Mediawatch: Ministers' 'helpful' handouts go multimedia
Photo:
TVNZ Q+A
"Dear Prime Minister: the rise in crime and antisocial behaviour since COVID 19 struck is stark and confronting. We ask that you please take urgent action to support recovery and retain our reputation as a safe city and country."
That was the message of a full-page ad in the
Weekend Herald
placed by groups representing Auckland businesses, accusing the government of failing to act on past promises.
It was almost identical to
a similar plea
to a previous PM four years ago.
The following day the current PM was the target of another open letter advert in the Sunday papers. This one - placed by electricity retailers, users and Consumer NZ - called on him to fix "a broken energy sector".
That campaign also featured on TVNZ's
Q+A
show the same day, and in a front-page
New Zealand Herald
story the next day, the Minister of Energy - the aptly named Simon Watts - acknowledged our electricity market was "not functioning as well as it should".
But it's not the first time that he's been singled out by a lobbying campaign in public.
In June, pro-electrification group Rewiring NZ deployed AI animation to turn him into a superhero in ads that urged the public to make it an election issue - and it used a billboard near the Beehive to make sure that he didn't miss it.
TVNZ's
Q+A
said lobby groups like Federated Farmers and the Sensible Sentencing Trust had used the same spot for the same reason in other campaigns.
But do ministers targeted by these ads even notice them?
"Yes, I do. On the way to the airport, out of Parliament and down onto the quays there - it's pretty hard to not to," National's Chris Bishop told TVNZ's Whena Owen.
But are campaigns singling out individual politicians in public really effective? Most ministers are also lobbied behind the scenes by the same special interest groups. Being hectored publicly as well could make them more inclined to dig in rather than give in.
"Lobby groups have always taken out ads in newspapers. Now they're moving it to digital billboards which can be up longer and can be cheaper," said Dr Claire Robinson, the author of
Promises, Promises: 80 years of Wooing New Zealand Voters
.
"They can be located at traffic lights where ministerial cars have to stop. It's probably a really good way of getting something under the nose of a cabinet minister who may not open the newspaper anymore in the morning to see it there."
"If you want to lobby a minister now you've got not only print, radio and TV - and you've got your own channels, social media and even LinkedIn posts. There's a complete industry in being able to disseminate your messages, hoping that one of them is going to get through," Dr Robinson told
Mediawatch
.
Politicians aren't shy about getting their own messages out to the media either - and have specialised staff to do it.
Journalists' email inboxes are clogged with media statements from ministers and MPs hoping that their comments will make it into the media's coverage.
And now they are going multimedia too.
Last weekend reporters got video of the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio greeting Winston Peters, along with a media statement, after an ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Malaysia, which was attended by Peters.
NZ First posted that footage
on Facebook
on the day of the meeting - and then there was another version last Tuesday featuring Peters looking statesmanlike, with a TikTok-type soundtrack added.
The same day the streaming show Herald Now ran the Rubio footage
during an interview with Peters
.
Should media be wary of airing images hand-picked by ministers' staff?
"Yes, because by using it they're essentially using party generated pictures and feeding the beast - and exacerbating the rule-breaking of political parties," Dr Robinson told
Mediawatch.
"Anything that is generated through party social media channels really needs to be stopped at the door.
"But at the same time the media loses all perspective when a PM or foreign minister meets a US president or Secretary of State. In 2014, photos of John Key playing golf with Obama were splashed across the newspapers . . . and nobody asked who took the photos back then."
Recently reporters have also received sound bites from ministers along with standard media statements.
Last week, Associate Minister of Justice Nicole McKee announced anti-money laundering law changes to make managing property easier through family trusts. The release included a minute-long MP3 clip of her reading out some of the key points - and 'video on request'.
In June her office also sent three separate sound bites about the 'Three Strikes' law coming into force.
Why send selected comments rather than allow reporters to record their own in a media conference in the usual way?
"Quite often we'll put out a media release, then we get all the phone calls looking for a grab. Why not give a grab ourselves?" McKee told
Mediawatch
.
