Tom's Guide Awards 2025: Our favorite gaming accessories, consoles, controllers and more
From massive curved gaming monitors, to magnetic-powered keyboards and comfortable gaming headsets that let you hear every footstep, there are also plenty of great accessories to elevate your gaming experience across any platform.
Our team of experts has tested and reviewed the latest consoles, handhelds and gaming accessories for the Tom's Guide Awards 2025. Below, we highlight the gaming devices and accessories that kept our play sessions going over the last 12 months and have made even the best games more fun to play.
There are really only two candidates at the table when it comes to selecting the best console you can buy in 2025: the PS5 and the Nintendo Switch 2. While the latter is a fantastic hybrid and may well be a recipient of this award in the future, its launch library is too trim at present to take the win, and so Sony's flagship console, especially its improved PS5 Slim variant, holds its crown for another year.
Almost five years into its lifecycle, and with two refreshed models on the market (PS5 Slim and PS5 Pro), this console is finally hitting its stride after a slow start to the generation. The Slim reduces the mammoth size of the chunky launch model, and it currently delivers the all-around console experience. While the Pro is a great pick for performance obsessives.
The best PS5 games now include some truly phenomenal titles, including must-play exclusives like Marvel's Spider-Man 2 and Astro Bot. And we can't forget just how impressive the speedy SSD continues to be. It's relegated lengthy loading screens to a thing of the past. The DualSense is also the best console controller on the market, with its unique features like haptic feedback and adaptive triggers still novel. The PS5 Slim also offers great value at $499 (often bundled with a game), and it drops even lower during major sales events.
The Lenovo Legion Go S is the handheld we've been dreaming of. It combines the impressive specs of the ROG Ally X with the smooth experience of SteamOS. Unless another SteamOS device with an AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme chip somehow shows up this year, the Lenovo Legion Go S with SteamOS is easily the best handheld gaming console of 2025.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
This device is a huge step forward for gaming handhelds, but it's also fantastic all on its own. If you've thought about getting a handheld, this is definitely the one to grab. Of course, if you're happy with your current Steam Deck or find SteamOS a bit limiting, the Windows 11 version of this handheld might be more up your alley. While you can't go wrong with any version of the Legion Go S, the SteamOS version is the best one for most people.
The Meta Quest 3S offers a premium VR experience at an affordable price, featuring excellent AR capabilities and access to hundreds of Quest 3 games and apps. It's one of the best VR headset thanks to its Snapdragon XR2 Gen2 processor and 8GB of RAM, which ensures smooth performance with a variable 90-120Hz refresh rate that's comparable to the Quest 3.
That said, it differs from the Quest 3 by using Quest 2's fresnel lenses, which results in a smaller field of view, lower resolution, and bulkier design. Despite these differences, the Quest 3S is a fantastic, low-cost alternative to the Quest 3 that's great for VR newcomers looking for an affordable entry-level device, unlike the costly Apple Vision Pro.
The Alienware 34 QD-OLED maintains the excellent features of its predecessor while introducing significant improvements. The new flat stand conserves desk space, and the elegant "interstellar indigo" chassis ensures it looks fitting in both a gaming setup and a professional office environment.
The display retains its impressive 1800R curved panel and ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio, offering a deeply immersive gaming experience. Performance-wise, it boasts a fast 240Hz refresh rate and a low 0.03ms response time. These specs, coupled with its sharp 1440p resolution and vivid colors, deliver a visually stunning and incredibly smooth gaming experience with virtually no input lag.
So, Lemokey finally showed up for the party. And by that we mean in 2025 it finally made a gaming keyboard worthy of mixing it with the big boys and that board is the Lemokey L5 HE — the best gaming keyboard from 2025.
Lemokey is a sub-brand of Keychron, which makes some of the best mechanical keyboards for productivity. But Lemokeys have usually just been rebranded Keychrons with gaming-focused keycaps and some 'gamer' branding.
