How did birds start flying? Scientists find answers through feathered dinosaur fossil
A well preserved Archaeopteryx fossil has offered detailed analysis into the evolution of flight of birds some 150 million years ago, according to a study. This comes more than 160 years after the remains of Archaeopteryx were discovered for the first time. In a new study, published in the Nature journal on Wednesday, scientists have conducted a CT-scan of a nearly complete and uncrushed specimen to gain fresh insights into how birds started flying, The New York Times reported.
It all started in 1861 when a group of scientists discovered Archaeopteryx in Germany's Solnhofen. This was found in limestones that were nearly 150 million years old. Back then, they were not aware that the fossilised skeleton, along with the several others that followed, would go on to provide major evidence regarding the theory of evolution.The fossil in a German quarry had visible feathers that instantly made it one of the earliest known bird candidates, the Guardian reported. This is the first specimen to have been identified with specialised wing feathers on the upper arm bone. The feathers go on to create a smooth aerodynamic line from the wing to body.
Dr Jingmai O'Connor, who led the research, said that the Archaeopteryx specimens have changed the way people "see the world" in comparison to other fossils. The paleontologist at the Field Museum in Chicago, along with his team, sheds light on the soft tissues along with the skeleton of the Chicago Archaeopteryx specimen.
Although Archaeopteryx is not considered among the firsts in dinosaurs to have 'wings,' O'Connor suggests that it could probably be the earliest known dinosaur that had the capability to fly using its feathers.Such feathers remain missing in other feathered dinosaurs, even though they remain closely associated with birds.The research highlights that the wing feathers of those dinosaurs only reached the elbow, adding that "non-avian dinosaurs couldn't fly". However, Archaeopteryx had this ability in it.
Also Read: Jamie Lee Curtis regrets undergoing plastic surgery at just 25, reveals the reason behind her decision
The latest specimen was owned privately earlier. The Field Museum acquired it in 2022 and put it up for display last year.This Chicago specimen helped the researchers to look into more details into Archaeopteryx and how it could fly. The first time when this fossil was brought to the museum, it had the same colour as its surrounding rock. The researchers even found it difficult to see through most of the soft-tissue.Later on, the Field Museum scientists did CT-scan and illuminated it using the UV light to have its digital map. Chicago Archaeopteryx's bones remained preserved in three dimensions. This helped the team in having a better evaluation of its skull's palate.
Also Read : UFC 317 fight card: Dana White announces headliners for vacant lightweight title; other major clashes
1. Could Chicago Archaeopteryx fly?The latest study suggests that the "beautifully preserved" Archaeopteryx had tertial feathers that reveal major details into its flying capabilities.
2. When and where was the first Archaeopteryx fossil discovered? According to reports, it was found in 1861 in 150 million-years-old limestones from Germany's Solnhofen.
Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Deport "Illegal Alien" Elon Musk: Ex Aide's Advice To Donald Trump
Hours after a public fallout between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, a former close aide of the US President questioned the immigration status of the Tesla CEO. Steve Bannon, a former White House strategist, called Musk "an illegal alien" who should be deported. He also urged the US government to seize the tech billionaire's company, SpaceX. Speaking with The New York Times, Bannon, one of Musk's most vocal critics, said, "They [US government] should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." His statement came after Musk threatened to shut down SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft that carries astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Bannon argued this could be a serious threat to the country, so Trump should sign an order under the Defense Production Act to take over SpaceX immediately. The Defense Production Act, a law from the time of the Korean War, gives the President the power to mandate private businesses to prioritise and accept government contracts for certain products such as weapons and medical supplies. On his podcast "War Room," Bannon said, "The action that President Trump should be taking immediately, I think, is when [Musk] threatens to take one of the big programs out of Space X, President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act to be called in on SpaceX and seize SpaceX tonight, before midnight." He didn't stop there. The former executive chairman of the right-wing Breitbart News website urged the US government to look into Musk's alleged drug use. He alleged the Tesla CEO tried to get secret information from the Pentagon about China. He further asked the Trump administration to put Musk's security clearance on hold and cancel all contracts with his companies. On Thursday, tensions peaked between Musk and Trump escalated after the billionaire's criticism of Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." Trump responded, saying he once had a good relationship with Musk, but now he was unsure if it would continue the same way. Musk fired back, accusing the Trump administration of withholding records related to Jeffrey Epstein, claiming the President's name was there.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Musk-Trump feud threatens billions in SpaceX deals, risks US space goals
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's spat on Thursday has escalated from online exchanges to potential real-world consequences, threatening a key part of the US space programme. After Trump threatened to cancel all federal contracts with Musk, putting a significant source of revenue for SpaceX at risk, Musk said that he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which ferries cargo and astronauts to the International Space Station for the US. However, he later appeared to back down, reported Bloomberg. SpaceX, the world's leading rocket launcher, also holds lucrative contracts with the Pentagon to launch national security satellites and is developing a spacecraft aimed at landing American astronauts on the Moon within two years. While Musk voiced his criticism on his social media platform X, Trump fired back during a meeting with the German Chancellor and through posts on his own site, Truth Social. However, the question remains whether either will carry out their threats. SpaceX's critical role in US space and defence The Bloomberg report quoted a senior fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, saying that cutting contracts with SpaceX would trigger a domino effect across many critical US government functions, especially within the Pentagon and Nasa. 