Dementia Risk Starts In Childhood And Even Infancy, Scientists Warn
Though not all of our dementia risk is in our control, medical journal The Lancet has said that almost half of our likelihood of developing the condition is down to 14 potentially 'modifiable' lifestyle factors.
These include controlling LDL cholesterol, preventing and treating hearing loss, and staying physically active.
These guidelines are heavily focused on those in midlife (aged 40-60), with the only comment for 'early years' being that those who got a better education as kids were 5% less likely to develop dementia.
But writing to The Lancet in 2024, scientists in the Next Generation Brain Health (NGBH) team say they have identified 'several high-priority modifiable factors in young adulthood and devised five key recommendations for promoting brain health, ranging from individual to policy levels.'
Looking at data from 15 countries across six continents, the researchers found that many of the risk factors for dementia started younger than expected.
'80% of adolescents living with obesity will remain this way when they are adults,' the group told The Conversation.
'The same applies to high blood pressure and lack of exercise. Similarly, virtually all adults who smoke or drink will have started these unhealthy habits in or around adolescence.'
Vision loss, air pollution, and the aforementioned lack of education are less studied in young people, particularly as they relate to dementia risk, they argue in their Lancet paper.
They point out that a person's cognitive ability at 11 is linked to their risk of dementia at 70; more and more research is showing associations between everything from childhood neglect to maternal smoking and the condition.
That means dementia risk could start as far back as infancy. But, the researchers argue, many dementia studies begin at midlife, skewing the recommendations towards an older crowd.
'Young adults (aged 18–39 years) are a neglected population in dementia research and policy making despite being highly exposed to several known modifiable risk factors,' the group shared.
It's frustrating to think that a lot of the modifiable risk factors for dementia may have begun before you could agree to them (though we don't yet know exactly how much, or by what age; that's what the experts argue we should study).
But even among adults, the existing risk factors for midlife are not exactly in our full control. They include things like having depression, getting a traumatic brain injury, and hearing loss.
The point is not to depress people out of trying to lower their dementia risk as soon as they can, the researchers say.
Instead, it is about encouraging both better policy (like making education, including post-secondary education, free) and improved community care (like ensuring people with hearing loss remain socially included) alongside personal self-improvement (like wearing a helmet when needed).
But pretending not to notice, or failing to act in a coordinated way upon, increased dementia risk for younger people will not help, the NGBH say.
And, as they told The Conversation, 'while it's never too late to take steps to reduce your risk of dementia, it's also never too early to start.'
This Longevity-Boosting Diet May Disrupt The Depression-Dementia Link
The Nutrient Linked To Lower Cancer, Heart Disease, And Dementia Risk
This Common Herb May Help To Fight Alzheimer's, Anxiety And Poor Sleep
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Protecting children online: The time to act is now
In today's digital era, children are growing up in a world where social media are as integral to their daily lives as school or family. While technology offers tremendous opportunities for learning, creativity, and connection, it also exposes young people to significant risks that can no longer be overlooked. The consequences are deeply concerning. According to a 2023 report by the European Commission, one in three young people in the EU spends more than three hours per day on social media. This level of overexposure has been closely associated with a growing mental health issues among minors—including anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem. A 2024 study by the World Health Organisation showed that a problematic social media use among adolescents increased from 7% in 2018 to 11% in 2022. It highlights negative impacts on mental health, sleep, well-being and academic performance. Social media platforms – often built around addictive algorithms – are designed to keep young users engaged for extended periods. Constant exposure to idealised, curated content can distort self-perception, fuelling feelings of inadequacy and dissatisfaction. These are not just statistics—they reflect the genuine emotional and psychological struggles faced by an entire generation that is increasingly ill–equipped to navigate the digital world in a healthy and balanced manner. Europe has made notable progress through initiatives like the Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) strategy and the Digital Services Act (DSA). Yet, the current framework remains insufficient. The online protection of children must be elevated to a political and societal priority, underpinned by concrete and enforceable action. We must therefore move swiftly to implement a set of focused measures, starting with default privacy settings for children's accounts to reduce the risk of unsolicited contact from strangers. We also asking for ecalibrated recommender systems that prioritise explicit user feedback—such as deliberate selection of topics—to minimise the risk of children being drawn into harmful content rabbit holes. We want enhanced safety controls, including the ability for children to block or mute any user and protection from being added to group chats without their explicit consent, thereby reducing exposure to cyberbullying. Above all, mandatory age verification mechanisms must be implemented across all social networks. Such measures are essential to prevent minors from bypassing age restrictions and to substantially reduce their exposure to harmful online environments. The European Commission's recent draft guidelines on the protection of minors under the DSA mark a significant step towards a safer digital space. They offer a unique opportunity to establish age verification a a standard practice across social networks—not as an optional feature, but as a strict requirement. Enforcing age verification will equip platforms with the technical means