Trump announces 90-day negotiating period on trade with Mexico
Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that his phone conversation with Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum was "very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other."
The Republican president had threatened tariffs of 30% on goods from Mexico in a July letter, something that Sheinbaum said Mexico can now stave off for the next three months.
"We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue," Sheinbaum wrote on X.
The leaders' morning call came at a moment of pressure and uncertainty for the world economy.
Nations are scrambling to finalise the outlines of a trade framework with Trump in order to avoid him imposing higher tariff rates that could upend economies and governments.
Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines.
His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News' "Hannity" programme that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict.
Among those uncertain about their trade status are Switzerland and Norway.
Norwegian Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg said it was "completely uncertain" whether a deal would be completed before Trump's deadline.
But even the public announcement of a deal can offer scant reassurance for an American trading partner.
EU officials are waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported autos and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Trump had announced a deal on Sunday while he was in Scotland.
"The US has made these commitments. Now it's up to the US to implement them. The ball is in their court," EU commission spokesman Olof Gill said.
The document would not be legally binding.
Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the US would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking.
He said autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminium and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period.
He said Mexico would end its "Non Tariff Trade Barriers," but he didn't provide specifics.
Some goods continue to be protected from tariffs by the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump negotiated during his first term.
But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year.
US Census Bureau figures show that the US ran a $171.5 billion (€149 billion) trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the US bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country.
The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion (€55 billion) in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.
Besides addressing fentanyl trafficking, Trump has made it a goal to close the trade gap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
4 minutes ago
- Euronews
Dutch group sues FIFA over transfer regulations after Diarra ruling
A Dutch foundation representing footballers has launched a class action lawsuit against FIFA and five football associations, alleging that transfer regulations unlawfully reduced players' earnings for over two decades. Justice for Players, the group behind the legal challenge, announced on Monday that professional male and female footballers who played for clubs within the European Union or the United Kingdom since 2002 are eligible to join the lawsuit. The action targets FIFA alongside the football federations of the Netherlands, France, Germany, Belgium and Denmark. According to the foundation, FIFA's rules on contract terminations and player transfers violated EU laws on competition and free movement of labour, a claim strengthened by a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year. "Preliminary estimates indicate that the number of affected footballers may comprise approximately 100,000 players," the foundation said in a statement. 'All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA regulations," its Chair Lucia Melcherts added. "The past and even current system unduly favours FIFA who has far too much unilateral power. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily," she explained. The legal case is rooted in the ECJ's ruling in the case of former Real Madrid, Arsenal and Chelsea player, Lassana Diarra, who joined Lokomotiv Moscow in 2013 before terminating his contract early due to alleged wage disputes. FIFA and the Court of Arbitration for Sport sided with the club and ordered Diarra to pay €10.5 million in compensation. Diarra argued that FIFA's rules had made it difficult for him to find a new club, as any new employer would have been liable for the fee. The ECJ ruled that such regulations contradicted EU competition laws. Some commentators have compared the judgment to the Jean-Marc Bosman ruling of 1995, which ended transfer fees for players whose contracts ended in the EU. The Diarra ruling has not yet led to systemic changes in the global football transfer market, which is worth more than €8.6 billion annually. Justice for Players cited economic analysis from consulting firm Compass Lexecon, which estimates that affected players earned on average 8% less over the course of their careers due to the contested regulations.
