‘Never again': Regulatory reform pledged to prevent repeat of water bill hikes
Steve Reed announced in a speech alongside the River Thames that regulator Ofwat would be scrapped, as part of measures to pull overlapping water regulation by four different bodies into one 'single powerful' regulator responsible for the whole sector.
He made the announcement in response to an independent review by Sir Jon Cunliffe which called for the move, as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in the water sector.
The review was commissioned by the Government to answer public fury over pollution in rivers, lakes and seas, soaring bills, shareholder payouts and bosses' bonuses.
Mr Reed pledged the new regulator would 'stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment', as he said the Government would cut sewage pollution by half by 2030 – based on a new, higher baseline of pollution in 2024 compared with previous targets relating to 2021.
And it would oversee maintenance and investment in water infrastructure so that 'hard-working British families are never again hit by the shocking bill hikes we saw last year'.
Questioned by journalists after the speech about future bill hikes, Mr Reed insisted it was 'absolutely the intention' that the reforms would ensure there was adequate investment in the long term to prevent the kind of 30% increase seen in customer water bills last year at the next price review in five years.
He also accused the Tories of failing to ensure sufficient investment in crumbling pipes and infrastructure that would have prevented the recent hikes.
But in a separate speech, review author Sir Jon warned that costs and bills are likely to continue to rise, as he recommended the Government introduce a national social tariff to help households struggling to pay.
'The cost of producing water and wastewater services is likely to increase over the medium and longer term as the industry has to replace ageing assets, respond to higher environmental and public health standards and continue to adapt to the challenges of population growth and climate change,' he said.
'And against that likely background of rising costs and rising bills, there is a need for a stronger safety net for the most vulnerable when exposed to water poverty.'
Asked if investor returns will need to rise to attract the capital needed and contribute to bill hikes, Sir Jon said: 'All the investors I talked to said we are happy to accept a lower return … if you can give us lower risk on the downside.
'Bills will have to reflect what investors need, the equity they need.
'That is part of the cost of building the infrastructure that we need but at the same time, a regulator needs to continue to maintain pressure and efficiency.'
Sir Jon's review did not explore renationalising water companies; ministers have refused to entertain the possibility despite demands from campaigners to return them to public ownership.
Mr Reed warned nationalisation would cost £100 billion and slow down efforts to cut pollution.
He said it was not the answer, adding: 'The problems are to do with governance and regulation, and we are fixing those problems so we can fix the problem of sewage pollution and unacceptable bill hikes in the fastest time possible.'
The reforms would see a single regulator replace Ofwat and take in functions related to the water sector from the Environment Agency, which currently investigates pollution incidents and licenses water abstraction from the environment, as well as the Drinking Water Inspectorate and Natural England.
Sir Jon suggested a new water regulator would take two years to set up after looking at the time frame for setting up Ofcom, the communications regulator, in the early 2000s.
The process could involve bringing the different organisations together as one before integrating the staff and working out where there may be duplication or gaps.
Sir Jon also said the Government will have to tackle the issue of securing a 'very high level of leadership', adding that the current system does not have the skills and expertise that will be needed in the new set-up.
Asked if ministers need to carry forward all of his 88 recommendations to ensure a full reset of the sector, he said: 'I don't think you're going to solve the fundamental problem unless you tackle all of those issues.
