
Grieving British mother of Air India crash victim tells of her agony after being sent the WRONG body
Amanda Donaghey lost her son Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek, 39, and his husband, Jamie, 45, when the Boeing 787 Dreamliner bound for London Gatwick crashed just seconds after takeoff on June 12 - claiming the lives of 260 people.
The couple had been returning to Britain after celebrating their wedding anniversary in India when the plane unexpectedly crashed, killing all but one passenger onboard.
The aircraft had turned into a huge fireball on impact but Ms Donaghey, 66, was determined to bring back her son's remains, handing over a sample of her blood in a bid to find matching DNA, The Sunday Times reports.
Things did not look promising, however, and three days came and went without a word from officials handling the bodies.
In the meantime, Jamie's remains were identified and sent home to the UK.
But just as the mother was losing hope, they got back to her with news that there had been a 'match' for Fiongal.
Ms Donaghey was relieved - the discovery meant she could bring her son's remains back and lay them next to his husband's.
The family set about organising funerals for the two men with the mother assured on her return to the UK that Fiongal's remains were in the casket.
Then, a heartbreaking development. The British coroner had conducted another DNA test which found that the remains in her son's coffin were not his after all.
Ms Donaghey said that the identity of the remains is still unknown, describing the confusion as 'appalling'.
Fiongal studied at the Royal College of Art and went on to work as a fashion designer, fronting design houses in London and Asia.
He then got into sprituality, yoga and reiki and established the Wellness Foundry, dedicated to such topics, in 2018.
The business founder married Jamie in 2022 and had taken to social media to describe their 'magical experience' in India the night before they caught the fateful flight.
They even posted a short clip from the airport departure lounge just hours ahead of the journey back, which would see them sit in seats 22A and 22B, bidding farewell to the country.
His mother was not aware he was on the plane, believing Fiongal to have flown back to the UK two days prior.
After taking a ride on her horse, she got a phone call from Fiongal's father who told her the pair had been travelling back on the aircraft.
Two days later, Ms Donaghey took a tricky trip to India from her home in the south of France, where she had moved 22 years ago.
She was greeted by a British High Commission crisis management team on her arrival in Ahmedabad in Gujarat.
Despite being exhausted, the mother headed straight to the nearby Civil Hospital to take a DNA test in a converted classroom.
Ms Donaghey then paid a visit BJ Medical College hostel, which had been hit by the Air India plane, but was not allowed to go through the final cordon as the aircraft's tail was still lodged in a building there.
'It was like a bomb site,' she said. 'You would think it was from a war scene, but there were still these small birds twittering.'
Also out there was Miten Patel who was determined to bring home his parents Ashok and Shobhana, who had been married since the 70s.
The financial advisor and retired microbiologist had been in the country for a yatra, a religious visit geared towards helping people to find peace when they die.
Ashok and Shobhana, pictured, had been married since the 70s and were in the country for a yatra, a religious visit geared towards helping people to find peace when they die
Mr Patel was handed several of his parents' items including Ashok's shirt and Shobhana's swan necklace.
After successfully retrieving the couple's remains, he later discovered 'other remains' in the casket said to contain his mother's body.
He was finally able to bury her last week, describing the successful end to the process as a 'miracle'.
Ms Donaghey has been going through a similar ordeal, but one that remains unresolved.
After initially being informed of the 'match' on June 20, she spoke with the British High Commission and hospital representatives, as well as an Avon and Somerset Police officer, acting as a disaster victim investigator.
She said: 'I was told they had found part of Fiongal but not all of him. I said I wanted to stay until they had finished looking.'
But on her return to the crash site, Ms Donaghey was handed the devastating news that there was nothing left to be found in the wreckage.
Things took an even more concerning turn when she was told about Shobhana's case, which had seen various remains get mixed up.
On June 28, she headed back to Gatwick on an Air India flight in a bid to get Fiongal's remains to a British hospital with better preserving standards than those in India.
They were handed over to Dr Fiona Wilcox, senior coroner for Inner West London, and in the meantime Ms Donaghey was given support by her sister in Cambridgeshire, as well as police family liaison officers.
Six days after her return, the mother was handed the heart-wrenching news that the remains in her son's coffin were not his at all.