France 24
35 minutes ago
- France 24
Swiss eye 'more attractive' offer for Trump after tariff shock
The Alpine nation faces a 39-percent duty, one of the highest among the dozens of countries that will be hit by new tariffs that are due to come into force from Thursday. The Swiss stock market tumbled by more than two percent when it opened on Monday before paring its losses later in the day. It was closed for a national holiday when Trump unveiled the tariffs on Friday. Trump had originally threatened in April to slap a 31-percent tariff on Switzerland in April and the Alpine country had swiftly decided to negotiate with the United States. By comparison, the 27-nation European Union struck its own deal with Trump and will face tariffs of 15 percent, down from a previous threat of 30 percent. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter has said Trump believes that Switzerland "steals" from the United States by enjoying a trade surplus of 40 billion Swiss francs ($50 billion). The Swiss Federal Council said on Monday it would "continue negotiations with the aim of reaching a trade deal", even beyond the Thursday deadline. "Switzerland enters this new phase ready to present a more attractive offer, taking US concerns into account and seeking to ease the current tariff situation," the council said in a statement. It said the looming tariff put the country "at a distinct disadvantage compared with other trading partners with similar economic profiles", citing lower duties for the EU, Britain and Japan. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, however, warned on Sunday that "the coming days" were not likely to see changes in any duties as the "tariff rates are pretty much set". Chocolate, watches, pharmaceuticals Hans Gersbach, deputy head of the KOF Swiss Economic Institute, said the tariffs could cut the country's annual growth by between 0.3 and 0.6 percent. But it could be as much as 0.7 percent if the pharmaceutical industry, which has so far been exempt from tariffs, is targeted by Trump. Pharmaceutical products account for more than half of Swiss exports, the economist noted. Analysts at Swiss investment managers Vontobel said in a note they believed "there is some hope for an agreement on US tariffs for Switzerland" that would bring them down to the 15 percent set for other countries However, they added, if the 39-percent tariffs remain in place, earnings for key sectors such as watchmakers "could be hit substantially". The chocolate industry association, Chocosuisse, said the tariffs were a "tough blow" for the sector, which is already reeling from a 10-percent duty.
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Texas Democrats stage walkout to block Trump-backed redistricting plan in high-stakes gamble
Dozens of Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives left the southern US state on Sunday, August 3, in a last-ditch maneuver to block electoral redistricting requested by US President Donald Trump. The high-stakes move took place before lawmakers were set to vote Monday on the new map, which, if passed, could help Republicans win five additional seats in the US House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections, giving them a better chance of maintaining their slim majority. The plan put to a vote would divide up Democratic-leaning urban centers, home to most of Texas's roughly 30 million residents. The practice of redrawing electoral districts is known in the United States as gerrymandering. Currently, Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. "This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity," said Gene Wu, chair of the Democratic caucus, in a statement. "We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent," he added. Texas lawmakers cannot pass bills in the House of Representatives, which has 150 members, without at least two-thirds present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the Republican-majority chamber, and more than 50 were expected to leave the state, according to Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the Democratic caucus. Threat of removal from office Texas's Republican governor Greg Abbott threatened to ask for the lawmakers to be removed from their positions. "This truancy ends now," he wrote in a statement released Sunday evening. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would convene as scheduled Monday afternoon. "If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table..." he wrote on X. The outcome of the strategy is highly uncertain and past attempts haven't worked. In 2021, House Democrats already left Texas for 38 days to protest voting rights restrictions, which were eventually passed after the blockade was lifted in a special session. Texas Democrats used the same tactic in 2003, when House members went to Oklahoma and senators to New Mexico, but failed to thwart a Republican redistricting plan. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, a candidate for the US Senate, said on X that Democrats who "try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested and brought back to the Capitol immediately. We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law." New Refusing to attend a legislative session constitutes a civil violation of the rules. In 2021, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that House leaders had the authority to "physically compel the attendance" of absent members, but no Democrat was forcibly returned to the state after warrants were issued that year. Two years later, Republicans passed new rules allowing for daily fines of $500 (about €430) for lawmakers who failed to show up for work as a penalty. For Trump, avoiding a repeat of 2018 Many Texas Democrats traveled to Illinois, in the north of the country, where they were welcomed by Governor JB Pritzker, a potential candidate for the 2028 presidential election, who offered his support. A staunch opponent of Donald Trump, Pritzker had already hosted several Texas Democrats the week before to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Governor Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. "This is not just rigging the system in Texas, it's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come," Pritzker said Sunday evening at a press conference alongside Democratic lawmakers who had just landed, including Gene Wu. "We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know," Wu told the media. With the Texas redistricting plan, Trump is hoping to avoid the setback that occurred during his first term (2017-2021), when Democrats took control of the House of Representatives in the November 2018 midterms, just two years after his election. In response to the move, Democratic governors have also raised the possibility of redrawing their own states' electoral maps in retaliation, but their options are more limited.
