logo
Erin Patterson: Mushroom killer made secretive visit to tip in hour after fatal lunch

Erin Patterson: Mushroom killer made secretive visit to tip in hour after fatal lunch

NZ Heralda day ago
Giving evidence, Ian Wilkinson said Don dropped him and his wife home shortly after 3pm for a scheduled meeting with other members of the Korumburra Baptist Church where he serves as pastor.
Meanwhile, Patterson during her time in the witness box claimed she began the clean-up after the quartet left her home.
'I kept cleaning up the kitchen and putting everything away, um, and I had a piece of cake and then another piece of cake and then another,' she said.
Patterson said she felt sick and 'brought it back up' – which her lawyers later argued may well explain why she wasn't as sick as the others.
Her teenage son gave evidence he helped his mum clean up, before playing the computer game Valorant with a friend.
He said later that evening he found his mother upstairs building Lego and asked her to drive the friend home about 7pm.
Erin Patterson's house in Leongatha, Australia. Photo / Getty Images
During the trial, jurors were shown CCTV footage of Patterson dumping her dehydrator, later found to contain remnants of death cap mushrooms, at the Koonwarra Transfer Station and Landfill on August 4 – a day after she was released from hospital.
But they didn't learn this wasn't Patterson's first visit to the tip.
In pre-trial hearings earlier this year, Crown prosecutor Sarah Lenthall told the court investigators had discovered Patterson visited the landfill within an hour of the lunch.
At 3.29pm on July 29, Patterson arrived at the Koonwarra Transfer Station and Landfill, dropping off an unknown item or items and a small amount of cardboard.
Records from the facility indicate she paid $9.50 at 3.51pm for the disposal of items that fell into the categories of '120L' bin and '0.5m pap/card'.
The items were not recovered, but it was alleged CCTV captured her disposing cardboard and 'something else'.
Stills from CCTV footage of killer mushroom cook Erin Patterson dumping her dehydrator. Photo / Supplied by the court
Prosecutors sought to use this, and the element of secrecy by not telling her son, as a basis for the jury to infer the items were connected to the fatal meal and incriminating.
Lenthall argued the evidence pointed to Patterson leaving less than 30 minutes after her guests did and that there was plenty of space left in her home bins.
'We say the jury could, acting on the evidence as a whole, accept that the only purpose of making that trip was to dispose of items related to the lunch,' she said.
'It must be due to the nature of the material, rather than the volume of material, as to why she's making that trip.'
In response, defence barrister Colin Mandy SC argued the prosecution was seeking to invite 'speculation' when a jury could not draw the logical inference Patterson's visit was incriminating.
'What's been disposed of at the Koonwarra tip could be entirely innocent and nothing to do with any event,' he said.
This conduct was ultimately ruled out of the case by trial judge Justice Christopher Beale and business records from the facility were altered before they were shown to the jury to remove mention of the July 29 trip.
Justice Beale's reasons for ruling this was inadmissible were released this week along with a series of his pre-trial rulings.
He wrote that when a suspect conceals or destroys something, such as a body, a jury could reasonably infer the act amounted to an implied admission of their guilt.
But the judge found when the thing in question is itself unknown, it invites the jury to speculate.
'I accept the accused's submission that since Item (a) invites speculation, it fails the test of relevance,' he said.
Patterson was found guilty of murdering Don, Gail and Heather and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson following 11 weeks of trial on July 7.
She will return to court later this month for a pre-sentence hearing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Tamihere's trial was 'fundamentally defective', lawyers argue
David Tamihere's trial was 'fundamentally defective', lawyers argue