The L5 HE changed all that: Hall Effect switches, 8K polling, tons of gaming features, as much modding potential as you could possibly need, and beautiful build quality. It's fully customizable with the epic Lemokey Launcher software, where you can adjust actuation, key binds and advanced features like Rapid Trigger and Last Key Prioritization (A.K.A 'Snap Tap'). The L5 HE is also an 8,000Hz polling board, making it suitable for elite-tier gaming and challenging boards like the Wooting 80HE. Lemokey might be late to the party, but better late than never.
With AAA titles finally running smoothly on macOS machines, the Corsair M75 is the most capable gaming mouse for Apple today. Sporting a minimalist design that makes it look almost as elegant as a Mac, the M75 comes in a beautiful Glacier Blue colorway.
But if that isn't enough to win you over, we love this mouse's 26,000 DPI and 1,000Hz polling rate, making it a stellar performer in Cyberpunk, Lies of P and others. Its optical switches are extremely responsive and comfortable to use for long periods of time. It's the easiest mouse to customize, and we don't mean that just in terms of its software. The side buttons can be replaced with different textured ones as they're magnetic, making modding the M75 a walk in the park.
The SteelSeries Arctis Nova 3 received a wireless update this year, and as soon as we tested it, we knew it would be hard to beat. That's thanks to its extremely comfortable design and fit, plush and spacious earcups, and elastic headband that lends the headset a lightweight feel.
It also excels in the sound department. 40mm Neodymium drivers and 200 game-tailored presets ensure you hear every single sound, regardless of the title you're playing. It creates immersive soundscapes thanks to directional and spatial audio. In fact, we love it so much that when we stopped using the headset, real life started sounding boring.
Its multi-platform compatibility is the cherry on top, as is its loud and clear mic that ensures everyone can hear you exclaim with joy when you take down an enemy or mumble under your breath in frustration when you fail to lockpick.
The DXRacer Martian immediately stands out from other gaming chairs we've reviewed in the past. For starters, it has a firmer seat, less aggressive curves and only comes in a very sleek all-black design. When it comes to customization, the only real choice you need to make is whether you want the chair with a leatherette or fabric finish. While the DXRacer Martian may seem simple at first glance, it's packed with innovative tech we've yet to see on any other gaming or even office chair for that matter.
What gives the Martian an almost out-of-this-world feel though is that DXRacer has equipped this gaming chair with a 5,000 mAh battery. For what purpose you may be wondering? Well, the Martian has an electric adjustable backrest.
With the push of a button, you can instantly change its recline angle from 90° to 135°. That's not all though as the Martian also comes with built-in airbags which can inflate or deflate depending on how much lumbar support you need. They're powered by that same internal battery and when combined, the Martian's airbags and electric backrest really make it feel like you're sitting in your car instead of at your desk.
Xbox Cloud Gaming may be the talk of the town (I'm still left having an existential crisis about whether I am, indeed, an Xbox after that ad campaign). But really, Nvidia GeForce Now is the clear leader in game streaming for three key reasons.
First, Nvidia has optimized the service to a point that you won't feel any latency from your controls to what's on-screen, while the visuals are crispy without any of that glitching you get with bandwidth, and the demand on network connection is relatively minor at 35 Mbps.
Second, the ways you can play are ever-expanding — most recently breathing new life into my Steam Deck, alongside apps being available on Mac, Meta Quest and even TVs. Having this service wherever you are is significant given how good the games look running on a remote gaming PC!
And finally, it comes down to the games you can play. Beyond being able to play Game Pass games through streaming, you can connect other game libraries like Steam and play the titles you own too.
There is one condition that Nvidia GeForce Now has to support the game. But given the service supports over 2,000 games, I highly doubt you'll ever run into a problem!
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Handheld Showdown: Steam Deck, Switch 2, ROG Ally — which console gets your vote?
