, if I saw him anywhere else, I might have something to say. "But if he's out with his family, I'm probably going to ignore it. But there's a lot of people around here who are not happy about it." Read more JD Vance to host Robert Jenrick at Cotswolds manor house (The Telegraph) US Vice President JD Vance set to stay at 'luxurious' estate on Ayrshire visit (The Daily Record) JD Vance visits farm shop owned by Tory donor's wife (The Telegraph)
