logo
Go behind the scenes with ‘Toucher & Hardy' on The Sports Hub: ‘There's a history there'

Go behind the scenes with ‘Toucher & Hardy' on The Sports Hub: ‘There's a history there'

Boston Globe3 days ago

The show features Fred Toucher (a host since The Sports Hub launched in August 2009), co-host Rob 'Hardy' Poole (who moved over from the midday 'Zolak and Bertrand' show
Advertisement
The visit was for a behind-the-scenes look at how 'Toucher and Hardy' is fulfilling all of its promise ― with Nielsen Audio-dominating ratings and seamless, often hilarious, on-air rapport ― particularly striking considering the morning show's dire condition less than two years ago.
That's when Toucher and co-host Rich Shertenlieb, who had partnered to great success and huge ratings for 17 years across two stations in the Boston market, became a cauldron of dysfunction that led to
The current circumstances are the opposite of dysfunctional, in part because Toucher, Hardy, and Adam 12 are genuine friends going back to their time together at defunct rock station
Advertisement
'These guys are legitimately people I talk to all the time,' said Toucher. 'We can all make fun of each other, which is a great relief, and they feel they can make fun of me, which is a great license for me because it doesn't make me have to be the jerk all the time.
'Everyone is an open book. That's a change with Hardy. It wasn't that way before. People don't feel like their ideas are precious or more valuable than anyone else's.'
The hosts don't exactly sing 'Kumbaya' during commercial breaks. They mostly check their phones, or check in with Adam 12 and assistant producers Ryan Beaton and Nick Gemelli in the control room.
The vibes are upbeat, though, in part because lead voice Toucher is intrigued by two particular topics:
'My favorite story in the history of sports,' Toucher says later.
The only quasi-tension comes when Gemelli ― who oversees
It's missing one key element: footage of the charismatic former Patriots tight end and the draw to the event.
Advertisement
Felger &
— Toucher & Hardy (@toucherandhardy)
Gemelli is summoned to the studio for an on-air scolding.
'Me, Felger, me, me, Felger, Felger,' says Hardy, watching the clip. 'You know who people would like to see?'
'Gronk,' says Gemelli.
'Gronk,' concurs Hardy.
In the post-show meeting, they go back and forth some more, then laugh about it.
'I know there really wasn't too much to work with there,' says Hardy, eventually.
Rob "Hardy" Poole came to Boston in 2004 to host on WBCN, and has long been heralded for his talents on and off the air.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Change does them good
Given how tense circumstances were in the last months of the 'Toucher and Rich' show, it's striking, if not totally unexpected given the talent involved, that the revamped version has found both success and satisfaction.
'Toucher and Hardy' received
Much of the success is the result of management's belief in Toucher's talent, and a willingness to self-reflect and make necessary changes in his life.
The split with Shertenlieb ― with whom Toucher had worked in Atlanta before coming to WBCN in 2006 ― was public, prolonged, and surprising considering their copacetic nature on the air and years of success.
Toucher dealt with career-threatening throat problems early in 2023, which
Advertisement
It would be an understatement to say it was a stressful time. Wallach said he just tried to stay out of 'the range of whatever blast radius there was.'
'That kind of situation is tough on everyone else,' said Mary Menna, vice president and market manager for Beasley Media Group in Boston. 'When mom and dad are not getting along, the kids are like … it doesn't make for a harmonious team.'
The drama may have dragged out, but the ending was abrupt. Throughout their careers, Toucher and Shertenlieb had negotiated contracts as a tandem. In 2023, with their deal set to expire at year's end, Shertenlieb decided to do it separately.
In October,
Listeners and outsiders may have presumed management would side with Shertenlieb ― a creative producer of comedic bits ― during the height of the drama, given his stability during Toucher's absence.
Yet there didn't seem to be a choice at all. Presuming Toucher was healthy and in a good frame of mind, he was their guy.
'Listen, Fred is a No. 1,' said program director Rick Radzik. 'The No. 1 chair ― there's a difference. At the end of the day, it was about the belief we all have in Fred, and that he improved what he needed to improve upon, as well.'
Said Menna: 'Some skill sets are just innate.'
Toucher put it more bluntly.
'Me being out with my throat problem is part of the reason I still have this job,' he said, 'because they realized Rich couldn't lead it.'
Advertisement
Shertenlieb, informed this story was being written, provided comment via email.
'I have stayed silent in an attempt to take the high road while Fred Toucher says untrue and slanderous things about me in an attempt to defame my character, much like he admitted to doing to other members of our show months before I left,' he wrote. 'This is disappointing, as Fred was someone I once considered a good friend.'
