Stateless in Serbia: Russians and Belarusians left in limbo
NOVI SAD: More than 20 Russians and Belarusians living in Serbia have become "stateless" after not being granted the Serbian nationality they had applied for.
Most have lived in Serbia for more than a decade - buying property, starting businesses and raising children born in the country - where they are now basically trapped, unable to leave.
Up to two years after renouncing their original nationality, which is required under Serbian rules, none has received a clear explanation from authorities for the delay.
"It has now been almost a year and a half that I've been without any citizenship," former Russian citizen Igor Grishin told AFP.
"And I don't know how long it will last," he added. "A month, a year... or the rest of my life."
The 58-year-old health podcaster has lived for 11 years in the northern town of Sremski Karlovci with his wife and two daughters.
His wife and older daughter obtained Serbian citizenship earlier, while the younger acquired it by birth.
"I cannot travel with my family," Grishin said. "I couldn't go to my mother's funeral in the Russian Federation and I cannot even visit her grave," he added.
Grishin is in contact with more than 20 others in the same situation though these are only the known cases.
Those spoken to claim they have never expressed any political views, either about Russia or Serbia, which in the past has cost some Russians in Serbia their residency there.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency
Planet Spark
Learn More
Undo
All said they had passed all security checks and renounced their original nationality as the final step.
"Serbia gave us confirmation -- a guarantee -- that it would accept us if we renounced our citizenship," Sergei Stets, a former Belarusian citizen who lives in Novi Sad, told AFP.
"I've now been without any citizenship for a year and a half," said the 46-year-old former mountain bike coach from Minsk.
"I feel as if we're not wanted neither there, nor here," he said.
Once the selector of Serbia's national team, he had to give it up because he is unable to leave the country, and now gets by delivering meals on his bike.
His wife, a horse-riding and equine therapy instructor, faces the same issue, having previously worked across the region.
"I wrote to the police several times. The answer was always the same -- the documentation is under review, and I need to wait," he said.
The Ombudsman's Office confirmed that they "are aware of the issue", adding that "the review of complaints is ongoing".
Every country has the right to conduct additional checks, said experts on migration and asylum.
"Although they completed all procedures and renounced their previous citizenship, the process can still take time," Rados Djurovic, a lawyer and director of the Asylum Protection Center NGO, told AFP.
However, "there is no justification for keeping people in an unregulated status long-term," he added.
Djurovic said outside factors linked to "state policy and international relations" may also be to blame for the delays.
Proposed amendments to the Citizenship Law in October 2023 aimed at simplifying the process for foreigners were withdrawn after objections from the European Commission.
"The more liberal reforms drew criticism from Europe, with concerns that easing citizenship rules could pose risks to Western countries," with Serbian citizens allowed to travel freely in the EU without a visa.
Despite being a candidate for EU membership, Serbia maintains close ties with Russia and has not joined Western sanctions -- including visa restrictions -- imposed on Moscow.
As a result, demand for Serbian passports has surged, with between 80,000 and 110,000 Russians settling in the country in recent years, according to the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP).
While some applicants remain in limbo, others notably influential Russians, have reportedly obtained citizenship through special procedures.
Last month the respected outlet KRIK revealed that 204 Russian nationals were granted Serbian passports for "national interest" reasons.
The list includes individuals linked to Russia's FSB security service, war profiteers from Ukraine and oligarchs under international sanctions.
Serbian authorities have not commented on the report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump says he'll 'know exactly' within minutes if Ukraine deal is possible
US President Donald Trump said he expects Russian President Vladimir Putin to arrive at their meeting in Alaska on Friday with concrete proposals to end the war in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters on Monday at the White House, Trump said it would only take him "a couple of minutes" to determine whether a deal is possible."At the end of that meeting, probably the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made," Trump said. He added that if Putin's proposals are serious, he will pass them on to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with a recommendation to either make peace or "keep fighting."advertisementTrump described the upcoming meeting as "really a feel-out meeting" and said it could go either way. "It'll be good, but it might be bad," he said. "I may say, lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal."UKRAINE FEARS DEAL WITHOUT ITS CONSENT MAY FAVOR MOSCOW Putin, eager to cement Russia's territorial gains since the February 2022 invasion, is expected to press for a ceasefire on terms Kyiv and its European allies have long resisted. Trump has signalled openness to ideas -- including land swaps -- that could alarm Ukraine, where leaders fear any agreement made without them would tilt toward Moscow's sidestepped repeated questions about whether he would insist on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's participation. "He's been to a lot of meetings" without stopping the war, Trump said, contrasting the wartime leader's record with Putin's decades in the US president left the door open to involving Kyiv later. "The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin," he said. "Or Putin and Zelenskyy and me." He promised to call both Zelenskyy and European leaders after the Alaska talks to brief them — but stressed, "I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal.""President Putin invited me to get involved," Trump said, calling it "very respectful" that the Russian leader would come to US soil. "I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that can be made for both parties."Putin is expected to hold firm on keeping occupied territory and blocking Ukraine's NATO membership. Zelenskyy insists Ukraine will not surrender land. On the front lines, fighting grinds on along a 1,000-kilometre front, with little sign of an end in sight.- EndsWith inputs from Associated Press
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Has The Fall of The US Dollar Begun? Why India And China's Rise Has Experts Sounding The Alarm
