
Is it legal for auto brands to make you service your car at their dealers to keep your warranty?
MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition.
For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere.
This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use.
Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi).
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit.
However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
"Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert.
"Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling."
Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020.
The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive.
The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'.
It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met.
"Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson.
However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop.
"Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC.
The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties.
"Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines.
Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law".
In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles.
The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product."
MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops.
MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition.
For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere.
This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use.
Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi).
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit.
However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
"Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert.
"Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling."
Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020.
The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive.
The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'.
It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met.
"Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson.
However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop.
"Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC.
The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties.
"Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines.
Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law".
In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles.
The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product."
MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops.
MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition.
For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere.
This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use.
Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi).
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit.
However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
"Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert.
"Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling."
Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020.
The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive.
The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'.
It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met.
"Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson.
However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop.
"Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC.
The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties.
"Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines.
Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law".
In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles.
The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product."
MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops.
MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition.
For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere.
This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use.
Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi).
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit.
However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
"Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert.
"Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling."
Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020.
The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive.
The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'.
It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met.
"Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson.
However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop.
"Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC.
The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties.
"Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines.
Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law".
In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles.
The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product."
MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia?
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Reports TikTok threatening 'constitutional challenge' against Labor's social media ban, raising foreign influence concerns
Chinese-owned social media giant TikTok is understood to have threatened a constitutional challenge against the Albanese government's under-16s social media ban, raising concerns about the influence Beijing has on Australian lawmaking. Multiple sources familiar with the matter told that TikTok engaged high-profile barristers to confront Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to blow up the entire child ban scheme with a constitutional challenge. TikTok denies this, telling 'no such threat has been made by TikTok'. It is understood the legal threat was linked to the implied freedom of political communication under the Australian Constitution. TikTok has been unhappy YouTube was given an exemption based on educational grounds, previously calling the carveout a 'sweetheart deal'. In response to the threat, Labor appears poised to either break a key promise and revoke YouTube's exemption, or change the policy more broadly to allow platforms such as TikTok to apply for exemptions. Minister Wells did not respond to detailed questions on the matter. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his frontbench are facing growing criticism from independent politicians that his government has failed on transparency pledges. If Minister Wells makes a significant policy change in line with TikTok's demands, it would raise serious concerns about Beijing's influence on Australia's domestic affairs. YouTube is banned altogether in China and the superpower is locked in a tech race with the US over AI and social media. The legal threat, and lobbying efforts by TikTok in general raises fresh questions about foreign influence over domestic policymaking and adds to debate about the government's transparency and handling of lobbyists. Secret TikTok meeting sparks transparency concerns recently revealed that Ms Wells' office held an 'introductory meeting' with TikTok shortly after she took over the communications portfolio in May 2025. That meeting took place around the same time that news broke the government had already decided it would strip YouTube's exemption from the social media restrictions. This was despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese himself previously approving the exemption and lauding YouTube for its 'educational and health support' benefits. However, Minister Wells shrouded the lobbying process in secrecy, refusing to disclose who lobbied her, when, or what was discussed. Many crossbench politicians, including Centre Alliance MP Rebekha Sharkie, Australia's Voice senator Fatima Payman and One Nation leader Pauline Hanson argued against Ms Wells' ban. Ms Payman said the developments raised extremely important questions about the government's susceptibility to lobbyists and possibly the Chinese government. 'The antidote is transparency' Independent Senator David Pocock said the government's refusal to provide clarity on the issue was part of a wider transparency crisis. 'I think there should be far more transparency across the board,' Senator Pocock told reporters at a press conference about the Albanese government's lack of transparency. 'There's some real questions about how the age assurance is going to work (in the social media ban laws). 'One of my big concerns is that when there's a lack of information, when there is a vacuum, that gets filled with all sorts of misinformation. 'And the remedy to that, the antidote is actually provide people with information. Be more transparent.' Damning new research from the Centre for Public Integrity revealed that the Albanese government has the worst transparency record in more than a decade. The proportion of freedom of information requests fully complied with has sunk from about half in 2021-22 to just 25 per cent under the Albanese government in 2023-24. 'Labor talked a huge game in opposition about transparency—They've come in and been one of the worst governments since 1993,' Mr Pocock said. Greens Senator Steph Hodgins-May joined the criticism, calling the government's actions 'deeply concerning'. 'What is this government trying to hide? ... We need decisions to be made in the open, not behind closed doors.' Shift under pressure The Albanese government's apparent reversal on YouTube marks a significant policy shift from its earlier public stance. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had previously defended YouTube's exemption, calling the platform vital for 'education and health support'. But in recent months, lobbying from TikTok and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant pushed the government toward including YouTube in the ban. YouTube educators Bounce Patrol said they were excluded from consultations by Ms Wells and her office. Creator Shannon Jones said she reached out to the minister's office to provide input but never received a reply. 'I reached out… but haven't heard back… Everything is just being done so fast, like it's all being considered and decided in the space of a week,' she told National security risks ignored The developments also appear to contradict advice from the 2023 Senate Select Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media. The committee warned that TikTok and its parent company ByteDance posed 'unique national security risks' and could be a tool of foreign interference. Despite TikTok being banned from government devices, it continues to wield influence as a 'stakeholder' in legislation. Chinese Premier Li Qiang recently delivered a thinly veiled warning to Mr Albanese over treatment of Chinese businesses, like TikTok, in Australia. 'I trust Australia will treat Chinese enterprise fairly and properly resolve issues regarding market access and investment review,' he said. 'Economic globalisation has encountered headwinds. Trade frictions continue to increase. 'We hope that you will embrace openness and co-operation, no matter how the world changes. 'You should be promoters of economic and trade co-operation so that our two countries will better draw on each other's strengths and grow together.'

