The biggest cities in the US are sinking, a study found. The phenomenon could tilt buildings and damage infrastructure.
All the biggest US cities are sinking, a new study found with satellite analysis.
In 28 cities, about 29,000 buildings are at risk of damage and worsening flooding.
This sinking, or subsidence, is mostly caused by groundwater use, the study found.
The ground is slowly sinking or deforming beneath all the biggest cities in the US, according to new satellite analysis.
If cities don't do something about this land-sinking phenomenon, called subsidence, it could damage buildings and infrastructure. It's already driving flooding in many places.
"We did not expect to see such widespread land subsidence," Manoochehr Shirzaei, a geophysicist at Virginia Tech, told Business Insider.
Shirzaei co-authored a study, published Thursday in the journal Nature Cities, using satellites to measure the millimeter-by-millimeter vertical movement of US cities.
He said there was a clear pattern in the data: Urban centers are sinking faster than other areas, and have a greater risk of building damage.
He found that subsidence is distorting 28 cities — all the places they checked — including Seattle, San Diego, Denver, Dallas, Chicago, and New York City.
About 34 million people live in the affected areas.
Sinking can directly boost flooding, since coastal cities get lower while sea levels rise around them. Even inland, it can create new troughs in the land that pool stormwater.
Take Houston, which was the fastest-sinking city in the new study, with 40% of its land area sinking five millimeters each year and some areas sinking two inches per year. Shirzaei's previous research found that subsidence had left standing water in some unexpected parts of the city after Hurricane Harvey.
The risks are especially high, though, in places where sinking is happening unevenly within a small area.
When part of the ground sinks slower, or even rises while the spot just next to it sinks, that puts a lot of strain on whatever is built there.
At New Orleans' Louis Armstrong International Airport, the differential sinking has already cracked pavement and left huge puddles on the plane taxiway.
In the worst-case scenario, uneven subsidence could tilt buildings, crack foundations, and hobble bridges.
Sinking alone "would not probably cause a significant risk, but when it compounds with other hazards — flood and storms and winds or poor maintenance or poor construction code — then that can be deadly and result in building failure," Shirzaei said.
About 29,000 buildings are at risk, the study found, even though uneven subsidence only affects about 1% of the land area in the studied cities.
That's sort of good news, because it means the problem areas are concentrated in small, identifiable parts of cities.
"These are areas that could potentially be exposed to a hazard if some immediate action is not taken in the next couple of years," Leonard Ohenhen, a postdoctoral researcher at Columbia's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the lead author of the study, told BI.
He hopes cities will focus on those hotspots "to enforce some building codes, maybe strengthen the integrity of infrastructure."
Groundwater extraction seems to be the main culprit behind America's sinking cities, according to the study.
That means cities can make a big difference by practicing better groundwater management — balancing withdrawals with rainfall that replenishes underground aquifers.
A few other factors are also at play.
Oil and gas extraction contribute to the problem in Texas, deflating the ground in a similar way to groundwater extraction.
The sheer weight of a city's buildings can also push it down into the Earth, as a 2023 study found in New York City.
In parts of the East Coast and across the center of the US, some subsidence is a leftover reaction from the disappearance of the Laurentide ice sheet. When this ice covered much of North America during the last Ice Age, it squeezed the land around its edges upward. Those regions are still settling back down today.
The study authors said that this was a contributing factor in New York, Indianapolis, Nashville, Philadelphia, Denver, Chicago, and Portland.