New Delhi: The long-standing dominance of the U.S. dollar is beginning to erode, and emerging economic powers such as India and China are steadily gaining ground, according to American economist Gerald Celente. He warns that the balance of global financial power is shifting, with the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) challenging U.S.-led economic policies and international influence. His remarks come at a time of mounting trade tensions between the United States and BRICS nations. America recently imposed steep tariffs on Indian goods, with a 50% duty being rolled out in two phases, the first 25% already in effect and the remainder set to be implemented from August 27. The Trump administration has justified the measure by citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. Brazil has also been targeted with similar tariffs, deepening the diplomatic rift. Speaking on a podcast hosted by Cuban-American journalist Rick Sanchez, Celente explained why India is unwilling to bow to U.S. pressure. He said only around 2% of India's GDP is tied to trade with Washington, making New Delhi less vulnerable to economic retaliation. According to him, India is increasingly becoming a self-reliant nation, which produces a large share of its goods domestically, a stage the United States itself once experienced before becoming heavily dependent on global supply chains. The economist also reflected on China's transformation from a nation once lacking advanced industry to a leader in manufacturing and technology, particularly in sectors such as electric vehicles. Western nations, he said, initially helped establish China's industrial base but now face competition from it. Much like India, China is moving towards greater self-sufficiency and reducing its reliance on foreign imports. Celente was critical of what he sees as America's tendency to dictate economic policy to other sovereign nations, arguing that Washington has no legitimate authority to influence the internal economic decisions of independent states. He believes this overreach is contributing to a growing resentment toward U.S. dominance across much of the world. With BRICS now representing over 40% of the global population, the scale of this shift is significant. India and China each have around 1.4 billion citizens, compared to the United States' population of 347 million. This demographic advantage, coupled with increasing trade within the bloc, gives BRICS members leverage in challenging the U.S.-led financial system. Celente predicts a bleak future for the U.S. dollar, describing the current trajectory as 'the death of the dollar'. He attributes part of the decline to U.S. monetary policy decisions, including the 2018 interest rate cuts under President Donald Trump. In his view, the American economy is on a downward slope, and the weakening of the dollar is already well underway. The BRICS nations have been actively working to reduce dependence on the dollar in international trade, seeking to bypass Western-dominated financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. If this trend continues, Celente warns, the dollar's role as the world's primary reserve currency could diminish far sooner than Washington expects.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is May Mailman, the Harvard-educated lawyer at the center of Trump's campaign against America's top universities?
May Mailman's role in challenging elite US universities during Trump's term. (Photo courtesy: Facebook) May Mailman, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has been the key figure behind President Trump's aggressive campaign targeting America's top universities, according to reporting by The New York Times. Through executive orders, the strategic use of federal funding, and civil rights investigations, Mailman helped design a broad approach aimed at pressuring elite institutions to alter their policies on admissions, diversity, and gender. Although Mailman departed the White House in August 2025, as reported by CBS News, she continues to serve as a special government employee, overseeing ongoing negotiations with universities such as Harvard, according to The New York Times. Driving policy to reshape higher education Mailman was instrumental in drafting executive orders early in Trump's second term that redefined the federal government's stance on sex, limiting recognition to only two genders and rolling back policies that promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion, as reported by The New York Times. These changes forced universities like the University of Pennsylvania to ban transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Find These Bugs in Bauru, Do Something Immediately Undo The New York Times further notes that Mailman was 'credited as an animating force behind a strategy that has intimidated independent institutions and undercut years of medical and scientific research.' She helped lead an effort to challenge what the administration viewed as liberal bias in admissions practices, particularly focusing on the role of race in college admissions. Using federal funding and civil rights investigations as leverage According to The New York Times, a key element of Mailman's strategy involved leveraging federal funding to pressure universities. Institutions faced the risk of losing significant research grants or student visa approvals if they did not align with the administration's demands. In addition, the administration opened civil rights investigations into admissions policies at several leading universities. The Times reports that Mailman personally closed a $221 million settlement with Columbia University—the largest settlement the administration has secured to date—after such investigations. Negotiations with elite universities While many universities chose to quietly comply, Harvard has been a rare holdout, willing to fight back in court, The New York Times reports. Mailman led the White House's negotiations with Harvard, which included contentious issues such as how race factored into admissions and disputes over patent investigations. The Times quotes Harvard officials describing these investigations as 'yet another retaliatory effort targeting Harvard for defending its rights and freedom. ' Talks with Harvard appeared to be progressing, with the university signalling openness to spending $500 million to reach a resolution, though new investigations and pressures continued, as noted by The New York Times. Impact on academic freedom and campus culture The New York Times highlights concerns from faculty and student groups that the administration's approach threatens academic freedom and free speech on campuses. Mailman's policies, which have included attempts to dictate hiring practices, admissions, and curriculum content, have been described by some as trampling on First Amendment rights. Adam Goldstein, vice president of strategic initiatives at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, was quoted by The New York Times saying, 'If you normalize the use of federal power like this, then academic freedom is just a memory and universities become political footballs and no longer useful instruments in the search for truth.' Mailman's pragmatism amid controversy Despite her aggressive tactics, The New York Times reports that Mailman is respected within government circles for her efficiency and ability to balance competing interests. University officials who have negotiated with her privately have praised her pragmatic approach, noting her skill in navigating complex discussions between the administration and academic institutions. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, praised Mailman as 'one of the most indispensable, gifted and dedicated staffers and lawyers in the Trump administration since Day 1,' according to The New York Times. Continuing influence after White House departure Though Mailman officially left her White House post in August 2025, The New York Times reports that she remains involved as a special government employee to 'tie up loose ends' on policy matters. CBS News also reported that Mailman plans to start a government affairs firm but will not represent clients related to her administration projects, including ongoing negotiations with Harvard. Mailman herself said, as quoted by The New York Times, 'We don't want to run these universities. We want some sweeping changes that set things in the right trajectory.' TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