Shertenlieb did not respond to a follow-up email asking for elaboration.
As the partnership with Shertenlieb fractured and chaos swirled in his personal life, Toucher realized that he needed to make lifestyle changes.
'I went through a lot of stuff, both self-inflicted and not self-inflicted,' he said. 'I had health issues that I had to take care of. I'm an alcoholic. I had to start looking at myself and trying to self-improve, which is something that I had become really stagnant on. I'd gone through a divorce and all of those things made me be self-reflective. I realized there was a lot of stuff in my life I had to change.'
Fred Toucher took over the No. 1 chair with the creation of "Toucher and Hardy" on The Sports Hub.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
The pieces fit
Chemistry in sports radio is elusive, even mysterious. Hosts don't necessarily have to be friends ― Mike Francesa and Chris Russo wouldn't even glance at each other by the end of their legendary run on WFAN's 'Mike and the Mad Dog' in New York.
The easy give-and-take that at least
seems
like true friendship, however, is essential.
'There's a history there,' said Menna about 'Toucher and Hardy.' 'With that came a lot of mutual respect for each other. There was a good foundation.'
Advertisement
The show works for those reasons, but also because of complementary skills.
'If we have in fact hit our stride, that means playing into each other's strengths and probably avoiding some of each other's landmines, too,' said Hardy. 'The more time we spend together not as friends, but actually doing a show, the more you get a feel for how these things are going to work in the room. If it doesn't work in the room, it's not going to work for the audience, either.'
When Shertenlieb departed, eventually landing an eponymous morning show at WZLX
'I wanted an equal and I needed his skill set,' said Toucher. 'I needed a guy who could do comedic production. And I already knew I liked him on the air and he was the guy I wanted on the air. The ball was in his court the whole time.'
Hardy said he wanted the job all along, and the only inkling of trepidation was leaving a good situation behind with the 'Zolak and Bertrand' show. Hardy acknowledges, though, that adjusting to the mornings remains a work in progress. 'Every time my alarm goes off at 4:30 in the morning, I can't believe it,' he said. 'I don't know what's happening right away.'
Hardy still isn't used to the 4:30 a.m. wake-up call.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Hardy's versatility is a source of admiration from his peers. Many considered him the most underutilized talent in the market during his years as the third voice on 'Zolak and Bertrand.'
'There's nothing he can't do at a high level. You don't usually see that,' said Adam 12. 'Hardy can host and lead. Hardy can co-host and be strong from a second position. Hardy's production skills are elite, and he's able to envision the way a thing is supposed to sound and then bring it to life.'
Toucher's ability to riff in real time to a piece of audio or a story line is unparalleled in the Boston radio market.
'Sometimes Fred barely wants to know anything beyond the subject matter,' said Hardy. 'Might be something as simple as, 'Hey, we've got some new audio about something that Belichick did.' 'Perfect, that's all I want to know,' and we just let them react to it live and let him take it from there.'
Adam 12's arrival brought more focus to the control room and to show prep. He books guests, runs the board, and makes sure production pieces are deployed in a timely manner. He's also changed up the 'rejoin' music ― the songs that play upon return from breaks ― which has given the show a distinctive feel.
'He wants to make sure that we're on top of things and we have more than just a skeleton, but a good game plan,' said Wallach.
He's also an expert in reading his friends' moods.
'Knowing these guys for 20 years, from the moment I see them in the morning, I can say, 'OK, Hardy's a little sleepy today.' We'll be working with that,' Adam 12 said with a laugh. 'But usually, it's 'Fred's very sleepy today.' '
Adam 12, Hardy said, 'is a positive person and has an infectious energy, but it's very difficult to get infected with energy at 5 o'clock in the morning when we first see each other. But damned if he doesn't try.'
Collective sleepiness aside, this much is true: Eighteen months after Hardy's addition, and nine beyond Adam 12 taking the wheel in the control room, the show has become the best version of itself.
All it required was uncommon faith from the bosses, and maybe a little fate in uniting three old pals at just the right time.
Fred Toucher (left) and Rob "Hardy" Poole in Waltham.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Chad Finn can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NBA Finals TV ratings don't reflect complete picture of fan reach
NBA Finals TV ratings don't reflect complete picture of fan reach

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

NBA Finals TV ratings don't reflect complete picture of fan reach

INDIANAPOLIS — The NBA Finals TV ratings discussion is a classic struggle between the optimist and the pessimist. One headline: "NBA Finals have been most-watched programs since first week of May.' Another headline: 'NBA Finals ratings down 24%.' Two things can be true in this season's Finals between 'small-market' Indiana and Oklahoma City. Yes, ratings are down from last season's Finals between Boston and Dallas, and yes, the Thunder-Pacers Finals have brought in millions of viewers, including a peak of 11.54 million at 11 p.m. ET of Game 3 on Wednesday, June 11. Of the top 10 TV shows June 2-8, four were NBA-related for ABC: Games 1 and 2 of the Finals, postgame coverage of Game 2, and the Game 1 pregame show. Those four totaled 25.6 million viewers, including 8.9 million for Game 1 and 8.7 million for Game 2, according to Nielsen. The topic of NBA TV ratings is shaped by the teams playing; the lack of household names driving the competition even though OKC's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is this season's MVP and Tyrese Haliburton is a two-time All-Star, 2024 Paris Olympics gold medalist and cold-blooded, game-winning shooter; a new era in which different teams are playing the Finals each season; and stars not named LeBron James, Steph Curry and Kevin Durant getting to the Finals. The league and its TV partners need to navigate those issues, and they are focused on attracting more viewers, especially casual sports fans. But, if you were to ask the league and Disney/ABC/ESPN if they are unhappy with the numbers, their answer is no. Would they like more viewers? Of course. However, winning the night and winning with key demographics is exactly what they and corporate/partners advertisers want. In today's world of viewing consumption – streaming, multiple devices, YouTube highlights – nuance is required. Nielsen numbers are important but no longer the only factor. 'Ratings have changed from what they used to be,' NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said before Game 1 of the Finals. 'Netflix is the most valuable pure play media company out there. Nobody in this room knows what their ratings are. We don't even think in terms of ratings. We think maybe in terms of popularity, buzz around a program. We're going through a transition, and we're going to work through that.' Silver and his business operations staff have given considerable thought to the topic. Don't fret too much for the league. The NBA's nine-year, $24 billion TV deal expires after the Finals, and the new 11-year, $76 billion pact with ESPN/ABC, NBC and Amazon starts next season. That's almost triple the previous deal. Before that deal was secured, there was skepticism that the NBA could net a deal that averaged $7 billion annually. But Silver got it done. That amount does not include the league's media deals with international broadcast partners. For the TV partners, the amount they agreed to pay the NBA was not arbitrarily snagged from the ether. High-paid executives analyzed the data and the financials and settled on a figure that allows their network to make money. There is extreme value in the NBA, and that's also reflected in the value of franchises. The Boston Celtics are expected to sell for at least a valuation of $6.1 billion, and if the NBA decides to expand, those expansion teams will go for at least $6 billion. Live sports on TV remain desirable to traditional and modern means of consumption. The NBA's YouTube channel has more than 20 million followers, its X account has 48 million followers, its Instagram account has 90.8 million followers and its Facebook account has 50 million followers. In February, Disney CEO and chairman Bob Iger said, 'We obviously believe in the NBA long term. We think it's a growth sport. We don't really look at ratings year-to-year that carefully. … We're not distracted in any sense by what's happening ratings-wise this season. We're happy to have this now for 11 more years, including the Finals in 10 of those years. It is and will continue to be a marquee part of ESPN's offering.' Also in February, this time at All-Star Weekend in San Francisco, Silver addressed the topic with a five-minute answer when asked by USA TODAY Sports how the NBA views TV ratings and what is considered success. It's clearly a topic that is front of mind for Silver. 'I like the challenge, frankly, because I think for the league, and together with our partners, we have to up our game at the same time,' Silver said. 'There's a lot more competition for attention than there used to be. Just think of all of your habits in the room for people who grew up watching more traditional television. … 'I don't think that kind of engagement through social media is necessarily a substitute for watching live games because that comes up all the time. Some suggesting, 'Well, isn't that bad you're training the next generation of fans who might never watch live games but only watching highlights?' I actually think it's additive. We have a much better chance of moving young fans, in particular, to live games if they become engaged with various forms of our content, whether it's things that our players are doing off the floor, music they love, fashion or highlights.' TV ratings for the NBA's 2024-25 season were down 2% which mirrors the NFL's 2.2% decline for its 2024 season. Through the NBA's conference finals, playoff ratings were up 3%, and viewership for Games 1 and 2 was 50% higher than the next three highest-rated shows ('The Tony Awards,' '60 Minutes,' 'America's Got Talent') for the week of June 2-8. Thunder-Pacers has turned into a compelling series of talented, well-coached teams whose offensive and defensive efforts make every possession matter. This Finals is going at least six games, and any Finals series that goes more than five games is a financial success for the league's TV partners. Follow NBA reporter Jeff Zillgitt on social media@JeffZillgitt

‘The Last of Us' Ratings Declined During Season 2. But Why?
‘The Last of Us' Ratings Declined During Season 2. But Why?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

‘The Last of Us' Ratings Declined During Season 2. But Why?

