Erin Patterson mushroom trial nears end - what you need to know
The trial of Erin Patterson, accused of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth by serving them a meal allegedly laced with death cap mushrooms, continues in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall has been on the stand for four days. His testimony has revealed new details about Erin Patterson's messages, devices and the digital evidence that investigators say helped build their case.
Australia Correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin wraps up week five of the trial.
The case
On July 29, 2023, Erin Patterson hosted a lunch at her home in Leongatha, Victoria, serving beef Wellington to her former in-laws: Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson.
ADVERTISEMENT
Subsequently, all four guests fell ill with symptoms consistent with death cap mushroom poisoning.
Don, Gail, and Heather died in the following days, while Ian survived after intensive medical treatment, including a liver transplant.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, asserting that the incident was a tragic accident.
Who is Detective Eppingstall?
Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall has led the investigation. This week, jurors have heard his detailed evidence over four consecutive days and both sides have put his case under a microscope.
Prosecution's case
Digital evidence and purchase history
ADVERTISEMENT
Detective Eppingstall presented evidence indicating that Patterson's computer had been used to access iNaturalist, a website documenting death cap mushroom sightings, in May 2022.
Additionally, Woolworths Everyday Rewards data showed purchases of mushrooms, pastry, eye fillet, onions and mashed potato in the week leading up to the lunch
Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall. (Source: Nine)
Mobile devices and SIM card activity
Eppingstall testified that Patterson used multiple phones and allegedly swapped SIM cards during a police search of her home.
One device, referred to as "Phone A", remains missing. Another phone was subjected to multiple factory resets, the court was told.
Dehydrator and disposal
ADVERTISEMENT
The prosecution highlighted that Patterson initially denied owning a food dehydrator. However, a manual was found in her home and CCTV footage showed a woman getting out of a red SUV and disposing of a dehydrator at a local transfer station shortly after the lunch.
Forensic analysis detected traces of death cap mushroom toxins on the dehydrator.
Text messages and health claims
Text messages presented in court revealed that Patterson had informed her former in-laws about undergoing cancer tests, a claim unsubstantiated by medical records.
The prosecution suggests this was a fabricated excuse to for the lunch as well as to prevent her children from attending.
Defence's argument
Contextualizing digital evidence
ADVERTISEMENT
Defence counsel Colin Mandy SC argued the digital evidence, including internet searches and purchase histories, does not conclusively prove intent to harm.
He emphasised that others could have accessed the computer and that receipts do not confirm which mushrooms were used in the meal.
Emotional state and health concerns
The defence acknowledged that Patterson lied about her health status but contended that these falsehoods stemmed from panic and longstanding health anxieties.
Patterson had a history of researching potential ovarian cancer, which the defence argues contributed to her mental state.
Relationship dynamics
Messages from a Facebook group chat were introduced, showing Patterson expressing frustration toward her in-laws and estranged husband.
ADVERTISEMENT
The defence maintained that these messages were taken out of context and represented emotional venting rather than evidence of malicious intent.
Police investigation scrutiny
Under cross-examination, Detective Eppingstall faced questions regarding the thoroughness of the investigation.
The defence pointed out during the initial search of Patterson's home, several electronic devices and bank records were not seized.
Eppingstall admitted to certain oversights but defended the overall integrity of the investigation.
Patterson's Police interview shown to court
Detective who led the investigation reveals stark new details about Patterson's actions and behaviour following the fatal lunch. (Source: 1News)
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the most scrutinised parts of the case is Patterson's interview with police, recorded three days after the fatal lunch.
The jury was played audio of the three-hour interview earlier in the trial. In it, Patterson appeared emotional but denied deliberately poisoning her guests.
She repeatedly told officers she didn't know how the mushrooms could have become contaminated, saying: 'I didn't do anything... I loved them.'
She said the beef Wellington was made with a mix of button mushrooms from the supermarket and dried mushrooms she believed were bought from an Asian grocer 'a long time ago'.
Patterson insisted she had no reason to harm her former in-laws and described the incident as 'an accident'.
However, Police noted that some of Patterson's statements conflicted with other evidence presented at trial, including:
She said she didn't own a dehydrator yet CCTV showed a woman disposing of one at a rubbish tip on the day Patterson discharged herself from hospital.
She initially told police she hadn't searched for mushrooms online, despite forensic evidence showing mushroom-related searches on a computer seized from her home.
She said she cooked and ate the same meal as her guests, but hospital staff said she did not display symptoms consistent with mushroom poisoning.
The defence has acknowledged that Patterson lied in parts of her interview but argued these were 'panicked omissions' from someone in shock and grief.
