Purdue coach Barry Odom took shot at Indiana football schedule. Curt Cignetti responds
Last week the fire came from closer to home. Purdue coach Barry Odom took a passing shot at the Hoosiers' preference for low-level nonconference opponents.
Cignetti said he saw Odom's comments, made last week on an Indianapolis radio show. Odom said teams owe it to fans to play schedules full of compelling games. Purdue plays Notre Dame annually in addition to its nine Big Ten games.
In the wake of news that IU had canceled future series with Virginia, Odom also took a swipe at his team's biggest rival.
"I could take the approach of one of the other schools in the state, cancel games and do some of those things, but the schedule is what it is," Odom said.
Tuesday at Big Ten media days, Cignetti was asked if he was surprised by Odom's comment.
Fire away: Purdue football coach Barry Odom takes shot at Indiana's schedule
"I like Barry Odom," Cignetti said, later winking. "Taking a shot at our schedule — did I think about it much? Not really, but that would be an overstatement.
"... Not that I didn't think much of it (as in) he shouldn't have done that. I saw it. It was a flicker in my brain, and then it was over."
Beyond this season. Purdue plays both Wake Forest and Notre Dame in both 2026 and 2028, North Carolina and the Fighting Irish in 2027, Vanderbilt in 2029 and TCU in 2030. Indiana currently has no power conference non-Big Ten games scheduled until a 2030 game against Notre Dame.
Despite an uninspiring nonconference schedule, the Hoosiers were prepared enough to beat Purdue 66-0 in last season's Old Oaken Bucket game. After that game, Purdue fired Ryan Walters and hired Odom.
Until that gap closes, Purdue coaches will have more concern about playing IU than who the Hoosiers play in the other 11 games.
Get IndyStar's IU coverage sent directly to your inbox with our IU Insider newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
22 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana football's offense was 2nd nationally in scoring. Who needs to step up to keep pace?
Part of what made Indiana football's most historic season last year was an offense among the best in the country. Critique of opponents aside, the Hoosiers did what they needed to: dominated. They finished last season second in scoring offense at 41.3 points per game. IU was 34th in total offense in gaining 426.4 yards per game. They breakdown was they were tied for 31st in passing offense with Baylor at 261.3 yards per game, and their run game was just 63rd at 165.1 yards per contest. Kurtis Rourke was masterful in leading the offense, even doing so on a torn ACL. He led an offense that was seventh in completion efficiency (68.1%). In the first edition of our roundtable, we discussed what Cal transfer quarterback Fernando Mendoza brings to the Hoosiers, and how they may use him differently. Mendoza was third in the ACC in yards passing per game at 273.09, which was 10th nationally. Ahead of him were Syracuse quarterback Kyle McCord who led the nation (367.62) and No. 1 NFL draft pick Cam Ward (331.77) whose Miami Hurricanes were the only team to score more than IU. Now, that doesn't guarantee success, but it is a large reason for why draft analysts and others are high on his addition for IU. But that is only part of the equation. Who may be the X-factor for success? How do new players fit in? Who fills the void for injured Michigan transfer Tyler Morris? IndyStar IU insider Zach Osterman and Herald-Times reporter Michael Niziolek huddled with IndyStar assistant sports editor Aaron Ferguson to discuss Mendoza's impact on IU football. Here is their conversation. Ferguson: Simply put, who needs to emerge among offensive skill positions for this team to play at a consistent level? Niziolek: With Curt Cignetti's focus on production over potential in the transfer portal, IU doesn't have many question marks at the skill positions going into 2025. Maryland transfer running back Roman Hemby is a good example. While he didn't have his best season in 2024, he has 3,268 yards from scrimmage in his career (2,347 rushing) and is probably the best pass-catching back the Hoosiers have had in a long time. He's not the only capable back in the room either with Lee Beebe Jr. and Kaelon Black expected to have prominent roles as well. Things get a little bit dicey at receiver where IU doesn't have the same kind of depth it did at the start of fall camp last year when Donaven McCulley and E.J. Williams Jr. struggled to make the rotation. The Hoosiers didn't miss a beat when they walked away from the team a month into the season. Indiana opens camp in a couple of weeks with five available veteran receivers — Williams happens to be one of them after taking his name out of the portal — and a group of four underclassmen with a combined 23 snaps of experience. It might not matter if IU stays healthy, but it was surprising Cignetti didn't seek out at least one additional receiver in the portal just as some insurance. Osterman: Yeah, I think this conversation has to begin with health. Indiana got uncommonly lucky with injuries last season. None of their top pass catchers missed meaningful time, nor did either of their top two running backs. That's not extraordinary luck — we know Cignetti believes in Derek Owings' ability to manage his roster's health — but it isn't something you can count on every year. Already, Indiana has had to make new plans at slot receiver, where Morris was expected to see significant snaps before a season-ending knee injury suffered in spring ball. The slot is probably the position I'm most curious about. Indiana added Makai Jackson (App State) in the winter and then plugged the Morris hole with Jonathan Brady (Cal) after the spring season. But that was a quietly important position for IU last season. The three players rotating through the slot combined for 104 receptions, 1,238 yards and 12 touchdowns. That is a big chunk of offense to replace, and already Indiana has had to shift gears once this offseason. Brady and Jackson have career