Berkshire Hathaway's Second Quarter 2025 Portfolio Moves
Berkshire Hathaway's (BRK/A, BRK/B) second-quarter 13F was filed after the market closed on August 14. This regulatory filing gives us a quarterly opportunity to observe what Warren Buffett and his investment team of Todd Combs and Ted Weschler are doing within Berkshire's publicly traded equity portfolio. Berkshire has a large stable of wholly-owned entities, but this report provides us with the details of the US publicly traded stock portion of their investments. Berkshire's second-quarter earnings report, which contains information about the extensive portfolio of wholly-owned operating companies, was released on Saturday, August 2.
Berkshire Hathaway's Top Ten Holdings
Berkshire's $257.5 billion investment portfolio consists of 41 companies, five more than reported for last quarter. Berkshire was a net seller of publicly traded stocks during the quarter. The top five holdings, in order of the size of holding, are Apple (AAPL), American Express (AXP), Bank of America (BAC), Coca-Cola (KO), and Chevron (CVX). The top 5 holdings account for 70% of the total portfolio. The investment portfolio remains very concentrated, with 87% of assets in the top ten holdings.
Berkshire Hathaway's Portfolio By Sector
Before the 2024 sales, Apple stock comprised over 50% of its publicly traded portfolio, but it remains the most significant holding at around 22%. The Berkshire portfolio was overweight technology due to its massive Apple stake, but the selling since 2024 has taken technology to an underweight. While Berkshire Hathaway had no change in its Apple (AAPL) position for the first quarter, it was trimmed again in the second quarter.
Despite continued trimming of Bank of America (BAC) in the second quarter, the financial sector is the most significant overweight in the portfolio at 39% of assets. Due to its top five holdings, plus Occidental Petroleum (OXY) and Kraft Heinz (KHC), the portfolio remains considerably overweight in consumer staples and energy relative to the S&P 500. Berkshire controls 28.1% of the outstanding shares in Occidental, which, combined with Chevron, leads to a significant energy sector overweight. A deeper analysis of the probable reasons behind the Occidental purchase can be found here. Berkshire has two small holdings in the industrial sector: Heico-A (HEI/A), which was added to in the quarter, and Allegion PLC (ALLE), which was a new addition to the portfolio. Allegion provides security products, systems, and services and is based in Ireland. Within any recollection, the portfolio has had no real estate companies, but that changed in the second quarter with the purchase of Lamar Advertising-A (LAMR). Lamar is not a typical real estate company, as it owns and operates outdoor advertising. Berkshire continues to own no publicly traded utilities. However, Berkshire's wholly-owned entities include a large railroad, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), and multiple regulated utilities and pipelines via Berkshire Hathaway Energy (BHE).
Because the 13F does not include international stocks, Berkshire Hathaway initially announced the acquisition of about 5% of five Japanese trading companies at the end of August 2020. These holdings are Itochu Corp., Marubeni Corp., Mitsubishi Corp., Mitsui & Co. Ltd., and Sumitomo Corp. According to regulatory filings in March 2025, Berkshire now has 8.5% to 9.8% ownership in these trading companies. In Buffett's 2024 annual letter, he noted that all five companies had agreed to relax the previously agreed-upon 10% ownership ceiling. At the recent annual meeting, Buffett said he 'won't give a thought' to selling them and expects Berkshire to own them for fifty years or more.
Portfolio Changes
In the first quarter, Berkshire requested and received confidential treatment for 'one or more holding(s)' from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Typically, this means Buffett or another investment professional is attempting to continue to add to the holding, and disclosure would likely drive the price higher. It was revealed along with the second-quarter filing that the three secret holdings were Nucor (NUE), Lennar-A (LEN), and D.R. Horton (DHI). Nucor is a steel maker. Lennar and D.R. Horton are builders of single-family homes. While single-family home sales are well off their recent peak and even 2005 levels, these homebuilders have remained profitable. There is a case that the US needs more housing stock, and our current homes are aging, which could provide a long-term opportunity, despite the short-term industry challenges of affordability and high mortgage interest rates. The UnitedHealth Group (UNH), provider of healthcare insurance, was also added to the portfolio in the second quarter.
Berkshire added to its positions in Constellation Brands (STZ), Domino's Pizza (DPZ), Pool Corporation (POOL), Chevron (OXY), Lennar-B (LEN/B), and Heico-A (HEI/A). Berkshire added to its previously held position in the Lennar B-shares.
