King must follow pardons board's advice, lawyer tells court
Published on: Thu, Aug 14, 2025
By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: The Malaysian Bar took its case to the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn a lower court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review against the Federal Territories Pardons Board's decision in Najib Razak's SRC International case. PUTRAJAYA: The Yang di-Pertuan Agong is required to follow the advice of the Federal Territories Pardons Board (FTPB) following a 1994 constitutional amendment, the Court of Appeal heard today. Lawyer Yeo Yang Poh said there could only be one decision in the pardon process after Article 40(1A) was added to the Federal Constitution that year. The provision stipulates that the king 'shall accept and act in accordance with' advice in the exercise of his functions under the constitution or federal law. 'The FTPB now decides for the king, which is in line with a constitutional monarchy. 'The king does not make a second decision,' Yeo said in the Malaysian Bar's appeal to reverse the High Court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review challenging the FTPB's decision in former prime minister Najib Razak's SRC International case. The appeal was heard by Justices Lim Chong Fong, Azhahari Kamal Ramli, and Leonard David Shim. On Feb 2, 2024, the FTPB announced that the former prime minister's prison sentence following his conviction in the SRC case had been reduced from 12 years to six, and his fine from RM210 million to RM50 million. Yeo, who appeared with Zainur Zakaria, Rajpal Singh Ghai, and Ahmad Amir Mahmood, said previously that the personal decision made by the king was held to be non-justiciable. 'After Article 40(1A), the king no longer has personal discretion, without which no prerogative exists,' he added. He said the king now exercised his constitutional power by accepting and implementing the FTPB's decision, and that the constitutional change elevated the monarch above the fray of any perceived political influence or personal preference. 'A decision made by a statutory body such as the FTPB is justiciable,' he said, adding that the Bar's leave application was far from frivolous. Yeo said the courts had consistently taken the position, following the 1985 case of Sim Kie Chon v Superintendent of Pudu Prison & Others, that the decision of a pardons board is not subject to legal challenge, as they were in the UK. In November last year, Justice Ahmad Kamal Shahid held that the king's decision and the FTPB's advice were part and parcel of a single process culminating in the pardon. Consequently, Ahmad Kamal, now a Court of Appeal judge, said that the subject matter of the Bar's proposed judicial review application was not suitable or appropriate to be reviewed by the court. The judge ruled that the prerogative of mercy, under Article 42 of the constitution, involved a direct exercise of the king's personal discretion. The Bar filed its application in the High Court on April 26, 2024, naming the FTPB and Najib as respondents. It sought declarations that the FTPB's Jan 29 decision halving Najib's prison sentence and reducing his fine was illegal, unconstitutional, and invalid. Najib was convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC and has been serving his sentence in Kajang prison since Aug 23, 2022. He filed a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022. Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the FTPB, while Shafee Abdullah represented Najib. The hearing has been adjourned to a date to be fixed after case management on Aug 18. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Syed Saddiq turns down offer to return as Muda president
KUALA LUMPUR: Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman has declined an offer to return as Muda president following his acquittal of corruption charges. The Muar member of parliament said he needs more time to decide on the position. "I have informed the party's leadership that I need a little bit more time. I want to spend time with my family, focus on my constituency work in Muar, and continue fundraising for local needs. "I've already relayed my decision to the party leadership, and I will leave it at that," Free Malaysia Today quoted as saying. On June 26, Muda's acting president, Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, offered the party's presidency back to Syed Saddiq. Syed Saddiq, who was the Muda president, vacated his post during his corruption trial. He was acquitted of four charges of abetting criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of party funds and money laundering. A three-judge Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the former youth and sports minister's appeal, setting aside his conviction, seven-year prison sentence, RM10 million fine and two strokes of the rotan.