The best handheld gaming consoles took off in a big way after the Steam Deck launched in 2022. Now, major companies like Asus, Lenovo and MSI are fighting to overthrow Valve's popular device. This is the best time for handheld gaming, and it should get better in the coming years. Given the popularity of handheld gaming videos on Tom's Guide's YouTube channel, we're launching a new limited series called Handheld Showdown. In Handheld Showdown, my colleague Paul Antill and I compare handheld devices and let you pick which ones move forward in the bracket. Matches include the Lenovo Legion Go S versus the Asus ROG Ally, the original Steam Deck versus the Steam Deck OLED, and more! Make sure to watch the first episode embedded above and vote for which console moves on! Here are the match-ups you can expect to see and vote on in the coming weeks. Handheld Showdown's bracket of eight was determined by our audience's ranks and input from our gaming experts. Now, we need your help to decide which four will move on to the semi-final round. That will lead us to the final two devices, and of course, the grand champion. Here are the matches, so please vote for the gaming handheld you think should win in each match-up: This is arguably the strangest match-up we have, given how these machines serve different audiences. That said, they are both handhelds, and their differences make them ideal for specific people. Do you want a robust gaming library or are you more interested in playing Nintendo games? Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Steam Deck OLED might seem like the easy winner here since it has a fancier panel, but the original Steam Deck shouldn't be overlooked since it still provides great value. Choosing between Steam Decks isn't as easy as it looks! The Lenovo Legion Go S is the first non-Valve gaming handheld with SteamOS, which certainly gives it a distinct advantage over other devices. However, the original Asus ROG Ally, with its ability to play almost all Windows 11 games, is still a fan-favorite. The Lenovo Legion Go is the most unique Windows handheld in this contest due to its large size and removable controllers. That said, the MSI Claw 8 AI+ and its Intel Core Ultra 7 CPU offer better performance than its aging AMD-powered rival. So those are the match-ups we'll have for Handheld Showdown! After you've voted, make sure to share this story with the folks in your gaming circles so that the best picks move on. Also, come back next week to vote on the semi-finals round! Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Disney+ Curse: How the Streaming Service Hurt Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar Brands
Marvel and Star Wars shows have seen declining streams while MCU and Pixar movies are feeling the box office hurt It was meant to be a cozy, celebratory get-together, with journalists gathering at Marvel Studios' office in the Frank G. Wells building at Disney's Burbank headquarters. At the event, held in early July, Kevin Feige, producer and president of Marvel Studios, was supposed to prime the pump for Marvel's next big bet: 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' But Feige wound up talking about something that his superheroes avoid at all costs: failure. More from TheWrap The Disney+ Curse: How the Streaming Service Hurt Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar Brands 'Big Brother' Season 27 Reaches Nearly 26 Million Viewers Across CBS, Paramount+ For Akiva Schaffer and His New 'Naked Gun,' Resurrecting the Theatrical Comedy Is No Joke 'Alien: Earth' and 'Wednesday' Top Most-Anticipated TV Shows of August 2025 | Charts The producer explained that the period after 2019's 'Avengers: Endgame,' which capped off a period of the movies known as the Infinity Saga and wound up being one of the most successful movies of all time, was about experimentation. But the demands of Disney+, Disney's direct-to-consumer streaming platform that launched in November 2019, was also about expansion. Feige specifically pointed to 'The Marvels,' the sequel to 2019's $1 billion-grossing 'Captain Marvel,' which brought in $206 million globally, as the movie that was 'hit hardest' by the new emphasis on Disney+ and the inclusion of characters from Marvel shows. 