Truth in climate action and the energy transition: countering climate denialism and misinformation
Image: Timothy Bernard Independent Newspapers
As the risks of climate change become increasingly evident worldwide, the need for reliable and accurate information is more crucial than ever.
The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report (2024) identifies misinformation and disinformation on all topics as a short-term risk to human society amongst others the issue of climate change and the notion of the green economy revolution as such targeted topics.
Recent research has shown a dramatic rise in disinformation related to the climate crisis, spreading at an alarming rate through social media, messaging apps, and generative AI.
Evident in South Africa's just transition journey, the spread of misinformation distorts public debate, weaken policy consensus and scientific consensus around climate change, its consequences, and causes, consequently obstructing the various actors' ability to respond with agility and effectively to the crisis.
For example, by distorting the realities of decarbonisation—whether by downplaying potential or growth of renewable energy or by understating the health impacts of coal fired power stations—misinformation creates confusion.
The United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stresses the urgency of combating 'coordinated disinformation campaigns impeding global progress on climate change''. Hence the UN and UNESCO launched the Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change at the G20 Leaders' Summit in Brazil in 2024 with the aim to promote information integrity on climate change, address disinformation, and enhance climate change awareness and action.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
As the public conversation on climate change evolves, so does the sophistication and range of arguments used to downplay or mortgage the need for action.
These arguments have evolved from outright denial of the reality or human causation of climate change and ad hominem attacks on scientists and the scientific consensus.
These discourses accept the existence of climate change but justify inaction or inadequate efforts, for example by manipulating discussions on what actions should be taken, by whom and how fast, proponents of climate delay would argue for minimal action or action taken by others, and have found a new lease of life emboldened by others, and also the geo-political landscape changes.
They focus attention on the negative social effects of climate policies and raise doubt that mitigation is possible.
The aim is to manipulate discussions on what action should be taken, the speed of action taken, who bears responsibility and where costs and benefits should be allocated.
These strategies have become known as 'climate delay' discourses aimed at creating deadlock or a sense of intractable obstacles to taking action.
In the same way, these are sharpened through sophisticated public relations strategies like corporate greenwashing as basic as nature-rinsing imagery, green colour schemes to create a perception of environmental stewardship to vague statements with little detail or evidence on sustainability targets or past performance. Another concept has been socio-environmentalism, in particular cherry-picking small projects with a low impact compared to the companies' revenue and environmental impact.
The oldest trick in the book has been companies professing to be part of the solution through non-transformative and miniscule initiatives such as recycling, water saving, reforestation and biofuels or when agribusinesses narrates their contribution and role in feeding the world, while fossil fuel companies position themselves as essential to growing energy demand worldwide, as well as key investors the clean energy transition.
The media plays a pivotal role in shaping public understanding, policy debates, and stakeholder actions around both climate change and the broader concept of a just transition. Timely, accurate reporting on these events—and on South Africa's innovative pilot projects—can galvanise public support for policies that buffer communities against future shocks, while creating new economic opportunities.
To move the needle on public attitudes, journalists must go beyond simply reporting data. We also need various perspectives that unpack the intersection of climate justice with race, gender, and class. Investigative reporting can expose the hidden costs of continued fossil fuel economy dependency—be it public-health burdens or environmental degradation.
Last week we celebrated World Press Freedom Day with a focus on the profound influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on journalism and media under the theme: Reporting in the Brave New World – The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Press Freedom and the Media.
To commemorate World Press Freedom Day, we ask our media to make a pledge to defend the reality as fiercely as they defend free speech and to resist the corporate capture and weaponisation of the business and financial journalism against climate action.
In a brave new way, this pledge must envision an information ecosystem that enables the media to deliver choice and freedom for all, in which people everywhere can express themselves and make informed decisions about the future they want – This transfer of power from the media to the people through improved climate reporting will empower workers and communities, and thus handing them greater control and share of voice in the discourse- which will be the fourth estate's greatest contribution towards climate action.
Blessing Manale.
Image: Supplied.
Blessing Manale, Executive Manager: Consensus Building, Communications & Outreach.