'I think you can get improvement on all those dimensions, but I do think you need to address it all in order to move us to a different place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Plans for flexible energy tariffs to help households cut electricity bills
Households will be able to switch to flexible energy tariffs and use smart appliances to help cut electricity bills under plans set out by the Government. Energy minister Michael Shanks unveiled the next steps to give households and businesses more freedom and choice over how and when they use energy as part of aims to make savings of up to £70 billion in system costs by 2050. The Government wants to offer consumers new ways to take advantage of off-peak, lower electricity prices, through flexible tariffs and smart technology. This includes helping electric vehicle (EV) drivers get discounts on their electricity when using public chargers at off-peak times. It also plans to ensure suppliers make information on smart tariffs more accessible to consumers, while taking the next steps to offer tailored products and services based on electricity usage. The so-called Clean Flexibility Roadmap comes as part of the UK's net-zero aims, while also helping lower bills and boosting the resilience of the power network. Britain will need to shift towards more flexible energy use as the UK becomes more dependent on wind and solar power, such as charging EV batteries when wind is generating a lot of electricity. Mr Shanks said: 'This roadmap gives households and businesses the choice and control over when and how they use their energy. 'The flexible electricity system we are working to build will help make that a reality for consumers across the country, by supporting them to bring down their bills through using new tariffs and technologies. 'In this way we will protect working people's pockets and ensure they are the first to benefit from our clean power mission.' A flexibility commissioner will be appointed to lead the policy work, and an annual forum will be set up to track progress on the initiative. Akshay Kaul, Ofgem's director general for infrastructure group, said: 'A more flexible energy market will be a real game changer, giving households more control over what they pay for their energy. 'Small lifestyle tweaks such as programming a dishwasher or tumble dryer to run overnight when costs are low or charging your electric car during high winds can have a material impact on people's bills. 'At Ofgem we're opening up flexibility markets to bring better tariffs and products to consumers to make cheaper bills a reality.' The Government has also launched a two-month consultation looking at how more consumers can be supported to use energy flexibly.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Only Nigel Farage benefits from another ‘summer of riots'
"We must not let Reform dominate the summer," Kemi Badenoch told Conservative MPs in an end-of-term pep talk. True, she grabbed some headlines with a limited shadow cabinet reshuffle, but so far, Reform UK is dominating the summer. Other carefully constructed Tory initiatives go largely unreported, to the party's frustration, while Nigel Farage makes news with that smirk or by raising an eyebrow. He is now widening his pitch beyond immigration, which he has banked as a vote-winner, and will campaign on law and order over the summer. His pledge to halve crime at a cost of £17bn doesn't add up. But it still garnered positive headlines; Reform is judged by different standards to rival parties. It is now seen as the best party on handling law and order. Farage got lucky with his timing. Yesterday's Daily Mail front page, on his crime campaign, was manna from heaven: 'Britain is facing societal collapse, warns Farage.' His backing of the protests outside an asylum hotel in Epping, Essex – and his dismissal of those arrested as 'a few bad eggs' – might have been attacked by other parties in normal times. But deputy prime minister Angela Rayner made a highly significant intervention at yesterday's cabinet meeting, warning that Britain could face a repeat of the riots almost a year ago unless the government addresses people's concerns, and that immigration is having 'a profound impact on society'. It seemed to validate Farage's warning of 'civil disobedience on a vast scale', and sparking fears of another summer of violence. Downing Street's briefings on cabinet meetings are normally as dry as dust. Its release of the deputy prime minister's remarks tells us that the government does not want to look flat-flooted and not 'in control' if there is more civil unrest this summer. Nor can Labour allow Farage a monopoly on proposals to crack down on illegal migration. Hence today's announcement of a deal between the government and food delivery companies to tackle hotspots of illegal working, sometimes near asylum hotels. 'This is a pull factor for migrants crossing the Channel,' one government insider admitted. On other issues, Reform has been less lucky. It sometimes shoots from the lip without thinking things through. Richard Tice, its deputy leader, sent shockwaves through industry by suggesting the party would scrap renewable energy contracts if it wins power, before half-retreating and saying a Reform government would oppose 'any form of variation' to the contracts. Labour warned that one million jobs would be at risk from Reform's plan. Tice temporarily forgot his party's pitch to the red wall: left on economics and right on social issues. He appeared to translate people's concerns about the cost to them of net zero measures like heat pumps and electric cars into opposition to climate change measures. In fact, a majority of Reform supporters back policies to combat climate change. With Reform consistently ahead in the opinion polls, the business world must take Farage seriously as a future prime minister, but its attempts to engage with his party are proving difficult. Business wants to know about Reform's policies, but the party has no formal policy-making process. As with his pal Donald Trump, policy seems to be whatever Farage thinks when he wakes up in the morning or announces on the hoof. "Policy is what Farage says – everything is decided by him," one business figure told me. 