logo
Ether, the number two crypto, closes on bitcoin

Ether, the number two crypto, closes on bitcoin

Axios21 hours ago
Ether, which powers the Ethereum blockchain, has in recent weeks abruptly caught up to bitcoin's rally, driven by digital asset treasury companies accruing over 2 million ether since June.
Why it matters: In past bull markets, the prices of the world's two biggest cryptocurrencies have made very similar moves, but that correlation broke down quite a bit over the last year.
That break was notable. Prior to last year it had looked like all of crypto largely marched in lockstep with bitcoin, raising questions about whether any other project could differentiate itself from the original.
But then bitcoin went on a tear with the launch of ETFs in 2024, and also since President Trump began to promise to make the U.S. a leader in crypto.
Ether also got an ETF and it also benefits from Trump's policies, but that wasn't showing up in its price.
Between the lines: Bitcoin and ether are very different assets: Bitcoin is just money. Ethereum is basically a giant tech company, except it doesn't have a CEO, office or a board.
The Ethereum blockchain was built as a platform for decentralized applications, and any and all activity on the blockchain requires some kind of payment in ether.
"Several of the biggest narratives that drove Ethereum's 2021 performance had decayed significantly in 2024, such as NFTs, web3, and metaverse," Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, says.
The intrigue: Over the past month, however, ether has benefited from some of the same factors that have been fueling bitcoin.
Driving the news: Ether decisively broke the $4,000 price barrier last week, a level it had only touched twice before — briefly — in the past three-plus years. Tuesday morning it was trading at over $4,400.
There's been a lot of buying going on. Monday, more than a billion dollars worth of exchange-traded ether products were purchased, according to CoinShares. A record.
Such purchases this year have already nearly doubled from last year.
What's happening: Certain companies pursuing a cryptocurrency accumulation strategy have started buying piles of ether, led by Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) and Sharplink Gaming (SBET).
The theory of these companies is that they can accrue more cryptocurrency per share over time using financial engineering, without diluting investors.
Which means that, hopefully, one purchase of stock will grow its holdings of an underlying cryptocurrency over time.
Collectively, these companies are approaching 2% of the total supply under management, with a giant new purchase of 317,000 ether (ETH) announced by Bitmine on Monday.
A friendlier SEC also looks likely to approve ether ETFs, earning a small yield for token holders on-chain, which should make the products a bit more attractive to investors.
What they're saying: "For years, Ethereum has lived in the shadow of its elder sibling, Bitcoin," Houston Morgan, from multichain investing platform ShapeShift, says.
"But that era is ending. ETH is on the cusp of stepping into its own spotlight. Ethereum price action is increasingly driven by its own fundamentals."
By the numbers: Bitcoin and ether have seen roughly similar gains since the start of the year, despite ether lagging for most of that period.
However, ether has a ways to go to truly catch up. Bitcoin is closing in on 300% in appreciation since the beginning of 2024.
Ether is close to doubling its price over the same period.
What we're watching: The market has begun to differentiate between the major cryptocurrencies, and despite ether's recent rise, that's expected to continue.
In the meantime, ether remains 9% away from setting a new all-time high, but it's risen that much in the last few days.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ethereum Could Soar to $25,000 by 2028: Standard Chartered
Ethereum Could Soar to $25,000 by 2028: Standard Chartered

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ethereum Could Soar to $25,000 by 2028: Standard Chartered

