Danny Davis won't seek reelection after 30 years in House
The move was not a surprise: Davis had suggested for weeks that he was ready to step out of the seat. He made the decision public on Thursday morning with a press conference outside of one of his Windy City offices.
'The road has not always been the easiest, but I tell you I've had so much fun doing this job, I would do it for nothing,' Davis told a crowd of reporters and supporters.
Davis, 83, is just the latest in a long and growing list of Illinois Democrats who are leaving their seats at the end of next year.
In May, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), 80, announced that she would not seek reelection after 14 terms in the House. And Reps. Raja Krishamoorthi (D-Ill.) and Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) are also giving up their seats to run for the U.S. Senate, where Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is retiring at the end of 2026 after serving 30 years in the upper chamber.
First elected in 1996, Davis is a senior member of the powerful Ways and Means Committee and has also played a leadership role within the Congressional Black Caucus, where he was previously co-chair of the group advocating for young men of color. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) quickly issued a statement praising Davis as 'a tremendous champion for racial, social and economic justice.'
'Danny forged a remarkable legacy and made clear his commitment to public service,' Jeffries said.
Davis's decision opens up what is likely to be a large and lively primary contest to replace him, and the veteran lawmaker quickly threw his weight behind La Shawn Ford, a member of the Illinois legislature.
But his retirement won't change the dynamics of the broader midterm race for control of the U.S. House, since Chicago is a safe Democratic stronghold. Indeed, Davis won reelection last year with 83 percent of the vote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
20 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
A Major Trump-Supporting Celebrity Just Signed Up To Be An ICE Officer
ICE has been ramping up efforts to recruit new agents. They've gotten rid of the age cap. They're offering studen loan forgiveness and a $50,000 sign up bonus. They're saying you don't need an undergraduate degree. And they're using South Park pics to entice anyone to join. Well, one of Trump's *famous* fans says he's signed up. In case you didn't know, Dean Cain is best known for playing Superman in the early '90s series Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman. Nowadays, he's a permanent Trump fanboy, tweeting stuff like this: This: And this: Now, he's joining ICE. Cain told Jesse Watters on Fox, "I put out a recruitment video yesterday. I'm actually a sworn deputy sheriff and a reserve police officer. I wasn't part of ICE, but once I put that out there and you put a little blurb on your show, it went crazy. So now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent ASAP. So they'll have 88,001 recruits for their 10,000 positions." "Are you gonna be hopping out of ICE vans and apprehending guys?" Watters asks. "I will do Director Lyons tells me what to do. If that what it takes. Absolutely, I somehow doubt I'll be in that position, but I'll be there in a heartbeat." Later in the interview, Watters asks, "What is it about serving this country that is inspiring to you?" "This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing. Listen, the United States takes in more legal immigrants than the next four countries combined," he says. "We have a broken immigration system. Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for, and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help him make sure it happens." So, there you have it, Dean Cain is joining ICE. Let's see if Roseanne steps up next!
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump says he's ordering a new census. Here's what the Constitution says
President Trump on Thursday called for "a new and highly accurate" census that excludes undocumented immigrants, an unusual move that could set up another legal challenge of the U.S. Constitution. The big picture: Though it doesn't exactly spell out a methodology, the Constitution has a pretty clear vision for when the census should happen and how it should calculate population totals. Trump's push for a new census comes as the president urges red states to draw new congressional maps more favorable to Republicans. Driving the news: Trump said his new census would be "based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024." "People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS," he wrote in a TruthSocial post. It's unclear if Trump is trying to tweak the current plan for the 2030 census or start a new one altogether. The White House and the U.S. Census Bureau did not immediately respond to Axios' requests for comment. Reality check: The Constitution laid out the Founding Fathers' vision for the census and how populations were meant to be counted. What the Constitution text says about the census The Constitution's Article 1, Section 2 stipulated how the population would be counted, though it also featured the " three-fifths compromise." The Constitution says the census should happen "within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct." How it works: The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, requires the "whole number of persons in each state" to be counted in the census. "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed," the amendment reads. The text gave the government a tool to help empower the people according to the United States Census Bureau. "The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress," the bureau says on its website. Yes, but: There's debate about how the "actual enumeration" for the census is meant to happen. Some contend the language gives Congress a wide net for its methodology. Who is included in census population counts? Zoom in: The US Census Bureau says the resident population includes "all people (citizens and noncitizens) who are living in the United States at the time of the census." "People are counted at their usual residence, which is the place where they live and sleep most of the time," the bureau explains. The intrigue: Defenders of the census say the current process helps states represent and serve everyone in their state. But critics contend that the Constitution was written "before tens of millions of migrants resided in the country illegally," according to Benjamin Weingarten of RealClearInvestigations. Can Trump order a new census? It's unclear. Trump said in his TruthSocial post Thursday that he urged the Department of Commerce to start working on a new census without specifics. Preparing for the census count is an arduous process that can take several years of planning. The Census Bureau has already started preparing a test census for 2026 and a rehearsal in 2028. "This iterative approach will give the Census Bureau an evidence-based design for the 2030 Census," the bureau says. Flashback: Trump floated a similar idea during his first term. He tried to erase unauthorized immigrants from population counts, while also moved to add a citizenship question a citizenship question to the census. The latter act was blocked by the Supreme Court. says that questions about one's immigration status could lead to faulty self-reported data, which could mess with population totals. Trump also signed a memo in 2020 that aimed to omit undocumented immigrants from the census count. A lower court deemed the policy unlawful. The Supreme Court later dismissed a lawsuit that challenged the Trump administration's plans.
Los Angeles Times
20 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump moves to shut down NASA missions that measure carbon dioxide and plant health
The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers. President Trump's budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are growing. NASA said in an emailed statement Wednesday that the missions were 'beyond their prime mission' and being terminated 'to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities.' But the missions — a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope — still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a 'national asset' that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development. They helped scientists discover, for example, that the Amazon rain forest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, while boreal forests in Canada, Russia and places where permafrost is melting absorb more than they emit, Crisp said. They also can detect the 'glow' of photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine, he said. 'This is really critical,' Crisp said. 'We're learning so much about this rapidly changing planet.' The decision to end the missions is 'extremely shortsighted,' said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan. 'The observations provided by these satellites ... [are] critical for managing growing climate change impacts around the planet, including in the U.S.,' he said. Crisp and others hope Congress will vote to preserve funding for the missions, which are funded through the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. A bill in the House closely aligns with the president's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. But with Congress in recess, it is unclear whether a budget will be adopted before the new fiscal year begins Oct. 1. If it doesn't, Congress could adopt a resolution to continue current funding until a budget is passed, though some lawmakers fear the Trump administration could try to delay or withhold that money. Congressional Democrats warned acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy last month that it would be illegal to terminate missions or impound funds already appropriated by Congress. Experts said the administration's move to eliminate funding aligns with other actions to cut or bury climate science. 'The principle seems to be that if we stop measuring climate change it will just disappear from the American consciousness,' said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. Crisp and others also are trying to put together a coalition of outside partners — including from Japan and Europe — that could fund and operate the instrument attached to the space station. NASA said it will accept outside proposals through Aug. 29. The free-flying satellite, though, is at risk of being brought down, meaning it would burn up in the atmosphere. National Public Radio first reported that NASA employees were making plans to end the missions. Crisp said advocates are hoping NASA also allows outside control of that satellite, which covers more of the globe, but there are legal hurdles to overcome because it would mean giving control of a U.S. satellite to a group that could include foreign partners. 'We're going out to billionaires. We're going out to foundations,' Crisp said. 'But ... it's a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just doesn't make sense.' Webber writes for the Associated Press.