Recent studies in Chicago and Miami have suggested that heat from the city and vibrations from construction, respectively, could also contribute to buildings sinking.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
I just read Claude's new blog — and you'd never guess it was written by AI
Anthropic has a new blog called Claude Explains, but it's not your typical corporate blog. As the name suggests, the company's AI chatbot is the one doing much of the writing. Unlike other tech attempts at fully automated content, this experiment is grounded in a cautious, human-in-the-loop approach that puts expert oversight front and center. Launched last week with little fanfare, Claude Explains lives on Anthropic's website and features blog posts that explore technical topics and practical AI use cases.A cheery note on the homepage reads, 'Welcome to the small corner of the Anthropic universe where Claude is writing on every topic under the sun,' making it sound like Claude is blogging freely without supervision. But behind the scenes, Anthropic says it's anything but hands-off. Claude generates the drafts, but subject matter experts and editorial teams enhance the content with insights, examples and practical blog serves as an early example of how AI can augment human work rather than replace it. By generating drafts that are then refined by subject matter experts, Claude helps teams move faster while still delivering high-quality, insightful content; effectively amplifying what human creators can accomplish on their own. Anthropic plans to expand the blog beyond technical topics, with upcoming posts focused on creative writing, data analysis and business strategy. And notably, the company is still hiring across editorial, content and marketing roles — underscoring its view that AI is a tool for humans, not a replacement. Anthropic's new blog arrives at a time when many companies are grappling with how (and how not) to use AI for content creation. OpenAI has teased models for creative writing. Meta wants AI to handle ad copy end to end. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Publishers like Gannett, Bloomberg and Business Insider have all tested AI-written articles — with mixed, often embarrassing, results. Business Insider recently had to walk back book recommendations that may have been generated by AI and pointed readers to titles that didn't exist. Bloomberg corrected dozens of AI-generated summaries. G/O Media drew public backlash for publishing error-filled AI articles without editorial approval. The common thread? Lack of oversight. Anthropic's blog aims to sidestep these missteps by anchoring Claude's contributions in a strong editorial framework. Human editors verify facts, reshape structure and ensure that each post genuinely helps readers understand AI's capabilities — especially in real-world scenarios. Claude Explains is an experiment in AI-generated content, while also making a statment. Anthropic's measured approach, combining AI speed with human judgment, offers a sharp contrast to efforts that rush to automate creativity without a safety net. The company isn't claiming AI can replace writers, in fact, it's showing what's possible when AI tools like Claude are used to support (not supplant) the people behind the content. It's too early to determine if this model will become a new industry standard, but for now, one thing is clear: Claude may be doing the writing, but humans aren't going anywhere and are still very much in charge.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why Slow-Moving Tropical Storms And Hurricanes Can Be Worse Than Major Hurricanes
Tropical storms and hurricanes that move slowly near the coast or inland are among the most feared by forecasters. Sometimes these tropical cyclones may not have powerful wind speeds, but the threats posed can be amplified due to their sluggish pace. Here's a look at what a slow speed means for rainfall potential and some other typical threats from a storm that's in no hurry to exit a region. In focus: The slower a storm moves, the more incredible the rainfall amounts can become. A storm chugging along at just 5 mph has a rainfall potential upwards of 30 inches, while one moving briskly at 20 mph typically produces much smaller rain totals in any given location. When this occurs near mountainous terrain, rainfall totals can be further enhanced. Reinforced: A landfalling major hurricane that is moving at an average or faster-than-average pace can drop less rainfall than a slow-moving tropical depression or storm. Why you should pay attention: Freshwater flooding fatalities now greatly outweigh deaths from other hurricane hazards, including wind speeds – and this proportion of deaths to other hazards continues to grow. Poster child for flooding: Hurricane Harvey is the most extreme example of major flooding caused by a storm that stalls out or moves slowly. Catastrophic damage occurred in Houston and other parts of southeastern Texas after Harvey spent days soaking the state. Much of this rain fell well after the storm was no longer a hurricane. Recent example: Hurricane Sally (2020) punished the Alabama and Florida coasts