Trump to ‘probably' impose pharma tariffs in August, urges EU investment
Trump said on Tuesday that the announcement would come 'probably at the end of the month, and we're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff'. Tariffs would come into effect on 1 August.
The US president has argued that slapping tariffs on EU pharmaceuticals – a major export for the bloc – would bring manufacturing back to the US. He has previously stated that the levies could gradually increase to 200% after giving drugmakers about a year to bring manufacturing back to the US.
Some are already on their way. In April, Swiss pharma player Roche signalled a $50 billion (€44 billion) investment in the US over the next five years.
Stefan Schneider, a long-time pharma analyst at Swiss investment house Vontobel, told Euractiv in an interview that these announcements, like Roche's, are merely reiterations of investments that had already been planned in the US.
According to several sources, Euractiv has also learned that Trump's strategy has been to contact pharmaceutical companies 'individually' – leaving the industry at large in the dark.
Nathalie Moll, director general of the Innovative Pharma Association Efpia, stressed: "Regardless of what is down the line, Europe needs to focus on making improvements to its own operating environment." She added: "We need wholesale changes to promote a fairer global distribution of contributions to R&D, increased investment in medicines, and fairer and faster access for our patients."
Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade chief, has said the bloc wants a 'negotiated solution' by 1 August and said he was on his way to Washington on Wednesday. Whatever the outcome, Trump's signal to attract EU pharma investments is clear.
(bms, aw)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
UK competition watchdog eyes special abuse control regime for Apple, Google
The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced a preliminary decision to designate mobile platform giants Apple and Google with "strategic market status", meaning they would become subject to special abuse controls by the UK regulator – in a similar approach to the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA). On Wednesday, the CMA announced that it's proposing to designate the two tech giants – saying that it had found 90-100% of mobile devices in the UK run on either Apple- or Google-owned mobile platforms, making the pair "an effective duopoly". A "strategic market status" designation on Apple and Google would unlock bespoke powers for the CMA's Digital Markets Unit to tackle platform-specific competition risks, with the wider goal of boosting the UK's app economy. The CMA has a number of concerns about Apple and Google's platforms, including restrictions placed on app developers' ability to steer consumers to offers outside the tech giants' own app stores – an issue which led the EU's executive to slap the iPhone-maker with a €500 million fine under the bloc's DMA earlier this year. It also said it wants to investigate restrictions the two companies' platforms put on developers' access to "features and functionality". Under the EU's DMA, Apple and Google's app stores are both designated as "core platform services" – meaning the app marketplaces are subject to an up-front list of obligations and prohibitions, such the DMA's ban on gatekeepers' self-preferencing. Apple has already been fined in relation to anti-steering under the DMA. Since March it has also been in talks with the Commission about implementing interoperability features to comply with the pan-EU law. Google, meanwhile, was also found by the Commission to have violated the DMA's rules on steering in relation to its Play Store – although it has yet to receive a fine. "Time is of the essence: as competition agencies and courts globally take action in these markets, it's essential the UK doesn't fall behind," said Sarah Cardell, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. Also today, the UK watchdog published separate roadmaps for actions the two mobile giants could take to improve competition – and avoid the risk of future enforcement – outlining measures focused on areas including interoperability, AI services, and consumer choice. A final decision by the CMA on whether to designate Apple and Google with "strategic market status" will be taken by 22 October. (nl)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
NGOs fear Brussels taking ‘chainsaw' to EU environmental protections
Stefano Porciello Euractiv Jul 23, 2025 16:29 4 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Want to keep reading? Get a subscription on Euractiv Pro and elevate your political insight! Discover Euractiv Pro For corporations Already have an account? Log in
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany's ‘butcher' minister told to push for greener diets
Government advisors in Germany are pushing for a shift in food policy to promote plant-based options and discourage excessive meat consumption Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Jul 23, 2025 16:14 3 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A government advisory board has urged German Agriculture Minister Alois Rainer to encourage citizens to eat less meat and embrace veggie alternatives, including lab-grown meat. Following his appointment last spring, Rainer, a trained butcher, said that Germans were mature enough to decide for themselves what to put in their shopping baskets. Just a few months later, the board, known as the agri-food advisory board (WBAE), handed him a report advocating for a shift away from his cherished meat products. The WBAE concluded that there is room for 'more sustainable diets' and that reducing consumption of animal products is key. One of its proposals is to slash the 19% VAT on plant-based foods, which it calls "tax discrimination' compared to the 7% rate applied to comparable animal products classified as staples. It also recommends gradually increasing taxes on meat and dairy. 'In terms of GHG emissions, plant-based alternative products such as soy drinks generally have advantages per kg of product over the corresponding animal products' the report states, calling for a 'climate label' to cover both animal and plant-based foods. But Rainer may not be ready to stomach the recommendations. 'It's important to me not to pit one against the other,' said the minister, who has sought to reverse course from his Green predecessor Cem Özdemir. Aware of the sensitivity surrounding food policy, the WBAE has packaged its recommendations in a '3R strategy': citizens should 'Reduce' meat consumption, 'Remix' animal and plant-based components, or 'Replace' meat with plant-based alternatives. The board's push is nothing new to Rainer, as we knew from day one he would be treading a tightrope on food policy matters. The coalition agreement between Rainer's conservative Christian Democrats and the centre-left Social Democrats already includes a pledge to support 'alternative proteins'. The WBAE report specifies that this includes cell-based meat and precision fermentation, which is used to replicate proteins and enzymes found in foods such as eggs and milk without involving animals. The board also hopes that the EU will adopt more 'innovation-friendly' rules. The European Commission is currently considering whether to fast-track the approval of so-called novel foods, many of which have drawn criticism from several EU farm ministers. The report also references another ongoing debate in Brussels: whether traditional meat terms can be used for plant-based products. While the EU executive recently yielded to pressure to tighten labelling rules, the German board is advocating a 'regulatory chill.' Meanwhile, the German government's advisory body endorsed the Nutri-score labelling system and joined criticism of the NOVA classification for ultra-processed foods, warning that it could penalise some plant-based products unfairly. Jeremias Lin contributed reporting. (adm, de)