Standard Chartered has raised its Ethereum price target to $25,000 by 2028, a major shift from March forecasts that predicted a structural decline for the world's second-largest crypto. The UK banking giant made a massive revision on its Ethereum outlook, now projecting $7,500 by the end of 2025, $12,000 in 2026, $18,000 in 2027, and $25,000 in both 2028 and 2029, up from its earlier $4,000 target for 2025. "We raise our price forecasts, as the backdrop for ETH has improved dramatically in recent months," the bank's Global Head of Digital Assets Research, Geoff Kendrick, wrote. He noted how institutional buying has occurred at nearly double the pace of Bitcoin accumulation during peak periods. Kendrick pointed to treasury companies and Ethereum ETFs purchasing 3.8% of all circulating ETH since June, the US GENIUS Act clearing regulatory pathways for stablecoins, and planned network upgrades as key drivers behind the bullish revision. Standard Chartered calls the legislation a 'pivotal change' that will boost liquidity, fuel DeFi growth, and drive ETH demand, given stablecoins already account for 40% of blockchain fees and are mostly issued on Ethereum. Ethereum is at $4,713.37, marking an 6% daily and 30% weekly gain. That price puts it just shy of its November 2021 all-time high of $4,878, according to CoinGecko. The odds that Ethereum climbs past its all-time high to $5,000 this year have jumped 39% in the past day on Myriad Markets. The prediction market's users now rate Ethereum reaching that milestone with 87.5% odds. (Disclosure: Myriad is a prediction market and engagement platform developed by Dastan, parent company of an editorially independent Decrypt.) Illia Otychenko, lead analyst at told Decrypt that while "the targets grab attention, it's worth remembering that the bank made similar bold forecasts last year, like $8,000 in 2024, and $14,000 in 2025" before reducing estimates during March's market downturn. Standard Chartered has previously shifted its Ethereum outlook significantly, reducing its 2025 target from $10,000 to $4,000 just months ago over concerns about layer-2 competition diluting mainnet fees. Ethereum Liquidations Top $294 Million As ETH Approaches New All-Time High "So the latest estimates seem to reflect improved market sentiment rather than potential price targets," Otychenko added, though he acknowledged that institutional accumulation and potential ETF inflows "indeed look like major catalysts that could accelerate Ether's price growth this year." Arthur Azizov, Founder and Investor at B2 Ventures, told Decrypt that the current momentum projects strong upside potential. "Either this year or next, we could see ETH reach $6,000," he said, while cautioning that maintaining support above $3,350 remains crucial for sustained momentum. Market liquidations data show the current rally's force, with over $264.8 million in Ethereum short positions eliminated in the last 24 hours, according to CoinGlass, as the crypto approaches key resistance levels. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Healthy Returns: FDA launches program to streamline creation of new U.S. drug manufacturing sites
Healthy Returns: FDA launches program to streamline creation of new U.S. drug manufacturing sites

CNBC

time24 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Healthy Returns: FDA launches program to streamline creation of new U.S. drug manufacturing sites

A new program from the Trump administration aims to make setting up manufacturing plants in the U.S. less of a headache for the pharmaceutical industry. The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday announced a new "PreCheck" program, which will use a two-phase approach to help boost domestic drug manufacturing after it shrunk dramatically over the past two decades. The announcement is a direct response to President Donald Trump's executive order in May calling on the FDA to reduce regulatory hurdles for domestic drug production in the U.S.. That order asked the agency to cut the amount of time it takes to approve new plants by eliminating unnecessary requirements, while also increasing the fees for and inspections of manufacturing facilities abroad. It follows a flurry of plans for new U.S. manufacturing investments from several drugmakers, such as Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie and Eli Lilly, in a bid to build goodwill with Trump. Still, the president could impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals imported into the U.S. any day now — a move that the industry argues could harm innovation and patient access to certain treatments. So, why has Trump made reshoring drug production a key facet of his trade policy? More than half of pharmaceuticals distributed in the U.S. are manufactured overseas, according to a release from the FDA. Only 11% of companies that produce active pharmaceutical ingredients are based in the U.S., while a significant share are in China and India, the agency added. The White House also estimates that it can currently take five to 10 years to build new manufacturing capacity for pharmaceuticals, which it previously called "unacceptable from a national-security standpoint." "Our gradual overreliance on foreign drug manufacturing has created national security risks," FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said in the release on Thursday. "The FDA PreCheck initiative is one of many steps FDA is taking that can help reverse America's reliance on foreign drug manufacturing and ensure that Americans have a resilient, strong, and domestic drug supply." Here's how the two phases of the program work: The FDA will host a public meeting on Sept. 30, where it will present on the program and discuss other proposals to "overcome current onshoring challenge," among other issues. Until then, concrete details on the program are sparse. It's unclear what requirements the FDA could eliminate, and how much less time it could take to approve new sites. We'll continue to watch as this program gets finalized and implemented, so stay tuned for our coverage! Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at Like it or not, more and more patients are turning to OpenAI's artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT to answer questions about their health care. And the company is paying attention. OpenAI launched its latest large-scale AI model called GPT-5 last week, and the startup said it's the "best model yet" for health-related queries. The product is designed to proactively flag health concerns, ask relevant questions and generate more precise and reliable responses, the company said in a blog post. "Health care is maybe the area where there's the strongest improvement of any (is this one extra?) of any category," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told CNBC's "Squawk Box" in an interview about GPT-5 on Friday. Altman said health-related questions make up a "huge fraction" of ChatGPT usage. In a post on X, he said he hopes GPT-5's health capabilities will "provide real service to people." OpenAI said GPT-5 scores "significantly higher" than previous models on its health-care AI benchmark called Health Bench. The company released Health Bench in May, and it's designed to measure how well AI models perform in realistic health scenarios. HealthBench was developed alongside 262 doctors from 60 countries. OpenAI said it's based on 5,000 conversations that simulate interactions between individual users or clinicians and AI models. OpenAI is also touting GPT-5 as a helpful tool for medical research. The company released a two-minute-long video with Dr. Derya Unutmaz, a professor and human immunologist, which demonstrates how he has been using the model. Unutmaz said GPT-5 is able to help him brainstorm, interpret data and save him time by predicting outcomes of potential experiments. "I think GPT-5 will help the patients to advocate for themselves, and I think that will empower the patients to feel more confident when they talk to their doctors," Unutmaz said in the video. Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Ashley at