necessary to uphold their own terms of service. It will also facilitate the enforcement of EU and national laws that set minimum age requirements for access to specific digital products or services. If we are genuinely committed to ensuring that the digital world fosters healthy development, learning, and meaningful connection—rather than becoming a breeding ground for anxiety, addiction and harm—then the decisive action must be taken now. Alexander Pröll, State Secretary for Digitalisation, Combating Antisemitism and Public Service, and the Constitution, Austria; Prof Radovan Fuchs, PhD., Minister of Science, Education and Youth, Croatia; Damir Habijan, Minister of Justice, Public Administration and Digital Transformation, Croatia; Dr Nicodemos Damianou, Deputy Minister of Research, Innovation and Digital Policy, Cyprus; Caroline Stage Olsen, Minister for Digital Affairs, Denmark; Clara Chappaz, Minister of Artificial intelligence and Digital Affairs, France; Elisabeth Borne, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research, France; Catherine Vautrin, Minister of Labour, Health, Solidarity, and Families, France; Karin Prien, Federal Minister of Education, Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Germany; Dimitrios Papastergiou, Minister of Digital Governance, Greece; Sofia Zacharaki, Minister of Education, Religious Affairs and Sports, Greece; Patrick O'Donovan, Minister for culture and communications, Ireland; Prof Giuseppe Valditar, Minister for Education and Merit, Italy; Alessio Butti, Undersecretary of State to the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, responsible for technological innovation and digital transition, Italy; Elisabeth Margue, Minister for Justice and Minister attached to the Prime Minister, responsible for the Media and Connectivity, Luxembourg; Claude Meisch, Minister for Education, Children and Youth Affairs, Luxembourg; Tomáš Drucker, Minister of Education, Research, Development, and Youth, Slovakia; Ksenija Klampfer, Minister of Digital Transformation, Slovenia; Vinko Logaj, Minister of Education and Care, Slovenia; Oscar López Águeda, Minister for Digital and Civil Service Transformation, Spain and María del Pilar Alegría Continente, Minister for Education and Vocational Training, Spain all coauthored this opinion article.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
IV Dexamethasone Cuts Postblock Pain After Hand Surgery
TOPLINE: In patients undergoing elective orthopedic wrist and hand surgery, IV administration of 0.11 mg/kg of dexamethasone before the operation significantly reduced the occurrence and severity of rebound pain after the resolution of the supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade and decreased the use of opioid analgesia. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a prospective randomized trial at a Korean medical center between May 2022 and September 2023 to evaluate the effect of IV dexamethasone on rebound pain in 56 adults undergoing elective orthopedic wrist and hand surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a 10 mL solution of either 0.11 mg/kg dexamethasone (n = 28; mean age, 49 years; 57% women) or 0.9% saline (control group; n = 28; mean age, 54.5 years; 46% women). Following the administration of a mixture of local anesthetics, dexamethasone or saline was administered immediately after the block. The primary outcome was the difference in worst pain scores before the block and within 12 hours after its resolution. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of rebound pain (defined as the sudden occurrence of severe pain with a numeric rating scale score ≥ 7 at the site of surgery after resolution of the block), cumulative consumption of opioids, and block-related complications. TAKEAWAY: The patients in the control group had a larger difference in pain scores — which the researchers calculated as the worst pain score within 12 hours of the resolution of the block minus the pain score before the block resolved — than those in the dexamethasone group (mean, 7.3 vs 4.7; mean difference between groups, 2.6; P < .001). Rebound pain occurred more frequently in the control group than in the dexamethasone group (79% vs 32%; P < .001); severity of pain at rest and on mobilization was higher in the control group at 6 and 12 hours (P < .001 for both) but not at 24 hours after surgery. The cumulative consumption of opioids was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < .001 for all). The dexamethasone group reported significantly higher satisfaction and better quality of sleep than the control group, with no block-related complications in either group. IN PRACTICE: 'Intravenous dexamethasone effectively mitigates rebound pain after SCBPB [supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade], ensuring a smoother transition from dense blockade to systemic analgesia,' the researchers reported. SOURCE: This study was led by RyungA Kang, MD, PhD, and Yu Jeong Bang, MD, of Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine in Seoul, Republic of Korea. It was published online on June 20, 2025, in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted at a single center and had a relatively small sample size, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The results might vary with combinations of local anesthetics other than the ones used in this study (2% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine with epinephrine). The dose and timing of administration of dexamethasone was selected based on a prior meta-analysis, but the optimal strategy to prevent rebound pain remained undefined. DISCLOSURES: This study did not receive any specific funding. The authors declared having no potential conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
A Compound Made From Shrimp Shells Can Rid The Body Of Microplastics
