Speaker under fire for inaction against convicted BJP MLA
1
2
Jaipur:
Rajasthan Assembly Speaker
Vasudev Devnani is dragging his feet in disqualifying
BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena
from the Anta constituency, even after the
Supreme Court
dismissed Meena's SLP against the Rajasthan High Court's May 1 decision upholding his three-year prison sentence. The Speaker's office has come under fire for the delay, despite legal provisions mandating immediate
disqualification
of elected representatives sentenced to over two years. "An official at the Assembly said they are consulting the legal team and will soon take a decision regarding the disqualification."Leader of Opposition Tikaram Jully lambasted Devnani for what he termed a "
constitutional failure
." "Nine days have passed since the high court upheld Meena's conviction, yet no action. The Speaker's position is not above the Constitution," Jully said. He also drew comparisons with Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, who acted within 24 hours to disqualify Rahul Gandhi under similar circumstances. "In one nation, we cannot have two constitutions. We will move court against this delay," Jully added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Diversification, policy reforms aid Odisha's industrial progress: CM
1 2 3 4 Bhubaneswar: Ahead of the BJP govt's one-year anniversary, chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi on Sunday said that Odisha is becoming a "diversified industrial powerhouse" and a top investment destination in the country by not just approving investments worth Rs 4.5 lakh crore but also successfully grounding projects worth Rs 1.78 lakh crore. "Odisha is no longer just a minerals and metals hub. We are becoming a diversified industrial powerhouse, where opportunity flows from port to plant, and from cities to every aspirational district," the CM said during a meeting with leading industrialists and entrepreneurs in the city. "We are not merely sanctioning projects; we are grounding them. We are not making promises; we are delivering results — at scale, with speed, and with purpose," Majhi said. Mapping the industrial growth story, he said, "In just one year, we approved over 200 large and mega projects. Odisha now stands for credibility, competitiveness and commitment to progress." The CM said industries are diversifying from minerals and metals to green energy, agro-processing, technical textiles and shipbuilding, with investments flowing into 20 sectors. He attributed the success to proactive policy push like outcome-based governance and a "whole-of-govt model" that emphasises seamless coordination between departments and agencies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo Roadshows in Delhi, Mumbai and Singapore have pitched Odisha as a hub for chemical, electronics, capital goods and advanced manufacturing, while two major events, Pravasi Bharatiya Divas and Utkarsh Odisha — Make in Odisha Conclave-2025, attracted global attention and industrial giants expanding the state's economic footprint, Majhi said. Majhi also spoke about the ambitious vision for 'Samruddha Odisha' by 2036, aligning with the centenary celebration of formation of the state. He outlined four key priorities in the upcoming year, including the launch of new policies targeting emerging and sunrise sectors, expansion of land banks, logistics corridors and critical infrastructure. He emphasised revamping the single-window system with digital-first project tracking and simplification of regulatory compliances to speed up approvals and encourage entrepreneurship. To support industrial labour, the state is developing 13 workers' hostels and modernising seven industrial estates with plug-and-play infrastructure. Furthermore, 30 MSME parks and 8 new industrial areas have been initiated to empower small enterprises and entrepreneurs. Industries minister Sampad Chandra Swain, MSME minister Gokulananda Mallik, development commissioner Anu Garg, and senior officers, among others, attended the event.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Gurjar Mahapanchayat ends after state govt's assurance on meeting their demands
Gurjar leader Vijay Bainsla read out the state government's response before the gathering, which included the cabinet's decision to recommend the inclusion of five per cent reservation for Most Backward Classes (MBCs) in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution. The Mahapanchayat was convened by the Gurjar Aarakshan Sangharsh Samiti in the Pilupura area of Bayana. Jaipur, Jun 8 (PTI) The Gurjar community's Mahapanchayat concluded on Sunday at Karwari Shaheed Memorial in Rajasthan's Bharatpur following a consensus over the state government's response to their demands, though a section of the community briefly disrupted train services in protest. The state also agreed to appoint a nodal officer in every district to address cases registered during previous Gurjar agitations, he said. Bainsla added that the government had also agreed to hold monthly review meetings on Devnarayan Board schemes, expedite pending recruitments, and other issues raised by the community. However, after the Mahapanchayat ended, a group of people gathered at the railway tracks near Fatehsinghpura and halted the 54794 Mathura-Sawai Madhopur passenger train for more than 90 minutes. They also removed clips from the railway track, affecting traffic on the Delhi-Mumbai route. Railway Protection Force (RPF), local police and administrative officials held talks with the protesters, following which operations resumed, officials said. 