'People are like, 'OK, I recognize her from a billion-dollar movie. But who are those other two? I guess they were in some TV show. I'll skip it,'' Feige said of the story that paired Brie Larson with Marvel TV stars Teyonah Parris and Iman Vellani. Later, Feige got more blunt: 'The expansion is what devalued [the Marvel brand]. It was just too much. It was a big company push. And it doesn't take too much to push us to go. There was a mandate that we were put in the middle of.' Feige's admission that Disney+ — with its countless streaming series, animated shows and 'special presentations' — had actively damaged the Marvel Studios brand is startling but also unsurprising. Nearly every one of Disney's core brands – in addition to Marvel Studios, Pixar and Lucasfilm – have been diminished by the company's direct-to-consumer streaming platform and that platform's insatiable thirst for fresh content. Over the last five years, Marvel and Star Wars Disney+ shows — with some exceptions — have seen declining streaming minutes as each subsequent series debuts, with Star Wars peaking with the second season of 'The Mandalorian' in 2021 through 'Skeleton Crew' in 2024, which failed to even make the weekly top 10 for Nielsen. There were ripple effects at the box office, with Marvel's 'Captain America: Brave New World,' which brought in $415 million globally, and 'Thunderbolts,' which did $382 million, both disappointments compared to previous franchises and when factoring in their respective budgets (both cost around $200 million to produce). And just this past weekend, 'The Fantastic Four' dropped a huge 66% from its $118 million opening weekend, dashing hopes that this film would get Marvel back on track at the box office. On the Pixar front, 'Elio' has been a catastrophe, bringing in $138.6 so far at the global box office, making it the worst performing Pixar film in history, ranking below even 'Onward,' a movie that opened right before the pandemic lockdown began. It's impossible to compare what those box office results might have been in the absence of Disney+, or how other factors like audiences getting accustomed to staying home during the pandemic may have impacted the desire to go to theaters to see these movies. But overall, TheWrap spoke to half a dozen executives and experts who agreed that the imperative to drive content to Disney's streaming service hurt the company's most cherished brands. 'Given the quality of the Marvel Disney+ output has been incredibly mediocre, it's dragged the entire brand down and diluted its creative,' said a producer with franchise experience. 'People don't care now.' That these once-beloved properties are landing with a meh for audiences now suggests that there is a potential long-term cost to the strategy of driving a fire-hose of content to retain Disney+ subscribers. It's one of the key lessons that the media companies have learned from the decision to follow Netflix into streaming, with these brands particularly noteworthy casualties. As Disney+'s shows have landed with subsequently less and less buzz, subscribers are starting to see the service as less of a must have. In the first quarter, Disney+ lost 700,000 subscribers, the first time it saw a decline, although it was partly attributed to price hikes (Disney reports its second-quarter results this week, so we'll see if that's a one-off or start of a trend). Disney's brand has also taken a hit. According to Brand Finance, which tracks the brand value of top global companies, the value of the Disney name fell 5.6% to $46.72 billion from a year earlier. A Disney spokesman declined to comment for the story. Iger's legacy In 2019, when CEO Bob Iger was both on the precipice of launching Disney+ and planning to retire, he positioned the new streaming platform as a key part his legacy — the thing that would carry the company through its next era and reposition the company not only as an entertainment juggernaut but also a tech giant. 'The decision to disrupt businesses that are fundamentally working but whose future is in question – intentionally taking on short-term losses in the hopes of generating long-term growth – requires no small amount of courage,' Iger wrote in his book, 'The Ride of a Lifetime.' The service launched on November 12, 2019, with a ton of Disney catalogue titles and a handful of new ones. The new shows and movies all had ties to legacy Disney hits, including 'Lady and the Tramp' and 'Toy Story.' But the headliner was 'The Mandalorian,' the first-ever live-action 'Star Wars' series. Every lever was pulled to help support the launch of this new initiative. There were activations in the Disney Parks, an elaborate press junket where journalists bopped from room to room interviewing talent from shows debuting with the service and countless articles written about the platform. At the time of launch, The New York Times said that Disney+ 'is the industry's equivalent of Thor's slamming down his magic hammer: a quake that changes everything.' And while the service started strong, it really took off during lockdown when the COVID-19 pandemic turned the entire industry upside down. Disney+ served as a lifeline for the