'Right now, no other company can match what SpaceX provides,' he said. SpaceX, valued at around $350 billion and one of the world's most valuable start-ups, has secured over $22 billion in unclassified contracts from the Department of Defense and Nasa since 2000. Nasa awarded SpaceX nearly $4 billion to help land US astronauts on the Moon. The agency's dependence on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft for missions to the International Space Station has increased, particularly due to delays with Boeing's Starliner programme. SpaceX also holds an $843 million contract to safely decommission the ISS at the end of its mission. Earlier this week, Musk revealed that SpaceX earned approximately $1.1 billion from Nasa contracts in 2025 alone. SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, which provides broadband access to rural areas and holds contracts with the Pentagon, could also face jeopardy. According to Peter Hays, a professorial lecturer at George Washington University's Space Policy Institute, 'Musk has launched more satellites than the rest of the world combined. It wouldn't be simple to just cut ties with him.' SpaceX, alongside Boeing, Lockheed Martin's United Launch Alliance (ULA), and soon Blue Origin, plays a vital role in launching US national security missions, including surveillance satellites for the Pentagon. However, Blue Origin has only recently introduced its New Glenn rocket, and ULA is still struggling to increase its launch capacity, leaving the Space Force and the National Reconnaissance Office heavily reliant on SpaceX. The report quoted Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, saying, 'They can't really cut off SpaceX without having a severe impact on the military space capabilities.' According to Harrison, the conflict between Trump and Musk could affect the future of the Golden Dome missile defence system. If the administration decides to use a design less dependent on space technology, SpaceX might face fewer contract opportunities. 'This dispute could influence the final design choices for the Golden Dome system,' he said. Legal authority and challenges to contract cancellation It remains uncertain whether Trump can unilaterally cancel contracts or revoke subsidies granted to SpaceX. Contract awards and cancellations are meant to be free from political influence, and if the President acts on his threats, SpaceX could sue for breach of contract. Even if the administration tries to end the contract through standard procedures, the public statements by the President could provide grounds to challenge the termination. Terminating federal contracts is both costly and politically sensitive. Most contracts include a 'termination for convenience' clause, but exercising this often requires the government to compensate contractors for billions of dollars in lost expenses. Moreover, only designated contracting officers, not the President, have the legal authority to sign or cancel federal contracts, according to a Bloomberg report. The report quoted Caryn Schenewerk, a space industry consultant and law professor at Georgetown University who formerly worked at SpaceX, stating, 'You can't just flip a switch. There are established procedures and responsibilities that must be followed to cancel contracts.' Improper handling of contract cancellations could expose the government to further legal battles, especially given Musk's history of litigation. In 2014, Musk sued the Air Force to allow SpaceX to compete for national security satellite launches but dropped the suit when the Air Force opened the contract to competition.
The Print
3 days ago
- The Print
Bengaluru stampede tragedy: What science tells us about crowd control
Several stampedes have occurred in India just this year. On 15 February, a stampede at the New Delhi Railway Station killed 18 people, including many passengers who were travelling to the Maha Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj, which also experienced a stampede in January. At least 30 people died at the religious gathering as crowd management measures failed. Published in Nature in February, the study analysed video footage from Spain's San Fermin festival, popular for its running of the bulls event held in July every year. Researchers found that when crowds reached a certain density, spontaneous and rhythmic patterns emerged. Termed 'collective oscillation', the crowd self-organised, and began forming involuntary large-scale, wave-like patterns. New Delhi : A stampede during Royal Challengers Bengaluru's victory celebrations outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium claimed 11 lives Wednesday, and injured several others. Stampedes are recurring tragedies in India, but a study by French and Spanish researchers suggests that patterns emerge in tightly packed crowds. The correct identification of these oscillations, and monitoring via drones and CCTVs, can ensure crowd control and safety during mass gatherings, it says. While these events haven't undergone any scientific scrutiny, the observations from the study in Nature have the potential to help organisers prevent the next stampede. In an interview to The New York Times, France-based physicist Dr. Denis Bartolo, who co-authored the study, said that he placed cameras across the plaza to film the movements of the crowd below. At first, it seemed 'erratic, chaotic, turbulent'. But Bartolo and his team applied fluid dynamic techniques to 'measure the flow of a material by inspecting its direction and velocity'. Similar orbital motions—which took 18 seconds to complete in that particular plaza—were detected right before a stampede that took place at the 2010 Love Parade in Duisburg, Germany, the study shows. The researchers found that above a critical density of people, these oscillations emerge almost organically, without any external guidance. These oscillations are caused by random interactions between people—a slight nudge to gain space, a shuffling of feet, or even an adjustment of posture. These 'odd frictional forces' provide a sort of collective quality to the crowd, leading the mass to exhibit properties similar to fluids. By mapping where and when oscillations start, organisers of mass events can use monitoring tools, like drones or CCTVs, to identify areas in the crowd before a disaster occurs. If these circular motions are detected, the relevant action can be taken, thereby averting stampede-like situations. A similar study, published in Nature in December 2024, studied how crowds behave in marathon events, where groups of runners move in the same direction. Particularly, the goal was to 'investigate the impact of race staff on crowd dynamics'. Similar to ripples in water, the simulations showed wave-like patterns coursing through the crowd. 'We can very clearly observe that starting from the initial homogeneous and random velocity of particles, density and velocity patterns are formed,' read the report by researchers from Indian Institute of Technology-Banaras Hindu University. But an NYT report warned that real-world applications may be limited—'It's one thing to have a well-lit venue filmed with high-quality cameras. But grainy nighttime security footage, for instance, may not reveal the telltale circular movements.' However, recognising that patterns form right before stampede-like events is the first step to building effective crowd management techniques. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: 'My brother was crazy about cricket, it took his life': Chinnaswamy stampede leaves families devastated