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
UN plastics treaty talks collapse
The 'hard-fought' negotiations to develop a landmark United Nations treaty to end plastic pollution closed on Friday without agreement and have been extended again The 'hard-fought' negotiations to develop a landmark United Nations treaty to 'This has been a hard-fought 10 days against the backdrop of geopolitical complexities, economic challenges and multilateral strains,' 'However, one thing remains clear: despite these complexities, all countries want to remain at the table. While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at Unep will continue the work against plastic pollution — pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and, yes, in our bodies.' South Africa's department of forestry, fisheries and the environment said the talks had collapsed because of 'deep divisions between nations and the absence of a clear process to resolve the deadlock'. 'South Africa is disappointed by the outcome and concerned about the procedural failings that stalled progress. But our resolve remains unshaken. While the lack of agreement is frustrating, South Africa will not waver in our fight to 'We will keep driving action at home and pressing for solutions abroad.' During the INC, George met South African industry, business, and civil society to strengthen partnerships for a circular economy. 'Collaboration with all stakeholders is vital. We must build a system where sustainable practices are the norm, not the exception,' the minister said. South Africa George warned about toxic chemicals in plastics and the spread of microplastics into food systems and human bodies. 'It is unacceptable that microplastics are found everywhere, including in our own bodies. We will act decisively to protect public health.' South Africa's Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations and the polluter pays principle are already holding producers to account for the full life cycle of their products. 'Our EPR framework is a cornerstone of our strategy, and we will keep strengthening it,' George said, adding that the country will keep working at home and with global partners to secure a meaningful, inclusive plastics treaty that protects our planet and future generations. In the final days of negotiations, the draft text of the treaty 'morphed into an appeal to corporate interests, with key elements like production reduction being gutted', noted In response, the majority of states effectively blocked what would have been a 'hollowed-out, ineffective and non-binding agreement', it said. 'As talks ended without a clear way forward, it is crucial to change the process to break the deadlock. We leave with disappointment yet determination for the fight against Pushing through a weak and destructive text, which was 'driven by corporate interests', would have presented no solutions to the plastics crisis, said 'The movement against plastics will continue to grow stronger, pushing for ambition at the local and national level in solidarity with and centring those most affected,' he said. 'From community-led zero waste initiatives to national campaigns for plastic bans, the pressure is mounting on governments to deliver the real solutions and a strong plastics treaty.' No treaty is better than a bad treaty, noted Ana Rocha, the global plastics policy director at the 'We stand with the ambitious majority who refused to back down and accept a treaty that disrespects the countries that are truly committed to this process and betrays our communities and our planet. 'Once again, negotiations collapsed, derailed by a chaotic and biased process that left even the most engaged countries struggling to be heard. A broken, non-transparent process will never deliver a just outcome. It's time to fix it, so people and the planet can finally have a fighting chance.' The majority of countries agreed on the need to cut plastic production, phase out harmful chemicals, ensure a just transition — particularly for wastepickers — establish a new dedicated fund to help developing countries implement the treaty, and make decisions through a two-thirds majority voting when consensus cannot be reached, among other ambitious measures. But this was derailed by a small group of petro-states calling themselves the 'Like-Minded Group', which includes Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran, who ' Gaia said INC-5.2 had 'left ambitious countries lost in process' with surprising changes in schedule, 'blatant lack of transparency', overnight meetings starting as late as 2am, and a final plenary that started with 40 minute notice at 5.30 am — less than four hours after the chair's final draft was released and more than 14 hours after its scheduled time. 'Make no mistake, INC-5.2 has been an abject failure,' said the 'When faced with a failure of this magnitude, it's essential to learn from it. In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time — some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty. 'It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are France's ecology minister, Agnes Pannier-Runacher, expressed disappointment that a handful of countries, guided by short-term financial interests rather than the health of their populations and the sustainability of their economies, had blocked the adoption of an ambitious treaty against plastic pollution. 'Plastic kills. It poisons our oceans, our soils, and ultimately, it contaminates our bodies … Oil-producing countries chose to look the other way. We choose to act.' Graham Forbes, Greenpeace's head of delegation to the global plastics treaty negotiations, said the inability to reach an agreement in Geneva must be a wakeup call for the world. 'The vast majority of governments want a strong agreement, yet a handful of bad actors were allowed to use process to drive such ambition into the ground. We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result.' The 'In Geneva, negotiators could not agree on key provisions essential to protecting the environment and human health, including effective obligations to reach sustainable levels of plastic production, address health, and account for impacts across the full life cycle of plastics,' it said. 'While a small group of countries actively denied the scientific evidence, we were encouraged by the overwhelming majority who engaged constructively with it. Our scientists thank them for their hard work and courage, and we remain committed to providing robust, independent science to support the next steps in the negotiations.' 'This was never going to be easy but the outcome we have today falls short of what our people, and the planet, need,' noted Surangel Whipps Jr, the president of Palau, speaking as the chair of The Alliance of Small Island States. 'Still, even after six rounds of negotiations, we will not walk away. The resilience of islanders has carried us through many storms, and we will persevere because we need real solutions, and we will carve pathways to deliver them for our people and our planet.' Azoulay said countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form 'a treaty of the willing'. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here.' INC chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso said that 'failing to reach the goal we set for ourselves may bring sadness, even frustration. Yet it should not lead to discouragement. 'On the contrary, it should spur us to regain our energy, renew our commitments, and unite our aspirations. It has not happened yet in Geneva, but I have no doubt that the day will come when the international community will unite its will and join hands to protect our environment and safeguard the health of our people.' Kate Lynch, Australia's head of the circular economy division, department of climate change, energy, the environment and water, said: 'We must acknowledge that hard line positions will not allow us to move ahead. 'Characterising any of our discussions in terms of winners and losers only makes us all ultimately losers. We really need to embrace the constructive spirit that we've seen in so many discussions here and in previous INC sessions and take some brave decisions to