'It's hard to work out what is just another headline and a serious policy.' Farage has started to hold business round-tables. "Everyone gets a bit p***ed, but we don't learn much," another company executive said. How will Reform deliver its pledge to raise the personal tax allowance from £12,570 to £20,000 at a cost of between £50bn and £80bn? We don't know. Will this promise survive a rigorous policy process than the grown-ups in Reform know the party needs? Such fantasy economics, based on deep spending cuts – with Reform sometimes pledging to spend the same billions of savings more than once – are Farage's Achilles heel. That's what other parties should target. "Farage is a vibe," one minister said, 'it's hard to attack a vibe.' But the other parties need to find a way. For now, many voters are not bothered about whether Reform's sums add up. The public will have a free hit at next May's elections to English local authorities, including London and Birmingham, and the Scottish and Welsh parliaments. That is bad news for both Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch, whose leadership will come under pressure if their parties do badly, as they probably will. But voters will care about the detail of Reform's economic pitch when they come to choose a government at the next general election. A vibe will not be enough.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Travelling to Trump's US is a low-level trauma – here's what Africans can do about it
Hello and welcome to The Long Wave. This week, I reflect on the increasing difficulty of travel and immigration for many from the African continent, and how one country is plotting a smoother path. I have just come back from holiday, and I'm still not used to how different travel is when not using an African passport. My British citizenship, which I acquired about five years ago, has transformed not only my ability to travel at short notice but it has eliminated overnight the intense stress and bureaucratic hurdles involved in applying for visas on my Sudanese passport. It is difficult to explain just how different the lives of those with 'powerful' passports are to those without. It is an entirely parallel existence. Gaining permission to travel to many destinations is often a lengthy, expensive and sickeningly uncertain process. A tourist visa to the UK can cost up to £1,000, in addition to the fee for private processing centres that handle much of Europe's visa applications abroad. And then there is the paperwork: bank statements, employment letters, academic records, certified proof of ownership of assets, and birth and marriage certificates if one is travelling to visit family. This is a non-exhaustive list. For a recent visa application for a family member, I submitted 32 documents. It may sound dramatic but such processes instil a sort of low-level trauma, after submitting to the violation of what feels like a bureaucratic cavity search. And all fees, whatever the decision, are non-refundable. Processing times are in the hands of the visa gods – it once took more than six months for me to receive a US visa. By the time it arrived, the meeting I needed to attend for work had passed by a comically long time. Separation and severed relationships It's not only travel for work or holiday that is hindered by such high barriers to entry. Relationships suffer. It is simply a feature of the world now that many families in the Black diaspora sprawl across continents. Last month Trump restricted entry to the US to nationals from 20 countries, half of which are in Africa. The decision is even crueler when you consider that it applies to countries such as Sudan, whose civil war has prompted many to seek refuge with family abroad. That is not just a political act of limiting immigration, it is a deeply personal one that severs connections between families, friends and partners. Family members of refugees from those countries have also been banned, so they can't visit relatives who have already managed to emigrate. The International Rescue Committee warned the decision could have 'far-reaching impacts on the lives of many American families, including refugees, asylees and green card holders, seeking to be reunified with their loved ones'. A global raising of barriers The fallout of this Trump order is colossal. There are students who are unable to graduate. Spouses unable to join their partners. Children separated from their parents. It's a severe policy, but shades of it exist elsewhere by other means. The UK recently terminated the rights of foreign care workers and most international students to bring their children and partners to the country. And even for those who simply want to have their family visit them, access is closed to all except those who can clear the high financial hurdles and meet the significant burdens of proof to show that either they can afford to maintain their visitors or that they will return to their home countries. Sign up to The Long Wave Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world after newsletter promotion It was 10 years before I – someone with fairly stable employment and a higher-education qualification – satisfied the Home Office's requirements and could finally invite my mother to visit. I broke down when I saw her face at arrivals, realising how hard it had been for both of us; the fact that she had not seen the life I had built as an adult. Compare this draconian measure to some countries in the Gulf, such as Saudi Arabia, that have an actual visa category, low-cost and swiftly processed, for parental visits and residency. A new African model But as some countries shut down, others are opening up. This month, Kenya removed visa requirements for almost all African citizens wanting to visit. Here, finally, there is the sort of regional solidarity that mirrors that of the EU and other western countries. Since it boosts African tourism and makes Kenya an inviting destination for people to gather at short notice for professional or festive reasons, it's a smart move. But it also sends an important signal to a continent embattled by visa restrictions and divided across borders set by colonial rule. We are not just liabilities, people to be judged on how many resources they might take from a country once allowed in. We are also tourists, friends, relatives, entrepreneurs and, above all, Africans who have the right to meet and mingle without the terror, and yes, contempt, of a suspicious visa process. If the African diaspora is being separated abroad, there is at least now a path to the option that some of us may reunite at home. To receive the complete version of The Long Wave in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.