with two days of tropical storm conditions, which led to up to 30 inches of rain. Swift water rescues were needed in southern Alabama and the western Florida panhandle as roads and bridges washed out. Tropical storms can be deadly, too: Tropical Storm Allison and its remnants loitered for days in the Houston area in June 2001, unleashing more than 40 inches of rain that resulted in massive flooding and 23 deaths in Texas alone. (MORE: Further beef up your forecast with our detailed, hour-by-hour breakdown for the next 8 days – only available on our Premium Pro experience.) In focus: Storms that stall or move at a snail's pace near the coastline pile up water and prolong the coastal flooding potential. In addition, large battering waves over a longer period can worsen damage to the coastline, including severe beach erosion. This is because the winds blow onshore for a longer period. Why you should pay attention: The persistence of winds can keep water pinned along the coast and in inlets, bays and rivers, causing damage to homes, businesses, boats and other structures for hours to days. Flooding example: Hurricane Sally (2020) daddled near the northern Gulf Coast producing 5 to 7 feet of storm surge in some communities from Alabama to Florida, including in Pensacola as shown below. The storm's slow motion toward the coast meant that the storm's storm surge lasted more than three days. The reverse can be true, too: Hurricane Sally also emptied Mobile Bay on the backside of the storm's circulation. Water levels dropped in the Bay by up to 7 feet. (MORE: For even more granular weather data tracking in your area, view your 15-minute details forecast in our Premium Pro experience.) In focus: Tropical storms and hurricanes can down trees no matter what speed they move, but when the winds continue for hours and hours, impacts can be enhanced. Why you should pay attention: Prolonged wind events increase the stress on trees and other structures. When combined with hours of heavy rainfall, trees are more likely to fall in soggy soil conditions even at lower wind speeds. Power outages and damage to homes and vehicles become increasingly likely as a storm drags on. MORE ON TROPICAL STORMS AND HURRICANES: What The Cone Of Uncertainty Means, And What It Doesn't Changes Ahead For The 2025 Hurricane Season How A Hurricane Hundreds Of Miles Away Can Change Your Plans Jonathan Belles has been a digital meteorologist for for 9 years and also assists in the production of videos for The Weather Channel en español. His favorite weather is tropical weather, but also enjoys covering high-impact weather and news stories and winter storms. He's a two-time graduate of Florida State University and a proud graduate of St. Petersburg College.
Vox
2 days ago
- Vox
Hurricane season is here. NOAA is in shambles. What could go wrong?
is an environmental correspondent at Vox, covering biodiversity loss and climate change. Before joining Vox, he was a senior energy reporter at Business Insider. Benji previously worked as a wildlife researcher. Hurricane season in the Atlantic has officially begun. And while this year will likely be less extreme than in 2024 — one of the most destructive seasons ever, with the earliest Category 5 hurricane on record — it's still shaping up to be a doozy. Forecasters at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predict 'above-average' activity this season, with six to 10 hurricanes. The season runs from June 1 to November 30. NOAA's 2025 hurricane forecast, by the numbers 60 percent: Chance of an above-normal hurricane season. 6 to 10: Hurricanes expected this season, meaning tropical storms with wind speeds reaching at least 74 mph. 3 to 5: Major hurricanes, or storms with wind speeds reaching 111 mph or higher. 13 to 19: Named storms, referring to tropical systems with wind speeds of at least 39 mph. NOAA says it will update its forecast in early August. At least three of those storms will be category 3 or higher, the forecasters project, meaning they will have gusts reaching at least 111 miles per hour. Other reputable forecasts predict a similarly active 2025 season with around nine hurricanes. Last year, there were 11 Atlantic hurricanes, whereas the average for 1991 to 2020 was just over 7, according to hurricane researchers at Colorado State University. A highly active hurricane season is obviously never a good thing, especially for people living in places like Florida, Louisiana, and, apparently, North Carolina (see: Hurricane Helene, the deadliest inland hurricane on record). Even when government agencies that forecast and respond to severe storms — namely, NOAA and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA — are fully staffed and funded, big hurricanes inflict billions of dollars of damage, and they cost lives. Under the Trump administration, however, these agencies are not well staffed and face steep budget cuts. Hundreds of government employees across these agencies have been fired or left, including those involved in hurricane forecasting. What could go wrong? Why forecasters expect more hurricanes than average this year The primary reason is that Caribbean waters are