Berkshire eliminated its T-Mobile (TMUS) positions. As noted previously, Berkshire reduced its positions in Apple (AAPL) and Bank of America (BAC). Charter Communications (CHTR), Liberty Media—Formula One (FWONK), and Davita (DVA) were also trimmed. Notably, the Davita sales were related to a 2024 agreement in which Davita will buy back shares quarterly from Berkshire when its stake rises above 45%.
Portfolio Valuation Metrics
This analysis looks at the Berkshire portfolio across a host of measures, including 12-month forward estimated: price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), return-on-equity (ROE), enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EV/EBITDA), price-to-book (P/B), dividend yield, current debt-to-EBITDA, current free cash flow yield, current operating margin, and long-term earnings-per-share growth consensus estimates.
Overall, the Berkshire portfolio analysis reflects a cheaper price-to-earnings valuation than the S&P 500 while having superior returns on capital as measured by return on equity with similar debt levels. The long-term (next 3 to 5 years) consensus earnings-per-share growth rate is expected to be lower than the S&P 500. Notably, Buffett's preference for high-quality companies that generate significant cash flows is evident from the superior return on equity combined with an exceptional free cash flow yield.
Summary
Berkshire was a net seller of $3 billion in publicly traded stocks in the second quarter, the eleventh straight quarter of Berkshire Hathaway's net sales of stocks. Berkshire bought $3.9 billion of stocks while selling $6.9 billion. Driven by earnings and continued stock sales, Berkshire has amassed a massive cash pile on an absolute basis and relative to the company's size. Buffett and his associates have been unable to find enough attractive acquisition targets in his circle of competence and at a valuation he is willing to pay. At the annual meeting, Buffett said that Berkshire 'holds a lot more cash and Treasury bills than I would like.' He always looks for investments, but 'things don't come along in an orderly fashion.'
Berkshire's price-to-book ratio remained elevated during the second quarter, so share repurchases were suspended. Berkshire only intends to repurchase shares when the 'repurchase price is below Berkshire's intrinsic value, conservatively determined.' The price-to-book ratio remains a reasonable proxy for gauging Berkshire's intrinsic value. The stock repurchases in the first quarter of 2024 were likely done at around 1.4-1.5 times book value. Berkshire's stock reached almost 1.8 times book in May 2025, so a lack of repurchases in the quarter wasn't unexpected. Despite the lack of enough compelling publicly traded stock opportunities, following the decline in its own shares, Berkshire's valuation is nearing a level where repurchases might restart. Share repurchases of Berkshire stock had been off the table at the elevated valuations, but an additional lever for Buffett to create value might soon return.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
9 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Kindle might have another competitor headed to shelves
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority TL;DR an online bookstore, was launched in January 2020 to help independent bookstores survive Amazon. Now the company may be introducing its first physical e-reader, presenting a direct competitor to the Amazon Kindle. There is currently a blank landing page for an e-reader visible on the site. In a compelling new development for e-book readers, known for championing independent bookstores, might soon bring a fresh competitor to the hardware space dominated by Amazon's Kindle. Since its launch in 2020, has carved out a niche as the Amazon alternative for people who want their online purchases to support small, local shops. Over the past five years, the platform has funneled millions of dollars to independent bookstores, cementing itself as a functional, reader-friendly marketplace. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. In early 2025, the company turned a new page by launching its own e-book store and reading app. The app offers an extensive catalog, from bestsellers to niche titles, and lets buyers choose which indie shop gets a cut of their purchase. Right now, digital reading experience lives entirely in software. But that could change. CEO Andy Hunter has openly floated the idea of a dedicated e-reader, possibly launched via crowdfunding to keep the project aligned with the company's community-driven ethos. As spotted by GoodEReader, the site now features a landing page for the potential hardware. The presumed vision for this hardware isn't a walled garden like Kindle, but something more open to multiple formats. Think along the lines of Kobo or Boox devices, but with the clear identity baked in. For readers, that could mean breaking free from the 'one-store, one-device' model and choosing an ecosystem that better fits their values. For indie bookstores, it could be a tangible product to sell alongside print titles and a way to reach tech-savvy readers they might otherwise miss. For the e-reader industry as a whole, it could be another voice in the ongoing conversation about digital rights, open formats, and fair revenue sharing. For now, this is mostly rumors, but if hints turn into hardware, a e-reader could be an intriguing shake-up of the e-reader space. Follow
