
‘Don't insist on ID': Delhi HC issues further guidelines on medical termination of pregnancy in minor rape survivors
The Delhi High Court has issued guidelines again to various authorities for 'institutional clarity' in hospitals in cases of medical termination of pregnancy of minor victims of sexual assault, directing that identity documents shall not be insisted on during medical examination when brought by the investigating officer after the registration of an FIR. It has also directed to designate nodal officers in government hospitals to coordinate the medico-legal aspects of such cases.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma issued the slew of guidelines on Thursday while allowing a plea seeking permission for the medical termination of pregnancy of a minor survivor of sexual assault.
The latest guidelines – especially for hospital administration – come after the court recorded that in the present case, 'the chain of events reveals a troubling picture of delay, miscommunication, and lack of clarity on the part of hospital authorities, all of which culminated in a significant lapse in providing timely medical care to a 17-year-old rape survivor.' Earlier, Justice Sharma had in April issued guidelines to child welfare committees (CWCs) and legal aid authorities.
Issuing further directions to hospital administrations, the court said that in cases where gestational pregnancy is found to be exceeding 24 weeks, 'the Medical Board shall be constituted immediately, and without waiting for any specific direction from the Court, the Board shall conduct the necessary medical examination and prepare an appropriate report at the earliest and place before appropriate authorities.'
It directed hospital administrations to 'make available the latest, updated Standard Operating Procedure (SOPs) and relevant legal guidelines in both Emergency and Gynaecology Departments, and to ensure that duty doctors are briefed and sensitised regularly regarding their obligations under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act, and guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court and High Courts.'
The court also instructed to conduct quarterly training programmes for doctors, medical staff, and legal officers attached to all hospitals, in coordination with legal aid bodies such as the Delhi State Legal Services Authority and the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee (DHCLSC).
Besides, a nodal officer must be designated in every government hospital to coordinate MTP and medico-legal processes for victims of sexual assault as a single point of contact for CWC, IOs and court. A standardised format for MTP request, consent, ultrasound requisition, and medical opinion must also be made available in all emergency and gynaecology units in both English and Hindi.
Issuing directions to the Delhi Police, the court said, the force must ensure that investigating officers (IO) dealing with POCSO and sexual assault cases undergo mandatory training every six months, with a focus on MTP procedures, court orders, and coordination with medical and welfare authorities. Certificates of completion shall be maintained in the officers' service records.
On April 17, Justice Sharma had issued guidelines, especially to CWCs and Delhi High Court Legal Services, to avoid delays in such cases, while dealing similarly with a plea seeking permission to medically terminate a pregnancy in a minor sexual assault survivor exceeding 27 weeks.
The court at the time, had laid down that whenever a minor victim of sexual assault, who is found pregnant with a gestational period of pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks, is produced before the CWC and is referred to a hospital for medical examination or medical termination of pregnancy, the concerned CWC shall forthwith inform the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee (DHCLSC) regarding the case.
Upon receipt of such information, DHCLSC shall immediately take appropriate steps to assess whether any legal intervention is required, including the need to approach the competent court seeking an order for medical termination of pregnancy which is beyond 24 weeks in case of a rape victim where she or her guardian seek medical termination of pregnancy, so as to avoid any further delay.
Prior to the April 2025 guidelines, the high court had been issuing guidelines through various judgments. In January 2023, it issued guidelines for investigating officers, outlining that survivors of sexual assault shall be medically examined, be presented before a medical board as envisaged under the MTP Act in case consent is given for termination, and the examination report must be presented to the concerned authorities for moving court if necessary. It had also directed the constitution of medical boards at hospitals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kerala HC sets aside state govt order stipulating internship fee for foreign medical graduates
Kochi: High court has set aside the state govt's order stipulating an internship fee for foreign medical graduates (FMGs). The bench of Justice N Nagaresh further observed that, as the National Medical Commission (NMC) Act mandates stipend payment to medical interns for their service, the state is not justified in levying an internship fee from medical graduates. The Court was considering a batch of petitions filed by FMGs challenging the GO dated April 3, 2025, issued by the health department additional secretary, which directed them to pay Rs 5,000 per month as an internship fee for the Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship (CRMI). The petitioners, who secured medical degrees from institutions outside India, contended that the NMC, which has the power under the Act to make policy regarding the internship, provides no option for the state to levy any fee for CRMI and had already directed that no such fee should be charged. The state opposed the arguments and submitted that the NMC cannot restrain state govts from levying an internship fee on Indian or foreign medical graduates. In 2020, the state had fixed the internship fee at Rs 10,000 per month for FMGs, and, in view of directions from a HC division bench in a previous petition, the govt had refixed the fee at Rs 5,000 per month. Meanwhile, the NMC clarified that it had taken a policy decision directing that no internship fee shall be collected from students undergoing CRMI. Accordingly, HC set aside the impugned GO mandating the internship fee for FMGs.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
HC quashes govt. order on collection of fees from medical interns
The Kerala High Court has set aside the State government's order imposing internship fee on foreign medical graduates for doing their compulsory rotatory medical Internship (CRMI) in government hospitals. Justice N. Nagaresh passed the order recently while allowing writ petitions filed by students who completed their medical degree courses in countries such as Russia, Bulgaria, the Philippines, and Guyana. According to the petitioners, no fees can be collected from the foreign medical graduates in light of the circular of the National Medical Commission. The government was collecting ₹5,000 a month as fees. The court observed that when the National Medical Commission (NMC) Act mandated payment of stipends to medical interns for their services, the State government was not justified in imposing internship fees on them.


New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Andhra HC slams GMRIT for denying exam access to student over attendance
VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Wednesday criticised the GMR Institute of Technology (GMRIT) for barring a BTech student from writing his fourth-semester exams due to low attendance, despite the student's medical condition. The petitioner, BVK Koushik of Madhuranagari, Srikakulam district, is a BTech (AI & Data Science) student at GMRIT. He missed classes due to health issues and submitted valid medical certificates to the college. However, GMRIT denied him permission to appear for the third-semester exams, citing less than 75 per cent attendance. Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, who heard the petition, objected to the college's refusal to release Koushik's third-semester results. The judge termed GMRIT's 10 per cent attendance relaxation cap 'arbitrary and one-sided,' questioning its constitutional validity. The Hight Court observed that illness is beyond human control and rigid attendance norms cannot be imposed in such cases. 'These rules are framed by a private institution and not by a government authority,' the Court noted. The Hight Court directed GMRIT, the State Education Department, the Vice-Chancellor, and Controller of Examinations of JNTU to allow the student to continue and complete his course without further hindrance.