Canada rescinds digital services tax in bid to advance trade talks with US
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump will resume trade negotiations in order to agree on a deal by July 21, 2025, the ministry said.
On Friday, Trump abruptly cut off trade talks with Canada over its tax targeting U.S. technology firms, saying that it was a "blatant attack" and that he would set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week.
The tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year, and payments will be retroactive to 2022.
Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data. (Reporting by Kanjyik Ghosh in Bengaluru; Editing by Christopher Cushing and Michael Perry)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
13 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
US-EU Trade Deal to Reshape Energy and Investment Landscape
A transformative trade agreement between the United States and the European Union is poised to redefine their economic relations. US President Donald Trump announced the deal, which is set to have far-reaching implications on both sides of the Atlantic. The agreement includes the unprecedented opening of trade at zero tariffs, along with a significant commitment from the EU to purchase $750 billion worth of energy over the next decade. Moreover, the EU has pledged to invest an additional $600 billion in various sectors, significantly surpassing previous investment targets. The deal was hailed by the Trump administration as a major victory for the US economy, promising to bolster energy exports and enhance investment flows. While the specifics of the energy sectors involved remain under discussion, the agreement signals a substantial shift in the global energy market. The US, a major producer of natural gas and oil, is expected to benefit from increased exports, particularly in liquefied natural gas and other energy resources. At the heart of the deal is the mutual understanding that both parties will benefit from zero tariffs on industrial goods, which has been a longstanding issue in US-EU trade talks. The tariff reduction is expected to boost economic growth on both sides, especially for sectors such as automotive, technology, and agriculture. For the EU, the opening of the US market is seen as a crucial opportunity to tap into the world's largest economy without facing the heavy tariffs that have traditionally limited market access. ADVERTISEMENT Investment plays a pivotal role in the agreement, with the EU's commitment to direct $600 billion more than previously agreed upon into US infrastructure, technology, and innovation. This will likely lead to a surge in American jobs, particularly in industries poised for growth. It also presents a major opportunity for EU businesses to secure a foothold in the burgeoning US tech sector, which has long been a hotspot for investment. The announcement of the deal was accompanied by optimistic rhetoric from both US and EU officials, who described the agreement as an example of transatlantic cooperation that will not only benefit both economies but also foster stronger geopolitical ties. Experts believe the trade deal could serve as a model for future trade relations, potentially influencing global trade dynamics and setting a precedent for other international agreements. However, the deal has faced criticism from some quarters. Critics argue that the focus on energy purchases and large-scale investments could overshadow critical issues like labour rights, environmental protections, and fair competition. Some environmental groups have voiced concerns about the potential long-term environmental impact of increased energy trade, particularly if it leads to more fossil fuel reliance. These concerns underscore the ongoing debates about the balance between economic growth and sustainability, a tension that continues to shape global trade discussions.
Arabian Post
13 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
Malaysia's Growth Outlook Adjusted Amid Tariff Uncertainty
Malaysia's central bank has revised its economic growth forecast for 2025, citing increased volatility stemming from ongoing global trade tensions, notably those related to US tariffs. The Bank Negara Malaysia reduced its expected GDP growth to a range of 4% to 5%, down from an earlier projection of 5% to 5.5%. The adjustment comes as a response to the shifting dynamics of global trade, which have been exacerbated by the imposition of tariffs by the United States under the administration of President Donald Trump. While Malaysia has been largely insulated from direct tariff measures, the broader implications of the US-China trade war and related tariffs have left a significant mark on its export-driven economy. Malaysia's position as a key player in global supply chains has made it vulnerable to shifts in the global trade environment. The US tariffs, particularly on Chinese goods, have reverberated through Southeast Asia's manufacturing sector, affecting Malaysia's export performance and business sentiment. BNM's decision to cut the forecast reflects the broader concerns surrounding economic stability in the region. The central bank noted that the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, particularly regarding its tariffs on various Chinese products, is likely to persist throughout 2025. Furthermore, the report highlighted the continued risks posed by rising protectionism and trade barriers globally, which have disrupted supply chains and added to market volatility. ADVERTISEMENT In addition to the impact of tariffs, Malaysia's central bank has also pointed to domestic factors influencing growth. These include higher inflationary pressures, mainly due to increased global commodity prices, which have had a knock-on effect on consumer spending. Malaysia's key exports, such as palm oil, rubber, and electronic components, have all seen price fluctuations driven by external factors such as US tariffs and China's economic slowdown. The reduction in growth expectations comes at a time when Malaysia is also grappling with challenges in maintaining fiscal discipline. The government has pledged to reduce its budget deficit but has struggled to meet its revenue targets, further complicating the nation's economic outlook. Malaysia's reliance on exports, especially to major economies like the United States and China, has made it particularly sensitive to trade tensions. These developments have placed additional strain on the country's fiscal policy, forcing the government to reconsider its growth strategies. The central bank's move is likely to have significant implications for Malaysia's monetary policy. With inflation on the rise and external risks mounting, BNM may opt to adopt a more cautious stance in terms of interest rate adjustments. While the central bank has refrained from any immediate changes, economists expect that it will closely monitor both domestic and international developments, particularly as trade tensions show no sign of easing. The challenges facing Malaysia's economy are also compounded by global economic slowdowns, which have affected demand for Malaysian goods and services. As countries like the United States and China grapple with their own internal economic issues, Malaysia's export markets have softened, leading to a reduced demand for its products. In particular, Malaysia's electronics and semiconductor industries, which account for a significant portion of its exports, have faced headwinds as the US-China trade war has diverted global supply chains elsewhere. Despite these challenges, the government remains optimistic about Malaysia's long-term prospects. The country has made significant strides in diversifying its economy over the past few years, with a growing emphasis on technology, innovation, and sustainable development. Malaysia's efforts to strengthen its digital infrastructure and promote industries such as e-commerce and renewable energy are seen as key to sustaining growth, even amid global trade disruptions.