They urged the jury not to treat her inconsistencies as proof of guilt, but rather as the behaviour of a distressed woman who was overwhelmed by the unfolding tragedy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
4 hours ago
- 1News
Aus mushroom cook triple-murder trial enters sixth week
Erin Patterson faces her sixth week on trial for three murders, accused of intentionally serving up a poisonous mushroom dish to her estranged husband's family. The 50-year-old's defence team will continue to question the case's lead investigator on Monday, after he spent four days in the witness box last week. Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall took the jury through evidence police had gathered from before and after Patterson cooked the meal on July 29, 2023, including her shopping list. Her Woolworths transaction history, from July 23 to July 28, revealed she had bought about 1.7kg of mushrooms in the days before she made the fatal meal. She also bought more than 4kg of fresh and frozen pastry and five beef eye fillet steaks for the individual beef Wellingtons, which the jury was told she had made from a RecipeTin Eats cookbook. ADVERTISEMENT The prosecution showed the jury Patterson's police interview, on the afternoon of August 5, 2023, after a search warrant at her home. She was interviewed the day after two of her lunch guests, Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, had died in hospital while the women's husbands were both still fighting for their lives. "We're trying to understand why you're not that ill," Det Eppingstall said to Patterson, in video of the interview. "But I'm sure you understand too that, like, I've never been in a situation like this before," Patterson said. "And I've been very, very helpful with the health department through the week because I wanted to help that side of things." Erin Patterson (Source: 1News) Patterson then lied to the police, when asked if she owned a food dehydrator she said "no" and "I might've had one years ago". ADVERTISEMENT "When I got the Thermomix I got really excited about, like, making everything from scratch," she said. Her defence team admitted at the beginning of the trial this was a lie, as was her claim to police she had "never" foraged for mushrooms. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, with her lawyers claiming the death cap mushroom-laced meal was a "terrible accident". Her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died in hospital days after eating the meal made by Patterson at her Leongatha home. Ian Wilkinson survived. The trial before Justice Christopher Beale in the regional Victorian town of Morwell continues.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Erin Patterson mushroom trial nears end - what you need to know
The trial of Erin Patterson, accused of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth by serving them a meal allegedly laced with death cap mushrooms, continues in the Supreme Court of Victoria. Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall has been on the stand for four days. His testimony has revealed new details about Erin Patterson's messages, devices and the digital evidence that investigators say helped build their case. Australia Correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin wraps up week five of the trial. The case On July 29, 2023, Erin Patterson hosted a lunch at her home in Leongatha, Victoria, serving beef Wellington to her former in-laws: Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson. ADVERTISEMENT Subsequently, all four guests fell ill with symptoms consistent with death cap mushroom poisoning. Don, Gail, and Heather died in the following days, while Ian survived after intensive medical treatment, including a liver transplant. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, asserting that the incident was a tragic accident. Who is Detective Eppingstall? Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall has led the investigation. This week, jurors have heard his detailed evidence over four consecutive days and both sides have put his case under a microscope. Prosecution's case Digital evidence and purchase history ADVERTISEMENT Detective Eppingstall presented evidence indicating that Patterson's computer had been used to access iNaturalist, a website documenting death cap mushroom sightings, in May 2022. Additionally, Woolworths Everyday Rewards data showed purchases of mushrooms, pastry, eye fillet, onions and mashed potato in the week leading up to the lunch Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall. (Source: Nine) Mobile devices and SIM card activity Eppingstall testified that Patterson used multiple phones and allegedly swapped SIM cards during a police search of her home. One device, referred to as "Phone A", remains missing. Another phone was subjected to multiple factory resets, the court was told. Dehydrator and disposal ADVERTISEMENT The prosecution highlighted that Patterson initially denied owning a food dehydrator. However, a manual was found in her home and CCTV footage showed a woman getting out of a red SUV and disposing of a dehydrator at a local transfer station shortly after the lunch. Forensic analysis detected traces of death cap mushroom toxins on the dehydrator. Text messages and health claims Text messages presented in court revealed that Patterson had informed her former in-laws about undergoing cancer tests, a claim unsubstantiated by medical records. The prosecution suggests this was a fabricated excuse to for the lunch as well as to prevent her children from attending. Defence's argument Contextualizing digital evidence ADVERTISEMENT Defence counsel Colin Mandy SC argued the digital evidence, including internet searches and purchase histories, does not conclusively prove intent to harm. He emphasised that others could have accessed the computer and that receipts do not confirm which