High butter prices 'a good thing' for NZ
Butter prices might be biting at the supermarket checkout, but there's a warning that anyone hoping they'll fall should be careful what they wish for.
The price of butter has increased about 50 percent over the past year, pushed up by high global dairy prices.
But economists say that's actually a good thing for New Zealand.
Household Economic Survey data shows that in 2023, households spent about $124 million on butter. Between 15 percent and 30 percent of households would buy butter over a one- or two-week period.
But the country exported $5.2 billion worth.
"It's not nearly worth trying to change the domestic butter game at the expense of our very lucrative export potential," Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said.
"Being in China at the moment, I've been looking around here ... we are still charging more in our premium export markets than we are seeing domestically.
"I mean in New Zealand, butter is $8.50 to $11 depending on who you're talking to or what shop you're going to. I've found an Anchor block in China that was only 454 grams for about $13.52. So the export stuff works for us."
India is also a large producer of butter and has comparatively low prices, but Olsen said that was not comparable because farmers there were getting a subsidy of up to a third.
In Australia, there was no GST on fresh food.
Butter is about 7 percent of total New Zealand exports.
"So yes, consumers get hit with higher butter prices in New Zealand," Olsen said.
"But we make a lot more as a country from the exports that we send out overseas. And I guess you know, cause there's all this talk of, well, what happens if butter prices were lower ... I do think that there is this conception that if magically butter prices were lower, everything else would be the same too.
"And that's just a complete false economy. If you had persistently lower butter prices, then there wouldn't be quite as many people farming. Or they wouldn't be the same profits from manufacturing and similar from Fonterra and what have you. That would mean there would be less money going into the economy across the country, people would have fewer jobs than they would at the moment. And so you might be paying cheaper, better prices. But you might not have a job.
"That's the trade-off that, that to a degree we're talking about ... I also think we talk a lot about butter. How much butter does every household in New Zealand consume? Like how many blocks are you guys buying?"
Westpac chief economist Kelly Eckhold said it was good for the country overall that dairy prices were high.
"Exports of cheese is $3 billion. All these dairy products are rising for the same underlying reason - demand for milk fats is increasing. Butter and cheese in particular are the things the world wants."
He said the conversation was influenced by the fact that everyone encountered the retail price but not everyone was exposed to the export earnings.
"One thing to think about is the gains from the income are more narrowly shared than the costs that come to all of us. We all go to the supermarket and buy a bit of butter and cheese and milk.
"But if I look at employment trends on a regional basis, you can see in the last few months the regions where jobs are growing are Canterbury, Otago, Southland, West Coast, Marlborough ... these are areas that have a much higher agricultural and dairy input. There are more jobs in those parts of the country whereas Wellington and Auckland are very weak. There aren't many dairy farms in Remuera unfortunately."
He said a wider problem was not that dairy products' price was rising but that New Zealand incomes were not keeping up.
"Prices are being bid up by people overseas who are wealthier than us and their incomes are growing more strongly.
"That's why they can afford to pay the prices that are pushing the prices up. The question isn't should we be redistributing further the profits form those sector. The question should be what can we do to improve the incomes of Kiwis so when demand goes up overseas we can keep pace. If we can do something that gets job growth up that's unequivocally better than putting price controls on butter or cheese."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
New government stats reveal how much councils are spending
Local Government Minister Simon Watts said councils needed to show they were spending ratepayers' money wisely. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The government has published new performance metrics revealing how much councils are spending as it continues to ramp up the pressure on local bodies. But Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) says the information only tells part of the story and should also include what councils are delivering for the money spent. The first set of "council profiles" draw on data to gauge financial performance. In a statement, Local Government Minister Simon Watts said the cost of living was the biggest worry for households and councils needed to show they were spending ratepayers' money wisely . "Ratepayers place immense trust in their local councils who make key decisions on local infrastructure, fiscal management, and how their community operates on a day-to-day basis on their behalf." he said. The figures show information on council demographics like population and land area, rates revenue, council debt, staffing numbers, how much councils spend and what they spend it on. Watts said people were getting fed up with rate rises and it was important they saw how their council was performing. "That's why the government is putting clear facts and figures directly into the hands of ratepayers. When ratepayers know more about how their council is performing and where their money is going, they can engage more effectively and ask the tough questions. "For instance, communities can now compare how much their council spends on core essentials like infrastructure and see whether their rates are going up more than average." he said. Council are grouped together with similar councils and then benchmarked on their performace. "Releasing these performance metrics aligns with our commitment to lifting the performance of local government. It is an opportunity for councils that are focused on their core functions to highlight their efficiency and value to their communities." Watts said. The government was "actively exploring" a rates capping system , he said. "Given the current pressures on households, the degree of rates increases is a massive worry." While the first release information covers financial performance, subsequent releases will cover metrics like asset management, service delivery, and governance In a statement, LGNZ Vice President Campbell Barry said the metrics were a good starting point for councils to engage with their communities, which always supported transparency and benchmarking. "The profiles detail council expenditure, but they don't show what the community gets for this investment or whether that investment has been supported by the community," he said. "At the moment, the metrics only provide part of the story. For example, is that council investing in key infrastructure to support future growth or make up for past underinvestment, has it been exposed to particular cost pressures or weather events, or is it at a particular point in an investment cycle?" Barry said local context was important. "We encourage people to also look at councils' pre-election reports - which provide a snapshot of council performance and value as well as unique challenges and opportunities - alongside the profiles, to get a fuller picture." he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Who's really to blame for our economic troubles?
Photo: RNZ New Zealand's economic downturn is proving hard to shake - but economists say when it comes to identifying the cause, it's not as simple as pointing the finger at government spending cutbacks or the Reserve Bank's interest rate hikes. Although conditions are expected to improve as the year progresses, the economy remains sluggish. The primary sector is providing one of the few bright spots. Last weekend, when issuing an annual update, Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr blamed the Reserve Bank's decision to thrust the economy into recession to tamp down problem inflation . Some readers contacted RNZ saying that was too simplistic and letting the government off the hook for the impact its spending cutbacks and public sector job cuts were having. "My wife's MPI office in Christchurch reduced headcount by about 10 percent," one wrote. "For each public service worker cut, two to three private sector jobs went with it. The cancellation or freezing of so many infrastructure projects saw my industry (engineering) lay off a quarter to a third of the workforce." So who's to blame? "The overstimulus of the economy from both the government and the Reserve Bank in 2020 and 2021 meant the economy was unsustainably overheated," said chief forecaster at Infometrics Gareth Kiernan. "The government and the Reserve Bank got us into the mess we were in, in the first place, and therefore had to get is out again." While normally monetary and fiscal policy would work to smooth the economic cycle, that was not the case this time, which made the upswing hotter and the downturn bleaker. "Normally, if the economy is going hot, they tend to pull things back. And if the economy is slowing down and we're heading to recession, you typically get more government spending and lower interest rates and that sort of thing. That's not what we've had over the last five years because they pumped things up too much and had to cool the jets on the other side. "Both the government and Reserve Bank needed to, they had no choice. "Government spending decisions have exacerbated the recession but they had no choice because they also exacerbated the boom before that." He said, in December 2022, government consumption spending was 13.5 percent higher than had been forecast before the pandemic hit. "It's still 7.5 percent larger than we were forecasting now… so they've pulled it back in line but it's still larger than it would otherwise have been expected. "Government investments - infrastructure, schools, hospitals, whatever else - by mid-2024, that's 18 percent larger than we were forecasting." Spending was still 13 percent higher, he said. "That puts some context around the fact that yeah, government has been tight but we still haven't undone or unwound all of the massive government-related Covid boom. "That's also reflective of the fact that fiscal numbers over for the next five years are only just getting back into surplus if you're lucky." Gareth Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household and government spending, business investment and exports and imports. Photo: Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household spending, government spending, business investment and exports and imports. He compared the current situation and the experience of the past two years to what normal growth might have been if it had kept going from the 2022 base at a 10-year average rate. "Government investment grew through 2023 and early 2024. It's done its fair share of contribution to how the economy has gone in a positive sense. "If I attribute all of the private sector investment and household spending and the slow growth there to interest rates and in Reserve Bank policy… then you put around about two-thirds of the underperformance of the economy over the last two years down to interest rates, 20 to 25 percent on to the government side of things when you take consumption and investment together and the other 10 percent or so is exports underperforming." Senior economist at ANZ Miles Workman said it was a question of how the Reserve Bank responded to the government's fiscal policies. "The faster the government gets the books back into the black, by restraining spending or increasing taxes, the more likely the RBNZ will need to lower the OCR, which would offset lower demand from fiscal policy settings by shoring up demand from households and businesses. "In other words, it's not as simple as saying government policy has caused X percent of the slowdown and the RBNZ has caused Y percent. The RBNZ's policy stance is a function of fiscal policy settings." Robert MacCulloch Photo: Supplied Economics professor at the University of Auckland Robert MacCulloch said there had been mishandling of the economy by governments on both sides in recent years. "The narrative the parties are using, that the other party is to blame for our problems… I'm past it now, that all the problems we've got are because of [Jacinda] Ardern and [Grant] Robertson and Labour messed it up, then Labour say the same about National. I think it's a con job on the people of the country. The country hasn't been doing great now for quite a long time under both major political parties." He said the wage subsidy had been a significant source of debt, but while it was introduced by the Labour government, National had put pressure on to extend it for bigger firms, which increased the cost. "Luxon's getting angry saying we inherited a shambles. I mean, what's he talking about? His party voted in favour of the all the fiscal and monetary policy. They were wildly enthusiastic about the wage subsidy scheme." He said the cuts the government were enacting were immaterial in the scheme of the fiscal pressures looming from the ageing population. "The cuts in bureaucracy they've done are just a couple of percent of those increased pressures on health and pensions. They're going to have to grapple with how you deal with those huge outflows with the ageing population… the Nats don't have a plan to rein in the cost of those major programmes." Photo: RNZ Eric Crampton