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
With no one to take over, Australia's oldest Chinese restaurant is closing
'We are getting old,' says Sai Yoke 'Sue' Wong, 74, who runs Toi Shan in Bendigo with her husband, Kok Hem 'Peter' Chee, 71. 'We have been wanting to retire for a long time. We looked for someone to take over, but no one has.' The couple will permanently close their restaurant in Bendigo's CBD on July 30. It will later reopen as an Indian restaurant. Toi Shan has been around since 1948, when Allan Chan took over On Loong cookshop and renamed it after the southern Chinese city he was born in, more commonly transliterated as Taishan. On Loong, however, dates back further, possibly to 1892. Its first iteration was on Bridge Street, in the heart of Bendigo's Chinatown, and it moved to the current location on Mitchell Street in 1942. The Chan family sold the business to Sue Wong's family in 2003. 'We've been here 20 years,' says Wong. 'It's a hard job with long hours. Staff are hard to find, and you don't make enough money to pay them anyway, so you work until midnight. One day it's busy, two days quiet, one day busy. It's hard for old guys.'


7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Chery wants to Australianise its cars to make them appeal to Americans
Chery, in its current state, may have only been operating in Australia since 2023, but a global executive says the feedback of Australians could help the brand's cars see success in the United States down the line. Locally, Chery has enjoyed substantial growth in its first few years. To the end of June 2025, the brand had recorded a whopping 228.8 per cent increase in sales from the same period in 2024, the largest of any brand – even the hard-charging BYD. This success has provided Chery with a wealth of feedback and guidance on how to improve its vehicles, with brand chief engineer David Xianqiang Lu telling CarExpert that the lessons learned can also help prepare it for potential future efforts in countries like the US. 'From any point of view, the Australian market is very, very important, and that's a reason to come here and try and start in the market,' he said. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. ABOVE: Chery Himla 'We consider at least two directions right now. One is, in my opinion, that the user here, and the user conditions here, are very close to the USA market. 'That's our next target where we want to go, I don't know whether that's the right words or not, but that's our ambition.' The US market is uncharted territory for Chinese brands. Efforts to stop Chinese cars from infiltrating its market have led the US Government to impose substantial tariffs on vehicles from the country, which means there are currently no Chinese brands operating in the US, though there are Chinese-owned ones such as Volvo, Polestar and Lotus. A 100 per cent tariff was slugged on Chinese EVs in 2024, followed by reciprocal tariffs imposed on the US by China. Despite that, brands like Chery are planning for the US' stance to soften in the coming years, opening the door for expanded global operations. ABOVE: Chery E5 'I know there are a lot of issues there, but that's a different story. As a company and an engineer, we are looking for the markets where we want to go,' Mr Lu told CarExpert. 'I believe the Australian market can help us learn a lot about the USA market. We've mentioned about a [pickup], with important towing capacities, which are also very big in USA market, so we can learn a lot.' Indeed, Chery has been developing new utes for some time, after earlier efforts like the Karry Higgo and Aika were phased out. It revealed a new ute, the Himla, at this year's Shanghai auto show, and it's understood several others are waiting in the wings – including a yet-to-be-revealed plug-in hybrid (PHEV) expected to come to Australia. ABOVE: The F700 ute, from the Chery-owned Jetour brand. It seems Australia could serve as a test bed for these vehicles, which will undoubtedly vary in size, powertrains, and construction (i.e. body-on-frame or unibody), to prove their worth before being shipped elsewhere. 'The other thing is the geographical position, this off-season. For us, in China right now it's summer, very hot, here it's winter,' Mr Lu told CarExpert. 'Australia also has some mountain area with snow and these kinds of things; we can test a vehicle here. Working together, leveraging global resources, we can further speed up our development process.' Any local development undertaken by Chery would follow similar efforts from other Chinese brands, including GWM, which recently hired former Holden handling tuner Rob Trubiani to spearhead local development efforts. Non-Chinese brands like Ford, Kia and Mitsubishi are also heavily involved in Australian vehicle tuning. ABOVE: Chery Tiggo 8 Additionally, Mr Lu outlined feedback received from Australian customers and media was always relayed to Chery's head office in China, which has informed the development of new models and tech, as well as updates for its existing lineup. 'Also the user here is different. I remember the first article I saw was from [CarExpert], the gentleman wrote about Chery's vehicle, he mentioned that the vehicle tuning and handling was not that good, suspension not that good,' he told CarExpert. 'We really take a lot of comments, and try to [improve] that. That's another thing, we really let the local experts help us tune the vehicle, maybe even special versions.'