Daily Express
14 hours ago
- Daily Express
Ex-foundation CEO claims ignorance over Najib's Ambank accounts
Published on: Friday, August 15, 2025 Published on: Fri, Aug 15, 2025 By: Faisal Asyraf, FMT Text Size: SRC International Sdn Bhd and its subsidiary, Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd, sued Najib Razak for the recovery of RM42 million allegedly misappropriated from the parent company's accounts. (Bernama pic) Kuala Lumpur: Former Yayasan Rakyat 1Malaysia (YR1M) CEO Ung Su Ling told the High Court here that she only learned from media reports on the SRC International trial that the Ambank accounts which received RM42 million belonged to former prime minister Najib Razak. Ung also claimed she was unaware that the funds had originated from SRC International when she received instructions from the late Azlin Alias, Najib's then principal private secretary, to facilitate the transfer of money from Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd (IPSB). The funds were transferred to two Ambank accounts ending in 880 and 906 in late 2014 and early 2015. Ung admitted to facilitating transfers from IPSB in three tranches – RM27 million, RM5 million and RM10 million – but maintained that she had no further details about the funds. 'At the material time, I was not aware of the source of these funds, nor was I informed of the same by Azlin. I can attest that these funds did not originate from nor belong to YR1M. 'However, based on subsequent media reports and the decision of the SRC case, I understand that these funds, which were transferred to IPSB, originated from SRC,' she said during examination-in-chief. She added that she followed Azlin's instructions to transfer the funds to the specified bank accounts without knowing who owned them. 'However, based on media reports and the Kuala Lumpur High Court's decision in the SRC case, I understand that the accounts ending in 880 and 906, to which the funds were transferred, were Najib's personal bank accounts,' Ung said. She was testifying as the first plaintiff witness in the lawsuit by SRC International Sdn Bhd and its subsidiary, Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd, against Najib to recover RM42 million allegedly misappropriated from the parent company's accounts. Asked about the relationship between YR1M and IPSB, Ung said that YR1M provided financial support through grants and funding to IPSB for community programmes aligned with the principles of the 1Malaysia initiative. During cross-examination by defence counsel Farhan Shafee, Ung said she never felt the need to find out more details about the funds. Farhan: Before giving any instructions (for the fund transfer), would you think it necessary to ask if there were any proposals regarding these funds? Ung: No. Farhan: In your mind, why not? Ung: It's not my place to enquire. In August 2022, Najib was convicted of seven charges involving abuse of power, money laundering and criminal breach of trust related to SRC International funds. His original sentence of 12 years' jail and a RM210 million fine was later reduced to six years and RM50 million following a royal pardon. The hearing before Justice Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan continues. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Focus Malaysia
16 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Is Waytha Moorthy's civil suit to disqualify PMX's premiership a sheer publicity stunt?
WHEN starved of the oxygen of publicity, one tactic is to create some legal drama to capture the public's attention. The higher the defendant's profile, the better. Could this be the thinking behind the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF)/Malaysian Advancement Party founder P. Waytha Moorthy's civil suit that seeks to disqualify the premiership of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim? This is on grounds that the royal pardon granted to the PKR president in 2018 did not state that he was exempt from the five-year disqualification period for contesting an election after being released from prison. For context, the former minister in Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's cabinet from 2018 to 2020 has wanted the High Court to declare PMX's election as Tambun MP on Nov 19, 2022 and his appointment as Prime Minister five days later null and void. On X, governance advocate ksampoh@MyOwn Inc (@Ksampoh) gave a detailed explanation as to why Waytha's suit was doomed to fail, citing similar suits against disgraced former premiers Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Tun Dr Mahathir which were previously thrown out by the court. Claiming that it was all just 'political theatre', the self-described true patriot confidently predicts that the suit will not succeed as 'the Federal Constitution, statutory time limits and past court decisions all make it clear that your case won't survive the first procedural hurdle'. Dear Waytha Moorthy, This lawsuit to 'disqualify' Anwar as Tambun Wakil Rakyat & Prime Minister is legally dead on arrival -& I say that based on the Constitution, the law, & precedent, not politics. 1- The Constitution doesn't back it Articles 48 & 50 of the Federal… — ksampoh@MyOwn Inc (@ksampoh) August 12, 2025 Commenters on the post were no less scathing with a few seeing right though the charade. One contended that the rakyat are tired of all the smokescreen acts 'by the same line-up of lawyers' that are mere diversionary tactics. It was a calculated move to ride on the momentum of the Turun Anwar rally, claimed one commenter. Knowing full well that the suit is not valid, it was argued that the former unity minister during Dr Mahathir's second premiership stint was merely trying 'to score some points in the court of public opinion'. As a person with a legal background, one commentator accused Waytha of manipulating the judicial system to spin conspiracy theories by claiming that the 'Madani (administration) controls the judiciary'. He would not be surprised if many citizens would believe Waytha. A few condemned this being a waste of court time and resources. One commenter suggested that the suit be dismissed and the 59-year-old politician be left to shoulder all the cost of this frivolous action. It was also claimed this was a part of a concerted attack on PMX by opposition groups to weaken his grip on power. One commenter highlighted that this suit was only filed AFTER the lawyer had met with Bersatu representatives, an insinuation that this was calculated political manoeuvring. More pertinently, the timing of the suit was questioned. Why not when PMX won in the Port Dickson by-election in 2018? Such gaps in reasoning caused one commenter to denounce 'this HINDRAF man is just good for nothing'. Such spurious and superfluous suits to create mere political theatre are an abuse of the legal process. As pointed out by one commenter, Malaysians are 'tired' of the constant wayang kulit (theatrics) in the jostle for power and influence. One commenter simply urged such individuals to stop wasting the rakyat's time. – Aug 15, 2025
