What Elden Ring Nightreign's First-Time Director Learned from Miyazaki
In a previous interview you had said that you brought the idea for Nightreign to Miyazaki-san who gave you the green light. Was the initial pitch for Nightreign close to what was ultimately made or did anything change between the conception and the execution of the idea?
Junya Ishizaki - Director of Elden Ring: Nightreign: The general concept we planned didn't change a great deal from what we initially pitched to Miyazaki, but during the course of development we've had a lot of input from other staff, ideas and concerns and all that sort of thing, which we've managed to take and incorporate into the game in exciting ways that kind of went beyond the initial concept.
So talking about some of that feedback, you guys had a Closed Network Test. Can you talk a little bit about how that helped you inform development for Nightreign and what lessons you learned from people playing the test?
Of course, game balance was a large part of it. Balancing and tweaking the game difficulty is always a large challenge when it comes to these games, along with responding to user feedback and incorporating that into the game as well. So we're continuing to look at that, but it was generally interesting to see player behavior, and get some good feedback from how players played the game and interacted with the systems. And also there's a lot of new rules and a lot of new systems in this new game design of Nightreign. So it was important to see how players gave us feedback to that and how we could make the onboarding process and explain those new systems better for them when the game comes out.
Can you talk about what it's been like jumping into the director's seat for this project? And did you get any advice from Miyazaki in terms of how to approach directing a video game?
As director, my feeling was essentially: I've just got to do this, I've got to put my all into it. It was me who brought the initial idea forward, so it's obviously something I wanted to do, but I realized that I would need the resolve to see it through to completion or see it through to the end.
In terms of advice from Miyazaki — well this wasn't just from Miyazaki but other directors at From — the one that stuck with me and etched into my mind was that a director shouldn't hold back. So, on the day-to-day process of making games, something that maybe I would've given a pass to would not get through so easily as director. I'd have to be a bit more critical, put a bit more discipline on myself to really take a good look at these things and decide the best way forward for the whole project.
Going back to that previous interview, you had said before that you can only play Nightreign either as a solo player or in a group of three. If you play in a group of two, then it matchmakes the third person. Can you talk a little bit about why there's no option for just a pair of players to drop into a match together?
The simple answer is that this is simply something that was overlooked during development as just a two-player option, so we're very sorry about that. As we said before, we set out to make this a multiplayer co-op game for three players, balanced for three players, so that was the main focus and it's at the core of Nightreign. Of course, I myself as a player understand that and often want times where I'm just playing myself, so this is something that we considered from the start. And so we did put a lot of effort into creating this experience that was playable for solo players in as much as the rules and new systems allowed. So in putting all our efforts into that aspect, we kind of overlooked and neglected the duos aspect, but this is something that we are looking at and considering for post-launch support as well.
Talking a little bit about that solo experience, can you explain how the game scales down the difficulty? Are there any unique things that happen when you're playing as a solo player versus playing in a squad?
Seeing as this game is built around three players, we understand the concerns of those solo players, but essentially a lot of the time in Nightreign you will be acting and behaving on your own. Even in a group as three, you'll be going off and challenging different areas of the map and collecting different things before you accumulate together at the boss fight.
So solo play is generally encouraged and is a natural part of the game loop, but also in general for those solo players — and this might be something that's difficult to notice in multiplayer — but the activeness and aggressiveness of enemies towards any one single player has been adjusted so that you don't find yourself in any unreasonable multi-foe fights. And just generally, when you're playing single player, the parameters adjust dynamically depending on the number of players in that session. So we hope that this will alleviate that feeling somewhat.
Of course there are no revives when you're solo, there are no teammates to revive you, so it is definitely a more challenging thing for the player to face. But we have also incorporated a self-revive feature which is possible to discover around the map just to allow them some more chances to continue that learning of the patterns and learning of the bosses without having to restart all over again.