For those unaware of the extent of the problem, microplastics (MPs) are said to be in essentially every person in every part of the world. Ice samples from the poles and tissue samples from the penis show the extent of penetration. Given that these pieces of plastic have been found in placenta samples and reproductive organs, we can say that children are being subjected to plastic exposure from birth. To what degree these nano and microplastics will hurt humans is still debated and research is ongoing, and the FDA states that they'll take regulatory action when adverse effects are known. However, the reason that people prefer to avoid becoming plasticized is the conventional wisdom that having small pieces of plastic within our immune cells, nerve cells, and altering which genes are expressed is something we'd want to avoid. There's certainly no known benefit. Microplastics have ben detected basically everywhere, including the brain and penis. Recent studies discuss the 'ubiquitous' extent of microplastics and their varied effects. Kidney death, liver inflammation, oxidative stress, cellular toxicity, alterations in gene expression and changes to the DNA itself are some of the observed effects of microplastic exposure. I will hypothesize that there's potentially a link between nanoplastics and mental wellbeing. Not just from the obvious observation that plastics in the brain are bad, although this is true; I instead refer to the interference that our gastrointestinal microbiota are suffering with their extracellular vesicles because of microplastics. Understanding the brain-gut-microbe axis and the effect that our intestinal flora there have an impact on our neurological function, one may observe that altering this intestinal environment with nanoplastics can have an effect on mental wellbeing. If you do start depressed, try milk aromatherapy. It shows promise in rats depressed because of gut-brain issues. The Dentist For those of us who don't enjoy visits to the dentist, we have reasons to be validated. Different materials are used in different dental practices, but a lot of them are plastic or packaged in plastic. By the nature of installing implants that will be subjected to the wear and tear of using one's mouth in daily life, microplastics are created and ingested. Other procedures like polishing restorations, ceramic crowns, using elastics, orthodontic appliances, and so on can generate particles. Think about the plastic fibers on the plastic toothbrush you grind against your teeth twice a day. Should we go back to chewing spruce sap? Remedies Chitin is a compound found in mushrooms and the exoskeletons of crustaceans and insects. Chitosan is easily made from chitin. It's used as a dietary supplement and sold to help consumers feel full, block fat absorption and lower cholesterol. Good for wound care as well. We ought to produce more of it and make it mainstream because we have another important reason to like it. A new study has shown that it can benefit our well-being in a novel and needed way: ridding our bodies of microplastics. The study was short but revealing, and I hope it will be reproduced with longer durations and human subjects. The researchers share two important conclusions. For even short periods of ingestion, microplastics accrue in the digestive tract, primarily the cecum which is the pouch between the small intestine and colon. Assuming that chemicals can leach from these plastics and that the particles themselves will eventually absorb into the wider body, it's clearly advantageous to expel this poison before it accrues/accumulates. The group of rats that was fed a diet supplemented with chitosan expelled more MPs that any of the other groups. Intriguingly and encouragingly for me, over a few days the rats released more MPs than they took in. This suggests that chitosan won't just block absorption of current MPs, but in fact facilitate the cleansing of the colon of recently ingested microplastics. Further, after the rats were euthanized and dissected, the chitosan group had the lightest colons which suggests that they had the least total waste accumulated. As side effects for adding chitosan to one's diet are minimal beyond some stomach upset, UNLESS YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO SHELLFISH OR MUSHROOMS, it seems like a reasonable addition. This is not medical advice and as I said, I look forward to studies done with humans for longer periods to provide us with more information. With said I'm intrigued. Singapore. Green buildings trap microplastics, clean the air and water, and cool the city. Prevention A better way to go than solving a problem is to prevent it. Microplastics come from plastics, and despite some laws and public initiatives, the industry is vital and won't fade away naturally. Proactive investment in alternatives will bring about a whole society shift; personal choice is not an option here. Plastic is ubiquitous and a consumer doesn't have a real option to move away from it. Our tap water and the air we breathe are contaminated, so we must do more than avoid microwaving food in plastic containers, or stop buying items packaged in plastic. If anyone has been to any store ever, they would know that this is impossible. Everything is wrapped in plastic. To exist in the modern world is to be a creator of waste; even the well-intentioned can do little more than be frustrated. Green roofs are 97.5% effective in removing microplastics. They're generally good for retaining storm water, cleaning the air and runoff, which lessens the work of wastewater treatment plants. Green roofs can contribute to an urban cooling effect, countering the Urban Head Island (UHI) problem. Singapore has been a prime example of this for years. Now, we find another reason to widely adopt the practice in every city, immediately. Singapore exemplifies greening a city to everyone's benefit. Great Pacific Garbage Patch Removing what's already been released is a net benefit. When considering the scale of the undertaking to clean the North Pacific Garbage Patch and the greenhouse gasses that will be released or the marine life that will be interfered with, it isn't immediately clear what the best approach might be. Leaving it and hoping a reef grows on top of it could make sense, given the rubber tire reef projects we've all heard about. A comparative analysis of the Ocean Cleanup shows that while there will be some impact from action, the effect of doing nothing is significantly worse. Proactive action where possible to remove what's been released before it continues to break down into microplastics and nano plastics is a viable strategy for long term environmental health. In the scenario presented, plastic pollution levels drop to below what's considered a safe limit. Inaction has the higher cost. Leaving plastics in the oceans will be more damaging than removal. Complex problems can't be solved with simple solutions. Plastics can't be completely replaced, but we can adapt the ways we use them and consider novel strategies to mitigate their harm. When these strategies prove themselves to be effective, they ought to be systematically applied.