resumes that suggest they're capable, but it's an important hole to fill. Niziolek: What I find interesting about Jackson, is that he developed into more of an outside receiver at App State. He lined up on the outside more than 90% of the time last year and the numbers were similar in 2023. I think IU is going to approach the slot receiver position differently this year with everyone rotating through there. Cignetti mentioned that all the receivers except Charlie Becker cross-trained at the position during spring camp. Jackson will also be looking to make up for lost time after being limited for much of spring camp with a hamstring injury that also kept him out of the spring game. Osterman: That's an interesting possibility. And entirely plausible. Honestly, when you consider the backs are also slightly different profile this year (probably fair to say Hemby and Beebe lean a little more toward pass catching than Ty Son Lawton and Justice Ellison did last season), and as we discussed in Part I, Mendoza has more potential mobility, I could see an offense that doesn't operate with total uniformity in 2025 to the way it did in 2024. I don't think there will be wholesale changes but I think it could look discernably different. Ferguson: One named not mentioned yet is Wisconsin transfer Riley Nowakowski, a tight end who was used as a blocker but also caught 11 passes for 74 yards last year in a failed Air Raid experiment. How does he fit into the Cignetti/Mike Shanahan offense, given he has those spread concepts and can be utilized in either phase of the game? Osterman: I'm not sure I'm ready to pin my flag to anything yet at tight end. Zach Horton was the alpha and omega there last season, and he's gone. James Bomba is the holdover from last year who, when healthy, was often utilized as a second end/blocker. IU also added Holden Staes, who on paper looks like the most pass game-oriented of those three. I'm also curious about Nowakowski's time playing fullback, something I don't think he'll do a lot at Indiana but something I'm not sure Indiana would've trusted anyone to do last year, so again, maybe that's another potential new wrinkle. Among those three (plus maybe a freshman if one impresses), I think Indiana has the tools it needs at tight end. I'm just not sure what the division of labor and order of responsibility is in that group. Niziolek: Staes has the greater potential as a receiving threat, but I think Nowakowski has an edge as the more proven inline blocker. Horton's toughness is what earned him such a prominent role in Cignetti's offense going back to when they were at James Madison together. Nowakowski earned a similar reputation at Wisconsin having earned a scholarship and starting role as a former walk-on and he's plenty capable of putting up numbers like Horton did last year (21 catches for 189 yards and four touchdowns). Ferguson: Is there a world where a tight end splits out more to help fill the void at slot, not that it's totally going away but replace whatever expected production came with Morris? Niziolek: Brady is a more direct replacement for Morris, but I think some of the production IU got from its slot receivers last year will go to the running backs. The Hoosiers brought in two of the top pass-catching backs (Hemby and Beebe Jr.) available in the portal. They are capable of moving all over the line of scrimmage and I think you will more screens out to them that might have gone to a guy like Myles Price last year. Indiana's running backs combined for 30 receptions last year, and I don't think it would be all that surprising if Hemby and Beebe double that number. Osterman: Hemby is a real X factor for me for Indiana this year. It might be nearness bias purely because I've seen him shred IU defenses a handful of times in the past. But he always felt like a player with more talent than his offense was equipped to showcase at Maryland, either because of a preference for throwing the ball or because of blocking issues. If Indiana sees similar performance from its offensive line this year, I think as Mike alludes to there, Hemby opens up a lot of fascinating options for Cignetti and Shanahan. Ferguson: If screens and pass-catchers in the backfield are going to diversify the offense, may we see variation in trick plays because they will be so versatile? Osterman: I don't think that's really something Cignetti leans into too much. He'll run them from time to time like any coach, probably to put them on film for future opponents as much as anything else. But I think his offenses tend to stay pretty true to what they're built to do around their personnel, rather than try to overthink stuff too much if that makes sense. Niziolek: Indiana didn't need to resort to trick plays very often last season since the offense operated at such a high level as the second-highest scoring team in the country. Some more versatility in the backfield might lead to a few more getting sprinkled in, but I don't think Cignetti will be desperate to insert them as long as the offense keeps the ball moving.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Greg Schiano built Rutgers football's infrastructure to adapt to changing landscape