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hogs Post Friday Gains
Lean hog futures posted Friday gains of 97 cents to $1.50, as bulls fought back to close out the week. October was still down 57 cents since last Friday. USDA's national base hog price was down $2.49 in the Friday PM report, at $107.88. The CME Lean Hog Index was back up a nickel at $109.83 on August 13. The large managed money speculators in lean hog futures and options added back another 1,446 contracts to their net long position as of 8/12 to 110,732 contracts. More News from Barchart Coffee Prices Soar to New 2-Month Highs Is the Corn Market a Buy? Coffee Prices Extend Weekly Rally to New 2-Month Highs Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. USDA's FOB plant pork cutout report from Friday afternoon was back up $1.22 at $116.40 per cwt. The belly was back lower after strength in the AM print, with the picnic also lower. USDA estimated hog slaughter for the full week to date total at 2.417 million head. That was 67,000 head above last week but down 98,5454 head from the same week last year. Oct 25 Hogs closed at $90.100, up $0.975, Dec 25 Hogs closed at $83.025, up $1.400 Feb 26 Hogs closed at $85.625, up $1.400, On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Struggling To Buy Your First House? You're Not Alone: Homebuyers Over the Age of 70 Now Outnumber Those Under 35
The U.S. housing market has entered a paradoxical new chapter: more senior citizens are buying homes than Gen Z and millennials combined. Once dominated by young first-time buyers, the American real estate landscape is now increasingly tilted toward older generations, raising questions about the future of homeownership and the American Dream itself. The Shift in Who Buys Homes Data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) shows just how stark the reversal has been. In 2024, 22% of homebuyers were 'older' baby boomers, while only 14% were younger millennials and a mere 5% were Gen Z. Nearly half of all homes purchased last year — 46% — went to buyers aged 60 and older, according to Deutsche Bank's global macro research team. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes This is a dramatic reversal from the norm. In 1991, the median age of a first-time buyer was just 28. By 2024, that number had ballooned to 38. Even more telling, the median age of all buyers reached a record-high 56 years old, up a full decade from 2021. Don't Miss: 📈 Jeff Bezos-Backed real estate investing is now open to everyone — starting at just $100. 🏦 Join 800,000+ investors earning passive real estate income with this Bezos-backed startup. Why Young Americans Are Locked Out The reasons for the generational imbalance are clear but troubling. Home prices remain historically elevated, while mortgage rates — hovering near multi-decade highs — are crushing affordability. The result is that younger buyers simply can't get their foot in the door. According to Americans need an annual income of around $114,000 to afford a median-priced home. Yet the average U.S. salary sits at just over half that figure. The gap between what homes cost and what people earn has widened dramatically, leaving many younger Americans stuck renting or living with family longer than expected. Meanwhile, older buyers — often with decades of accumulated wealth, home equity, and savings — are able to weather high interest rates and steep prices. Many boomers downsize into smaller properties or purchase second homes outright, further skewing the market. The Stalled Generational Hand-Off Owning a home has long been a cornerstone of financial stability in the U.S. It's not only shelter but also a primary source of wealth creation, providing equity that can fund future purchases or retirement. Traditionally, as older generations sell homes, younger ones step in to buy them — ensuring a cycle of renewal. But that hand-off is now stalling. Unless interest rates fall, housing prices correct, or wages rise meaningfully, millennials and Gen Z face the prospect of being a 'lost generation' of homeowners — one that never quite catches up. See Next: 📢Wall Street's Quiet Move Could Change Your Wealth Forever—Act Before It's Full 🏦Wall Street Just Went Big on This Secret Asset Class—Your Chance Is Running Out The American Dream, on Hold For decades, homeownership has been considered synonymous with the American Dream. But as the barriers to entry grow, that dream looks increasingly out of reach for younger generations. The long-term implications could ripple across the economy, from retirement savings shortfalls to reduced mobility and weakened consumer spending. Still, experts caution against assuming today's imbalance will last forever. Eventually, younger generations will inherit homes from parents and grandparents. But the critical question remains: at what price, and after how many years of delay? For now, America's housing market is upside down. Instead of the young claiming their first homes, it's the elderly who are driving the market forward — a reversal that underscores the nation's deepening affordability crisis and raises sobering questions about the future of generational wealth. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