unusually warm right now, Brian McNoldy, a hurricane expert at the University of Miami, told Vox. Warm water provides fuel for hurricanes, and waters in and around the Caribbean tend to be where hurricanes form early in the season. If this sounds familiar, that's because the Caribbean has been unusually warm for a while now. That was a key reason why the 2024 and 2023 hurricane seasons were so active. Warm ocean water, and its ability to help form and then intensify hurricanes, is one of the clearest signals — and consequences — of climate change. Data indicates that climate change has made current temperatures in parts of the Caribbean and near Florida several (and in some cases 30 to 60) times more likely. The Atlantic has cooled some since hitting extremely high temperatures over the last two summers, yet 'the overall long-term trend is to warm,' said McNoldy, a senior research associate at the Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science. The Caribbean is currently far hotter than average. Courtesy of Brian McNoldy The other key reason why forecasters expect an ample number of hurricanes this year has to do with a complicated climate phenomenon known as the ENSO cycle. ENSO has three phases — El Niño, La Niña, and neutral — that are determined by ocean temperatures and wind patterns. And each phase means something slightly different for hurricane season. Put simply, El Niño tends to suppress hurricanes because it causes an increase in wind shear — the abrupt changes in wind speed and direction. And wind shear can disrupt hurricanes. In La Niña years, meanwhile, there's little wind shear, allowing hurricanes to form, and they're often accompanied by higher sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic. Right now the ENSO phase is, rather unexcitedly, neutral. That means there won't be the high, hurricane-blocking wind shear of El Niño, but the conditions won't be as favorable as they are in La Niña. This all leads to more unpredictability, according to climate scientists. The government says it's prepared. Is it? When publishing the NOAA hurricane forecast last month, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who oversees NOAA, said 'we have never been more prepared for hurricane season.' Climate scientists have challenged that claim. They point out that, under the Trump administration, hundreds of workers at NOAA have been fired or otherwise pushed out, which threatens the accuracy of weather forecasts that can help save lives. FEMA has also lost employees, denied requests for hurricane relief, and is reportedly ending door-to-door canvassing in disaster regions designed to help survivors access government aid. 'Secretary Lutnick's claim is the sort of lie that endangers the lives of people living along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts, and even those further inland unable to escape the extensive reach of associated torrential rains and flooding,' Marc Alessi, an atmospheric scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, an environmental advocacy group, told Vox. 'Notwithstanding the valiant efforts of dedicated career staff, this administration has taken to actively thwarting the vital scientific work at agencies including NOAA that communities rely on to stay safe throughout hurricane season.' According to Alessi, a handful of National Weather Service offices along the Gulf Coast — which is often hit by hurricanes — currently lack lead meteorologists. 'Missing this sort of expertise in the face of a projected above-average hurricane season could lead to a breakdown in proper warning and evacuation in vulnerable communities should a storm strike, potentially leading to more deaths that could have otherwise been avoided,' Alessi said. As my colleague Umair Irfan has reported, the National Weather Service is also launching weather balloons less frequently, due to staffing cuts. Those balloons measure temperature, humidity, and windspeed, providing data that feeds into forecasts. 'They've been short-staffed for a long time, but the recent spate of people retiring or being let go have led some stations now to the point where they do not have enough folks to go out and launch those balloons,' Pamela Knox, an agricultural climatologist at the University of Georgia extension and director of the UGA weather network, told Irfan in May. 'We're becoming more blind because we are not having access to that data anymore. A bigger issue is when you have extreme events, because extreme events have a tendency to happen very quickly. You have to have real-time data.' The White House is also trying to dramatically shrink NOAA's funding, proposing a budget cut of roughly $2 billion. In response to the proposed cuts, five former directors of the National Weather Service signed an open letter that raises alarm about what funding and staffing losses mean for all Americans. 'Our worst nightmare is that weather forecast offices will be so understaffed that there will be needless loss of life,' the former directors wrote in the letter. 'We know that's a nightmare shared by those on the forecasting front lines — and by the people who depend on their efforts.'