The first season of The Last of Us was a ratings blockbuster for HBO, setting records from the moment it premiered in 2023. The adaption of the postapocalyptic PlayStation game was the second-biggest series debut for network since 2010 and grew its audience significantly over its first few weeks. The second season told a slightly different story, and in more ways than one. More from The Hollywood Reporter Jason Isaacs Supports Johnny Flynn Cast as Lucius Malfoy in HBO's 'Harry Potter' Series 'Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun 'The Last of Us' Creators Confirm Kaitlyn Dever-Led Season 3: "I Was Sure They Wouldn't Let Us Do This" The Last of Us season two was still an extremely popular and acclaimed success. But according to Nielsen, the seven-episode second season has been softer in the ratings overall, despite kicking off slightly higher. The season's fourth and fifth episodes — the most recent episodes with third-party ratings available — had smaller audiences than any season one episodes. Measured on a week-by-week basis, Nielsen's season two tracking goes from 805 million minutes streamed during premiere week to 937 to 827 to 738 to 745. Overall, season two has averaged 18 percent fewer viewers than the first five episodes of season one. Granted, second seasons often performer lower than debut seasons, but The Last of Us is a show where potential growth seemed very possible, if not likely. The show is a heavily serialized Emmy-winning sensation that had two years to accumulate new fans. The season two trailers looked fantastic. Reviews were extremely strong (if just a tad softer than season one — 92 percent Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes versus 96 percent for the first season). There was plenty of marketing and publicity. And several buzzy HBO dramas have grown their audiences after their debut seasons (such as Game of Thrones, Succession and The White Lotus). So what gives? There is, of course, the obvious: The new season's second episode brutally killed off the show's beloved co-lead Joel (Pedro Pascal), leaving his ward Ellie (Bella Ramsey) to embark on a quest for revenge against his killer, Abby (Kaitlyn Dever). It could be as simple as that. And, yes, there are fans who have criticized Ramsey's portrayal of Ellie in season two, but there is actually evidence pushing back on that as the culprit, as we'll get to below. Here is another point of comparison to be made with Thrones: Fans feel that epic fantasy show started to lose its footing, if not its ratings, late in its run. Many point out that's around the same point in the story when showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss ran out of books to adapt from George R.R. Martin. What I find interesting is that Martin ran into enormous difficulty finishing his story around the same point that two entirely different writers began to struggle with their adaptation, despite Benioff and Weiss having previously pulled off many original deviations from the books. In other words: There is probably something inherently difficult about making A Song of Ice and Fire work — regardless of the medium or writer — after Jon Snow gets stabbed to death and Daenerys gets stuck in her Meereen pyramid. Likewise with The Last of Us, there might be something inherently more difficult about pulling off this tale after the first game/season. Once the story stops being about a 'wolf and cub' wandering the apocalypse and becomes the story of a dead wolf and an angry cub chasing a villain who is a mirror universe version of herself, something just slips for some percentage of viewers. The second season's trope-busting story is intensely clever, and has Something to Say about the nature of storytelling and heroes and how we invest in a point of view. You can respect the all artistic choices being made, but that doesn't mean the same number of people will enjoy that kind of story. It is, admittedly, a bit of a bummer. For more evidence, let's look at the sales of The Last of Us games. The first game — which inspired the first season — sold more than 20 million copies. The second game (which was hugely divisive in the gaming community) sold more than 10 million copies. These numbers are out of date (and don't account for the first game having a longer sales history). But by all reported accounts, the second game's sales lagged the first. Given both had Ellie voiced by Ashley Johnson — whom gamers loved in the role — pointing fingers at Ramsey for any slippage seems off base (particularly as the show has seemingly maintained its audience better than the sequel game). One could argue the mission of HBO's The Last of Us shouldn't have been absolute fidelity to the games, but rather fidelity to telling the best possible story with the games as merely an inspiration. Of course, there is no winning that one. Even the smallest change — of which there are many in the series — gets analyzed and criticized, and major shifts would likely get blasted even more. In a way, staying close to the game is the safest route, even if the story itself is more risky. If people don't like what you're doing, you can always say, 'We're being faithful to the game.' I suspect a key reason for the show's ratings slippage has less to do with season two and more to do with the end of season one. The end of the first season of Thrones (yes, back to that again) left viewers bursting with questions about what happens next for a large number of compelling characters. But the end of The Last of Us season one was actually a perfect conclusion. Once Joel saved Ellie from the Fireflies and they settled into a safe and thriving survivor camp, it felt like The End. If you're a viewer watching these two likable characters endure all sorts of grisly horrors, this was just about the best outcome for Joel and Ellie you could realistically hope for. A second season of The Last of Us can only be written as 'but then more — and even worse — bad stuff happens' for a tale that felt resolved. Indeed, the first PlayStation game was written as a complete story. The Last of Us Part II was partly inspired by the same market forces that typically result in sequels — namely, that the first game was a hit. But just imagine if Martin had ended his first Song of Ice and Fire book with all the Stark kids safely back at Winterfell and then he had to figure out a sequel. Or imagine, if after killing off Ned Stark, the only remaining major season one character was Arya, and there was no Tyrion, Jon Snow, Sansa, Dany, Cersei, Jaime and others. In either case, season two could have still been cool, but it would almost certainly have been less popular than the version we got. From HBO's viewpoint, a critically acclaimed, Emmy-worthy appointment television hit is still a hit. Viewers will still line up to check out season three and the recent season will continue to rack up additional viewership on Max over time (when all forms of viewing are tallied over time, both seasons will easily be over 30 million views per episode). There is a 'so what?' counter-argument to be made about all this. But the audience reaction still reflects something interesting about the challenges of adaptation and how some great stories come with knots that cannot be untied. — Rick Porter contributed to this report. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise

Good Night, and Good Luck: Live Broadcast of Broadway Play Delivers CNN's 2nd-Biggest Night of 2025
Good Night, and Good Luck: Live Broadcast of Broadway Play Delivers CNN's 2nd-Biggest Night of 2025

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Good Night, and Good Luck: Live Broadcast of Broadway Play Delivers CNN's 2nd-Biggest Night of 2025

'Twas a good night, indeed. CNN's live broadcast of the George Clooney-led Broadway play Good Night, and Good Luck on Saturday night reached 7.34 million global viewers, including streaming audiences on Max and More from TVLine Andor Tops Nielsen Streaming Chart With Release of Series Finale; Rogue One Returns to Top 10 Movies Ratings: Tony Awards Surge 38% to Biggest Audience Since 2019 Yes, George Clooney Has Seen The Pitt - Here's What the ER Vet Had to Say About Noah Wyle's New Medical Show The Stateside share of that audience tallied 5.64 million people, with an additional 1.7 million tuning in internationally. On CNN alone, Good Night, and Good Luck drew north of 2 million total viewers, fueling a No. 1 ranking across all of cable for the day, and leading the newser to its second-highest Prime (7 pm-11 pm) delivery of the year in total viewers — trailing only President Trump's address to Congress on March 4. TVLine readers gave the telecast an average grade of 'A.' Good Night, and Good Luck gave CNN its third-biggest event of 2025 on the Max platform, viewing peaked at 8:33 pm (during the closing monologue of the performance, suggesting sustained tune-in). Of note, 155,000 total people attended Good Night, and Good Luck performances throughout its nine-week Broadway run. Good Night, and Good Luck on CNN: The Broadcast's Most Notable Moments View List Based on the 2005 film of the same name, Good Night, and Good Luck — which wrapped its Broadway run on Sunday — starred ER alum Clooney as legendary CBS journalist Edward R. Murrow. The true story takes place in the 1950s, as Murrow came under fire for criticizing Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who levied unsubstantiated charges of communism at various Americans during the Cold War. The 100-minute production ran without intermission, as it has since it opened at New York's Winter Garden Theatre on April 3. Clooney directed the 2005 film, in which he played Murrow's producer, Fred Friendly. In the Broadway show, Friendly is played by Glenn Fleshler (True Detective). Clooney and Grant Heslov wrote both the movie and the play. The play's cast also includes Clark Gregg (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), Ilana Glazer (Broad City), Carter Hudson, Paul Gross, Christopher Denham, Fran Kraz, Mac Brandt, Will Dagger and Georgia Heers. The production is nominated for five Tony Awards, including Clooney for Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Play. Note: Though the CNN-provided photos below are black-and-white, the broadcast was in color.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store