mushrooms were used in the meal. Emotional state and health concerns The defence acknowledged that Patterson lied about her health status but contended that these falsehoods stemmed from panic and longstanding health anxieties. Patterson had a history of researching potential ovarian cancer, which the defence argues contributed to her mental state. Relationship dynamics Messages from a Facebook group chat were introduced, showing Patterson expressing frustration toward her in-laws and estranged husband. ADVERTISEMENT The defence maintained that these messages were taken out of context and represented emotional venting rather than evidence of malicious intent. Police investigation scrutiny Under cross-examination, Detective Eppingstall faced questions regarding the thoroughness of the investigation. The defence pointed out during the initial search of Patterson's home, several electronic devices and bank records were not seized. Eppingstall admitted to certain oversights but defended the overall integrity of the investigation. Patterson's Police interview shown to court Detective who led the investigation reveals stark new details about Patterson's actions and behaviour following the fatal lunch. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT One of the most scrutinised parts of the case is Patterson's interview with police, recorded three days after the fatal lunch. The jury was played audio of the three-hour interview earlier in the trial. In it, Patterson appeared emotional but denied deliberately poisoning her guests. She repeatedly told officers she didn't know how the mushrooms could have become contaminated, saying: 'I didn't do anything... I loved them.' She said the beef Wellington was made with a mix of button mushrooms from the supermarket and dried mushrooms she believed were bought from an Asian grocer 'a long time ago'. Patterson insisted she had no reason to harm her former in-laws and described the incident as 'an accident'. However, Police noted that some of Patterson's statements conflicted with other evidence presented at trial, including: She said she didn't own a dehydrator yet CCTV showed a woman disposing of one at a rubbish tip on the day Patterson discharged herself from hospital. She initially told police she hadn't searched for mushrooms online, despite forensic evidence showing mushroom-related searches on a computer seized from her home. She said she cooked and ate the same meal as her guests, but hospital staff said she did not display symptoms consistent with mushroom poisoning. The defence has acknowledged that Patterson lied in parts of her interview but argued these were 'panicked omissions' from someone in shock and grief. They urged the jury not to treat her inconsistencies as proof of guilt, but rather as the behaviour of a distressed woman who was overwhelmed by the unfolding tragedy.
1News
4 days ago
- 1News
Mushroom trial week five: SIM cards, cancer claims and receipts
The murder trial of Victorian woman Erin Patterson, accused of poisoning her former in-laws with a beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms, is entering its final phase. This week, the detective who led the investigation gave evidence, revealing key details about Patterson's actions and behaviour following the fatal lunch. Text messages and a false cancer claim Evidence so far in the trial of Erin Patterson, the Australian woman accused of murdering three people with beef Wellingtons. (Source: 1News) The jury was shown a series of text messages between Erin Patterson and her former mother-in-law, Gail Patterson. ADVERTISEMENT In one exchange, Erin claimed she had undergone a needle biopsy and was awaiting an MRI. But Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall told the court police found no medical records to support that claim. While the defence acknowledged there was no cancer diagnosis, they argued Patterson had long held fears about her health. Mobile phones and missing devices Erin Patterson (Source: Nine) Eppingstall said Patterson had multiple mobile phones and alleged she swapped SIM cards between them during a police raid. One of those phones, he said, has never been recovered. The jury also heard Patterson messaged friends saying she had purchased a new phone and had learned to do a 'hard reboot' when hers broke. Death cap mushroom searches ADVERTISEMENT Police also examined a computer seized from Patterson's home. Its search history included queries about death cap mushrooms and visits to the iNaturalist website – the same site where two fungi experts had previously logged toxic mushroom sightings. The defence maintains the data does not prove who performed the searches. Shopping receipts and the food dehydrator An illustration of Erin Patterson's shopping receipts. (Source: Nine) The prosecution presented a timeline of receipts linked to Patterson's Everyday Rewards card. Between six days before the lunch and the day prior, she shopped at Woolworths three times buying mushrooms, pastry, eye fillet steaks, onions and 1.5 kilograms of mashed potatoes. Patterson's bank records also showed an online purchase was made on August 4 from Desma Environmental, a business linked to the Gippsland tip where a used food dehydrator was later recovered. A shifting story on mushroom sourcing ADVERTISEMENT Death cap mushrooms (file image). (Source: Earlier this week, the jury also heard from Department of Health official Sally Ann Atkinson, who was tasked with tracing the origin of the mushrooms. She told the court Patterson was initially difficult to contact and, when reached, gave changing accounts of where the mushrooms were sourced. The defence argued Patterson was under significant emotional pressure at the time. With the trial now in its fifth week, the case is expected to soon enter closing arguments before the jury begins deliberations. Patterson denies all charges and maintains her innocence.