Switching gears a bit to the story of Nightreign, can you set the stage and talk about how this game fits into Elden Ring's lore?
Nightreign shares essentially the base setting and the world of Elden Ring, but it's played out on a different stage so to speak. So there's this concept called the Night Lord, which is a sort of abstract phenomenon or calamity that has befallen the lands between in this alternate timeline and much like a real-life calamity, it's something that it's not done by design or intention, it's just something that has occurred naturally and it's befallen the lands between and it needed some sort of opposition. It needs something to oppose it and that opposition comes in the form of the Nightfarers who are these warriors who are entrusted with the fate of opposing and defeating the Nightlord and putting a stop to this terrible calamity.
One of the things that I got to find out while I've been here is the way the story plays out over the course of a variety of remembrances. Can you talk a little bit about the decision to make the story of Nightreign come out through these individual character storylines versus a more traditional style of telling the story with a beginning, middle, and end?
So as mentioned just now of course we have this phenomenon called the Night Lord and this calamity has brought these Nightfaring warriors together for the purpose of fulfilling the prophecy of defeating the Night Lord. So these are different characters from different times and different cultures who have been brought together to face this calamity, but that's not their sole objective. They each have their own aims and their own motivations and their own anguishes that they are grappling with. We hope that players will enjoy exploring and unraveling each of these aspects, unraveling more of their character backstories and find some attachment to each character. This time of course, players aren't creating their own character, so we hopefully have incorporated a lot of elements that give them a lot of character and give them a lot of room to explore and find their favorites among them.
Obviously, this was designed as a co-op PVE kind of experience, but PVP has always been a big part of the FromSoft RPG lineage. Was PVP ever something that was considered like having your squad being able to invade another squad's world or anything like that?
From the start, PVP was not something that we very actively considered for Nightreign. We wanted it to be a co-op multiplayer experience at its core and we found that as we developed these character actions and these unique abilities for each character, balancing them and tweaking them around PVP as well proved to be very… Not only very difficult, but took away from those ideas and that scope that we'd established for each of these characters. So we really wanted the focus to be on PVE and on co-op, and so we knew where our priorities were. So no, we didn't consider PVP in Nightreign.
Kind of drilling into the whole balance aspect, can you talk about how strict your approach to balancing has been and how the approach differs from something more single-player focused like base Elden Ring that also has those PVP elements?
For more solo play oriented games such as Elden Ring, of course we're taking a lot of things into account such as the stages, how the enemies are laid out and designed, the wide breadth of player builds and equipment as well. So this time the approach is a little bit different and we are trying to cater to a fun experience with three people. So making sure the experience is fun at its core with a group of three, but it also doesn't collapse if it's a solo player as well. So combined with the new character actions that we brought in for each of the Nightfarers and for each of these new bosses, for example Gladius, I believe you faced yesterday or today's session, these are bosses as well that have been tuned and balanced for party play, for solo, for three play co-op. So this was an important aspect of the balancing approach for Nightreign.
Speaking of those bosses, it seems like the difficulty of the bosses compared to something like Elden Ring has kind of jumped up — the bosses deal a lot more damage, they take a lot more hits, presumably being balanced because due to the nature of having three players in a squad. Did you have an idea in mind of what might be too difficult for base Elden Ring, but just right for Nightreign?
So with the general rule set of Nightreign being this, or rather, the structure being this three day/night cycle, we wanted the boss fight at the end, this culmination of everything, to reflect the player, what they've learned and what they've established during that time. So this was an important aspect of the balance. You don't get a lot of room to breathe maybe that you do in Elden Ring where you have a lot of time to build up and go back to a boss. But instead you have this quite comparatively strict structure with the three days and nights to prepare.
