Zelenskiy discussed new lending program with IMF chief Georgieva
"We discussed a new programme of financial assistance that will strengthen Ukrainians now and in the post-war period," Zelenskiy wrote on the Telegram messaging app ahead of an expected staff visit to Ukraine later this month.
"We are prepared to carry out the necessary steps quickly. The government is already working on this."
Georgieva confirmed what she called a productive call in a post on X. She said they discussed Ukraine's economic outlook, the resilience of the Ukrainian people and "the importance of reforms and financial assistance to support Ukraine now and during reconstruction."
Ukraine's new prime minister, Yulia Svyrydenko, also spoke with Georgieva earlier this week as Kyiv works to cover a widening budget deficit. Ukrainian authorities have said they could face a shortfall of about $19 billion next year alone.
Ukraine's current $15.5-billion programme with the IMF expires in 2027.
Officials say the current IMF programme needs to be updated given that Ukraine's needs have changed as the war drags on. Moscow invaded its smaller neighbour in February 2022.
Svyrydenko appointed a new economic security chief on Wednesday as part of a campaign to strengthen governance, fulfilling a key condition for Kyiv to continue receiving wartime support from Western lenders.
Analysts say Ukraine's financing gap will widen significantly next year if Russia keeps up its intense attacks across the country and the government fails to act on demands for reform from foreign lenders.
IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack told reporters last month that IMF staff and authorities would intensify discussions about the 2026 budget and Ukraine's financing needs for the medium term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Investors expectations for Bank of England QT edge lower
LONDON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Investor expectations for Bank of England quantitative tightening in the 12 months from October edged lower to a median 72 billion pounds ($97 billion), down from 75 billion pounds in a survey conducted by the central bank in May. The BoE's quarterly Market Participants Survey, opens new tab also showed that a much smaller minority of investors expected the BoE to keep up the current 100 billion pounds annual pace of QT into the next year. The top quarter of expectations for QT in August had fallen to 75 billion pounds from 100 billion pounds in May. Median expectations for rate cuts were little changed from three months ago. Investors still see the Bank of England steadily cutting Bank Rate to a low of 3.25% by the time of its April 30 meeting next year, down from 4% after Thursday's rate cut. ($1 = 0.7440 pounds)
BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump deadline for Russia arrives
Ukrainian soldiers have expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as Donald Trump's deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing arrived and he eyed a possible meeting with Vladimir Putin to discuss the conflict. The US president's efforts to pressure Mr Putin have so far delivered no progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Advertisement Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 620-mile front line from north-east to south-east Ukraine. The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out into the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages. Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine's northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk. In the Pokrovsk area, one commander said Moscow is not interested in peace. Advertisement 'It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,' Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told the Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. 'I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that, it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,' he said. In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia's invasion. 'We are on our land, we have no way out,' he said. 'So we stand our ground, we have no choice.' Advertisement Donald Trump is hoping for a meeting with Vladimir Putin (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Mr Trump said on Thursday that he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian president will not meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since the Second World War. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said: 'Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process. 'Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West.' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to end the conflict. Advertisement He said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow 'to negotiate on behalf of Europe', or 'we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent'. Mr Orban, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe's concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent's interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative. 'This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,' he said. 'This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.'
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's war on the middle classes has just taken a vicious turn
A government in severe distress always falls back into its comfort zone of issues it wants to talk about, rather than tackle the most important issues before it. And so, as the dog returneth to its vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly, and the Labour Party return to the comforting familiarity of fomenting class war. Another day when, instead of focusing on economic catastrophe, social meltdown and ever-more boat crossings, Labour are tinkering with their already-disastrous Equality Act to introduce a requirement for schools to consider the 'socio-economic' background of pupils when selecting children. This consideration is even likely to trump how far away a student lives from a school, whether they have siblings already there, and perhaps even whether they have disabilities. What these factors are is obviously not properly defined yet, as doing the hard work is too much for the brainboxes behind this scheme. Perhaps it will be based on the same policy surrounding civil service internships announced last week, where you can only apply if you are an ethnic minority or if your dad did a certain list of jobs when you were fourteen. Because being judged on who your father was is now, in this topsy-turvy world, something that the Left-wing progressives do, rather than the toffs. We already know the enormous, wonderful, inspiring, sacrificial steps that parents will take to get their children into the best schools. They take second jobs to pay for private school (much harder since Labour's ruinous and useless VAT increase); they will move house to be in better areas; they will even change religion to get into, for example, Catholic schools. So when yet another ladder of opportunity is removed and broken up for firewood, what will parents do next? Will they quit their jobs, sell investments, adopt a Cockney accent, all in a bid to contort themselves into Labour's increasingly narrow criteria of 'working class'? What then will happen to the economy? This will hurt children, it will hurt parents, it will hurt Britain. The same happened after the disgraceful attacks on the grammar school system. But Labour don't care. Theirs is a pathological hatred of middle England, the wellspring from which so many of them come, but bitterly resent. It is no more someone's fault to be born to loving middle-class parents than to be born to loving working-class ones, or unloving families or no family. As Alex Burghart, the Conservative shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said so well in these pages: 'Rather than dragging people down through social engineering, we should instead focus on improving equality of opportunity, so hard-working people can get on, irrespective of their class, colour or creed.' More broadly, this sorry little diminution of Britain is just the latest in a long list of examples proving that the Left, broadly defined, just does not understand human nature. The Rev Fergus Butler-Gallie put this perfectly recently: 'Liberalism believes that human nature can be bribed or oppressed or educated into goodness' and that this world view 'has been a catastrophe for the last 50 years of policy making'. Governments must work with the grain of human nature, understanding that parents will do everything they can for their children, and harnessing that rather than trying to deny it, or worse, decry it as evil and selfish. Some children will always be brighter than others, too. Again, a return of the grammar school system would allow those kids to thrive, regardless of their 'socio-economic' background. Capitalism works by harnessing human nature – socialism fails by denying it. No amount of moronic Labour policies will ever change that.