At a meeting attended by Fiongal's father, sister and brother, family liaison officers said: 'We don't have Fiongal. We have carried out the DNA tests and we do not have Fiongal.'
Amanda said: 'I had my doubts but to be told that was heartbreaking.'
Despite realising that their ambition to bury Fiongal and Jamie alongside one another was now impossible, Ms Donaghey and her family have not given up on trying to locate his remains, ringing the Foreign Office each day looking for answers.
Some 53 of the 242 people on the ill-fated flight were British but, as many were of Indian heritage and thus buried in the country of the crash, just 12 sets of remains were delivered back to the UK.
The remaining 10 were all matches, but it is still not known for sure whether the identities of the bodies that stayed in India are correct.
James Healy-Pratt, an international aviation lawyer and partner with Keystone Law, is representing 20 bereaved families and confirmed they were in contact with Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister's office and Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
A government spokesperson said: 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them. Formal identification of bodies is a matter for the Indian authorities.
'We continue to liaise with the government of Gujarat and the government of India on behalf of the Inner West London senior coroner to support the coronial process.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Brent housing: Mum with disabled son says home is rat-infested
A mother has begun legal proceedings against her local authority over the conditions in her council house, which a pest control report found was uninhabitable due to a rat Eniola – who preferred that her first name not be used – has lived in the property in Neasden, north London, since 1992. She shares the house with her adult daughter and her son, who is severely said: "My family is struggling to breathe in the house, we have rat bites all over our body [and] I have no good drinking water as the kitchen sink is busted."Brent Council said it was unable to comment on the case at this time due to the legal proceedings. 'Tired of being ignored' The family described feeling "depressed" living in the damp and rat-infested property and said they were desperate for the council to move them out. Ms Eniola told the Local Democracy Reporting Service she was now taking the matter to court because she was "tired of being ignored" and the house was beyond repair. She said: "The council never wanted to remedy the situation as it's expensive due to the major works that the house needs."I don't want to die early; who will take care of my disabled son? I just want to leave Brent permanently and move to another [area] for a fresh start. "Brent Council has terrorised me and my family by keeping us in dangerous housing despite reports saying it's not safe."Since first raising the issues more than three years ago, Ms Eniola claims the council has sent a number of surveyors round to the property but the reports are never followed up on. She said: "[The council] say they have no record of it and just book another one in. "In one year alone we had six surveyors come round but they refuse to acknowledge the reports." 'Not fit to live in' Brent Council's pest control service inspected the property on 12 November 2024, and confirmed the presence of a "rodent infestation". In a report seen by the LDRS, the officer believed the home to be "fully infested with mice and rats", with mould and damp having "overtaken the entire house".The report concludes: "Considering the current rodent infestation and mould... it is highly advisable to move out tenants due to the vulnerability of the son as it is not fit to live [in]. [The whole] house needs refurbishing due to historical mould and rodent infestation in the property."In her legal case against the council, Ms Eniola cites ongoing disrepair issues, which include sewer damage allowing rats to enter the property, damp and mould growth, and damage to the kitchen sink that causes "foul odours" to spread throughout the said her son's asthma had worsened in the house and he had had to be taken for emergency medical treatment. She added: "We're all inhaling black mould and we're depressed due to living here."Ms Eniola's solicitors are awaiting a date when the case will be heard at the county court.