And so that was an important aspect of balancing these bosses. They are supposed to be very imposing, and challenging, and fearsome when you face them, but after some time and some learning and some observation, you'll be able to defeat them at the end of this three day and night cycle. So that was a large part of it was creating that balance between the structure and that culminates in a fun and exciting boss fight itself.A big aspect of FromSoft's prior games is the post-game: New Game Plus, and other post-game challenges that await you even after you complete the game. Does Nightreign have something like that waiting for players after they defeat the eight Nightlords?
We have incorporated some post-game or end-game features for players once they've gone through all of the Nightlords. I first want to stress that to get to that point, we feel that there is enough content there to satisfy users in general, so to get through each of those Nightlords and use each of these characters and experiment with the game as a whole. But beyond that, you have the unlocking relics, new relic rites to experiment even more with the character builds. You have these elements that you will be accumulating as you proceed through the game, such as the relics and the character stories and scenarios, but there's no time limit on these at all. There's no limit to how much the player can explore and how long they take. So we hope that these elements will give them a little extra bump to go past the end game and explore a bit more of what the game has to offer.
Did you ever consider making Nightreign a free-to-play game instead of it being a premium priced experience? And can you talk a little bit about the decision to put a price tag on it when so much of the competition in the multiplayer space is free-to-play these days?
Free-to-play was one consideration, but given the time and the budget and the workforce that we had and the ideas that we were developing with our staff that we were cultivating, we felt that the best course of action for Nightreign was to release it as a non-full price but also not full play title. So we hope that there's enough content there that justifies this purchase and that players will get to experience everything it has to offer.
And finally, is there anything that you're really happy about and are particularly proud of with regards to what you accomplished with Nightreign?
It's a bit of a broad summary, but I'm just generally pleased that we managed to take this game from its initial concept to its implementation and develop it as in terms of the vision that I initially had from that three day and night structure to the way that players come together and sort of converge in this condensed RPG system and to fight against that boss together, this was a strong idea that I had and I knew that it would go well that if we could implement it properly and I know that games are, when they take shape, it's a bit of a miracle in itself, so I'm extremely thankful to the team and I'm extremely pleased that we managed to realize this concept to its completion. So yes, that's definitely something I'm very proud of.
[Editor's Note: This article previously mentioned that this was the first time that the baton of director had been passed from Hidetaka Miyazaki to another. It has been corrected to mention that it's actually the second time, with Yui Tanimura and Tomohiro Shibuya co-directing Dark Souls 2. We apologize for the error.]
Mitchell Saltzman is an editorial producer at IGN. You can find him on twitter @JurassicRabbit
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Viral fandom map Wplace takes Utah by storm
Welcome to Salt Lake City, where Hilbert charges through Glendale, Raymond the Cat watches over Liberty Park, and a potential sapphic romance blooms in Emigration Canyon between Stardew Valley's Haley and Melina from Elden Ring. State of play: Utah's gamers and other fandoms are frantically staking out territory on Wplace, a viral new community drawing site where users can make their mark on a world map, one pixel at a time. As of Wednesday, Salt Lake had acquired the nation's ninth-most pixels since Wplace launched, per the site's regional rankings. How it works: You can paint anywhere on Earth — and SLC, like most places, is heavily colonized by video game characters. Film and TV deep cuts are joining the mix, along with memes, local landmarks and sports mascots. The big picture: The site has become a virtual graffiti wall, with users constantly modifying or replacing existing art. The intrigue: Artists start with a bank of pixels, which replenishes one every 30 seconds. That means time is of the essence. Fandoms often rendezvous to overwhelm a place with their chosen images — or complete one so impressive that other fans will guard it from vandals. Case in point: West Valley City has been consumed by a sprawling, now-viral scene from the game Deltarune. Plop a zombified piglin on top of it, and expect to be swiftly erased by Dreemurr defenders. Zoom in: Other elaborate images have appeared at the Salt Lake City Temple, the Delta Center and the Ninth & Ninth Whale. Zoom out: Fans of the adult furry visual novel " Echo" have decorated the eponymous Summit County hamlet, while Elmo, in Emery County, is home to the "Sesame Street" character. What they're saying: " Looking at the Wplace map is so weird because it reminds me that cool people that I share interests with actually exist near me??" one user posted on X. "Like ... theres Ultrakill and Deltarune fans in Utah." Friction point: Some users have drawn battle lines over identity and ideology.


