District 204 Superintendent Adrian Talley announces he's stepping down after next school year
Talley told the Indian Prairie school board in an executive session in March that he would not be renewing his contract, according to an email statement from Talley to The Beacon-News on Friday morning. Per Talley's announcement on the district website, the board had offered to renew his contract beyond the 2025-26 school year.
Talley highlighted the district's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and its efforts to support mental health as key achievements during his tenure in Wednesday's message. He also credited the passage of the district's $420 bond sale referendum question that is paying for capital improvements in the school district as having 'laid the groundwork to make District 204 safer and stronger for years to come.'
Talley told The Beacon-News he plans to 'continue to work through the next school year until the very end.' He also plans next school year to catalogue monthly what work needs to be done by the new superintendent going forward.
He said in his announcement on the district website that the timeline for his stepping down was to give the school board 'ample time to conduct a thorough search for the next superintendent, who will begin on July 1, 2026.' This is similar to the process previous District 204 Superintendent Karen Sullivan followed when she retired, Talley told The Beacon-News.
Talley said he doesn't know what his next steps will be after leaving the superintendent's role at the end of next school year.
On Thursday, Indian Prairie school board President Laurie Donahue released an announcement via the district's website about beginning the process of searching for a new superintendent.
The school board has authorized sending a request for proposals to search firms that will help select a new superintendent, according to Donahue's message. Those will be due April 25 and then evaluated by the board, with semi-finalists selected by May 5. The board will then meet with the semi-finalists and approve a firm on June 9.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
38 minutes ago
- CBS News
Some Denver City Council members express concerns about $26,000 retreat: "I'm uncomfortable with the timing"
Two Denver City Council members on Tuesday expressed concerns about a two-night Colorado mountain retreat for Denver City Council members next week that carried a $26,000 price tag, even as 171 city workers are being notified that they are losing their jobs. "I'm uncomfortable with the timing," said council member Paul Kashmann on Tuesday, about the retreat that was spotlighted Monday by a CBS News Investigation. "I don't believe the timing is anywhere close to ideal, and that's an understatement." Denver city workers began receiving notifications Monday that they were being laid off as part of an effort to help the city address a $200 million budget deficit projected for 2026. Ten of Denver's 13 councilmembers are scheduled to go on the retreat from August 27- 29 at the Lone Rock retreat center in Park County. Council representative Stacie Gilmore was not planning to attend the team building and professional development retreat due to a scheduling conflict, but said, "A camping trip, campfire, and s'mores up at Genesee would help as much. And be way cheaper". Council President Amanda Sandoval had pushed for the high country retreat saying, "So just because we're having a time of crisis doesn't mean council shouldn't learn to work better together." Sandoval said the retreat had been discussed since last December, and a contract was signed on May 8. It called for the city council to pay $16,000 for facility use, meals and rooms, $2,600 for ADA transportation, and $7,600 for a facilitator and assessment tool, bringing the cost to about $26,000. In April, Sandoval emailed her colleagues on the city council about the retreat, writing, "I truly believe this will be an incredible opportunity for us to step away from the day-to-day hustle, get to know each other better in a beautiful setting, and just maybe have some fun." She said she had attended an event at the facility in 2024, "and I absolutely fell in love with the facility. I think you all will too". The money came out of the city council's annual budget. Two weeks after signing the contract, Mayor Mike Johnston detailed layoffs, furloughs, and cost-cutting that would be needed to address Denver's financial deficit. "I would never have done any of this", said Sandoval, "had I known any of this information prior to signing that contract." She said the city has tried unsuccessfully to get a refund or reschedule the retreat, which will last about 36 hours. The Park County facility features "breathtaking views," according to its website, 60 individual cabins along with restaurants, meeting spaces, a fitness center, and a yoga room. Asked if there were less expensive options closer to Denver, Sandoval said, "There aren't a lot of options. We do not have a facility like that in Denver." She said the retreat will bring the council together to work more productively, "so we can serve the residents of Denver." Kashmann said he was "not sure" if he would still go to the retreat, in light of the layoffs. "I will decide what's the best use of my time," he said. He complimented Sandoval for "trying to make us more efficient" and said he thought there was value in team building and making the council a more effective body. "I understand people's concerns with the dollars," said Kashmann, who reiterated, "the main concern is the timing".