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Key decision looms for police inquiry on evidence leader
Ad Hoc Committee into serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will decide on Monday whether to use external legal counsel or parliamentary legal services as evidence leader. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers The Ad Hoc Committee set up to inquire into serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will decide on Monday who between the parliamentary legal services or an external legal counsel should be the evidence leader. This emerged when the committee received inputs from political parties and MPs when the terms of reference were considered on Thursday. The draft terms of reference propose that the committee utilise the services of an external legal counsel in an advisory capacity to assist it carry out its work where necessary, including presenting the evidence of a witness to the committee. However, the ANC said the committee should use the services of legal counsel within the parliamentary legal services. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ ANC MP Khusela Sangoni-Diko said they should not seek to utilise resources unnecessarily when those services were available in-house. 'Our understanding is that Parliament has counsel, even senior counsel within its own members. We must use the services of legal counsel rather than external services,' Sangoni-Diko said. MK Party MP David Skosana said external legal counsel should not displace the MPs from their oversight duty. 'We propose that external legal counsel may propose a line of questioning, but members must retain control and the scope of inquiry,' he said. This was contrary to the proposal that the format of questioning of witnesses be determined by the external legal counsel in consultation with chairperson of the committee, Soviet Lekganyane. Skosana said the appointment of a vetted external legal counsel should be transparent and that they should be told about the costs of their services. 'We hope there are no people lined up already, like we have seen in State Capture corruption. We have seen that and we can back it up,' he said. ActionSA MP Dereleen James was unsure if the parliamentary legal services have the requisite exposure to the responsibilities of an evidence leader. James said an evidence leader should have demonstrable exposure in criminal law and prosecutorial experience to guide the evidential process, or a legal counsel with proven handling of complex and interconnected evidence, as demonstrated in the Zondo Commission of Inquiry. While the draft terms of reference propose that witnesses be allowed to have legal assistance at their own cost, the Red Berets want them to have legal access with the assistance of the Legal Aid Board. 'In the interest of making justice accessible to everybody, they should be able to access Legal Aid if they want to have legal representation,' EFF MP Leigh-Ann Mathys said. In its submission, the DA provided a new section in the terms of reference to deal with the confidentiality and protection of whistle-blowers. The party said all individuals providing evidence should be afforded appropriate protection from retaliation or threats. 'Whistle-blowers and other sources that come forward with sensitive information are protected under the law, possibly with the assistance of witness protection.' IFP MP Albert Mncwango said: 'We need to pay particular attention to the security and safety of our witnesses.' Regarding the venues for meetings of the committee, it is proposed that they be held in Parliament or any other suitable venue. It is also proposed that hybrid or virtual meetings be held to accommodate those MPs unable to travel to Cape Town. Skosana said they should have secure platform with identity verification and secure channels for sensitive evidence, in addition to avoid cost if it held meetings outside Parliament. 'We should avoid what the State Capture Commission has done at all costs,' he said. DA MP Diane Barnard Kohler said their meetings should be in Parliament since MPs were provided with accommodation and transport. 'I would vehement object to this being moved elsewhere,' she said.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa unaware of SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit
President Cyril Ramaphosa will meet Chief of the South African National Defence Force, General Rudzani Maphwanya, within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip to Iran. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers The Presidency on Thursday night said President Cyril Ramaphosa was unaware of the 'ill-advised' visit by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) Chief Rudzani Maphwanywa to Iran. Addressing the media, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit. He stated that it was Defence Minister Angie Motshekga, not Ramaphosa, who approved Maphwanya's travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander-in-chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the president did not know.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Maphwanya was quoted by Iranian media as pledging 'common goals' with Iran and said his trip carried 'a political message'. Magwenya said there was a concern about Maphwanya's trip. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions as well as conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill advised and more so the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes, which delve into the area of foreign policy that only the president, as well as the Department of International Relations, are responsible for.' Maphwanya's trip took place amid tensions between South Africa and the US President Donald Trump imposed 30% tariffs on South African goods, which were implemented this month. Magwenya said South Africa was in a process of resetting diplomatic and political relations with the United States, as well as balancing the trade relationship in a mutually beneficial manner between the two countries. 'Of resolving the relationship or resolving issues around the relationship with the US, you then have senior government or military officials in statements that will further inflame the situation. It is not helpful at all,' he said. Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and DIRCO were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the president and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence, if there was to be any, for the defence's chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. 'It is also difficult to speak to. One must consider what constitutes the grave nature of charges or accusations that would require a court-martial,' Magwenya said. Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa told Newzroom Afrika that he was unaware of the visit. 'I don't know what the purpose of his visit was. It is only the minister who will be in the know. If he did not ask for permission to leave from the minister, then he will have to swim in his stew,' he said. Holomisa also said such visits outside the country were authorised by Motshekga. 'The last word has been said by the Presidency, and the Presidency is the custodian of our foreign policy. There is nothing one can contest on that, but what we should be waiting for is either to hear the minister herself addressing this issue or alternatively wait for General Maphwanya to come back and tell the nation how he went there, what was the purpose.' He said since the matter was in the open, Maphwanya should be allowed to respond openly and be transparent about it. Holomisa added that it was too early to say what would happen to Maphwanya. 'If he went abroad without permission from the president or the minister, he will have to face the music and explain on what basis he had to utter such words, which are creating controversy,' he said.