RNZ's reporters in the press gallery in Parliament told
Mediawatch
they wouldn't use audio supplied under those circumstances.
"I believe it has been picked up by a couple of radio stations but I haven't actually tracked it myself."
ACT leader David Seymour has spoken about bypassing the media because they "abuse their power to edit" and refused to allow ACT's ministers to appear on RNZ's
Morning Report
. He's even appealed for funds from ACT supporters to fund his own online media channels.
Is McKee supplying audio comments as a substitute for interviews or media conferences at which she could be challenged or questioned by reporters?
"That's not the reason. It's actually realising that our media are quite stretched - for time and for people," McKee told
Mediawatch
.
On that issue of the family trusts and anti-money laundering laws, McKee was interviewed by RNZ news after sending out the statement and audio.
"I've always made myself available to the media. Should they want a sound grab directly, I'm happy to give it. We just thought that this would help the media, especially if they do have those tight deadlines. And of course some have less staff now."
"It doesn't take me long to add a couple of 10-second sound bites to the media releases we put out. And of course if it is being picked up then it is useful to some. So we'll continue to do it."
McKee says she hasn't tracked which media outlets have used the supplied audio.
Another minister handing out sound bites with media statements lately is Associate Minister of Transport James Meager.
"Now is the perfect time to look ahead toward building a resilient maritime economy for future generations," he said in mid-June, announcing pumped-up investment in navigation services for shipping.
One week later, Meager sent out three more sound bites, about a funding boost for lifesaving.
Meager credits his press secretary, former Newstalk ZB journalist Blake Benny.
"He came to me with the idea that if we include some audio grabs with our press releases, it makes the job of producers and radio reporters so much easier," Meager told
Mediawatch
.
If so, it might mean not having to answer questions about contestable claims made in statements - or confront contradictions?
"There's always the option for journalists who want to ring up and press on some of the details in those press releases. I'm always happy to take interviews. The only time I decline would be if it's outside my portfolio or if I literally can't do them."
Few ministers ever issue statements on matters outside their portfolio - and Meager declined to say which outlets had broadcast his recorded statements.
Before he became an MP, he set up an online archive of political ads -
electionads.org.nz
- with partner Dr Ashley Murchison, an expert who wrote a PhD about responses to political ads.
Some of Nicole McKee's recent media statements said video was available on request as well. Meager doesn't offer that - yet.
"But if we had the resources and that made people's lives easier then it might be something that we look into. I used to work as a press secretary and I think I wish I'd been smart enough to think of this six years ago," he told
Mediawatch
.
But he says he and other ministers will be offering the media more multimedia stuff in future.
"I'm doing a couple (of soundbites) this weekend for a couple of announcements we're making in the top of the South so hopefully they'll be picked up. In the weekend when staffing levels are lower, that might be a little bit helpful too."
Dr Claire Robinson
Photo:
supplied
"Political parties have always used new technology to try and get their messages across - even going back to Michael Joseph Savage in 1938 when he used film, which was a new technology back then," Dr Claire Robinson told
Mediawatch
.
"I think that the politicians hope that the time-poor media will just insert (the content) into coverage. But there's something deeper going on here because they're exploiting the whopping decline in journalism employment," said Dr Robinson, who is also the current chief of Toi Mai / the Workforce Development Council, which published
a development plan
for journalism in 2024.
"That decline is because of government-enabled inaction or policies that have seen that advertising money that used to sustain news media organisations go offshore. In the old days (they) would have more scrutiny and political parties are now exploiting that gap and creating their own media."
In
a recent piece for
The Post
, Dr Robinson said the public pays for political parties' digital media messaging - but shouldn't be paying for some of it.
"The rules are really clear. You can only electioneer using public funds in the three months prior to an election campaign. The rest of the time parties are enabled to create information, but not to electioneer with social media," Dr Robinson told
Mediawatch
.
She says the NZ First party publishing footage of Winston Peters in Malaysia as foreign minister on social media is an example of the problem.
