Do you have faith in the commission of inquiry to investigate Mkhwanazi's allegations?
On Sunday, Ramaphosa announced he was placing Mchunu on special leave while the commission of inquiry, chaired by acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, investigated the alleged political interference in police operations.
Opposition parties, including ActionSA, the DA and the Good party, argued that previous inquiries yielded little results. Meanwhile Rise Mzansi welcomed the move.
Good party secretary-general Brett Herron said the appointment of a commission, while well-intentioned, is too slow, too cumbersome and too costly.
'We have walked this road before, most notably with the Zondo commission, and we have seen that a commission of inquiry cannot replace a criminal investigation. The Zondo commission produced volumes of prima facie evidence, which the investigating authorities were then required to investigate before any decision to prosecute could be made,' he said.
There have been at least two notable commissions of inquiry since Ramaphosa took office in 2018 — the commission of inquiry into allegations of state capture and the commission of inquiry into the delay in the investigation and prosecution of TRC cases.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
23 minutes ago
- IOL News
G20 a chance for South Africa to redefine global leadership
President Cyril Ramaphosa addresses the G20 High Level Opening Session on the margins of the 79th Session of the General Assembly in New York. South Africa assumed the G20 Presidency this year under the theme 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainable Development'. Image: Kopano Tlape| GCIS Naledi Ramontja AS SOUTH Africa prepares to host the G20 Summit in just a few months, it steps onto the world stage during some of the most turbulent and unpredictable periods in recent history, marked by global conflicts, economic instabilities, and shifting power dynamics. At home, South Africa is also facing its serious challenges: high unemployment, poor service delivery, high levels of corruption, sluggish economic growth, and ongoing political uncertainties. Yet despite these pressures, there is a sense of cautious optimism. South Africa follows in the footsteps of recent G20 presidencies, Brazil in 2024, Indonesia in 2022, and India in 2023. All of these are countries of the Global South that have successfully used their leadership to shape the agenda, elevate new voices, and signal a changing world order. For decades, the United States held a dominant position in global affairs, but that era of unchallenged leadership is slowly giving way. We are witnessing the rise of a multipolar world, where global power is distributed among several nations. China's Belt and Road Initiative, its expanding military presence in the South China Sea, and dominance in emerging technologies like 5G and AI signal a clear push for influence. Russia, meanwhile, has adopted an aggressive posture, from the annexation of Crimea in 2014 to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Its growing ties with China, Brazil, Iran, and parts of Africa prove that Moscow is re-asserting itself, too, as a world leader. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading From 2024 up to 2025, the BRICS bloc expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and most recently Indonesia. The broadening of the bloc shows growing frustration with Western-led institutions and a desire for a more balanced global order. Meanwhile, Western influence is visibly weakening. Events like Brexit and the growing divisions within the European Union point to internal fatigue and shifting priorities. The Summits bring together leaders from the world's largest economies to address pressing global challenges and foster economic cooperation. Right now, those challenges are mounting from geopolitical tensions and economic slowdowns to technological disruption and climate instability. For South Africa, taking on the G20 presidency is not just about hosting another global event it's about leading through uncertainty. It's about stepping up at a time when clear leadership, inclusive dialogue, and courageous diplomacy are more needed than ever. Since taking over the G20 presidency in December 2024, the country has already hosted several important events. In February 2025, Finance Ministers and Central Bankers met in Cape Town to discuss climate finance, debt relief, and the risks of protectionism, though major countries like the U.S. and China were absent. Early in the year, the Foreign Ministers met at Nasrec to discuss global tensions, including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. South Africa emphasised its neutral and principled stance during these talks. Last week, a Sherpas meeting was held in Sun City, where officials discussed a wide range of issues. These meetings also worked on early drafts of the Johannesburg Leaders' Declaration. The introduction of the G20@20 initiative adds deeper meaning to South Africa's presidency. As the forum marks 20 years, this milestone offers a symbolic and strategic moment for South Africa to reflect on how the G20 has evolved and how it can be reshaped to better serve a changing world. For us, this is not just about looking back; it is about making the G20 more inclusive, more transparent, and more responsive to global issues. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development also stands at a critical crossroads, and the need for action has never been more urgent. Throughout the year's meetings and consultations, South Africa has consistently emphasised the importance of turning words into measurable outcomes and calling for real progress on energy access, climate finance, debt reform, and digital inclusion. Of course, the country's G20 leadership is focused on a few important areas held under the unifying theme of Solidarity, Equality, and Sustainability. At the same time, the world is facing more and more conflicts. The Russia-Ukraine war is the biggest in Europe since World War II. In the Middle East, the Israel-Hamas war continues, while the Syrian civil war drags on. Israel and Iran, long-time regional rivals, are now also at locked heads, an increasingly dangerous confrontation that has spilled beyond rhetoric into direct military action. The United States continues to stand firmly with Israel in the conflict, while the Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi rushed to the Kremlin to secure backing from Russia. At this point, the situation remains highly unpredictable, and it's unclear how far the confrontation could escalate or what broader consequences it may bring for regional and global stability. Here in Africa, countries like Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger have seen military takeovers. Highlighting a troubling trend of democratic backsliding and growing instabilities. Tensions between the U.S. and China have turned into a kind of modern Cold War. There are trade wars, restrictions on technology, and fights over important materials. The U.S. has blocked some exports to China, and China has done the same in return. This rivalry is no longer just about trade, it is about control over the future of technology and global influence. The relationship between South Africa and the United States is also facing stress. South Africa's attempts to maintain a non-aligned stance on global conflicts, particularly the Russia-Ukraine war have drawn criticism from Western lawmakers. The tensions deepened further after South Africa brought a case against Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), sparking strong political reactions across the world and in Washington. Against this backdrop, uncertainty surrounds the planned handover of the G20 presidency to the United States especially with President Donald Trump reportedly refusing to attend the Johannesburg summit in November. The G20 summit is not just another diplomatic gathering, it is a chance to confront hard truths, reimagine international cooperation, and strengthen the foundations of a fairer, more resilient world. If South Africa can rise to this moment with honesty, vision, and courage, it will not only shape the legacy of its leadership it will help redefine what global leadership looks like in an era of profound change. And when the time comes to hand over the presidency in 2026, it should be able to do so with confidence and pride. Ramontja is an research assistant at the Institute for Pan-African Thought and Conversation, University of Johannesburg Cape Times


eNCA
28 minutes ago
- eNCA
Will Mkhwanazi Police Inquiry End ANC's Political Rule?