entire company, which had its theme parks closed and cruise ships grounded. A year after the launch, Disney announced that it had over 94.9 million subscribers. It beat its four-year goal in just 14 months. As an economic engine, Disney+ did what it was supposed to do. But creatively, it would sap the company's brands of their singular oomph. A galaxy far, far away 'The Mandalorian' kicked off Disney+ and it was an undeniable hit. People went crazy for Jon Favreau's lone gunslinger and, in particular, his diminutive sidekick, who people quickly referred to as Baby Yoda. It arrived a month before the ninth film in the 'Star Wars' film saga, 'Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,' hit theaters. In its first week, it racked up 791 million minutes watched, according to Nielsen. That early success opened the floodgates for multiple 'Star Wars'-centered projects a year. 'When you went to a Star Wars movie, it used to be special,' said a marketing exec from a rival studio. 'But there's a difference between let's have a movie every four years versus let's have three shows on the air all the time and have a movie every year.' A year after the premiere of 'The Mandalorian,' during the Investors Day event, the company unveiled a host of 'Star Wars'-related content coming to Disney+ — much of which, 10 years later, has yet to materialize. But at that point, Disney was in a groove. 'The Mandalorian' had just returned two months before the event, and the first week of Season 2 saw 1 billion minutes watched. The show averaged more than a billion minutes watched every week through the rest of the year and peaked in the week of its season finale at 1.34 billion minutes. Then came the first red flag. 'The Book of Boba Fett' debuted a year after that. At first glance, the show's premise of fleshing out a fan-favorite character seemed like a sure-fire hit. But its uneven story and mixed pacing turned off viewers, and despite the re-emergence of the Mandalorian and Baby Yoda towards the end, it wrangled 885 million minutes watched in its final week — a good number, but nowhere near the heights of 'The Mandalorian.' Subsequent series like 'Obi-Wan Kenobi' would start off strong (1.02 billion minutes in the first week) before tapering off (860 million in the final week). 'Obi-Wan' would kick off a trend that the two other Star Wars shows would follow: views that would fall week to week, suggesting flagging interest. 'Ahsoka' started with 829 million views in its first week, with views falling by 31 percent by the finale. Likewise, 'The Acolyte' similarly lost nearly a third of its viewership over the span of its 10-week run. Despite setting itself up for another season, it was quickly canceled. 'Ahsoka' will be back for a second season, at least. 'Skeleton Crew,' a 'Goonies'-like take on Star Wars featuring a young cast getting into hijinks with space pirates that debuted at the end of 2024, never even made the top 10, so there isn't data available from Nielsen. Finally, there's 'Andor,' the rare critical hit that proved to be the exception to the Disney+ curse. It ended the first season with 674 million minutes streamed in the final week having steadily built up its audience. By the end of its second season, the number leaped to 931 million minutes streamed as critics and audiences alike heaped praise upon its mature themes. What's important to keep in mind, is that throughout this whole period when Lucasfilm emphasized 'Star Wars' series on Disney+, not a single 'Star Wars' movie was released theatrically. At its height, following the acquisition of Lucasfilm by Disney and the successful relaunch of the franchise with 2015's 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens,' Disney was releasing a new 'Star Wars' movie every year. 'The biggest problem with Disney+ is not the quality of the material,' said Dan Zehr, the host of the Coffee with Kenobi podcast and an author who has written books for Lucasfilm. 'It's that less is more. The less Star Wars we have, the more it builds the anticipation.' Next year, we'll finally get a new 'Star Wars' movie and instead of an original story or a continuation of the saga installments, it will be an expansion of 'The Mandalorian' – a big-screen movie directed by creator Jon Favreau called 'The Mandalorian and Grogu.' In 2027, 'Star Wars: Starfighter,' directed by Shawn Levy and starring Ryan Gosling, will arrive in theaters. But besides a second season of 'Ahsoka,' there are currently no new live-action 'Star Wars' series that have been announced. After years of being bombarded with 'Star Wars' series on Disney+, to diminishing returns, the franchise is returning to the big screen. Will 'Star Wars' be special again? Or, as