"It has their party logo and is using Peters' role in his capacity as Minister of Foreign Affairs for party purposes. It doesn't say 'Vote for NZ First' but the boundaries are blurred. It is really saying our leader is a great leader because he can create amazing relationships with people."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
27 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Ōmokoroa pub confrontation ends with couple followed home, and a ‘trail of blood'
By Hannah Bartlett of File photo. Photo: SunLive Terse words outside a pub on a Saturday afternoon ended with a "trail of blood" at a Bay of Plenty property, after three men followed a couple home and beat them up. Two men have been sentenced in the Tauranga District Court over the incident. The assault began when victim Beau-Derek Toi Toi thought one of the defendants was staring at him, as Toi Toi drove past The Village Green pub on his way to the Ōmokoroa shops last July. He yelled: "What's your f***ing problem?" before getting out of his car and confronting Fletcher Shane Laurence, who was at the pub having a drink with a woman. Toi Toi believed Laurence and the woman were "staring at him". The two men exchanged words, with Laurence suggesting they "meet at the top of the hill in 20 minutes". But Toi Toi left. According to the Crown summary of facts he "did not want the verbal exchange to escalate into a fight", so he and his partner went to the laundromat and, about 20 minutes later, headed home. However, Laurence enlisted the help of two friends, and the trio followed Toi Toi and his partner Pania Pettifer home, pulling into their driveway behind them. There they began an "ongoing" attack on the couple, for which two of the three were today sentenced in the Tauranga District Court. According to the summary of facts, Samuel Sparham was wearing "black gloves with padded knuckles" as he got out of the car, driven by a man who can not be named for legal reasons, and accused Toi Toi of threatening his family. The driver and Sparham punched Toi Toi about 20 times, hitting his face and body as he was pushed up against the car. Toi Toi managed to punch Sparham once, then made his way around to the side of the house. Pettifer approached Laurence and asked him: "Are you going to f***ing hit me?" He pushed her to the ground and kept walking around the house to find Toi Toi, who was now being held by his arms by the other two men. Pettifer had followed, and Laurence again pushed her to the ground before kicking Toi Toi in the chest. As Pettifer got up and ran towards Toi Toi, Sparham pushed her over, and the three men returned to their Subaru. After getting free, Toi Toi wedged himself in a gap between the top and bottom part of the house. Laurence said to Toi Toi: "There's no problem now, eh, it's all sorted... you can't call the police because we know where you live and we're gangsters." The summary of facts stated after the attack, there was a "trail of blood" along the victims' property. An ambulance took Toi Toi to hospital where he was found to have fractures to his ribs and face, as well as swelling on his forehead. Reparation was sought by the victims for the "security cameras and dog" they'd acquired, due to feeling unsafe after the attack. The pair's victim impact statements spoke of the continued anxiety they both suffer, and are on medication for, as well as the impact it's had on their ability to sleep. They now own four dogs, and Toi Toi still has breathing difficulties because of the injuries to his nose and sinuses. They both fear bumping into the trio again, and are reluctant to go out in public. The three faced charges of injuring with intent to injure and common assault, and the driver also faced a charge of driving while disqualified. Laurence sought a sentence indication by Judge Melinda Mason, which all three accepted, in which the judge noted the aggravating factors were the multiple attackers, attacks to the head, and the extensive injuries. She did not accept the Crown's submission of victim vulnerability, or that it was an unprovoked attack. "In my view... it was not an unprovoked attack, nor was it pre-mediated, although it was ongoing," said Judge Mason. "I do not consider that to be an aggravating factor, particularly when the complainant was the initial aggressor and he was followed back." Judge Mason adopted a starting point of 26 months' imprisonment, and the defendants were allowed a 20% discount for pleading guilty. Reparation of $1152 was sought and was to be shared across the three defendants. Laurence was sentenced to 10 months' home detention, with six months' post-detention conditions. Sparham was sentenced to 17 months' imprisonment, after an uplift for offending while parole was applied, but was also given discounts for his background, prospects of rehabilitation, and remorse. He offered to pay $2500 emotional harm reparation, and the judge ordered that to be paid within 48 hours. He was currently serving another term of imprisonment, on unrelated matters, and was granted leave to apply for home detention once that sentence was complete. The third defendant's sentencing was adjourned until Friday at 11am, for reasons that can not be reported. - This story was originally published by the NZ Herald