'The train movement remained disrupted for more than one and a half hours,' Chief Public Relations Officer (CPRO) of North Western Railway said. Bharatpur Collector Amit Yadav said the area was vacated after talks. Inspector General of Police Rahul Prakash said the protesters were assured that their concerns would be addressed. Reacting to the incident, Bainsla said that majority from the community was satisfied with the government's response and chose not to focus on isolated acts. 'To get the 5 per cent MBC reservation included in the Ninth Schedule, the state cabinet will recommend the move and urge the Centre to act. This was our key demand and we are happy,' he told PTI. The Ninth Schedule contains a list of laws that are shielded from judicial review. Bainsla also confirmed the government's agreement on appointing nodal officers to dispose of cases from past agitations. Earlier in the day, the Samiti had issued an ultimatum to the BJP government to respond to its demands by Sunday afternoon. Minister of State for Home Jawahar Singh Bedham urged the Gurjar leadership to avoid agitation, saying the government was open to dialogue. 'Everyone has the right to express themselves in a democracy. But when the government is willing to talk, what is the need for a Mahapanchayat or protest?' he said, while also personally appealing to Bainsla. 'He contested the Deoli-Uniyara seat and attends party meetings. I urge him to resolve the issues through dialogue,' the minister said. Due to the Mahapanchayat, traffic between Bayana and Hindaun City was diverted via alternate routes, and additional police force was deployed to maintain law and order. Kirori Singh Bainsla, Vijay Bainsla's late father, had led several Gurjar agitations since 2006, including rail blockades on key routes. PTI AG OZ OZ This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Democracy without dissent a contradiction: Justice Surya Kant
Democracy without dissent is a contradiction and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity, Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant has asserted as he invoked India's constitutional ethos and the top court's role in defending civil liberties. Justice Kant, who is in line to take over as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in November this year, was speaking at the Washington Supreme Court as part of an international judicial exchange. In his address earlier this week that underscored the shared constitutional commitments of India and the United States, the judge said: 'Democracy without dissent is a contradiction, and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity…These are not merely legal precedents; they are constitutional declarations.' Justice Kant highlighted that the right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the First Amendment in the US, has been 'zealously defended' by courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Drawing parallels with the US Supreme Court's protection of student protest in Tinker Vs Des Moines (1969), he recalled how India's top court, much earlier, had established the primacy of expression in Romesh Thappar and Brij Bhushan cases in 1950, ruling against pre-censorship and vague notions of public order. 'In both countries, the judiciary has consistently pushed back against the temptation to suppress dissent under misguided and deceptive notions that the executive may hold,' he noted. Reaffirming the foundational nature of constitutional supremacy in both democracies, Justice Kant highlighted that the basic structure doctrine in India that asserts Parliament cannot amend away core constitutional values mirrors the American principle that 'even the majoritarian will must bow' before foundational ideals like liberty, federalism, and equality. 'These doctrines reflect a shared understanding that tampering with these principles would cause a rift so immense that it would threaten the very heart of our existence,' he warned. ALSO READ | Free speech, democracy, and the epidemic of hurt feelings Justice Kant also spotlighted India's global leadership in using public interest litigation (PIL) as a judicial tool to redress collective harm. Citing the Vishaka judgment (1997) where the Indian Supreme Court laid down workplace sexual harassment guidelines in the absence of legislation, he said: 'Though structurally distinct, both approaches reflect a shared judicial philosophy: that justice must not be confined to individual litigants but must be responsive to collective harm and systemic failure.' In contrast, he acknowledged the role of class action lawsuits in the US, such as Lois Jenson Vs Eveleth Taconite Co (1993), where female workers collectively challenged workplace abuse. Addressing the evolution of due process jurisprudence, Justice Kant recalled how the Indian Constitution initially adopted 'procedure established by law' over the American-style 'due process,' but eventually evolved the latter through judicial interpretation. 'In the seminal Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Indian Supreme Court read into the phrase the requirements of justice, fairness, and reasonableness -- effectively harmonizing our doctrine with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' he added. Justice Kant concluded his address on a note of judicial kinship, stating: 'It is my firm belief that our countries, and our legal systems, share a kindred spirit rooted in the pursuit of justice, liberty, and the rule of law… The law must be a shield for the weak, not a sword for the powerful.'