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Drilling Stuck Near 4-Year Lows, Thanks to Energy Policy Puzzle
'Drill, baby, drill' — the pro-oil mantra that the Trump administration rode in on in January — is playing out more like 'chill, baby, chill.' The number of operating US oil and gas rigs held flat at 539 last week, according to Baker Hughes. The figure, seen as a key indicator of future output, is hovering near four-year lows and has fallen by 47 rigs in the past 12 months. READ ALSO: Homebuilders Offer Best Incentives Since COVID and Meta Focuses on New Smart(er) Glasses The Rig is Up The White House essentially rolled out the petroleum-based polyester red carpet for the oil and gas industry this year, cutting regulations, offering up more public land for drilling at slashed royalty rates, ending wind, solar and electric vehicle incentives; and sticking tax giveaways in the GOP's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But it takes a world to move oil markets, which ultimately dictate the incentives to drill, and even the might of a US administration ideologically devoted to fossil fuels has struggled to change that. The proof is in the macro. Oil inventories are set to accumulate at 2.96 million barrels per day next year, pushing the world toward a record supply glut, the International Energy Agency's (IEA) latest monthly report said last week. Global oil demand is also growing at less than half the rate seen in 2023, the IEA added, while consumption in the world's second-largest economy, China, is set to peak earlier than expected in 2027. On the supply side, OPEC+, which includes Saudi Arabia and Russia, is set to hike production next month despite warnings from the IEA that it could tip the world into oversupply later this year. And all of this means that the price of oil is under pressure: The US crude oil benchmark, West Texas Intermediate, was at $63 on Friday, not far off the $62 four-year low it touched in May. Most oil and gas analysts calculate that the break-even point for newly drilled wells is about $60 per barrel, but that doesn't factor in elevated tariffs on raw materials like steel and equipment that companies are now facing. There are, nevertheless, some signs that future demand could pick up: Wood Mackenzie analysts estimated earlier this year that a slower transition to clean energy, clearly the Trump administration's preference, could mean the world requires about 5% more oil per year than previously forecast beginning in the mid-2030s. Roughly 100 billion extra barrels of oil and gas, they estimated, would be needed by 2050 to close the resulting gap. Ultimately, the Trump administration's desired outcomes have yet to materialize. Oil output is increasing at a slower rate than it did last year. Prices at the pump have changed little since the president's inauguration. Crude oil exports are falling, including by nearly 12% year-over-year in May, the latest month with available data. The Dallas Fed's latest quarterly survey of oil industry executives was pessimistic, to say the least, with more than half saying they will probably drill fewer wells this year than they initially planned. Crude Outlook: The cost equation for US oil firms is also about to get worse: The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said last week that it expects the per-barrel price of crude to fall below $60 by the end of the year and average close to $50 in 2026. Because of increases in well productivity, the EIA said it still anticipates that American crude output will hit a record 13.6 million barrels per day in December. Afterward, however, it expects US producers 'will pull back on drilling and well completion activity' and bring output down to 13.3 million per day. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AeroVironment (AVAV) Secures New Production Agreement For US$1.4 Billion Satellite Program
AeroVironment recently benefited from a new production agreement signed with Mercury Systems, aimed at supporting the U.S. Space Force's SCAR program. This development coincided with strong quarterly results showing a revenue increase, reflecting positively in a 46% share price rise over the last quarter. The agreement, alongside other client and product-related advancements like the partnership with SNC and the introduction of the Skyfall concept for Mars exploration, bolstered investor confidence. Despite broader market fluctuations impacted by tech stock slumps and Fed-related uncertainties, AVAV's focused advancements solidified its position for the period. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 risks for AeroVironment (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about. Uncover 13 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. AeroVironment's new agreement with Mercury Systems is set to enhance the company's involvement in the U.S. Space Force's SCAR program, which could boost both revenue and earnings forecasts by adding crucial contracts and expanding its defense portfolio. This agreement aligns with the company's ongoing push for innovation in unmanned systems, thereby reinforcing its growth narrative driven by rising global defense spending and the strategic acquisition of companies like BlueHalo. Over the past five years, AeroVironment's total shareholder return, including share price and dividends, has soared by 215.66%, indicating robust long-term performance for investors. However, in the past year, the company's share price performance lagged behind the US Aerospace & Defense industry, which returned 31.7%. This suggests the potential for catching up in the coming periods, especially with recent strategic advancements and market expansions. The current share price stands at $247.13, showing significant movement toward the analysts' consensus price target of $280.83. If the company's projected revenue growth and earnings materialize, the share price could approach the target. However, challenges such as government contract dependencies and potential integration issues from prior acquisitions remain crucial factors to monitor. Upon reviewing our latest valuation report, AeroVironment's share price might be too optimistic. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include AVAV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
