Latest news with #AustralianConsumerLaw
7NEWS
7 days ago
- Automotive
- 7NEWS
Is it legal for auto brands to make you service your car at their dealers to keep your warranty?
More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops. MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition. For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere. This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use. Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi). Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit. However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). 'Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs,' an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert. 'Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling.' Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020. The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive. The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'. It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions — in this case servicing — are met. 'Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees,' said an ACCC spokesperson. However, both standard warranties and extended warranties — whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions — are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop. 'Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality,' said the ACCC. The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties. 'Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away,' says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced — including hefty fines. Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to 'apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law'. In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million — the maximum fine possible at the time — for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles. The ACCC told CarExpert: 'The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product.'
The Advertiser
15-07-2025
- Automotive
- The Advertiser
Is it legal for auto brands to make you service your car at their dealers to keep your warranty?
More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops. MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition. For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere. This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use. Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi). Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit. However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). "Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert. "Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling." Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020. The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive. The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'. It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met. "Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson. However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop. "Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC. The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties. "Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines. Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law". In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles. The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product." MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia? Content originally sourced from: More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops. MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition. For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere. This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use. Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi). Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit. However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). "Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert. "Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling." Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020. The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive. The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'. It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met. "Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson. However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop. "Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC. The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties. "Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines. Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law". In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles. The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product." MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia? Content originally sourced from: More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops. MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition. For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere. This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use. Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi). Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit. However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). "Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert. "Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling." Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020. The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive. The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'. It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met. "Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson. However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop. "Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC. The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties. "Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines. Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law". In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles. The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product." MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia? Content originally sourced from: More auto brands in Australia are offering extended new-vehicle warranties on the condition that owners have their cars serviced only by official dealership workshops. MG is the latest brand to force customers to service their vehicle within its own dealer network to receive the Chinese brand's full 10-year/200,000km warranty, which was implemented in August 2024 without such a condition. For vehicles purchased from July 1, 2025, if customers don't service their vehicle at an MG dealership, they only receive the brand's standard seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. MG recently also announced a reduced seven-year/200,000km warranty for private buyers of its commercial vehicles including the upcoming MG U9 dual-cab ute – due on sale in Australia later this year – and only a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty for customers who choose to service their vehicle elsewhere. This drops further to five years or 160,000km (once again whichever comes first) if the U9 is being pressed into commercial use. Similarly, Nissan and Mitsubishi also offer 10-year extended warranties for their new vehicles on the condition that buyers service the vehicle at their respective brands' dealerships (limited to 300,000km by Nissan and 200,000km by Mitsubishi). Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Owners who service elsewhere are only offered a five-year warranty, with Mitsubishi's standard warranty also limited to 100,000km but Nissan's stipulating no mileage limit. However, the practice is perfectly legal, according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). "Manufacturer warranties can come with conditions, such as conditions on servicing or repairs," an ACCC spokesperson told CarExpert. "Manufacturers may offer such warranties as a selling point to differentiate the products they are selling." Such conditions can only be deemed illegal if they are anti-competitive – something Mitsubishi ensured would not be the case when it introduced its 10-year 'Diamond Advantage' warranty in 2020. The automaker applied for an exemption from the ACCC, which evaluated Mitsubishi's warranty conditions, definition of servicing centres and whether the conditions were anti-competitive. The ACCC deemed Mitsubishi's extended warranty is not anti-competitive, enabling Mitsubishi to offer it to consumers and remain protected from legal action by the ACCC's 'exemption'. It gives the manufacturer the right to not offer a longer warranty unless its chosen conditions – in this case servicing – are met. "Warranties are extra promises that a business can choose to make on top of the consumer guarantees," said an ACCC spokesperson. However, both standard warranties and extended warranties – whether customers pay extra for them or they're attached to servicing conditions – are separate from the 'automatic guarantees' that protect buyers under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This means auto brands can include the condition of servicing with their extended and even standard warranties, without any impact on consumer rights even if the vehicle is serviced by an independent workshop. "Under the Australian Consumer Law, when consumers buy products and services they come with automatic guarantees. These include that products are fit for purpose and are of acceptable quality," said the ACCC. The key point here is that 'consumer guarantees', as the ACCC describes them, are not the same as standard or extended warranties. "Consumer guarantees are automatic and can't be taken away," says the ACCC. If they are, penalties can be enforced – including hefty fines. Mazda Australia was fined $11.5 million in January 2024 after a Federal Court appeal was dismissed, because it was deemed to have failed to "apply the consumer guarantee provisions of the Australian Consumer Law". In 2018, Ford Australia was made to pay $10 million – the maximum fine possible at the time – for 'unconscionable' conduct towards customers who encountered faulty Powershift dual-clutch automatic transmissions in Focus, Fiesta and Mondeo vehicles. The ACCC told CarExpert: "The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law may continue to apply after a manufacturer warranty period has expired, and regardless of whether an independent operator has serviced or repaired the product." MORE: Which brands offer the nest new car warranties in Australia? Content originally sourced from:
9 News
10-07-2025
- Business
- 9 News
Sabrina joined a common 'side hustle' to make extra cash. It 'destroyed' her
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Exclusive: Sabrina wanted to make some extra cash. Chloe* followed other local mums. Ellen* was looking for love. All three took part in in multi-level marketing (MLM) businesses that they say left them in financial or emotional ruin. Sabrina wanted to make some extra cash but ended up broke. (Supplied) There are about 300,000 MLM consultants in Australia, according to Direct Selling Australia (DSA) – about 80 per cent of them women. MLMs are legal in Australia but research shows most consultants will only lose money. The industry has also been plagued with allegations of "toxic" culture and unethical business practices for years. Yet more than 90,000 Aussies joined MLMs in 2023 alone, many just trying to make ends meet. "They prey on vulnerable people, they offer hope in this financial crisis," Ellen told MLM businesses, also known as direct selling or network marketing, work by recruiting individual salespeople or "consultants". But they don't receive a salary or wages. Instead, they make money by selling MLM products, which they must purchase themselves from the business then sell at a markup or through recruitment. Consultants can make hefty bonuses by recruiting other consultants under them (known as their "downline") to earn a percentage on all