Late buying interest lifts Bursa Malaysia to close at intraday high
At 5pm, the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) inched up 0.68 of-a-point, or 0.05 per cent, to close at 1,524.50 from Tuesday's close of 1,523.82.
The benchmark index opened 0.28 of-a-point higher at 1,524.10 and hit a low of 1,516.96 during the morning session.
However, the broader market was negativeve, with losers outpacing gainers 570 to 377, while 508 counters were unchanged, 1,076 untraded and 89 suspended.
Turnover declined to 2.65 billion units worth RM2.07 billion from 3.36 billion shares worth RM2.18 billion yesterday.
UOB Kay Hian Wealth Advisors Sdn Bhd's head of investment research Mohd Sedek Jantan said the market barometer traded within a narrow range for most of the day, hovering around 1,522, before a sharp uptick in the final 10 minutes pushed it to close at 1,524.50.
He said the financial services counters lagged earlier in the session, pressured by the widening divergence in monetary policy between Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) and the United States (US) Federal Reserve (Fed).
"Earlier this month, BNM cut the Overnight Policy Rate by 25 basis points to 2.75 per cent and the Fed is widely expected to keep its benchmark rate unchanged at 4.33 per cent.
"This growing policy gap has amplified the risk of capital outflows from interest rate–sensitive sectors, prompting foreign investors to reduce their positioning in Malaysian financials," he told Bernama.
Mohd Sedek also noted that markets are beginning to price in increased volatility, with less than 48 hours remaining before the US tariff negotiation deadline and ahead of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decision later tonight.
Meanwhile, Rakuten Trade Sdn Bhd equity research vice-president Thong Pak Leng expects investors to gradually re-enter the market, anticipating potential catalysts such as regional policy easing, progress on trade negotiations, and renewed interest in undervalued blue-chip stocks.
"We retain our weekly FBM KLCI target at between 1,510 and 1,540," he said.
Heavyweights Petronas Chemicals (PChem) rose 28 sen to RM4.07, Public Bank gained eight sen to RM4.29, and Hong Leong Bank was 26 sen higher at RM19.30, while CIMB slipped nine sen to RM6.55 and Maybank lost seven sen to RM9.45.
Tenaga Nasional fell four sen to RM13.28 and IHH Healthcare climbed three sen to RM6.63.
Of the most active counters, NexG and Zetrix AI were flat at 53 sen and 84.5 sen, respectively, Lotte Chemical Titan advanced four sen to 72 sen, while Tanco slid nine sen to 83.5 sen, and Pharmaniaga erased two sen to 16 sen.
Besides PChem, other top gainers were Chin Teck Plantations which garnered 27 sen to RM9.76, Hong Leong Bank rose 26 sen to RM19.30, and Far East Holdings surged 20 sen to RM4.
Among the top losers, Nestle fell 40 sen to RM87.40, Fraser and Neave dipped 30 sen to RM28.60, and Allianz Malaysia slid 28 sen to RM17.42.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Healthcare Reset programme gaining traction
The Reset strategy aims to slow rising medical costs and introduce a more sustainable funding model. KUALA LUMPUR: The government's push to overhaul Malaysia's healthcare financing framework via the Reset programme is gaining traction, with the rollout of a Universal base medical and health insurance/takaful (MHIT) product expected in the second half of 2026. Spearheaded by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) in collaboration with the Health and Finance Ministries – and supported by the World Bank – the Reset strategy aims to slow rising medical costs and introduce a more sustainable funding model. 'The base product has a deadline, which is that we're going to finalise the design (and conceptualisation of base MHIT product) this year,' said a spokesperson at a media workshop on the Reset Strategy by BNM and the Health Ministry yesterday. 'We're going to pilot it sometime towards the middle of next year. And then, we're ready for rollout by the end of next year. And the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system is a feature that will be incorporated within the base product design,' the spokesperson said. The DRG framework – widely used in private healthcare systems globally – assigns a fixed, bundled payment for treatment based on diagnosis, rather than billing each service separately. According to the spokesperson, it will be introduced in stages to gradually supplant the fee-for-service model currently driving medical inflation. On intended outcomes, the spokesperson pointed to medical cost inflation as a critical barometer of success. 'We expect some stabilisation in that rather than just continual, or steeper increases over time. So we should see that stabilised. That would be a key outcome measure. 'We are also concerned about policy as well. So we are looking at things like how we can also capture data like re-admission based on that to measure quality of care as well,' the spokesperson added.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump raises pressure on central bank, calls for Fed governor to resign
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump ramped up pressure on the US central bank Wednesday, calling for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to step down – after his recent criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates sooner. "Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, while sharing a Bloomberg news report on how the Federal Housing Finance Agency's director has called for greater scrutiny of Cook over a pair of mortgages. FHFA director Bill Pulte – a staunch ally of Trump – had reportedly written a letter to the US attorney general calling for an investigation of Cook while suggesting that she might have committed a criminal offense. The Trump administration has pursued allegations of mortgage fraud against high-profile Democrats who are seen as political adversaries of the president. It was not immediately clear if such a probe will take place