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Confessions of Samuel Pepys by Guy de la Bédoyère review – journal of a predator
Samuel Pepys's diary, which covers 1660 to 1669, is regarded as one of the great classic texts in the English language. Words spill out of Pepys – 1.25m of them – as he bustles around London, building a successful career as a naval administrator while navigating the double trauma of the plague and the Great Fire of London. Historians have long gone to the diary for details of middle-class life during the mid‑17th century: the seamy streets, the watermen, the taverns and, as Pepys moves up the greasy pole, the court and the king. Best of all is his eye for the picturesque detail: the way, for instance, on the morning of 4 September 1666, as fire licks around his house, Pepys buries a choice parmesan cheese in the garden with the intention of keeping it safe. Not all of the diary is in English, though. Quite a lot of it is in French (or rather Franglais), Latin, Spanish and a curious mashup of all three. Pepys increasingly resorted to this home-brewed polyglot whenever the subject of sex came up, which was often. Indeed, sex – chasing it, having it, worrying about getting it again – dominated Pepys's waking life and haunted his dreams, many of them nightmares. Putting these anguished passages in a garbled form not only lessened the chance of servants snooping, but also served to protect him from his own abiding sense of shame. As an extra layer of concealment, Pepys wrote 'my Journall' using tachygraphy, an early form of shorthand. Pepys's diaries were published in bowdlerised form in the 19th century, and it was not until the 1970s that they became available in 11 unexpurgated volumes. Even then, explains Guy de la Bédoyère, there were many transcription errors and, crucially, no attempt was made to translate the coded passages into English. Historians knew about them, of course, not least because all you needed was a bit of classroom French and Latin to work out their meaning. On 25 March 1668, Pepys records that he has given 'Mrs Daniels' eight pairs of gloves 'for tocar my prick con her hand', which is hardly likely to keep anyone guessing for very long. All the same, it has been easy to lose sight of the sexual thread of Pepys's diary amid all the chatter about navy ships and expensive cheese. Which is why, for the first time, De la Bédoyère has gone back to the original manuscript and translated all of Pepys's coded entries, publishing them end-to-end with only a minimum of contextual information. The result is an extraordinarily detailed snapshot of life seen through the eyes of a man for whom no day was complete unless he had managed to fondle at least one woman's 'mameles' (breasts) on his way to or from work. In the past, people have blamed Pepys's bad behaviour on the Restoration. These were the years when the dour pieties of Oliver Cromwell had been replaced by Charles II's permissive libertarianism. But there is much more – and much worse – to the occluded parts of Pepys's diary than mere bawdiness. On 3 February 1664, for example, he is travelling in a carriage down Ludgate Hill when he witnesses three men raping a woman and wishes he could join in. On 1 December 1660, he beats his maid Jane savagely with a broom, though it is clear that he is eyeing her up for a future assignation. He often uses the words 'towsing' and 'tumbling' to describe what he is doing with women which sounds jolly and bucolic until De la Bédoyère explains that these terms are euphemisms for violence. The only occasion on which Pepys might hold back was if he knew a woman was single, which would make any pregnancy impossible to explain away. (It was a mercy that he didn't realise that an earlier operation for a bladder stone had probably left him sterile.) For that reason, he badgered any girl he wanted to sleep with regularly to get married, so he could carry on regardless. As news of his behaviour got around, so others would try to exploit it. On 11 August 1665, an old waterman called Delkes presented Pepys with his daughter-in-law, who was willing to sleep with him in return for a guarantee that her husband would not be pressed into naval service. And then there was his marriage. Pepys had wed Elizabeth when she was just 14. He was proud of her beauty, congratulating himself on how much prettier she was than the many grand ladies at court whom he encountered on his way to becoming secretary to the navy. Everything else about her frustrated him. He grumbled about her untidiness, extravagance, moodiness and the fact that her heavy periods and a recurrent labial abscess meant that she often wasn't available for sex. Most of all, he resented the way that she had taken to hiring plain maidservants in the hope that he would leave them alone (it didn't work). Inevitably he took out his frustrations with his fists: on 19 December 1664 he gave Elizabeth such a black eye that she was unable to go to church on Christmas Day for fear of what the neighbours would think. While Pepys's dark side has long been known, it is something else to be confronted with the evidence laid out quite so starkly. The man who emerges from De la Bédoyère's meticulous filleting is no Restoration roustabout but a chilling embodiment of male entitlement. This newly explicit view of Pepys does not negate the continuing value of his diary – which remains a magnificent historical resource – but from now on it will be impossible to go to it in a state of innocence, let alone denial. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion The Confessions of Samuel Pepys: His Private Revelations by Guy de la Bédoyère is published by Abacus (£25). To support the Guardian order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.


The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Lottery results LIVE: National Lottery Set For Life draw tonight, August 4, 2025
THE National Lottery Set For Life numbers are in and it's time to find out if you've won the top prize of £10,000 every month for 30 years. Could tonight's jackpot see you start ticking off that bucket list every month or building your own start-up as a budding entrepreneur? 1 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! The winning Set For Life numbers are: 11, 26, 28, 32, 39 and the Life Ball is 02. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it.