those recruits' sales. This model, popularised by brands like Avon and Tupperware, has been compared to those of illegal pyramid schemes but MLMs are legal under Australian Consumer Law because they offer tangible products. But fewer than one per cent of MLM consultants make a profit, according to US research , and a slew of MLMs have been accused of unethical sales and recruitment tactics. Consultants predominantly sell and recruit through their personal networks, targeting friends, family and social media connections to buy or join. And most MLMs require consultants to make regular purchases and meet sales targets just to stay in the business. So why would someone ever join? Sabrina was working as a travel agent in Queensland when an old friend suggested she join skincare MLM NuCerity. She promised it would help Sabrina achieve financial freedom and be her own boss. "I was doing a lot of overtime and she started telling me how it would be a great way to eventually get some time freedom," Sabrina told "I signed up straight away." She believed her friend had her best interests in mind and ignored some red flags, like when other consultants allegedly told her not to Google the business. "I trusted her, so I didn't really question anything," Sabrina said. Sabrina "didn't question anything" when an old friend recruited her into an MLM business. (Supplied) Had she Googled NuCerity, Sabrina might have found warnings not to join the MLM that left her broke and emotionally "shattered". Sabrina was with NuCerity for four years but never made more than a few hundred dollars a month, even after quitting her job to focus on the MLM. Any money she did make was spent on NuCerity products to stay in the business, so she had to rely on her then-partner to cover rent, bills and groceries. NuCerity has since gone out of business. It was acquired by ARIIX , which has also gone out of business and in turn was acquired by NewAge. All three companies have not responded to a request for comment. Single mum Ellen was convinced to join a health product MLM by a man she met on a dating app who swore it would be the "perfect side hustle" on top of her nursing job. She hoped to make extra cash and was involved with a string of MLMs over the next few years but lost thousands. "This has really f----- me over emotionally and financially," she said tearfully. Other former consultants told they were recruited into MLMs by friends and relatives who promised they could earn easy money and work from home. Most said they only believed the claims because of their relationship with the recruiter. Chloe, from Perth, was sceptical when local mums started joining a beauty MLM but was eventually recruited by a relative. Though she made $6000 in less than a year, she said the toxic and "cult-like" behaviour she witnessed in the MLM shocked her. "Not only did I witness most mums losing money but the emotional and spiritual abuse was like nothing I'd seen before," Chloe said. She alleged other consultants bullied and harassed new recruits, manipulated them into paying for their own training courses and "shut down" anyone who challenged them. When reached out to the health MLM it said it took "allegations of bullying and harassment extremely seriously but strongly rejects any allegations that misrepresent our business model, culture, or the safety of our products." Sabrina alleged she was encouraged by NuCerity consultants to spend beyond her means to maintain the image of success even when she was scraping by. She claimed that when she questioned these tactics, she was "gaslit" into believing she was the problem. "It's incredible how these groups can just brainwash you," she said. "My auntie even asked me, 'Is this a cult?'" It certainly felt like one to Ellen, who only stayed in the MLM industry for so long because she craved a sense of community. Most MLMs encourage consultants to connect and form groups, offering a sense of connection to vulnerable and isolated individuals. "I'm very isolated socially and I felt like I belonged," Ellen said, but it soured quickly. "They pretend to be your friend [but] they just close ranks and shut you out if you don't do exactly what they say." Former consultants alleged they were encouraged to target vulnerable people to boost sales and recruitment. "We were encouraged to find a niche – burnt-out nurses, or menopausal women, or single mums – and infiltrate," Ellen claimed. "To join all these Facebook groups, then start offering [MLM products] on the sly." Sabrina and two other NuCerity consultants went a step further, starting their own Facebook group to lure other women into the MLM. Advertised as a group for women to make friends, they used it to identify and connect with potential targets. "We started organising weekend coffees under the pretence of wanting to connect and make friends ... we were really sneaky, to be honest," Sabrina said. Then they tried to sell to or recruit the women, many of whom had limited social or support networks. Chloe said that mothers in her local area were prime targets, as many were socially isolated and craved connection with other women. "The women who join are not dumb or naïve," she said. "They are being recruited by their best friends, sisters, mums, aunties, work colleagues, people they know, like and trust ... and it's not simple to leave." When Sabrina finally left NuCerity it was because she couldn't afford the $200 minimum monthly spend to stay in the business. As soon as that happened, the consultants she'd called friends cut her off. "Everything just started crumbling. I completely lost my self-esteem, I was very depressed," she said. It took months to recover financially and emotionally, and years to come clean to members of the Facebook group she had started (after the other consultants left). Ellen struggled for years before finally escaping the MLM industry after saying she said she realised it was "all smoke and mirrors". "It's a lot of manipulation, you're most likely not going to