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

David Tamihere's trial was 'fundamentally defective', lawyers argue

David Tamihere. Photo: RNZ The lawyer for convicted double murderer David Tamihere has described his trial as fundamentally defective, as the Supreme Court hears his appeal at the High Court in Auckland on Monday. Five Supreme Court judges are hearing arguments on whether the Court of Appeal in an earlier ruling was right to not quash his convictions. Tamihere has always denied killing Swedish tourists Urban Höglin (23) and Heidi Paakkonen (21), and served 20 years of a life sentence . His lawyers are appealing an earlier Court of Appeal ruling that found a miscarriage of justice, but upheld his convictions. In court on Monday morning, Tamihere's lawyer Murray Gibson outlined the three grounds of his submissions. "Multiple breaches of fair trial rights relating to the evidence of principal Crown witnesses, fundamental error in that the Crown no longer subscribes to the case advanced at trial or evidence on which the jury were invited to find the defendant culpable of the homicide," he said. "Thirdly, relates to the constitutional role of the jury." Monday morning was spent with Tamihere's lawyers giving a summary of their case, but deviated briefly to examine a map of the area Höglin and Paakkonen were said to have been exploring at the time of their disappearance in 1989 , and where crews searched for them afterward. Part of the Crown evidence in the original 1990 trial was false, coming from a prison informant later convicted of perjury. Gibson referenced this when addressing the panel of judges. Swedish tourists Urban Höglin (23) and Heidi Paakkonen (21). Photo: Supplied "The Crown retreated from the theory put forward at trial, and advanced two subsequent explanations. It drew on evidence and propositions that have since been discredited." This meant when the jury came to consider Tamihere's guilt, it did so within a discarded framework, Gibson said. "This must be, in council's submission, a sign of a fundamentally defective trial." Chief Justice Dame Helen Winkelmann said it was extremely tempting to try and work out what happened to the tourists. "But that's certainly not the task of this court." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

David Tamihere Supreme Court appeal: His last chance to clear murder convictions?
David Tamihere Supreme Court appeal: His last chance to clear murder convictions?

NZ Herald

time13 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

David Tamihere Supreme Court appeal: His last chance to clear murder convictions?