Business of Fashion
5 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
How Beauty Plans to Crack Substack
One morning in July, a group of fashion and beauty publicists gathered on Zoom for a masterclass on how to get their clients featured on the newsletter-based social media platform Substack. Lindy Segal, a beauty journalist, and Bella Gerard, an editor-turned-content creator, hosted the webinar titled 'Everything You Need To Know About Substack Before Your Clients Start Asking.' Segal and Gerard, who began publishing their respective newsletters on the platform in 2022 and 2024, found themselves being pulled aside at work events by PR friends to get their advice on Substack. 'Publicists and agencies are being asked about Substack by their clients — or they know they're about to be — but they aren't sure what they should be telling them so we wanted to offer them a primer,' said Segal. Out of the 43 attendees, half represented beauty brands. The duo will host a second session later in August due to demand. Beauty is a small but growing category on Substack. Brands are in the process of figuring out how to crack the platform — or moving full-speed ahead with Substack strategies in the hopes of finding (or building) small but engaged communities. Cosmetics brand Merit advertised its first fragrance, in fall 2024, with a back page New York Times ad and a sponsored edition of Emily Sundberg's newsletter Feed Me. Clean makeup line Saie introduced From the Saie Office in May 2024 as a direct line between founder and chief executive Laney Crowell and brand fans, while Selena Gomez's Rare Beauty launched Rare Secrets in April to give a behind-the-scenes glimpse into team culture and product development. Skincare label The Inkey List will launch its newsletter this fall. ADVERTISEMENT 'Substack brings back that early-2000s blogging energy: personal, dynamic and free-flowing,' said Crowell. 'It feels less about the quick scroll and more about storytelling.' Treating the platform like a blog means that beauty experts that have broken through are those who show latitude. Makeup artist and Jones Road founder Bobbi Brown has one for her personal and private brain dumps, facialist Sofie Pavitt has one for detailed acne care guides and Dieux co-founder Charlotte Palermino has one for industry hot takes. There is no shortage of beauty perspectives on Substack, but there doesn't seem to be an abundance of them either — only a slim fraction of newsletters on the platform's Fashion & Beauty section are focussed on the latter exclusively rather than occasionally. Beauty gets less attention on Substack than sports or streetwear, but audiences still flock to writers with unique voices. (BoF Team) The growing corporate interest in the category, however, poses risks to the 'personal, dynamic' quality that makes Substacks so readable. And while it takes time to find the right editorial tone, brands can find it hard to justify an investment that probably won't lead to any sales boosts or viral moments… at least not immediately. A presence on Instagram and TikTok has become table stakes for beauty companies, but not every brand needs to be on Substack. Even early adopters, like the makeup brand Too Faced, have since put their Substack strategies on pause. Those that really want to unlock the benefits of the platform, which can cultivate engaged followings quickly, have to invest time and headcount into the strategy. 'Readers are extremely engaged, and they really respond to intentionality,' said Segal, noting that brands stuck on metrics wouldn't fully recognise the value of a Substack audience. Forging a Deeper Connection Substack offers brands something unique among the various social media channels they use to connect with audiences: a platform that makes users slow down and engage with longer, more thoughtful content as an antidote to doomscrolling. 'I've never been like a shock jockey, with the endless hot takes,' said Pavitt, who likes the long-form format of Substack that encourages deeper discourse. As they dip into the platform, brands are hoping to stay nimble by creating the content themselves or with employees already on staff. Pavitt writes her Substack herself — 'it's just my time and expertise,' she said. Brown's is created by her and her assistant, while Rare Beauty's director of creative strategy, MacKenzie Kassab, heads up Rare Secrets. ADVERTISEMENT The most popular accounts on Substack come from writers like Jessica Defino, whose newsletter, The Review of Beauty, has amassed over 130,000 subscribers. Saie, hoping to replicate that success, hired former Allure editor Paige Stables to help craft their newsletter's voice. 