Zehr put it, 'To me, Star Wars is a dining experience, it's not fast food. When you make it like fast food, it suffers.' Trouble in the MCU The first year that Marvel Studios started producing series for Disney+ there were four big budget live-action series ('WandaVision,' 'The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,' 'Loki' and 'Hawkeye'). In 2022, there were three ('Moon Knight,' 'Ms. Marvel' and 'She-Hulk: Attorney at Law') with two in 2023 (the second season of 'Loki' and 'Secret Invasion'). There were two shows in 2024 ('Echo' and 'Agatha All Along') and there have been two so far this year ('Daredevil: Born Again' and 'Ironheart'), with a third on the way later this year ('Wonder Man'). 'I do think that it has eroded the branding,' said Dave Gonzales, the co-author of the indispensable history of Marvel Studios, 'MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios.' 'All of the sub-brands have been eroded.' For Marvel, he said, it's particularly interesting because it followed a period of being at the top of the industry. 'They were finally getting to do what they wanted to do – put everything in development.' Feige acknowledged this at the press event, saying that they suddenly had access to big stars who wanted to do more esoteric projects with the studio, citing Oscar Isaac wanting to do 'Moon Knight' as a reason to greenlight it. Other projects, like 'Hawkeye,' started off as features before being reconfigured, just as 'Obi-Wan Kenobi' had been, into a limited streaming series. There were also specials (dubbed 'Special Presentations') like 'Werewolf by Night' and 'The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special.' Before the Disney+ era began, Feige promised that the entire thing would be connected – series would lead into movies and then back to series, in a giant, interconnected loop. But they ran into problems almost immediately, with the global pandemic impacting productions and even the rollout of series (for instance, 'WandaVision' was originally meant to come out after 'Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness' and then had to be reconfigured to tee up that sequel, which also starred Elisabeth Olsen). 'Marvel remade how they made franchise movies but they thought they could do the same thing with television – you can't,' said Gonzales. 'They think they're more nimble than they actually are.' With 'WandaVision,' Gonzales said, they moved the movie pipeline to a television pipeline and ended up with shows that cost hundreds of millions of dollars. 'We'll never have TV shows that cost that much again,' he added. And while there have been a handful of hit Marvel Studios series on Disney+, most notably 'WandaVision,' which on its most watched week pulled down an impressive 924 million minutes streamed, per Nielsen, its spinoff 'Agatha All Along,' which racked up 744 million minutes in its final week, plus 'Loki,' with two episodes from its first season topping 1 billion minutes streamed, the majority of them failed to make waves. 'Ironheart,' the latest MCU show featuring a tech-savvy armored heroine based in Chicago, garnered just 563 million minutes streamed in its final week in July. The chilling effect of these shows have extended to the films, with 'Captain America: Brave New World' ($415 million) and 'Thunderbolts' ($380 million) both underperforming at the box office. Notably, 'Deadpool & Wolverine' ($1.3 billion) and 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' ($118 million opening weekend) have performed well because they're so detached from the rest of the MCU and Disney+ shows, but even 'Fantastic Four' is showing cracks with its drastic dropoff at the box office in its second weekend. Feige said that the studio felt the residual effects of people thinking, 'I had to have seen these other shows to understand who this is.' But when looking at what happened to Pixar, the Avengers should consider themselves lucky. Pixar's problems Back in 2019, Disney corporate leaned on Pixar to supply new material for the streaming service, which is difficult when the pipelines for Pixar's features and shorts are so rigidly solidified. At first, the contributions were minor, such as the micro-length Toy Story spin-off 'Forky Asks a Question,' with total running time coming in at around 30 minutes per series. Disney+'s demands for content got more ambitious. The company, under CEO Bob Chapek (who was subsequently replaced by a returning Iger), sent three Pixar original films (2020's 'Soul,' 2021's 'Luca' and 2022's 'Turning Red') directly to Disney+. There was the sensation that families were concerned about going to movie theaters, so Disney delivered new Pixar movies directly into their homes. But when 'Lightyear,' an expansion of the 'Toy Story' franchise but ostensibly a new IP, was released in the summer of 2022, it underperformed, making just $226.4 million globally. 