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters target Stockton Mine
First published on By Sharon Davis and Ellen Curnow* Protesters used the aerial ropeway cables as a zip line to access a coal bucket high off the ground. Photo: Supplied Climate activists have climbed into a coal bucket on the rope way at Stockton Mine again to protest Bathurst Resources Ltd's fast-track application to extend its mining operations across the Buller plateaux to Denniston. Yesterday afternoon, two Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters clipped themselves to the ropeway cable and used it like a zipline to access a coal bucket in a remote area high off the ground. This follows a larger protest at Stockton and Denniston in April which ended with at least nine people charged with wilful trespass. Protester Rachel Andrews, from Palmerston North, was among those charged with trespass on 21 April. Speaking to The News from a coal bucket this morning she said they had a good supply of water and food and planned to disrupt the transport of coal from Stockton Mine for as long as possible. Their goal was to have Bathurst withdraw its fast-track application to mine 20 million tonnes of coal on the Denniston Plateau. While there are only two protesters in the coal bucket, she said they were supported by a huge group of people who were against the mine and the fast-track process. "There is huge opposition to this mine, even on the West Coast," she said. Andrews said there were several reasons she was personally motivated to participate. One was the legacy she would leave for future generations. She wanted to be able to tell her four grandchildren that she did everything she could to prevent a climate disaster. "We're in a climate emergency,,, people are dying from climate disasters. We can't afford to burn the coal already out of the ground, let alone mining more." Andrews was also unhappy with the "undemocratic process" under the Fast Track Bill. She said it placed the decision-making process in the hands of a few people who had shown that they didn't care about the environment and were proud to support more mines. Protest was the only way for the public to intervene in the fast-track process, she said. "There is no longer any way for members of the public to voice concerns about proposed projects like this coal mine on kiwi habitat. The New Zealand government has effectively forced communities to take actions like this if we want to be heard." Andrews spent part of the April protest in a "nest in one of pylons" and was trespassed from Stockton. She said a lot of thought had gone into planning an action like this. But any consequences would be worth it, to be able to say she had done everything she could to prevent a disaster for future generations. "I don't take the consequences lightly." Andrews said many organisations were committed to stopping fast-tracked mines and were in it for the long haul. "We will continue doing everything we can to oppose Bathurst Resources' proposed mine ... We will not stand idly by and accept this destruction," she said. The International Court of Justice recently said countries must address the "urgent and existential threat" of climate change by curbing emissions and yet New Zealand was encouraging more mines and more drilling for oil and gas. Andrews said the proposed mine on Denniston would generate at least 53 million tonnes of emissions, close to New Zealand's entire net emissions of 59 million tonnes. "We can't afford to keep destroying the planet," she said. Westport sergeant Georgie Were said police would be negotiating with the protesters to get them to come down. She said they were in a remote location which made communication difficult. The News tried unsuccessfully to contact Bathurst Resources Ltd for comment. During a recent panel discussion on how Buller could transition from coal, Bathurst chief executive Richard Tacon acknowledged the right to protest but said climbing into coal buckets was dangerous. The protesters could have accidentally flicked a lever, flipped the bucket and fallen to their deaths, he said. Locals took to Facebook today in support of the mine and local employment, with some suggesting starting the ropeway or enlisting the fire brigade to point a hose at the protesters to get them to come down. *This story originally appeared in the Westport News.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Madison Burgess-Smith and Mike Williams Part 1
Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Madison Burgess-Smith and Mike Williams. Starting off, the Panel hears how homelessness and rough sleeping is on the rise across the country and then they discuss the government's move to ban on-card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