'You need a good writer to be able to connect with people,' said Kirbie Johnson, the host of the podcast, Gloss Angeles, and writer of her own Substack, Ahead of the Kirb. 'Having your social media team run your Substack without having any editorial background and understanding of a writing voice is not the move.' 'I now see Instagram, Tiktok, Threads, Facebook and Snapchat as entertainment platforms, not social media,' said Johnson. Frequent changes to social media algorithms have all but guaranteed a slowing of organic reach, leading to a sharp drop in views and likes. 'I'm seeing people with millions of followers get 59 likes on Instagram,' she said. 'Not a lot of people are engaging as much as they used to on Tiktok and Reels. And brands have it ten times harder than a content creator.' How to Stick With Substack Colette Laxton, co-founder of The Inkey List, is currently in the throes of conceptualising and writing the brand's Substack, debuting early fall. In line with The Inkey List's mouthy tone of voice, planned headlines for posts include 'We sold Hyaluronic Acid Serum at a loss for years... and we'd do it again. Here's why.' Laxton will be driving the concepts and writing the posts, with support from her team on layouts and editing. She sees Substack as freeing, with no word count constraints or the need to be 'thumb-stopping.' 'It's where curiosity meets connection, and where we have the opportunity to build a real homegrown community versus other traditional marketing channels,' she said. She plans to embed product when it's relevant, but doesn't want it to feel salesy. Shopping-focussed newsletters may lend themselves to affiliate linked lists, but experts did not see Substack as a channel suited to pushing product. 'We want people to subscribe for the content even if they never buy,' Laxton said. Substack 'challenges traditional marketing techniques seen across social media, e-commerce and CRM,' said Goodwin. 'It's hard for brands to have a sincere, genuine voice when the ultimate goal is marketing their brand.' While other social media outlets have become quasi shopping destinations, or places for brands to encourage conversions, everyone The Business of Beauty interviewed for this story said that Substack was not the place to push that agenda. For now, many beauty brands don't even have a paid subscription model. 'We've never thought of monetising our Substack content,' said Saie's Crowell, who describes the return on investment of the brand's newsletter in 'engagement, brand awareness and press drivers.' ADVERTISEMENT Bobbi Brown's eponymously named newsletter costs $7 per month, with all proceeds going to a New Jersey charity, Reach Out Montclair. 'For me, it was never about the money, but if people are paying for a subscription, I want to make sure they felt it was worth it,' Brown said. Paid subscriptions have access to giveaways, exclusive perks and interviews with her celebrity friends. Also, they can reach out to Brown directly. Segal also stresses the different nature of the Substack beast: Smaller subscriber counts can still be powerful. While she has 2,000 subscribers, 'my newsletters regularly get more views than stories that have been published on major magazine websites,' she said. Brands that feel the genuine need to communicate outside of traditional marketing may find a foothold in Substack. As Laxton put it, 'Social is fast and reactive. Substack is intentional and reflective.' Sign up to The Business of Beauty newsletter, your complimentary, must-read source for the day's most important beauty and wellness news and analysis.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
This 4.3%-Yielding Dividend Stock Could Double Its Payout In 8 Years
Key Points Despite raising its dividend payment by 8% annually over the past 12 years, Brookfield Infrastructure stock offers a high yield that is more than triple the market average. Brookfield Infrastructure grew second-quarter funds from operations by 9% year over year, when adjusted for fluctuating currency exchange rates. If Brookfield Infrastructure's bottom line continues growing at its present pace, the company could double its payout in about eight years. 