'Elemental,' another Pixar original released the following summer, underperformed initially before making nearly $500 million worldwide through strong word of mouth. And while last year's 'Inside Out 2' was a phenomenon, making $1.69 billion worldwide, this summer's 'Elio' has struggled, making just $139 million worldwide and becoming the first Pixar movie not to break $100 million domestically. ('Onward,' released a few days before the pandemic in 2020, didn't meet that mark but if it had stayed in theaters, it would have.) In 2023, the New York Times proclaimed that 'Pixar is damaged as a big-screen brand.' Elsewhere in the same article, the report noted that 'as some box office analysts speculated, Disney had weakened the Pixar brand by using its films to build the Disney+ streaming service.' 'When you had an original Pixar movie, it was like, It's going to be huge,' said the marketing exec at a rival studio. 'The brand is so devalued because they put those movies on Disney+, not every Pixar movie is a theatrical event.' Like Marvel Studios and Lucasfilm, Disney has pumped the brakes on Disney+-specific Pixar material. Last year saw the release of 'Dream Productions,' a three-episode spinoff of 'Inside Out 2' focused on the studio that produces Riley's dreams. It was followed by 'Win or Lose,' which streamed on Disney+ earlier this year. It's one of the best things that the studio has ever made — eight half-hour episodes about a softball team, with each installment told from a different player's point-of-view (or their coach or their parent…) The show fared OK — Nielsen said that it earned 6.2 million viewers in the U.S. over the first 35 days – but making a direct-to-streaming show disrupted Pixar's pipeline, pulling resources away from features and costing as much as one of those bigger projects. A long-form streaming series that was meant to follow 'Win or Lose' was quietly canceled and may get reworked into a feature at Pixar. And there hasn't been anything announced, long or short, on the Pixar side of things. The damage has been done. The survivors Not every Disney brand has taken a huge hit. Disney's live-action slate has been largely unaffected, thanks to a combination of approaches. The service used to have a robust line-up of original movies, from a live-action Lady and the Tramp' to 'Hocus Pocus 2.' Some even drifted off the 21st Century Fox assets like 'Home Sweet Home Alone.' But none of these films encroached on any of its brands. If there had been a new live-action adaptation of a beloved Disney animated movie appearing regularly on Disney+, it might have bitten into that business. But they knew, from the beginning, that less was more. And after a while, Disney decided to simply remove most of the movies from Disney+ entirely – you can't find 'The One and Only Ivan,' co-starring and produced by Angelina Jolie or sci-fi adventure 'Crater' or the charming 'Timmy Failure: Mistakes Were Made' on the platform. These were big-deal titles that Disney touted as being key to their service. They also decided to move some of these projects to theatrical. A 'Moana' series was reconfigured as 'Moana 2,' which was released theatrically last year and made over $1 billion. This summer's live-action 'Lilo & Stitch' was originally planned as a Disney+ original but debuted in theaters and has become the only western movie to make more than $1 billion this year. Walt Disney Animation Studios actually benefited from Disney+. After 'Encanto,' the first post-pandemic Disney animated movie to get a full theatrical release, saw a successful run after debuting on Thanksgiving 2021, Disney decided to throw the movie on Disney+ for Christmas. That's where it became the most-watched film of 2022 with 27.4 billion minutes viewed. Soon after, Disney started referring to it as the company's 'newest franchise.' It inspired a live show at the Hollywood Bowl, entertainment offerings at the Disney Parks and a full-on attraction that is being built at Disney's Animal Kingdom. What's next Walt Disney Studios used to think of projects as 'brand deposits' or 'brand withdrawals.' 'Brand deposits' added to the value of the company's brand, either monetarily or through prestige. These were the projects that embodied Disney – either in their wholesomeness, their entertainment value or their desire to push things forward, technologically or storytelling-wise. 