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Exporters increasingly find 'alternative markets' ahead of Aug 1 tariff deadline
With US tariffs climbing – particularly on politically sensitive goods like steel, electric vehicles and pharmaceuticals – some firms have begun rerouting exports to more predictable, lower-tariff markets, though not yet at scale. The question now is how widespread it will become, and at what economic cost. India offers an early example. The Asian subcontinent is facing tariffs of up to 26 per cent – among the steepest imposed on any major economy – on goods coming into the US under President Donald Trump 's Liberation Day levies. India's $32 billion jewellery and gems industry is looking to alternative markets, especially the Middle East. That shift will be on show at Sajex 2025, a jewellery trade fair set for September in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Backed by the Indian government and industry bodies, the event is part of a broader push to establish the Middle East as a long-term market for Indian exports. India, a global leader in diamond processing and jewellery manufacturing, regards Saudi Arabia as a big growth opportunity, especially as trade tensions with the US resurface. The kingdom's jewellery market was estimated at $4.6 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow strongly through 2030. Tariff push For many countries, US tariff increases under the current administration have remained modest so far, typically around 10 per cent, whereas two dozen or so face substantially higher levies. So, the impact of tariffs is concentrated but weighty. For now, many exporters are coping with this by stomaching a squeeze in their margins, negotiating lower prices with suppliers, or taking advantage of weaker domestic currencies, which help to offset some of the added cost. But if tariffs rise permanently to above 10 per cent to15 per cent, it will lead to economics shifting in many industries. At that point, rethinking where and how to export becomes unavoidable. China, which had faced tariffs as high as 145 per cent on some goods entering the US, responded by accelerating shipments ahead of tariff deadlines and redirecting exports to other markets. That redirection has been greatest to those economies with a free trade agreement with China, or where import penetration was below average. The Trump administration announced new levies in April but delayed implementation twice – first to July, then again to August – prompting a rush to beat the clock. Some of those duties have since been eased under a temporary trade truce agreed between Washington and Beijing in London. Another meeting is set to take place soon in Stockholm. Still, Chinese exports to the US fell 10.9 per cent year-on-year in dollar terms during the first half of the year. Over the same period, exports to Asean countries – some of which Washington claims are being used to reroute Chinese goods and bypass tariffs – rose 13 per cent. In June alone, total Chinese exports rose 5.8 per cent in dollar terms, driven in part by firms racing to move goods before tariffs take effect in August. The surge offered a short-term lift to China's economy, which has leaned heavily on exports to compensate for weak domestic demand amid a prolonged property sector downturn. China-EU shift? While concerns persist over a wave of redirected Chinese goods entering Europe and other industrialised markets, there is little clear evidence of such a shift – at least not yet. Much of the excess appears to be heading into emerging economies, where trade oversight tends to be lighter and price remains a bigger factor in purchasing decisions. In China's case, the worry extends beyond volume. Some believe that redirected exports are state-subsidised, fuelling fears in places like the EU that competition is being distorted long before goods cross any borders. Meanwhile, on Sunday, a new trade deal was reached between the US and the EU with a 15 per tariff on most EU goods to the US, including pharmaceuticals, automobiles and semiconductors, averting a transatlantic trade war. Tariffs on metals remain unchanged. For now, changes in global trade flows are limited. One reason is that for heavily regulated or very complex products, like medical devices or automotive parts, redirecting exports tends to require compliance with new safety and certification standards. That can be time consuming and costly. Also, shifting factories across borders does not happen overnight. The semiconductor industry offers a good example. Two years ago, Taiwan's TSMC, one of the world's largest chip makers, said it planned to build a new €10 billion semiconductor plant in Germany. However, the factory is not expected to be up and running until 2027. For exporters, such delays can affect revenue. For importers, higher tariffs usually lead to higher consumer prices. In the US, this is already happening, with inflation rising to 2.7 per cent in June, ahead of forecasts, and core inflation increasing to 2.9 per cent. US retail stalwart Walmart, which imports heavily from China and Mexico, has warned that even a partial rollback of US tariffs leaves them too high to absorb. The last US-China trade war, launched in 2018, saw nearly all tariff costs passed through to American firms and consumers. History seems to be repeating itself. Macroeconomic data points to the broader fallout. A surge in imports, driven by pre-tariff stockpiling, helped drag the US economy into a 0.2 per cent annualised contraction in the first quarter of the year, the first such decline since 2022. General Motors is a case study in tariff exposure. With plants in Mexico, South Korea and Canada, the US car maker absorbed $1.1 billion in tariff costs in the second quarter, wiping out nearly a third of its adjusted profits. For now, many executives I teach at IMD are still in wait-and-see mode. Some companies are now delaying production shifts until 2026. Many cite advice to front-load exports before each tariff deadline. That has tactic worked so far. But with another deadline looming on August 1, the space for temporary fixes is closing. The deeper lesson of this moment is that volatility in trade policy is corrosive. As World Trade Organisation modelling suggests, if global tariffs rise and countries retaliate against the US, trade growth could reverse – falling from a projected 2.7 per cent gain this year to a decline of 0.5 per cent. In a world already navigating inflation, instability and slowing demand, few economies can afford another self-inflicted slowdown.
