
Welfare of armed forces veterans remains priority amid pension dispute
Deputy Defence Minister Adly Zahari said while the case is currently before the courts, the ministry will continue to implement measures to assist both pensionable and non-pensionable veterans.
"At the government level, once a matter has been brought to court, whether it involves the ministry or the government, we will abide by any decision made by the court.
"While the case is still in court, we continue to consider all aspects of the welfare of our defence personnel," he said in Dewan Rakyat, today.
Adly said this included extending cost-of-living aid to non-pensionable veterans, who under current regulations are not entitled to such allowances apart from their savings in the Armed Forces Fund Board (LTAT)
"Although the issue of cost-of-living aid for pensionable personnel is not being deliberated in court, we decided to also extend this aid to non-pensionable personnel.
"Non-pensionable veterans would normally receive nothing apart from their savings in LTAT.
"However, out of goodwill, under the Madani government led by the Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) and the Defence Minister (Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin), we provide them with a monthly cost-of-living allowance of RM500," he said.
He said this in response to Datuk Khlir Mohd Nor (PN-Ketereh) who enquired why the ministry did not discuss the issue of pension adjustments for armed forces veterans who retired before January 2013 in the Malaysian Armed Forces Council (MAT).
Adly said the ministry also provides cost-of-living aid to over 6,000 pensionable veterans, in addition to assistance for non-pensionable personnel.
This includes an extra RM300 monthly for those whose pensions fall below the poverty line of RM1,198, and further support for veterans with disabled family members or school-going dependents.
"Therefore, our cost-of-living assistance is not limited to non-pensionable personnel as pensionable veterans are also taken into account and we know that the most important priority is ensuring the welfare of our veterans and their families.," he said.
In June this year, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal by the government and three others to overturn a High Court ruling that had previously favoured 50 retired armed forces personnel in a pension adjustment dispute.
On Feb 5 last year, the High Court ruled that all military personnel who retired before Jan 1, 2013, are entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after Jan 1, 2013.
The 50 military personnel of various ranks filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated the provisions in Federal Constitution read together with Section 187 of the MAF Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement new pension adjustments for the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1, 2013.
Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla who represented the retired personnel said he would study the court's grounds of judgment before deciding whether to bring the matter up to the Federal Court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
A-GC: Full pardon erased all bars on Anwar, making lawsuit baseless
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's royal pardon in 2018 fully restored his eligibility to serve as a member of parliament and as Prime Minister, the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has affirmed, rejecting claims in a lawsuit that he should have been disqualified. In a statement, the A-GC said the 15th Yang di-Pertuan Agong had granted Anwar a full pardon, reinstating his legal status "as a person who has never committed any offence." This, it added, meant there was no basis for disqualification under Article 48(1)(e) of the Federal Constitution. The clarification follows a suit filed by lawyer and former minister P. Waytha Moorthy, who is seeking to nullify Anwar's election as Tambun MP on Nov 19, 2022, and his appointment as prime minister five days later. Waytha argued that the pardon did not expressly exempt Anwar from the constitutional five-year ban on contesting elections after a prison release. The former cabinet minister, who served under Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad from 2018 to 2020, claimed that without such an exemption, Anwar should have been barred from standing in the 15th General Election. Citing the Court of Appeal's decision in Anwar Ibrahim v Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz [2023] 2 MLJ 545, the A-GC stressed that the King held the constitutional authority to pardon both the conviction and the sentence. "Therefore, there is no question of Datuk Seri Anwar being disqualified as a member of the Dewan Rakyat or as prime minister," it said. The A-GC further said that any challenge to an MP's election must be made through an election petition under Article 118 of the Federal Constitution and within the time frame stipulated in Section 38 of the Election Offences Act 1954.

Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Sept hearing in High Court for Tuan Ibrahim's RM2.3b defamation suit against Rafizi over flood mitigation project
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 — The High Court here will hear the defamation suit filed by former environment and water minister Datuk Seri Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man against former economy minister Datuk Seri Mohd Rafizi Ramli over six days in September, beginning Sept 8. The suit, filed on Nov 17, 2022, relates to statements allegedly defamatory concerning the approval of several projects, including a flood mitigation project, awarded to a company. Lawyer Yusfarizal Yussoff, representing Tuan Ibrahim, said Judge Datuk Aliza Sulaiman has set Sept 8, 9, 10, 11, 29, and 30 for the trial. This was also confirmed by lawyer Nik Zarith Nik Moustpha, representing Mohd Rafizi. Neither of the two former ministers was present at today's proceedings, which were conducted in chambers. In his statement of claim, Tuan Ibrahim alleged that Rafizi made defamatory statements against him at two press conferences at the PKR headquarters in Petaling Jaya, which were streamed live on the defendant's YouTube account, on Jan 7 and 9, 2022. The statements allegedly implied that he was involved in approving a project worth RM2 billion for the Sungai Langat flood mitigation project, as well as a sewage treatment plant and sewerage pipe network projects in Kinta and Petaling Jaya, bringing the total value to more than RM2.3 billion. — Bernama


Daily Express
5 hours ago
- Daily Express
King must follow pardons board's advice, lawyer tells court
Published on: Thursday, August 14, 2025 Published on: Thu, Aug 14, 2025 By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: The Malaysian Bar took its case to the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn a lower court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review against the Federal Territories Pardons Board's decision in Najib Razak's SRC International case. PUTRAJAYA: The Yang di-Pertuan Agong is required to follow the advice of the Federal Territories Pardons Board (FTPB) following a 1994 constitutional amendment, the Court of Appeal heard today. Lawyer Yeo Yang Poh said there could only be one decision in the pardon process after Article 40(1A) was added to the Federal Constitution that year. The provision stipulates that the king 'shall accept and act in accordance with' advice in the exercise of his functions under the constitution or federal law. 'The FTPB now decides for the king, which is in line with a constitutional monarchy. 'The king does not make a second decision,' Yeo said in the Malaysian Bar's appeal to reverse the High Court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review challenging the FTPB's decision in former prime minister Najib Razak's SRC International case. The appeal was heard by Justices Lim Chong Fong, Azhahari Kamal Ramli, and Leonard David Shim. On Feb 2, 2024, the FTPB announced that the former prime minister's prison sentence following his conviction in the SRC case had been reduced from 12 years to six, and his fine from RM210 million to RM50 million. Yeo, who appeared with Zainur Zakaria, Rajpal Singh Ghai, and Ahmad Amir Mahmood, said previously that the personal decision made by the king was held to be non-justiciable. 'After Article 40(1A), the king no longer has personal discretion, without which no prerogative exists,' he added. He said the king now exercised his constitutional power by accepting and implementing the FTPB's decision, and that the constitutional change elevated the monarch above the fray of any perceived political influence or personal preference. 'A decision made by a statutory body such as the FTPB is justiciable,' he said, adding that the Bar's leave application was far from frivolous. Yeo said the courts had consistently taken the position, following the 1985 case of Sim Kie Chon v Superintendent of Pudu Prison & Others, that the decision of a pardons board is not subject to legal challenge, as they were in the UK. In November last year, Justice Ahmad Kamal Shahid held that the king's decision and the FTPB's advice were part and parcel of a single process culminating in the pardon. Consequently, Ahmad Kamal, now a Court of Appeal judge, said that the subject matter of the Bar's proposed judicial review application was not suitable or appropriate to be reviewed by the court. The judge ruled that the prerogative of mercy, under Article 42 of the constitution, involved a direct exercise of the king's personal discretion. The Bar filed its application in the High Court on April 26, 2024, naming the FTPB and Najib as respondents. It sought declarations that the FTPB's Jan 29 decision halving Najib's prison sentence and reducing his fine was illegal, unconstitutional, and invalid. Najib was convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC and has been serving his sentence in Kajang prison since Aug 23, 2022. He filed a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022. Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the FTPB, while Shafee Abdullah represented Najib. The hearing has been adjourned to a date to be fixed after case management on Aug 18. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia