Australian National University announces more job cuts as it seeks to save $250 million
The additional job losses come on top of the 41 proposed job cuts announced last month.
The positions are across academic and professional roles from within the College of Science and Medicine, the College of Arts and Social Sciences, and the Research and Innovation Portfolio.
The staff now have three weeks to provide their response and feedback to what the university intends to do.
Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell said that while the job losses were necessary, the proposal was not set in stone and planned staff cuts could be changed.
"Last year, for instance, we had multiple change plans and in each one of those instances, the number of staff that was impacted changed and it became a smaller number in those plans," she said.
Professor Bell also acknowledged that the impact of the cuts was unclear, but that the broad offering of courses would continue.
"It's not yet clear what the impact will be on courses, but the reality is we have programs that we are committed to and we'll continue to deliver those," she said.
"It's really important that we maintain a really strong research portfolio and a really strong transformative educational experience."
The union representing staff at the ANU says the cuts are eroding the academic stature and reputation of the university.
In a statement, Dr Lachlan Clohesy, National Tertiary Education Union ACT division secretary, said the ANU shouldn't be proposing more job cuts.
"These job losses lay at the feet of the vice-chancellor," he said.
This latest round of cuts to reduce staff and money is part of a broader savings plan the ANU says is necessary to ensure the long-term future of the institution.
"In October of last year, we agreed with [the ANU] Council that we needed to take $250 million out of the recurring operating base of the university," Professor Bell said.
"Which was a big shift for the university but was the amount we needed so that we were no longer spending more than we were earning."
The key aim for the ANU is to break even financially for 2026, and the total savings planned include $100 million less in staff salaries.
"We are making strides along that journey for the $100 million we needed to take out of the salary of the university," Professor Bell said.
In a statement, the ANU added that "it is anticipated that no organisational change proposals will be released beyond 31 October, 2025 for the 2025 year".
But the university said it was unknown at this stage whether further changes or cuts would be required in 2026.
The latest proposed savings come just weeks after Federal Education Minister Jason Clare raised "significant concerns" about the ANU with the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
A "live compliance process" — a review into the concerns raised at the ANU — is ongoing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussie Amazon workers lagging behind in re-training as tech giant continues global automation rollout
Staff at Amazon Australia are not a priority for the massive upskilling happening across the e-commerce behemoth's global network. At a conference this week in Japan, Amazon announced its one millionth warehouse robot was now in use across the planet. The company says globally, 700,000 Amazon workers have been formally 'upskilled' to keep up with this wave of automation - but Australians account for a tiny fraction of these workers. Only one of Amazon Australia's eight 'fulfilment centre' warehouses have the company's patented product-shifting, AI-operated robots; as Amazon accelerates its AI and robotics goals, the company argues relatively few job losses will result, contending people doing repetitive manual tasks will be retrained and 'upskilled'. Compared to Amazon's warehouses in comparable countries, Australian facilities are a step behind the company's newest technology, meaning retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots is lagging. Information from Amazon says the company has created 700 new categories of jobs globally since introducing robots. A proposed highly-robotised Melbourne warehouse will create more than 2000 jobs, requiring entry-level workers up to engineers and operations managers. 'Australia is one of our last countries to have launched … we're in the process of scaling-up the program.'
News.com.au
39 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussie screwed by ‘horrendous' practice to bring bills down
The promise of cheaper power bills and a greener footprint saw Christine Hirchfield jump at a chance to install new solar panels but instead she said the move 'blew up in her face'. More than a year since they were placed on her Victorian rooftop, the solar panels remain unconnected to the grid and Ms Hirchfield has been through a nightmare experience that has involved disputes and debt collectors. Now, the 73-year-old is sharing her experience with as consumer groups call for a national ban on an alarming issue. Ms Hirchfield responded to an advertisement on Facebook before a salesperson from a company called GC Perfect Solar turned up at her door. She claims she was promised a great deal including an interest-free payment plan, free cleaning of the panels for 10 years and a generous 15-cent feed-in tariff for every kilowatt sent back into the grid. She claims her later inquiries found a tariff return of just 4.9 cents. While she insisted she needed to digest the information before signing up to anything, she was then told she would receive a free battery after a year, she claims. Given she lost power quite often – this final freebie convinced her to sign on for the solar panels. The retiree also describes the original document from GC Perfect Solar as quite light on details and expected a more formal contract – but then a few days later she was handing over her bank details for direct debits, she claimed. 'I am sorry the day I let that person into my house because it has been a nightmare and rollercoaster,' she said. 'Smell a rat' Ms Hirchfield was actually excited when the solar panels were put on her regional home in March last year but when the finance contract with Brighte, a finance provider specialising in renewable energy, dropped the next day she was shocked. The agreement she had signed with GC Perfect Solar was to pay $88 a fortnight. But the finance contract had payments of $95 plus fees, which as a pensioner she could not afford. 'That's not what was discussed and it snowballed from there,' she said. 'I got straight on to the bank and I thought I smell a rat. I cancelled my bank card and that's when everything started to go downhill.' She lodged complaints with Brighte, GC Perfect Solar and Consumer Affairs Victoria. Brighte investigated the matter and months later released her from the finance agreement with no payments taken. But the nightmare did not end there. Ms Hirchfield received a letter of demand from a debt collection agency on behalf of GC Perfect Solar for $2200 in September last year. Then she claims it later demanded the full amount of the contract worth $11,8000. Meanwhile, she had requested that the company remove the solar panels from her house. Do you have a story? Contact That's when the Consumer Action Law Centre got involved, with the group claiming Ms Hirchfield was subject to unsolicited selling – a practice it wants to see completely banned in Australia. The centre's lawyers, in a letter sent to the debt collection agency, claimed Ms Hirchfield had been subject to misleading and deceptive conduct under Australian consumer law and denied she was liable for the debt. It also outlined that if she was to experience humiliation or distress due to prohibited debt collection by GC Perfect Solar or its agents, she could seek damages up to $10,000. Since then, Ms Hirchfield has heard nothing but she is concerned that the dispute is effectively ongoing. She said the experience had made her far less trusting. 'It would have blown people who aren't as switched on. It would have been so demeaning and overawing and if I can spare one person from the pain then I hope I can,' she said. 'I know what it did to me mentally – it really rocked my world – and what started as great idea and affordable all blew up in my face.' GC Perfect Solar did not respond to request for comment. Chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy Now the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has announced it's conducting a review into unsolicited selling and lead generation, and whether harmful conduct is adequately addressed by current laws. The review comes in response to Consumer Action Law Centre's (CALC) designated complaint, which argues harmful unsolicited sales practices are commonplace across Australia and need to be stamped out. It also argued lead generation is a grey area but occurs when a customer is drawn to an advertisement on the web or social media and agrees to further contact. CALC is one of three groups granted the special power to make a complaint where they can report an urgent issue directly to the ACCC for attention. It outlined that door-to-door sales and cold calling are a widespread issue causing serious financial and personal harm to individuals, while the use of lead generation marketing on social media is rife, particularly in the rooftop solar industry. It warns that consumers are being faced with being chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy and even risk losing their homes. Consumer Action Law Centre CEO Steph Tonkin said unsolicited selling and doorknocking has been a 'horrific problem for such a long period of time'. CALC has been campaigning against the practice for the past 20 years. 'It impacts vulnerable consumers such as people with language barriers who don't say no and more than half of our clients have serious mental health issues and acquired brain injuries,' Ms Tonkin told 'Generally it's backpackers that companies bus out to regional centres and they see someone who is not 100 per cent with it and they sign them up to $10,000 and $15,000 solar panel contracts and do it because of buy now, pay later. It's often a dodgy salesperson meets dodgy installer and it's a hot mess as people are paying off these solar panels when they can't afford it.' 'Horrendous stories' Vulnerable cohorts such as older people, people living in regional areas and those on low incomes, with disabilities or mental health issues, in particular fall victim, according to CALC's complaint which features 23 cases, including Christine Hirchfield, as examples. But it's not only the solar power industry that CALC alleges is problematic, but also the sales of things such as airconditioning units or vacuum cleaners, recliner chairs, roller shutters, photography packages and services like education courses. The ACCC is calling on the public to make submissions on their experiences of unsolicited selling by July 31. Ms Tonkin said the organisation had heard 'horrendous stories' about high pressure sales tactics applied to people who are often obviously mentally unwell, salespeople crossing out the legal 10 day cooling off period in a contract or walking past a person into their loungeroom even when asked to leave. 'The solar panels of today are the encyclopedias of yesterday,' she noted. 'But it's also recliner chairs that don't meet the description and don't work or education courses that don't exist. It's full businesses that are shut down and pop up again — it's this underbelly.' Spotlight on solar More than four million Australian households have installed rooftop solar and the use of unsolicited selling is likely to have made a proportion of these households aware of the availability of government subsidies and rebates, the ACCC found a report into the complaint. But the sectors interaction with government rebates, subsidies and loans is complex and consumers attempting to navigate this area may rely primarily on the information provided by salespeople, the watchdog added. The CALC complaint asserts that the use of unscrupulous unsolicited selling practices in the rooftop solar industry may have eroded trust and undermined the drive to Net Zero. A spokesperson for finance company Brighte said it is disappointing when a customer's experience of a third-party solar retailer does not meet its expectations. 'We expect all third-party solar retailers referring our finance products to uphold the highest standards of integrity and customer care,' they said. 'When concerns are raised with us, we act to protect customers, engage with the retailers and recommend customers contact their relevant state consumer protection authority if the issue cannot be resolved. 'In this case, after considering the customer's concerns, we took no payments from the customer and they have no further obligations to Brighte. We also ended our relationship with the sales agent.' Overall, the consumer watchdog notes there some protections for consumers when it comes to unsolicited selling, but CALC said they aren't enough to prevent the alarming practice. The ACCC has received approximately 250 consumer reports from January 2024 to March 2025 relating to unsolicited selling across a broad range of industries, although it acknowledged those impacted may not come forward. CALC also alleges that some businesses are circumventing the requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements by using lead generation tactics to obtain an invitation from consumers to come to their home, or to obtain consent from consumers to be contacted over the phone.
Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Daily Telegraph
Australia's most expensive home sold for $142m
With no registered mortgage required, Chinese-born company director Yan Zhang paid $141.55m last week for Australia's most expensive penthouse overlooking Sydney Harbour at Barangaroo. Zhang now owns the top three floors of the One Sydney Harbour development, ending some of the mystery since its off-the-plan exchange in 2019 by Lendlease. The strata fees for the 1980sq m holding will be sky-high because the two-level penthouse has 4794 of the 100,000 unit entitlements and the secondary apartment has 2109. RELATED: $1.1bn bonanza, top sales of 2025 revealed The Sell's quick back-of-an envelope calculation puts the combined quarterly strata at a staggering $107,000 given the building's $6.2m annual levies. Little is known about 37-year-old Zhang, who recently set up shelf company Yry Family Pty Ltd, which gives its address as the 88/88 Barangaroo Ave penthouse. Zhang directs only one other company, Zicheng Australia, which was set up in 2007 and co-directed with Wei Ling Zhang, 63, who was born in Shanghai, China. MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay Both have given their address as the 52-floor Pitt St, Century Tower sub-penthouse that they bought mortgage-free for $1.33m in 2004 when Zhang was just 16. It was a good buy because it had previously sold for $1,443,000 in 1997. Lendlease will be hoping their One Sydney Harbour prices do not fall back. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes In 2019 on its exchange, it was reported the mystery buyer of the three-level penthouse was a local Australian resident from mainland China so there no pesky Foreign Investment Review Board requirements. Construction of the 89-storey Renzo Piano-designed tower was initially scheduled for a late 2023 completion, with Lendlease registering the slightly-delayed strata plan in February last year. The highest previously registered purchase had been $38.95m to the Zhong family for the entire 76th floor that settled seamlessly in May last year. MORE: Aus pub's $500m collapse, staff owed $7m
