&w=3840&q=100)
China fuelling AI goals with state backing, open source, infra funding
At the time, that mostly meant turning to another popular American product made by Meta.
But in the year since, there has been a major shift in the global race to develop advancedAI Chinese companies like DeepSeek and Alibaba have churned out open-sourceAI systems of their own that rank among the world's top performers.
China is quickly closing the gap with the United States in the contest to make technologies that rival the human brain. This is not an accident. The Chinese government has spent a decade funneling resources toward becoming anAI superpower, using the same strategy it used to dominate the electric vehicle and solar power industries.
'China is applying state support across the entireAI tech stack, from chips and data centers down to energy,' said Kyle Chan, an adjunct researcher at the RAND Corporation, a think tank.
For the past 10 years, Beijing has pushed Chinese companies to build manufacturing capabilities in high-tech industries for which the country previously depended on imports. That approach helped China become the maker of a third of the world's manufactured goods and a leader in electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels. And it has also been applied to the essential building blocks of advancedAI systems: computing power, skilled engineers and data resources.
China pushed that industrial policy approach as three presidential administrations in Washington tried to hold back its ability to make technologies like artificial intelligence, including by restricting sales of chips made by Nvidia, America's leadingAI chipmaker.
On Monday, Nvidia said the US government had approved sales, with a license, of a China-specific chip known as the H20. But with Beijing's backing, Chinese companies like Huawei have been racing to develop alternatives to Nvidia's technology.
Beijing's approach toAI is intended to help Chinese tech companies make advancements despite Washington's restrictions.
In the United States, companies like Google and Meta have spent billions on data centers. But in China, it is the government that has played a major role in financingAI infrastructure and hardware, including data centers, high-capacity servers and semiconductors.
To concentrate the country's engineering talent, the Chinese government also financed a network of labs where much of its most advancedAI research takes place, often in collaboration with big tech companies like Alibaba and ByteDance.
Beijing has also directed banks and local governments to go on a lending spree that fueled hundreds of start-ups. Since 2014, the government has spent nearly $100 billion on a fund to grow the semiconductor industry, and in April said it would allocate $8.5 billion for youngAI start-ups.
Local governments have set up entire neighborhoods that function as start-up incubators, like Dream Town in Hangzhou, a city in China's south that is home to Alibaba and DeepSeek and is known as a hot spot forAI talent.
'For the government to help us cover even 10 or 15 percent of our early-stage research costs, that's a huge benefit,' said Jia Haojun, the founder of Deep Principle, a Hangzhou start-up focused on usingAI for chemical research that raised $10 million last year.
Different city districts offer competing incentives to lure start-ups to their areas. Deep Principle received a $2.5 million subsidy from a district in Hangzhou when the start-up moved to the city, Mr. Jia said. A local official helped him find office space and employee housing.
AmericanAI systems were built using information from all types of websites, including some that are inaccessible on China's censored internet, like Reddit and Wikipedia. But Chinese companies need to make sure that anyAI products used by the general public comply with Beijing's controls on information. So the government has created data resources that contain approved information for companies to use to train theirAI systems, like one based on state media articles that is called 'the mainstream values corpus.'
Chinese tech companies also have an enormous amount of data on how people use the internet, which has helped companies like ByteDance, the parent of TikTok, develop some of the country's most popularAI systems.
Yet Beijing's industrial policy approach toAI has also been inefficient. An abundance ofAI start-ups are vying for their piece of a cutthroat market, competing to offer their models at low rates to engineers.
This top-down approach also makes it burdensome to shift resources quickly as technology changes. Chinese companies spent years working onAI technologies like facial recognition but were caught off-guard by the advances in generativeAI behind ChatGPT.
'It can be difficult to figure out where to invest and allocate resources,' said Mr. Chan, the RAND researcher. 'A.I. is not like traditional industries like steel or shipbuilding, where the technology is fairly stable.'
Much of the government funding has gone to China's leading chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, which manufactures chips designed by companies like Huawei and Qualcomm. SMIC has raced to produceAI chips for Huawei that are intended to compete with ones made by Nvidia.