10 stocks we like better than Brookfield Infrastructure › Investors looking for ways to pad their passive income stream with dividend stocks typically have two basic options. You can choose dividend payers that offer high yields, but these stocks tend to raise their payouts slowly, if at all. On the other hand, you could buy shares of businesses expected to raise their payouts quickly. Unfortunately, rapid payout raisers tend to offer yields that are less than the risk-free interest rate you can receive from a basic savings account. If you're not excited about low-yield payout growers or risky high-yield stocks, I've got good news. Brookfield Infrastructure (NYSE: BIPC) is a highly reliable dividend grower that offers a juicy 4.3% yield at recent prices. Here's why it looks like a perfect dividend growth stock for folks who want to see their payouts grow but can't accept low yields up front. A perfect foundation for steadily growing dividend payments Every day, millions of workers rely on Brookfield Infrastructure's massive portfolio of utility, energy, transport, and data-related assets to do their job. Whether it's pipelines that deliver natural gas, fiber optic cables that deliver data, or shipping containers that carry goods, demand for the assets this company invests in is reliable. With heaps of assets subject to depreciation and amortization, funds from operations (FFO) is the preferred metric for evaluating Brookfield Infrastructure's cash flows from one period to another. Income-seeking investors adore this business, because about 85% of FFO comes from regulated utility businesses and entities that sign long-term contracts. The company targets a payout ratio between 60% and 70% of FFO. Despite raising its payout by 8% annually over the past 12 years, the latest dividend payment was in the preferred range at 68% of FFO generated during the quarter. That means raising the dividend payment at roughly the same pace as the company's bottom line shouldn't be a problem. Brookfield Infrastructure's dividend payout has grown by 8% annually over the past 12 years. Continuing at this pace probably won't be a problem. If we adjust for foreign exchange rates, second-quarter FFO rose by 9% year over year. Second-quarter FFO that grew 9% year over year hit the top end of Brookfield Infrastructure's expected growth rate over the long term. If it can maintain this pace, the dividend payments that freshly acquired shares deliver could double in about eight years. Two avenues for growth Brookfield Infrastructure has investment-grade credit ratings from the major rating agencies. It's also a subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM), a leading alternative asset manager with over $1 trillion in assets under management. Brookfield Infrastructure's parent boasts an "A" credit rating from Fitch, and an "A-" rating from S&P Global. Over the past 12 months, Brookfield Asset Management raised a whopping $97 billion in capital, which gives Brookfield Infrastructure a lot of opportunities to acquire new assets. Brookfield Infrastructure recently acquired 5,500 miles of pipelines capable of transporting 2.5 million barrels per day of refined products between Texas and New York. The company expects enough profit from the pipeline to repay its principal investment in about seven years. Operating this pipeline seems like a great way to generate a profit, but it isn't Brookfield's only option. In the first seven months of 2025, the company sold nine assets for proceeds of around $2.4 billion. Brookfield Infrastructure refers to selling assets it's developed as a capital recycling program. Whatever you want to call it, it's been a tremendous source of profit. For example, the company recently sold a stake in its U.K. ports operation for $385 million, which was 7.5 times more than it paid in 2009. That works out to a 19% internal rate of return. With Brookfield Asset Management at its back, Brookfield Infrastructure doesn't just get the benefit of cheap and plentiful capital. It also has access to around 2,500 investment professionals who have their fingers on the pulse of the alternative-asset landscape. Continued growth at the top end of management's expected range of 5% to 9% isn't guaranteed, but it isn't an entirely unreasonable expectation either. For most investors, adding some shares of this stock to a diverse portfolio now and holding them indefinitely looks like the right move. Should you invest $1,000 in Brookfield Infrastructure right now? Before you buy stock in Brookfield Infrastructure, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Brookfield Infrastructure wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Cory Renauer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends S&P Global. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Asset Management and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This 4.3%-Yielding Dividend Stock Could Double Its Payout In 8 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio