logo
Who's really to blame for our economic troubles?

Who's really to blame for our economic troubles?

RNZ News30-07-2025
Photo:
RNZ
New Zealand's economic downturn is proving hard to shake - but economists say when it comes to identifying the cause, it's not as simple as pointing the finger at government spending cutbacks or the Reserve Bank's interest rate hikes.
Although conditions are expected to improve as the year progresses, the economy remains sluggish. The primary sector is providing one of the few bright spots.
Last weekend, when issuing an annual update, Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr
blamed the Reserve Bank's decision to thrust the economy into recession to tamp down problem inflation
.
Some readers contacted RNZ saying that was too simplistic and letting the government off the hook for the impact its spending cutbacks and public sector job cuts were having.
"My wife's MPI office in Christchurch reduced headcount by about 10 percent," one wrote. "For each public service worker cut, two to three private sector jobs went with it. The cancellation or freezing of so many infrastructure projects saw my industry (engineering) lay off a quarter to a third of the workforce."
So who's to blame?
"The overstimulus of the economy from both the government and the Reserve Bank in 2020 and 2021 meant the economy was unsustainably overheated," said chief forecaster at Infometrics Gareth Kiernan.
"The government and the Reserve Bank got us into the mess we were in, in the first place, and therefore had to get is out again."
While normally monetary and fiscal policy would work to smooth the economic cycle, that was not the case this time, which made the upswing hotter and the downturn bleaker.
"Normally, if the economy is going hot, they tend to pull things back. And if the economy is slowing down and we're heading to recession, you typically get more government spending and lower interest rates and that sort of thing. That's not what we've had over the last five years because they pumped things up too much and had to cool the jets on the other side.
"Both the government and Reserve Bank needed to, they had no choice.
"Government spending decisions have exacerbated the recession but they had no choice because they also exacerbated the boom before that."
He said, in December 2022, government consumption spending was 13.5 percent higher than had been forecast before the pandemic hit.
"It's still 7.5 percent larger than we were forecasting now… so they've pulled it back in line but it's still larger than it would otherwise have been expected.
"Government investments - infrastructure, schools, hospitals, whatever else - by mid-2024, that's 18 percent larger than we were forecasting."
Spending was still 13 percent higher, he said.
"That puts some context around the fact that yeah, government has been tight but we still haven't undone or unwound all of the massive government-related Covid boom.
"That's also reflective of the fact that fiscal numbers over for the next five years are only just getting back into surplus if you're lucky."
Gareth Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household and government spending, business investment and exports and imports.
Photo:
Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household spending, government spending, business investment and exports and imports.
He compared the current situation and the experience of the past two years to what normal growth might have been if it had kept going from the 2022 base at a 10-year average rate.
"Government investment grew through 2023 and early 2024. It's done its fair share of contribution to how the economy has gone in a positive sense.
"If I attribute all of the private sector investment and household spending and the slow growth there to interest rates and in Reserve Bank policy… then you put around about two-thirds of the underperformance of the economy over the last two years down to interest rates, 20 to 25 percent on to the government side of things when you take consumption and investment together and the other 10 percent or so is exports underperforming."
Senior economist at ANZ Miles Workman said it was a question of how the Reserve Bank responded to the government's fiscal policies.
"The faster the government gets the books back into the black, by restraining spending or increasing taxes, the more likely the RBNZ will need to lower the OCR, which would offset lower demand from fiscal policy settings by shoring up demand from households and businesses.
"In other words, it's not as simple as saying government policy has caused X percent of the slowdown and the RBNZ has caused Y percent. The RBNZ's policy stance is a function of fiscal policy settings."
Robert MacCulloch
Photo:
Supplied
Economics professor at the University of Auckland Robert MacCulloch said there had been mishandling of the economy by governments on both sides in recent years.
"The narrative the parties are using, that the other party is to blame for our problems… I'm past it now, that all the problems we've got are because of [Jacinda] Ardern and [Grant] Robertson and Labour messed it up, then Labour say the same about National. I think it's a con job on the people of the country. The country hasn't been doing great now for quite a long time under both major political parties."
He said the wage subsidy had been a significant source of debt, but while it was introduced by the Labour government, National had put pressure on to extend it for bigger firms, which increased the cost.
"Luxon's getting angry saying we inherited a shambles. I mean, what's he talking about? His party voted in favour of the all the fiscal and monetary policy. They were wildly enthusiastic about the wage subsidy scheme."
He said the cuts the government were enacting were immaterial in the scheme of the fiscal pressures looming from the ageing population.
"The cuts in bureaucracy they've done are just a couple of percent of those increased pressures on health and pensions. They're going to have to grapple with how you deal with those huge outflows with the ageing population… the Nats don't have a plan to rein in the cost of those major programmes."
Photo:
RNZ
Eric Crampton
Photo:
Supplied
The chief economist at the NZ Initiative, Eric Crampton, said the labour market was "certainly in worse shape" than it had been from mid-2021 to mid-2023.
"But employment rates during that period were the result of substantial overheating from debt-fuelled spending and substantial monetary stimulus. They could not be sustained without severe inflationary consequence. It is wrong to blame anyone for labour markets not looking now like they did in 2022."
He said monetary policy would always be expected to move last.
"That doesn't mean monetary policy is slow. It means that whatever the bank does in monetary policy takes into account what everyone else has done and is expected to do. So if the fiscal authority announces a track - a Budget, Budget policy statement - monetary policy adjusts to take that into account. The Reserve Bank moves last - it makes its move after seeing what everyone else is doing.
"Governments can be more and less helpful with all of that. But a bank following an inflation target ought to be taking account of what Parliament is doing. "
He said the Reserve Bank had a tough job at present.
"While the employment statistics are comparable to where they were around 2016-2017, government estimates still suggest that there is a remaining output gap - that the economy is running a bit below potential. However, there are inflationary pressures both in the non-traded sector and in tradeables. The bank's failure to keep inflation within bounds over the Covid period should have it sensitive to the risks of going above-target again. So I wouldn't want to blame them too much for current unemployment except to the extent that the bank's errors during the Covid period makes things a bit harder now. "
He said keeping inflation within its target was the best thing the Reserve Bank could do to ensure long-term stable employment.
"Given inflation risks, the bank would likely need to act to offset fiscal stimulus, if Parliament decided to provide further fiscal stimulus - we are still running a substantial deficit as well."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic
Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic

The Treasury briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Photo: FANATIC STUDIO / SCIENCE PHOTO L The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4 percent of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35 percent of the costs of the response. A further 18 percent came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. RNZ has approached Labour for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Labour MPs gather in Christchurch to formulate election strategy
Labour MPs gather in Christchurch to formulate election strategy

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Labour MPs gather in Christchurch to formulate election strategy

Labour leader Chris Hipkins addressed the Queenstown Business Chamber on Thursday. Photo: Screengrab Analysis: Labour MPs are gathering in Christchurch for a team 'away day', as the party inches closer to announcing its tax policy. Last year's mid-winter retreat was held in Auckland to re-engage with 'supercity' residents , after the party's bruising defeat in Election 2023 The caucus is now pushing to connect with the South Island - leader Chris Hipkins addressed the Queenstown Business Chamber on Thursday, while other MPs visited flood-affected properties in Moteuka. They will all come together in Christchurch on Friday to look to the year ahead and talk strategy for the run-up to next year's election. The meeting comes as the government works against a tide of negative headlines about the economy, with unemployment jumping to 5.2 percent on Wednesday. National campaigned on rebuilding the economy and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon heralded 2025 as the year of "going for growth" in his State of the Nation speech in January . The party is now battling the headwinds of an economic downturn, with some business voices, like former National leader-turned Auckland Chamber boss Simon Bridges, criticising the coalition for not doing more to stimulate the economy. Labour has been near silent on the policy front, choosing instead to criticise the coalition's ideas and hone its messaging on the cost of living to better resonate with voters feeling the pinch. Responding to an update on the government's transition to a universal road-user charges system , Hipkins said the timing could "clobber" those already struggling to pay the bills, but as for Labour's alternative timeline, who knows? The strategy thus far shows some promise, with the left bloc parties - Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori - holding a narrow lead over the coalition in several political polls this year. Labour has also emerged as the party New Zealanders think has the best handle on the cost of living, according to the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor , but the race remains tight and the coalition parties are poised to pounce, when Labour unveils its tax plan this year. On Sunday, The Post reported Labour was one step closer to endorsing a capital gains tax (CGT) - insiders say the party's policy council has narrowly voted for a CGT over a wealth tax . While MPs will most likely discuss tax policy at today's mid-winter retreat, the public shouldn't hold its breath for an announcement. Party process requires both the council and caucus to sign off on policy. In the meantime, the party is clearly preparing to pitch - and defend - its approach to tax. Hipkins told TVNZ's Q+A in March he would need time to "counter the misinformation that often goes with tax changes" before the 2026 Election. Hipkins will give an opening speech to his caucus in Christchurch on Friday, before MPs have policy and strategy discussions behind closed doors. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

NZX steady as Eroad rallies on road user charge changes
NZX steady as Eroad rallies on road user charge changes

NZ Herald

time4 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

NZX steady as Eroad rallies on road user charge changes

'Of course, we have an earnings season starting next week, so you tend to see volumes a little lighter as people await the company announcements and guidance especially,' Sullivan said. 'US markets were positive, even though India has been hit with a higher tariff level than initially quoted. Our interest rates are buoying the market more than geopolitical instability and tariffs.' On the NZX, Eroad rallied by 26.42% today after the Government unveiled a raft of changes to the country's Road User Charges system in preparation for 3.5 million vehicles becoming liable for the charges. As has previously been signalled, the current Fuel Excise Duty is expected to be abolished in the coming years, with all vehicles moving to Road User Charges (RUCs). Eroad's share price lifted 42c to $2.01 after 3.1 million shares changed hands on turnover of $5.9m. 'Obviously they're seen as a potential frontrunner for being able to offer a solution in that area. Material uplift in volume and share price and their market cap would put them up as a NZX 50 constituent as well, so the potential to eventually be included in NZX indices.' Elsewhere, Radius Healthcare shares rose 3.90% to $0.40 on high volume of 10.4 million shares after it announced an upgrade to its projected underlying earnings before interest and tax. Sullivan said Radius doesn't seem to be able to put a foot wrong at the moment, noting its share price rose 22% in July, 22% in June and 25% in April. Chorus also had another positive day, with its share price lifting 1.21% or 11c to $9.20. Contact Energy, meanwhile, fell 0.76% to $9.10 after $11.1m in turnover was traded. US markets Wall Street stocks rose on Wednesday local time, with Apple and most other large tech companies rallying as markets largely shrugged off US President Donald Trump's latest tariff hikes. Apple piled on more than 5% after White House officials said the tech giant plans an additional US$100 billion ($168b) in capital spending in the United States. Amazon and Google parent Alphabet were among the other large tech names that also rose. 'By standing up and publicly announcing a domestic investment with President Trump, it reduces the likelihood of Trump imposing new tariff burdens on Apple,' said FHN Financial's Chris Low. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished up 0.2% at 44,193.12. The broad-based S&P 500 gained 0.7% to 6,345.06, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 1.2% to 21,169.42, less than 10 points from an all-time record. Trump ordered an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods. The levy, which is expected to come into force in three weeks, is due to New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store