From cooking the books to hiding the books: Team Trump puts access to jobs data in doubt
From cooking the books to hiding the books: Team Trump puts access to jobs data in doubt

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

From cooking the books to hiding the books: Team Trump puts access to jobs data in doubt

A key element of the White House's war on data is hiding government statistics it doesn't like. In fact, throughout Donald Trump's second term, his administration has gone to outlandish lengths to keep important data away from the public. As The Washington Post reported a few months ago, 'The Trump administration is deleting taxpayer-funded data — information that Americans use to make sense of the world. In its absence, the president can paint the world as he pleases.' The same report added, 'Curating reality is an old political game, but Trump's sweeping statistical purges are part of a broader attempt to reinvent 'truth.'' It's difficult to do a full accounting of what has gone missing, but we know the list includes climate data, education data, trade data and crime data — all of which has been buried, deliberately, because the figures were deemed politically inconvenient. That list might yet grow in dramatic ways. The Washington Post reported: President Donald Trump's nominee to run the Bureau of Labor Statistics told Fox News Digital on Monday that the agency should suspend monthly jobs reports, a change that could leave businesses and policymakers at least temporarily without the data they've used for decades to gauge the state of the labor market and broader economy. For several decades, the public, here and around the world, could count on the release of new U.S. jobs data on the first Friday of every month. Donald Trump's handpicked choice to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics, E.J. Antoni, apparently disapproves of this schedule. 'Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' Antoni said, referring to recent revisions to monthly reports. 'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences.' (Antoni's interview with Fox News Digital was apparently taped on Monday but published Tuesday, after Trump announced that he was nominating the Heritage Foundation economist to lead the BLS.) The argument is badly flawed, in part because releasing the data quarterly, instead of monthly, leaves everyone in the dark for much of the year, and in part because of the underlying motivation: If the goal is to address 'a lack of confidence in the data,' the president wouldn't have fired a highly qualified and widely respected BLS chief in the first place, only to replace her with an unqualified partisan loyalist. Indeed, perhaps people would have greater confidence in the data if Trump stopped lying about the figures. Nevertheless, after Antoni's comments to Fox News Digital circulated, a reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt whether the administration would, in fact, start limiting public access to U.S. job data to once per quarter, instead of once per month. 'Well, look, what I'll tell you about the Bureau of Labor Statistics — I believe that is the plan and that's the hope, and that these monthly reports will be data that the American people can trust,' Leavitt said. 'As you know, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has made massive revisions after the last several reports that they have put out. 'And there has certainly been a decline in the quality and reliability of data coming from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and there's been an increase in revisions,' Leavitt added. First, when a White House press secretary begins her answer to a straightforward question with, 'Well, look,' that tends to be a bad sign. Second, saying that the administration 'plans' and 'hopes' to keep releasing monthly reports was hardly a firm commitment to the status quo. Third, the White House continues to talk about revisions to government statistics in a way that makes it seem as if Trump administration officials don't understand the underlying policy details at a basic level. Fourth, if there's been 'a decline in the quality and reliability of data,' that might have something to do with the president firing so many of the people who were responsible for collecting and compiling the data. And finally, all of this served as a reminder of a threat that hasn't been widely appreciated. In recent weeks, many have voiced concerns about the president and his team possibly manipulating official data, but now there's a new concern: What if they limit access to the data for months on end? There's no need to cook the books when it's easier to close the books and keep them hidden. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store