succeed, you're most likely going to lose a hell of a lot of friends and family," she said. She's suffered mental health issues as a result and is still thousands of dollars out of pocket. Sabrina, Chloe and Ellen now spend their free time educating other Australians about the financial and personal risks of MLMs in the hopes that other women don't fall into the same trap. "They are not providing an opportunity for mums and vulnerable people," Chloe said. "It's a model where only one per cent earn a decent income and the rest lose money." Sabrina added that Australians who leave MLMs shouldn't feel ashamed to share their stories, as they can help others find the motivation to get out of a bad situation. She, Chloe and Ellen called for better financial education for vulnerable groups and greater government protections and support for people who lose money in MLMs. *Names changed for privacy. national money finance business CONTACT US
The Advertiser
10-07-2025
- Automotive
- The Advertiser
Oh what a peeling: Toyota to defend faulty paint claims
Frustrated Toyota Corolla owners have been driven to file a class action suit over alleged defects that cause paint to peel when exposed to sunlight. The Japanese vehicle juggernaut, Australia's best-selling car brand for more than two decades, will "vigorously defend" the claims filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday. The suit was filed on behalf of disgruntled drivers of Corollas manufactured from July 12, 2010 to September 30, 2014 and painted with factory code 040 white paint. The claim argues the paint defect breaches Australian Consumer Law and that Toyota is liable to compensate affected customers for loss and damage. Under Australian Consumer Law, any vehicle purchased from 2011 onwards must be of "acceptable quality". But in a July 2022 statement, Toyota Australia explained the alleged defects could have arisen because of sustained sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. "Over time, (exposure) degrades the adhesion between the factory-applied paint primer coat layer and the base metal electrodeposition layer, causing paint to peel from the metal body panel." Lawyers from William Roberts argued that Toyota hid some crucial information from consumers about alleged manufacturing problems. "Throughout the periods during which the affected vehicles were manufactured, Toyota did not disclose to the public that affected vehicles contained the paint peeling defect or ... had the propensity to experience the ... defect," they said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says consumers have a right to a free repair when a car has a minor problem. A Facebook group boasting over 7000 members, dedicated to taking Toyota to task over what they say are flaws from the car maker, had several Corolla drivers voicing their intention to join the lawsuit. Many posted photos of paint peeled off from large sections of their vehicles. A Toyota spokesperson acknowledged the claims, adding customers with questions about their vehicles should contact their local dealer. "Toyota Australia has been served with a statement of claim for a paint peeling class action in relation to certain 2010 – 2014 Corolla vehicles," they said. "We intend to defend the claims vigorously." Frustrated Toyota Corolla owners have been driven to file a class action suit over alleged defects that cause paint to peel when exposed to sunlight. The Japanese vehicle juggernaut, Australia's best-selling car brand for more than two decades, will "vigorously defend" the claims filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday. The suit was filed on behalf of disgruntled drivers of Corollas manufactured from July 12, 2010 to September 30, 2014 and painted with factory code 040 white paint. The claim argues the paint defect breaches Australian Consumer Law and that Toyota is liable to compensate affected customers for loss and damage. Under Australian Consumer Law, any vehicle purchased from 2011 onwards must be of "acceptable quality". But in a July 2022 statement, Toyota Australia explained the alleged defects could have arisen because of sustained sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. "Over time, (exposure) degrades the adhesion between the factory-applied paint primer coat layer and the base metal electrodeposition layer, causing paint to peel from the metal body panel." Lawyers from William Roberts argued that Toyota hid some crucial information from consumers about alleged manufacturing problems. "Throughout the periods during which the affected vehicles were manufactured, Toyota did not disclose to the public that affected vehicles contained the paint peeling defect or ... had the propensity to experience the ... defect," they said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says consumers have a right to a free repair when a car has a minor problem. A Facebook group boasting over 7000 members, dedicated to taking Toyota to task over what they say are flaws from the car maker, had several Corolla drivers voicing their intention to join the lawsuit. Many posted photos of paint peeled off from large sections of their vehicles. A Toyota spokesperson acknowledged the claims, adding customers with questions about their vehicles should contact their local dealer. "Toyota Australia has been served with a statement of claim for a paint peeling class action in relation to certain 2010 – 2014 Corolla vehicles," they said. "We intend to defend the claims vigorously." Frustrated Toyota Corolla owners have been driven to file a class action suit over alleged defects that cause paint to peel when exposed to sunlight. The Japanese vehicle juggernaut, Australia's best-selling car brand for more than two decades, will "vigorously defend" the claims filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday. The suit was filed on behalf of disgruntled drivers of Corollas manufactured from July 12, 2010 to September 30, 2014 and painted with factory code 040 white paint. The