With his recent address to South Africa, President Ramaphosa established a new commission of inquiry to investigate the allegations made by Gen. Mkhwanazi, related to corruption in the police service. President Ramaphosa has named a strong group to lead the inquiry but could this backfire and reveal more damning evidence about his ANC? Furthermore, can the ANC survive this latest bout of public relations crisis and maintain their lead position in South African politics in 2025? And are his suggested plans enough to investigate the major accusations made against SAPS? Let's dig in to all of these questions

IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
Are Ramaphosa's commissions investigative action or political deflection?
Assessing the effectiveness of President Cyril Ramaphosa's commissions in tackling corruption Image: Jairus Mmutle/ GCIS Since taking office in 2018, President Cyril Ramaphosa has established numerous presidential commissions and task teams in South Africa. While these are intended to investigate corruption and address crises, critics argue that they serve as a costly substitute for decisive action, often leading to minimal progress. Ramaphosa's presidency has been marked by an unprecedented number of formal commissions of inquiry and ad hoc advisory bodies, costing millions of rand. Some critics suggest that this approach has prioritised investigations over prosecution, especially of politically connected individuals. Notable among these are the recent commissions into law enforcement corruption, apartheid-era prosecutions, and the state's response to COVID-19 procurement irregularities. For instance, earlier this week, Ramaphosa announced aims to investigate allegations of police corruption involving Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, national deputy commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, the judiciary, and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). The commission's establishment follows mounting public concern over the integrity of South Africa's law enforcement agencies and the government's ability to hold influential figures accountable. Since 2018, President Ramaphosa has established numerous task forces, committees, and commissions. Some of the most prominent include the Presidential Task Team on Military Veterans, led by the late Deputy President David Mabuza, which focuses on veteran welfare and the Zondo Commission. The Presidential Climate Finance Task Team tasked with mobilising funds for South Africa's energy transition, the National Logistics Crisis Committee, responsible for addressing infrastructure collapse and vandalism in logistics sectors, G20 Task Forces covering inclusive economic growth, food security, and artificial intelligence/data governance during South Africa's G20 presidency are among some of the commissions. In addition, several commissions of inquiry have been set up to probe sensitive issues, including the Inquiry into Law Enforcement Agencies and the Commission of Inquiry into Delayed TRC Prosecutions. Since 2018, more than eight commissions have been established, with some critics questioning their effectiveness. Opposition parties have been vociferous in their criticism. Vuyo Zungula, leader of the African Transformation Movement, argued that 'appointing commissions is often a way for the president to deflect public outrage rather than pursue real accountability.' Zungula strongly advocated utilising existing institutions like the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), which he believes has a proven track record of prosecuting corruption. Similarly, Mmusi Maimane, leader of Build One South Africa, has called for the revival of the now-disbanded 'Scorpions,' an elite police unit known for probing top political figures and corruption allegations. This entity was dissolved amid political controversy. Political analysts interpret Ramaphosa's extensive use of commissions as a strategic move. Dr Ntsikelelo Breakfast suggests that 'this is a well-calculated political response,' highlighting concerns over the pace and effectiveness of these investigations. 'While placing Mchunu on leave is a good move, he prolonged timelines of these commissions risk creating a sense of inertia,' Breakfast warned. Ian Cameron, chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police, voiced a familiar frustration. 'We've seen this movie before. The Zondo Commission cost taxpayers billions, yet few of its recommendations have been implemented, and no kingpin is behind bars.' In response to mounting criticism of the commission to investigate police corruption, President Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, stated the government's commitment to transparency and accountability. 'The commission's reports will be delivered within strict timelines- an interim report within three months and a final report in six,' Magwenya stated. He added, "If any compelling evidence emerges during the process, it will be handed over to prosecuting authorities immediately.' Magwenya insisted that 'the President is not shielding anyone,' reaffirming Ramaphosa's stance that these investigations aim to uncover the truth and restore public confidence. [email protected] IOL Politics