targeting Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the central bank's board. The president is also limited in his ability to remove officials from the central bank. A Supreme Court order recently suggested that Fed officials cannot be taken out of their jobs over policy disagreements, meaning they have to be removed for "cause," which could be interpreted to mean wrongdoing. The US leader's targeting of Cook, who sits on the Fed's rate-setting committee, comes after his repeated broadsides against Powell while the central bank kept the benchmark lending rate unchanged this year. On Tuesday night, Trump again called for a "major rate cut," saying there was "no inflation" and claiming that the Fed's policymaking was harming the housing industry due to elevated mortgage rates. He called Powell "a disaster" in a social media post. Although the US consumer price index, a key inflation gauge, was steady at 2.7 per cent in July, it remains higher than it was a few months earlier. Fed officials have been trying to ensure inflation is kept in check – despite the effects of Trump's sweeping tariffs – while balancing risks to the labor market as they mull the right time for further rate cuts. Cook took office as a Fed governor in May 2022 and was reappointed to the board in September 2023. She was sworn in later that same month for a term ending in 2038. She has previously served on the Council of Economic Advisers under former president Barack Obama. Earlier this year, Trump suggested that what he called an overly costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters could be a reason to oust Powell, before backing off the threat. Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. —AFP
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Markets, Trump in delicate policy dance
UNITED States President Donald Trump has faced little opposition in his drive to rip up the global economic rule book, whether from his fellow Republicans, political opponents or institutional guard rails. The only exception has been "the market". But now even investors are holding their fire, enabling more risk to build up in the financial system. Wall Street's reaction to Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2 was so ferocious that the president did something he had rarely done: he backed down. Trillions of dollars were wiped off the value of US stocks amid a 10 per cent nosedive from April 3-4. The only two-day selloffs since the 1930s that were bigger occurred during World War 2, "Black Monday" in 1987, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, and the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. The stock market bottomed out on April 7 after Trump paused most of his country-specific tariffs. Wall Street has not looked back since, with the S&P 500 rebounding 35 per cent to a new all-time high. This episode suggests that "the market" is one of the few true checks on Trump's apparent pursuit to re-shape the US — and indeed the world — economy. The only problem is that the president has continued to pursue unorthodox policies in recent months — including challenging the independence of the Federal Reserve (Fed), firing statisticians and slapping tariffs on countries for non-economic reasons — and investors have failed to tap the brakes. The so-called "Trump put" — the idea that the president won't let the markets fall too far — is essentially a funhouse mirror version of the famous "Fed put", the long-held belief that, in the event of a crisis, the central bank will step in to restore stability. Trump seemingly did just that in April, but it was to clean up a mess of his own making. And one could argue that it was actually investors who came to the economy's rescue by putting pressure on the president to reconsider policies considered ill-advised by most economists. Trump and markets are, therefore, now in a curious dance. Investors appear to believe that markets can ultimately stop Trump from pushing the envelope too far on tariffs or other policies. But as a result, investors are not over-reacting — or reacting at all — to the latest controversies around the Bureau of Labour Statistics firing, his attacks on Fed chair Jerome Powell, his pressure on Intel's chief executive officer to resign, or the outsized tariffs slapped on Brazil and India. This, in turn, has powered the markets to new record highs, emboldening Trump to push the envelope even further. So even though the market has the power to rein in the president's economic policy excesses, it's not using it. Why hasn't the market pushed back? As the cliche goes, equity investors are paid to be optimistic. It's in their interest to keep the train hurtling along provided there aren't any immediate obstacles to derail it. There are, of course, a few pretty large hurdles on the horizon for the US economy, including the highest tariffs since the 1930s and some of the biggest budget deficits since World War 2 outside of crisis periods. But until these or other issues present an immediate economic threat, markets can choose to ignore them. By under-reacting to Trump's unorthodox policies, markets may be not only delaying the day of reckoning but amplifying the potential impact. Why? Genuine economic and geopolitical paradigm shifts are underway, and investors are not pricing in the attendant risk. Nobody knows what the ultimate impact of these shifts will be, but we do know that with greater uncertainty comes greater downside risk. Yet equity volatility is currently the lowest it has been this year, and even in the bond market — not known for its optimism — volatility is the lowest in 3½ years, while US corporate bond spreads are the tightest since 1998. Ultimately, the market is unlikely to call Trump's bluff until something truly unexpected or extreme hits. In the meantime, investors can justify this nonchalance by saying that corporate earnings growth is solid, artificial intelligence enthusiasm is high, economic growth remains decent, unemployment is low and consumers are still spending.