He admitted stealing the Swedish couple's white Subaru but denied ever meeting them. Tamihere, now in his 70s and living in West Auckland, has always maintained that he was framed by police. He was charged with their murders and at his trial in November 1990, a jailhouse informant, then known as 'secret witness C', testified that Tamihere had admitted to the killings while in prison – having been sentenced on the earlier rape conviction. David Tamihere at his home in Sunnyvale after the Court of Appeal declined to quash his convictions in 2024. Photo / Michael Craig Witness C – a murderer later identified as Roberto Conchie Harris, who would die in prison and have his evidence discredited - claimed Tamihere told him he had bashed Höglin with a piece of wood and dumped the couple's bodies at sea. Two other inmates also testified that Tamihere had made admissions. Another piece of key evidence came from two trampers who said they saw Tamihere with a blonde woman who looked like Paakkonen. But it was after Tamihere's conviction, despite the Crown having no bodies or a murder weapon, that the case was turned on its head. Slain Swedish couple Urban Hoglin and Heidi Paakkonen. Paakkonen's body has never been found. Exactly two years after Tamihere was charged, Höglin's body was found in a shallow grave by pig hunters near Whangamata – more than 70km from where the Crown said the murders had happened. But it was not enough to convince the Court of Appeal in 1992, or the Privy Council later, and Tamihere would spend 20 years behind bars. He was released on parole from his life sentence in 2010. In 2020, he was granted the rare legal lifeline of a Royal Prerogative of Mercy which allowed his case to be heard by the Court of Appeal in 2023 – only to have his case dismissed again, despite the panel of three judges finding the use of evidence from a discredited jailhouse snitch amounted to a miscarriage of justice. But last December, in yet another twist in one of New Zealand's most infamous cases, the country's highest court, the Supreme Court, granted him leave – and a final chance to try and clear his name. The five justices hearing Tamihere's challenge will focus on whether the Court of Appeal should have exercised its jurisdiction under a particular section of the Crimes Act to quash the double-murder convictions. The Supreme Court has said it will likely probe whether Tamihere's trial was unfair whether there was (in light of new evidence or otherwise) a fundamental error at his trial Couple disappeared when Tamihere was on the run Höglin and Paakkonen went missing when they were hiking in dense Coromandel bush in April 1989. At that time, Tamihere was on the run from police. Three years earlier, he had raped and threatened a 47-year-old woman in her home for more than six hours. He pleaded guilty to that offence but had ignored his bail conditions and absconded to the bush, where he was living rough. He also had a prior conviction for manslaughter after hitting 23-year-old stripper Mary Barcham on the head with a rifle in 1972, when he was 18. On April 10, 1989, Tamihere came across the Swedish couple's white Subaru, 'loaded with gear' and parked near the start of a difficult walking track. He stole the car – something he has always admitted. Weeks later, after the Swedes' disappearance had sparked the largest land-based search in New Zealand history, Tamihere was linked to the car. The Hughes connection Tamihere has always claimed that police framed him. The head of the investigation, Detective Inspector John Hughes, had also been involved in the case against Arthur Allan Thomas, who was found guilty over the Crewe murders in 1970. Thomas was released after nine years in jail and given nearly $1 million in compensation; a Royal Commission of Inquiry said that detectives had planted fake evidence, and police had produced fake confessions from two prisoners. 'It causes us grave concern that very senior police officers were so obviously ready to place credence on such unreliable, self-interested, and, in the case of the first inmate, deluded evidence,' the commission's report said. The report did not name any officers in relation to the confessions, nor was there any sign of Hughes' involvement in the planting of fake evidence. But Hughes did provide evidence about Thomas being in the Crewe home that was wrong, and which allowed Thomas' credibility to be attacked under cross-examination. Hughes died in 2006. The Post journalist Mike White reported in 2023 that Hughes had bragged to Sir Bob Jones that 'I nailed [Tamihere] by making up all the evidence'. Hughes was also spoken to as part of the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) investigation, in 1996, into Harris' claims of a $100,000 police offer and help to get parole in exchange for saying Tamihere had confessed to the murders to him. Hughes told the IPCA that the claim of a $100,000 bribe was 'absolute rubbish'. 'I believed that he [Harris] was sincere for his motive for coming forward... He was respectful to the Crown, Defence Counsel and everyone and explained why he was there. He was sick of listening to Tamihere quoting about what he had done,' Hughes told the IPCA. Hughes admitted to travelling to Christchurch to appear at Harris' parole hearing in 1992, telling the Parole Board that Harris had given evidence at the Tamihere trial, 'nothing more'. The board postponed its decision until a further hearing six months later, when it recommended releasing Harris. The IPCA found the allegations of police misconduct had 'no validity whatsoever'.

Russell Crowe opens up about assault arrest in 2005: ‘I can forgive my bad days'
Russell Crowe opens up about assault arrest in 2005: ‘I can forgive my bad days'

NZ Herald

time15 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Russell Crowe opens up about assault arrest in 2005: ‘I can forgive my bad days'

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Russell Crowe opens up about assault arrest in 2005: 'I can forgive my bad days' Russell Crowe at the Giorgio Armani fashion show on June 17, 2024 in Milan, Italy. Photo / Getty Images Russell Crowe has opened up about his assault arrest in 2005. The New Zealand-born actor, 61, was seized by police in New York in 2005 for assault after throwing a telephone at a hotel employee, and he has now reflected on the incident in an interview with the Daily Telegraph on Sunday (17.08.25.) He said: 'Look man, at 61, I can forgive my bad days. 'I'm not at all one of those people that say you shouldn't have regrets, I absolutely respect regret,' he said. 'Regret is one of the greatest processes.' He added: 'You know, you're not gonna be finding any improvement by not being honest with yourself about who you are and what you did, what you might've said.' Russell was led from the Mercer Hotel in handcuffs during the incidence after lashing out at staff when he was unable to place a call to his then-wife, Danielle Spencer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store