claim argues the paint defect breaches Australian Consumer Law and that Toyota is liable to compensate affected customers for loss and damage. Under Australian Consumer Law, any vehicle purchased from 2011 onwards must be of "acceptable quality". But in a July 2022 statement, Toyota Australia explained the alleged defects could have arisen because of sustained sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. "Over time, (exposure) degrades the adhesion between the factory-applied paint primer coat layer and the base metal electrodeposition layer, causing paint to peel from the metal body panel." Lawyers from William Roberts argued that Toyota hid some crucial information from consumers about alleged manufacturing problems. "Throughout the periods during which the affected vehicles were manufactured, Toyota did not disclose to the public that affected vehicles contained the paint peeling defect or ... had the propensity to experience the ... defect," they said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says consumers have a right to a free repair when a car has a minor problem. A Facebook group boasting over 7000 members, dedicated to taking Toyota to task over what they say are flaws from the car maker, had several Corolla drivers voicing their intention to join the lawsuit. Many posted photos of paint peeled off from large sections of their vehicles. A Toyota spokesperson acknowledged the claims, adding customers with questions about their vehicles should contact their local dealer. "Toyota Australia has been served with a statement of claim for a paint peeling class action in relation to certain 2010 – 2014 Corolla vehicles," they said. "We intend to defend the claims vigorously." Frustrated Toyota Corolla owners have been driven to file a class action suit over alleged defects that cause paint to peel when exposed to sunlight. The Japanese vehicle juggernaut, Australia's best-selling car brand for more than two decades, will "vigorously defend" the claims filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday. The suit was filed on behalf of disgruntled drivers of Corollas manufactured from July 12, 2010 to September 30, 2014 and painted with factory code 040 white paint. The claim argues the paint defect breaches Australian Consumer Law and that Toyota is liable to compensate affected customers for loss and damage. Under Australian Consumer Law, any vehicle purchased from 2011 onwards must be of "acceptable quality". But in a July 2022 statement, Toyota Australia explained the alleged defects could have arisen because of sustained sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. "Over time, (exposure) degrades the adhesion between the factory-applied paint primer coat layer and the base metal electrodeposition layer, causing paint to peel from the metal body panel." Lawyers from William Roberts argued that Toyota hid some crucial information from consumers about alleged manufacturing problems. "Throughout the periods during which the affected vehicles were manufactured, Toyota did not disclose to the public that affected vehicles contained the paint peeling defect or ... had the propensity to experience the ... defect," they said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says consumers have a right to a free repair when a car has a minor problem. A Facebook group boasting over 7000 members, dedicated to taking Toyota to task over what they say are flaws from the car maker, had several Corolla drivers voicing their intention to join the lawsuit. Many posted photos of paint peeled off from large sections of their vehicles. A Toyota spokesperson acknowledged the claims, adding customers with questions about their vehicles should contact their local dealer. "Toyota Australia has been served with a statement of claim for a paint peeling class action in relation to certain 2010 – 2014 Corolla vehicles," they said. "We intend to defend the claims vigorously."
Yahoo
10-07-2025
- Automotive
- Yahoo
Oh what a peeling: suit over alleged Toyota paint flaws
Frustrated Toyota Corolla owners have been driven to file a class action suit over alleged defects that cause paint to peel when exposed to sunlight. The Japanese vehicle juggernaut has been Australia's best-selling car brand for more than two decades with Corollas, in particular, outstripping other competitors in its class. The suit was filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday on behalf of disgruntled drivers of Corollas manufactured from July 12, 2010 to September 30, 2014 and painted with factory code 040 white paint. The claim argues the paint defect breaches Australian Consumer Law and that Toyota is liable to compensate affected customers for loss and damage. Under Australian Consumer Law, any vehicle purchased from 2011 onwards must be of "acceptable quality". But in a July 2022 statement, Toyota Australia explained the alleged defects could have arisen because of sustained sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) exposure. "Over time, (exposure) degrades the adhesion between the factory-applied paint primer coat layer and the base metal electrodeposition layer, causing paint to peel from the metal body panel." Lawyers from William Roberts argued that Toyota hid some crucial information from consumers about alleged manufacturing problems. "Throughout the periods during which the affected vehicles were manufactured, Toyota did not disclose to the public that affected vehicles contained the paint peeling defect or ... had the propensity to experience the ... defect," they said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says consumers have a right to a free repair when a car has a minor problem. A Facebook group boasting over 7000 members, dedicated to taking Toyota to task over what they say are flaws from the car maker, had several Corolla drivers voicing their intention to join the lawsuit. Many posted photos of paint peeled off from large sections of their vehicles. AAP has contacted Toyota for comment.