While Huawei chips may be good enough for some tasks, they cannot do everything Nvidia chips can do. Companies are also reluctant to make the switch because it is difficult for SMIC to manufacture them in large quantities.
'The idea is that in the event of being cut off, there is some viable alternative — even if it is lagging in performance — so China'sAI industry can continue to make some progress instead of being stopped altogether,' Mr. Chan said.
Chinese companies are turning to open-sourceAI systems as the fastest way to catch up to rivals in Silicon Valley, which are thought to have at least a few months' lead over China's most advanced technology.
In the past year, Alibaba has released several popular open-source systems. ByteDance, which spent $11 billion last year on data centers and otherAI infrastructure, also published details about how it built some of its technology. This month, Huawei released an open-source system. Even Baidu, a Chinese internet company that previously praised the 'monetization potential' of closedAI products, recently released open-source versions of some of its systems.
While OpenAI and Google charge a premium for access to their closedAI systems, the Chinese approach of making models publicly available has made it easier for engineers around the world to build on their systems.
OpenAI has warned that ChineseAI companies like DeepSeek could block American competitors from markets around the world, giving them the chance to set standards for how the new technology is used.
Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, has framed the competition between American and ChineseAI companies as ideological and said he wants to 'make sure democraticAI wins over authoritarianAI'
The thinking is that China's approach may appeal to more engineers around the world.
'Open-source is a source of technological soft power,' said Kevin Xu, the US-based founder of Interconnected Capital, a hedge fund that invests in artificial intelligence technologies. 'It is effectively the Hollywood movie or the Big Mac of technology.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
No Entry For GM Crops, Says New Delhi; India-US Trade Talks Hit A Sacred Wall
New Delhi: Genetically modified (GM) crops will not be crossing India's borders anytime soon, no matter how urgently the United States knocks. As trade negotiations between New Delhi and Washington enter a crucial phase, insiders say one red line is not up for discussion. 'There are things that are not about negotiation. Some things are a matter of principle,' said a senior official close to the development. That principle, sources say, is GM corn and soy. While American negotiators have made agricultural access a central demand, pressing India for a wider entry gate for U.S. farm goods, New Delhi is not blinking, especially on GM imports. Over the years, the issue has mutated from a mere trade disagreement into a symbolic fight over sovereignty, food safety and grassroots politics. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has repeatedly flagged India's restrictions on GM products, calling them 'non-tariff barriers'. But Indian authorities remain unmoved, largely because of the hardline stance taken by domestic groups closely aligned with the ruling establishment. Last month, the message from Sangh affiliates was if America insists on forcing GM crops into the Indian market, there may be no trade deal at all. Carried in Business Standard, that warning echoed the sentiments of influential groups such as the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS) and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), which have long opposed agricultural concessions to Washington, particularly in sectors like dairy and GM crops. Their argument? Food security. The BKS has often warned that allowing U.S. crops into India, especially without clear labelling or transparency, could sabotage domestic farming ecosystems and compromise health safety standards. On the other hand, the SJM sees this as a direct attack on economic self-reliance. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. U.S. officials have privately hinted at the urgency of the moment, pointing to a deadline set by President Donald Trump, who is seeking a revival of his trade agenda. Trump has marked August 1 as a red-letter day. If no interim deal is inked by then, India could be hit with reciprocal tariffs, potentially as high as 26 percent. Indian trade negotiators are not indifferent to that pressure. But according to officials involved in the process, the sixth round of talks will only happen in the second half of August after Trump's deadline expires. Any hope for a short-term resolution seems, at best, unrealistic. As one official put it, 'We are not looking at compromise in areas that touch the lives of millions.' In other words, GM corn is off the table. And perhaps, so is the deal, at least for now.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump on Gaza talks collapse and Hamas hostage standoff: ‘I know what I'd do... but Israel is going to make a decision'
US President Donald Trump on Sunday said Israel is now facing a critical moment as ceasefire negotiations with Hamas have broken down. He emphasised that the Israeli government will soon have to 'make a decision' on how to proceed in Gaza. 'They [Hamas] don't want to give [the hostages] back,' Trump told reporters in Scotland. 'And so Israel is going to have to make a decision.' Trump added: 'I know what I'd do, but I don't think it's appropriate that I say. But Israel is going to make a decision.' The President also highlighted ongoing US aid efforts to Gaza, lamenting the lack of international recognition. 'We gave $60 million two weeks ago for food, for Gaza,' Trump said. 'And nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it. It makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and you have other countries not giving anything.' Trump said some of his own supporters criticised him for providing aid to Palestinians, but he defended the move. 'There is a humanitarian reason for doing it,' he said. 'Will I do more aid? Yeah. The US is going to do more aid for Gaza but we would like to have other countries participate.' Trump claimed that without American assistance, conditions in Gaza would have deteriorated further. 'If we weren't there, I think people would have starved, frankly,' he said. 'They would have starved and it's not like they're eating well.' Trump called on other nations to contribute to humanitarian efforts in Gaza and expressed frustration at the lack of acknowledgment from the international community. 'It would be nice to at least have a 'thank you,'' he said. Trump's comments come as Israel faces growing criticism over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Over the weekend, Israel approved humanitarian airdrops and announced plans to establish corridors for United Nations convoys to distribute supplies. Earlier ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas collapsed last week, leaving the future of hostages and regional stability uncertain.


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Even After U.S. Plea, Saudi Refused Defense Aid To Israel; Prince Salman Rejected Trump's Request Against Iran
Riyadh/Washington: A previously undisclosed standoff unfolded behind the scenes of the 12-day Iran-Israel war in June, as Saudi Arabia flatly refused a direct request from the United States to transfer its powerful American-made THAAD air defense systems to Israel, according to two senior U.S. defense officials cited by the Middle East Eye . At the height of the conflict, Iran had unleashed waves of advanced ballistic missiles, and Israel's stockpile of interceptor missiles, especially the high-altitude THAADs, was running dangerously low. Faced with the rapid depletion of its own interceptors like the Arrow and Patriot, the U.S. administration urgently reached out to Riyadh. But the response it got was immediate and firm. According to one official familiar with the internal deliberations, 'We were asking everyone to contribute. When that failed, we tried to negotiate. But this was not just about one country.' American officials tried to convince Saudi Arabia that Tehran was not only a threat to Israel; it posed a looming danger to Saudi national security as well. But the Saudis did not budge. Despite being fully capable of aiding Israel, the kingdom chose to prioritise its own defense. Saudi Arabia had already activated its THAAD systems in response to threats from Houthi rebels, with some units even deployed to guard the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. At one point during the war, Israeli defense officials were forced to let some incoming Iranian missiles fall on uninhabited areas as they rationed what little interceptor stock remained. U.S. think tanks had already flagged the issue in classified memos, highlighting Israel's supply of Arrow and Patriot systems was shrinking by the hour. Meanwhile, on July 3, nine days after a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Saudi Arabia inaugurated a newly acquired THAAD battery from the United States, a move closely watched in Washington. Concerns were spiraling inside the Pentagon. The Guardian reported that the United States itself was down to just 25% of its Patriot interceptor reserves, and Pentagon planners were alarmed about whether America could even sustain its own global military posture if the Iran-Israel war escalated further. One American official told the Middle East Eye that internal projections showed a 'catastrophic depletion' of interceptors was imminent. In a desperate move, the United States tested its Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) from a Navy destroyer of the Arleigh Burke class to reinforce Israeli defenses. The Telegraph confirmed that Iran had already scored direct hits on five key Israeli military bases. The final twist came when The Wall Street Journal revealed that American officials had floated the idea of redirecting Saudi THAAD systems to Tel Aviv, but Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman rejected it outright. Washington then turned to the UAE with a similar request. Whether the Emirates complied remains unknown. No official confirmation has surfaced. The silence speaks volumes. As it stands, this behind-the-curtain episode exposes not only the limits of U.S. influence in the Gulf, but also the extent to which Saudi Arabia has begun charting its own course, even when it means defying its closest Western ally in the middle of a regional war.