Photo: Supplied The chief economist at the NZ Initiative, Eric Crampton, said the labour market was "certainly in worse shape" than it had been from mid-2021 to mid-2023. "But employment rates during that period were the result of substantial overheating from debt-fuelled spending and substantial monetary stimulus. They could not be sustained without severe inflationary consequence. It is wrong to blame anyone for labour markets not looking now like they did in 2022." He said monetary policy would always be expected to move last. "That doesn't mean monetary policy is slow. It means that whatever the bank does in monetary policy takes into account what everyone else has done and is expected to do. So if the fiscal authority announces a track - a Budget, Budget policy statement - monetary policy adjusts to take that into account. The Reserve Bank moves last - it makes its move after seeing what everyone else is doing. "Governments can be more and less helpful with all of that. But a bank following an inflation target ought to be taking account of what Parliament is doing. " He said the Reserve Bank had a tough job at present. "While the employment statistics are comparable to where they were around 2016-2017, government estimates still suggest that there is a remaining output gap - that the economy is running a bit below potential. However, there are inflationary pressures both in the non-traded sector and in tradeables. The bank's failure to keep inflation within bounds over the Covid period should have it sensitive to the risks of going above-target again. So I wouldn't want to blame them too much for current unemployment except to the extent that the bank's errors during the Covid period makes things a bit harder now. " He said keeping inflation within its target was the best thing the Reserve Bank could do to ensure long-term stable employment. "Given inflation risks, the bank would likely need to act to offset fiscal stimulus, if Parliament decided to provide further fiscal stimulus - we are still running a substantial deficit as well." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Kaipara councillor warns Northlanders face $4000-plus water rates
Affordability for users was the big elephant in the room, Paniora said. She said financial metrics for the new CCO meant user charges within 2.5%-3.5% of household income. Paniora said that meant Northlanders paying between $2888 to $4430, based on Infometrics' average $115,536 annual household income. Drinking water and wastewater assets, debts and services for about 100,000 Northlanders will shift from the three councils to the CCO. KDC yesterday voted to become part of the region's Local Water Done Well (LWDW) plan at a meeting in Mangawhai. WDC kick-started the councils' move toward the regional three-council CCO on July 24. FNDC councillors will decide on whether to step into the plan today. Whangārei's strong drinking water and wastewater asset position has become a hot potato amidst the changes. KDC chief executive Jason Marris said his council had won the inclusion of cross-subsidisation in the new CCO. This had meant concession from Northland's two other district councils. The new CCO's agreement says cross-subsidisation, which it calls harmonisation, will be considered within three years of the company's 2027 establishment. But KDC will be pushing for it to happen as soon as possible within that timeframe. KDC general manager corporate services Sue Davidson said the CCO's initial principles required ring-fencing of debt and pricing, with a pathway to harmonisation to be considered within three years of establishment. 'However, KDC will work towards including harmonisation as early as possible in the implementation phase,' Davidson said in meeting agenda papers. This means Whangārei ratepayers will likely be subsidising those in Kaipara. If KDC didn't move on to the regional CCO, it faced a potential Local Water Done Well financial crisis, she said. KDC could not achieve financial sustainability delivering water services, if it adopted an in-house business unit to do so. The council is still carrying debt from the controversial Mangawhai sewerage scheme and has little financial room to move for required drinking water and wastewater services fixes to meet tougher new water reform requirements, which are monitored through regulator Taumata Arowai. KDC initially wanted to shift its council water services into Auckland's Watercare instead of joining with a Northland CCO. But Auckland Council turned that move down, before the September 3 deadline for regions to get their water services plan to the Government. Financial contributions to KDC from developers operating in Kaipara's Mangawhai, New Zealand's fastest-growing coastal settlement, have been significantly factored into the new Northland CCO meeting LWDW financial sustainability requirements. Davidson said there was significant risk around the amount of development contribution money factored into the new model's financials. 'The initial calculations were considered too aggressive and were moderated on request of elected members. The numbers remain ambitious and continue to carry significant risk of being achieved,' Davidson said. Paniora said the new arrangements did not regard water as a taonga as had already been established by the Treaty of Waitangi. She said Māori as tangata whenua had been left out of the conversation regarding the new plan. Paniora said the only hope for consideration of this aspect lay with FNDC. She said she couldn't vote in favour of today's KDC decision and wanted to wait for the outcome of tomorrow's FNDC decision. The new three-council CCO plan for Northland allows an off-ramp for FNDC not to sign up. In that case there would be a two-council CCO. Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson, Deputy Mayor Jonathan Larsen and councillors Mike Howard, Gordon Lambeth, Ash Nayyar, Mark Vincent and Rachael Williams voted to be part of the Northland plan. Paniora and councillor Eryn Wilson-Collins voted not to be. ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