As the wayward search for Rutgers' new athletics director appears to finally be close to an end, Greg Schiano's football program will begin training camp having been unaffected and undeterred by what transpired over the last year. The chaos that's engulfed the Rodkin Center hasn't moved across Sutphen Road to infiltrate the Hale Center. And that's not a coincidence. Schiano since he's been back has run his program in his vision with the personnel and infrastructure that he sees fit. As the landscape of college sports – especially college football – has evolved with Name, Image and Likeness, the transfer portal and now revenue sharing, that infrastructure has only become more important. It's also become bigger. But the freedom Schiano has to lead his program without interference has helped insulate it from an AD search that became a punchline nationally – its previous leading candidate, Brian Lafemina, according to NJ Advance Media pulled his name from consideration in recent weeks. The university has now zeroed in on Keli Zinn, the executive deputy director of athletics and chief operating officer at Louisiana State, according to reports. When asked about the long search last week in Las Vegas at Big Ten Media Days, Schiano said he hadn't spent much time worrying about the search. Had it affected anything? 'Not our operation,' said Schiano, who's beginning his sixth season since returning to Rutgers. More: Rutgers is targeting LSU administrator as next athletics director, per reports Rutgers football's infrastructure While it undoubtedly would help Schiano to have an athletics director who could help him raise funds – something he's never had during his second stint – it's not something that's stopping him. Schiano's program has increasingly started to look like an NFL organization. His two years as the head coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2012 and 2013 gave him an up-close, inside look at what it needs. NFL organizations have college personnel and pro personnel to evaluate both groups of players. Schiano's program has groups to evaluate high school players and college players so it's ready to jump when anyone enters the portal. Schiano's been diligent about how he's built the operation. 'Certainly we need more people to help with evaluations but we've kind of reorganized our entire population,' Schiano said. 'My whole thing has always been measure twice and cut once. I don't want to just react, I'd rather be a little bit later and get it right than have to be the first out of gate. I don't want to be last but certainly don't need to be first. I've observed a lot of other people, what they've done. Things I think are good, things that are not. Certainly from my own experience I had an idea of how I wanted to do it.' 'Comfortable with the team we have' Schiano credited the team he's assembled to help lead it: Chief of Staff Kevin MacConnell, assistant general manager for finance Jordan Wolkstein, assistant general manager for personnel Eric Josephs, and assistant athletic director for football Will Gilkison, who helps run the ins and outs of program operations. Wolkstein's role helping to oversee contracts and compensation for players shows just how much college football has changed, but it's also a necessity. When it comes to paying players and roster construction to stay within a budget, that's another area Schiano's time in the NFL helped prepare him for. 'I think it helps a lot,' Schiano said. 'I think it just helps with the comfortability of dealing with finance as it ties to football. I think you have to some discipline. We've had some players that if we could've spent a little more, we could've probably gotten them. To me the most important thing is your own team. You're around them every day, you know who they are. So where you can't afford to make mistakes is on your own team. That's the one you should know. Every time you step outside your organization there's some unknown there.' Every year Schiano's program has evolved. Every year it's looked more and more like a pro organization to adapt to the changes in college football. He's built it in his vision. At some point Rutgers will hire an athletics director, but until it does operations inside the Hale Center continue to run smoothly. 'We really feel comfortable with the team that we have,' Schiano said. 'We do have to continue to strategically add people to build the infrastructure but I want to make sure they're the right people.' This article originally appeared on Rutgers football: Greg Schiano has built program to adapt to changes
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Angel Reese Dealt 'Brutal Truth' In Rivalry With Caitlin Clark
Angel Reese Dealt 'Brutal Truth' In Rivalry With Caitlin Clark originally appeared on The Spun. Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark have been rivals dating back to their time at the college basketball level. Reese, starring at LSU, and Clark, starring at Iowa, twice faced off in the NCAA Tournament. Reese and the Tigers topped Clark and the Hawkeyes in the 2023 national championship game. Clark and the Hawkeyes got revenge in the Elite Eight in 2024. The two have since become two of the biggest stars in the WNBA, with Reese starring for the Chicago Sky and Clark starring for the Indiana Fever. While Clark has been getting a lot of credit for the WNBA's growth, Reese has made it clear that she believes she deserves a lot of credit, too. "People are talking about women's basketball, you never would think they'd be talking about women's basketball," Reese said in 2024. "People are pulling up to games. We got celebrities coming to games and sold-out arenas just because of one single game. Just looking at that, I'll take that role. I'll take the bad guy role, and I'll continue to take that on and be that for my teammates. I know I'll go down in history. I'll look back in 20 years and be like, the reason why we're watching women's basketball is not just because of one person. It's because of me, too. I want y'all to realize that." But while that might be true to an extent, Ice Cube recently made it clear that when it comes to people being interested in Clark or Reese, there's not much of a debate. Ice Cube, who offered Caitlin Clark $5 million to play in his BIG3 League, admitted that when he spoke to investors and advertisers, there wasn't much of a debate between Clark and Reese. The league's sponsors suggested that Clark, not Reese, would make the biggest impact. While an offer was made to Clark, no such offer was made to Reese. 'They didn't tell us the same thing about Angel Reese,' Cube informed TMZ Sports. 'I don't know if we can make that same offer.' Ice Cube added the door has probably been closed on Clark. Meanwhile, it never seemed to open for Reese. Angel Reese Dealt 'Brutal Truth' In Rivalry With Caitlin Clark first appeared on The Spun on Jul 28, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