'Brand withdrawals' were projects that actively took away from the Disney brand, either because they didn't fit tonally or didn't deliver on the Disney promise. The brand withdrawal of Disney+ is huge. The company seems to be taking the right steps to course correct – chiefly, to not put out as much product on the streaming service and to re-emphasize the importance of theatrical exhibition. There are far fewer new things on the service. So far this year, there has been a single Disney+ original film and far fewer Lucasfilm and Marvel Studios projects. These numbers will get even smaller, as the streaming service puts its weight behind a handful of projects that hopefully more will enjoy. And just as 'Encanto' found new life on Disney+, the company, if it is smart, will emphasize the platform as a library of all things Disney. This is partially how the product was sold back in 2019. In a way, this might be the easiest way of rehabilitating the company's brands – by reminding people of how good things used to be. Umberto Gonzalez contributed to this story. The post The Disney+ Curse: How the Streaming Service Hurt Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar Brands appeared first on TheWrap.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Sony WF-C710N Blend Retro Looks With Rich Audio
Sony announced its new budget noise-canceling wireless earbuds, the Sony WF-C710N, in India last month. At $120 / INR 8,990, they aim to pair signature Sony audio with high-end ANC performance on a budget. But the most unforgettable part about them is their design. The new Sony budget earbuds are available to purchase now, and here are five things you need to know about them. 1. Translucent Design Distinction The Sony WF-C710N come in White, Pink, Glass Blue, and Black color options, and the Blue variant features a distinctive translucent design. It reminds me of the old iMacs, where you get an inside look in a colorful body. It is a fun and stylish design, which is carried over to the elongated case. You get several different-sized eartips inside the box, and they fit better than their predecessors. The small earbuds offer a secure fit and are rated IPX4 for water resistance, so they'll survive your sweat and the odd splash of water. 2. Vast Controls With An Odd Choice The Sony WF-C710N feature tap controls and offer a variety of choices. By default, the right earbud controls playback, while the left one is set to control noise cancellation. A single tap on the latter toggles noise cancellation and Ambient Sound, whereas a long press turns on Quick Attention mode for when you want to quickly converse with someone. On the right, a single tap can play/pause audio, a double tap skips to the next track, and a triple tap goes back to the previous track. A long press activates your voice assistant. You can also control volume with four taps on each earbud (down on the left, up on the right). That's a diverse set of controls for a pair of earbuds that can only register taps. You also get the option to adjust controls by group, but you can't customize each gesture and tap. So, the options are limited to noise cancellation modes, playback controls and nothing. 3. How Do the Sony WF-C710N Sound? The Sony WF-C710N support AAC and SBC codecs, which are enough for most people. You don't get higher-resolution LDAC or aptX codecs on these, but these Sony earbuds offer an enjoyable audio experience. They are tuned to provide deep and powerful bass, while the treble can get too sharp at times. You can expect good stereo separation, so tracks with multiple instruments sound clear and immersive. Plus, you can tweak the sound quality using a variety of EQ presets or make your own custom EQ setting within the app. 4. About Noise Cancellation and Call Quality The Sony WF-C710N sport new Dual Noise Sensor filters to enhance ANC performance (and it's much better than the WF-C700N). They won't give you WF-1000XM5-level noise cancellation, but they get close. Ambient public chatter on the streets and cafe noise is reduced very well, while airplane engine noise is muffled to a good degree, too. These Sony earbuds also offer clear call quality, thanks to the Precise Voice Pickup Technology and a wind noise reduction structure around the mic. 5. Good Battery Life The Sony WF-C710N will last you around 7-9 hours with a mix of ANC on and off. Add the case to the mix, and you're looking at up to 30 hours with ANC on and 40 hours with it turned off, which is solid battery life on a single charge. The Sony WF-C710N feature a distinctive translucent look, good sound and ANC performance, and last long on a single charge. Bring the Sony features like long press and vast controls into the equation, and you're looking at a pleasing experience. You can purchase the Sony WF-C710N for $88 or INR 8,990 from major retailers and the company's website.
