Reintroducing a carbon price the 'most economically efficient tax reform' to repair budget
Speaking at the Australian Clean Energy Summit in Sydney, Professor Ross Garnaut said the Albanese government had the right objectives on renewable generation, emissions reduction and supporting new export industries based on clean energy.
However, he added that, despite the Albanese government's "Herculean efforts", Australia looked set to fall short of its objectives.
"Failure to reach them will have tragic consequences for Australian productivity, budgetary strength and contribution to the global climate mitigation effort," he argued.
Professor Garnaut's speech comes as Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen is preparing to announce an extension of the Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS), which promotes investment in renewable energy generation.
"In three short years, we have seen Capacity Investment Scheme unlock record levels of investment in Australia's energy grid and get us on track to reach 82 per cent renewable energy by 2030," he will tell the Investor Group on Climate Change in a speech on Tuesday evening.
"We will be further expanding the CIS with a further 3 gigawatts of generation, enough to power more than 1 million households.
"We will also incentivise even more storage to come online. Through the CIS, we will underwrite an additional 5 GW of dispatchable capacity or storage.
"This is equivalent to supplying 4.6 million households in the National Electricity Market with energy at peak times, and will support an additional $21 billion in investment in dispatchable capacity."
However, speaking ahead of Mr Bowen's announcement, Professor Garnaut was critical that almost all new private grid-scale investment in solar and wind power was now underwritten by government.
He said the combination of falling prices for solar and wind power, along with the sliding value of large generation certificates (LGCs) for renewable projects, meant that even effective government subsidies like the CIS might no longer be effective in attracting enough renewables investment.
In fact, Professor Garnaut argued that they might be discouraging voluntary private sector investment.
"Announcement of the extended CIS was one of several Commonwealth policy and other changes that led to a slowing of voluntary commitments to use renewable energy. The election of President Trump in November 2024 has been the latest of these developments," he observed.
Professor Garnaut instead urged the government to completely overhaul its carbon reduction strategy.
"There are limits to the progress that we can make towards Anthony Albanese objectives using Tony Abbott policies. These policies include the safeguard mechanism and heavy reliance on voluntary commitments to using renewable energy," he said.
"Australia now needs Anthony Albanese policies to achieve Anthony Albanese objectives."
The eminent economist urged a return to the past to help Australia achieve a net zero emissions future at the lowest possible cost.
"The best cure in the national interest is a carbon price. Not by a little bit, but by a big margin," he argued.
"The carbon price greatly reduces contingent budget liabilities from the CIS and other underwriting schemes.
"In addition, it can add about 1 per cent of GDP or about $25 billion to government revenues, with only a small proportion being required to compensate households for increases in power prices."
Ahead of the federal government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month, Professor Garnaut said that reintroducing some form of carbon price was a far better idea than increasing the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
"Introduction of carbon pricing is the most economically efficient tax reform available to Australia at a time when we need budget repair," he told the audience.
"It delivers all of the economic advantages claimed for increases in GST by its advocates, with the additional advantage of increasing the efficiency of markets.
"The carbon price unleashes the innovation, dynamism and capital resources of competitive markets to build the transition. It efficiently reduces emissions through most of the economy and not only in electricity generation."
If the politics of a carbon price are still too difficult, an alternative temporary fix suggested by Professor Garnaut would be to extend the federal government's Renewable Energy Target (RET).
However, he argued it would not contribute to budget repair, nor to reducing emissions outside the electricity sector, and would ultimately need to be supplanted by carbon pricing "well before 2050".
"Apply neither of the remedies, and we are headed for energy and climate policy crisis within a few years, with demands from the energy sector contributing to severe budgetary problems," Professor Garnaut warned.
In the absence of either, the economist warned that Australian consumers remained vulnerable to the "oligopolistic" behaviour of gas suppliers and big energy generators.
"Average gas power prices are now much higher than during the height of Ukraine disruption, despite gas commodity prices having fallen back," he observed.
"They have been driven to a considerable extent by the loosening of inhibitions in the use of oligopolistic power to lift prices.
"At times, gas generators reduced output when low renewable output was lifting market prices above the average."
Professor Garnaut said a carbon price was the most technology-agnostic, efficient and equitable way to reduce emissions.
"All forms of energy and all ways of reducing emissions can compete on a level playing field," he argued.
"There is no need then for a climate trigger in environmental legislation.
"Nuclear power, which is genuinely zero emissions like solar and wind, gets the same advantage on climate grounds as wind or solar. Gas gets an advantage over coal because it does less climate damage.
"Geological carbon capture and storage is rewarded for its reductions in emissions at the same rate as renewable energy. So is sequestration of carbon in plants and soils."
Professor Garnaut ended with this message to politicians of all political persuasions:
"Let's stop kidding ourselves in the 48th Parliament," he concluded.
"Let's start telling the truth. The truth is that early adoption of carbon pricing is in Australia's national interest, and needs to be considered as a matter of urgency."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Expert reveals blast risk for new 15,000-home Melbourne suburb
A former explosives engineer who worked in the mining sector before becoming a real estate guru has issued a stark warning for a new mega suburb planned for Melbourne's north. Just the prospect of nearby explosive work at a neighbouring quarry, coupled with people who don't understand it, could be enough to hit home values and the ability to onsell residences nearby. Even with the likelihood blasting will be done so safely it has no risk of physically impacting homes. The Victorian Government this week approved plans for a new 15,000 home precinct to Melbourne's north — as well as a basalt quarry to help build infrastructure as well as properties. Authorities have planned a 250m 'blast buffer', and the nearest houses will be about 500m away with estate amenities filling the remaining space between them and the excavation site. Real estate investment expert, and former explosives engineer Jane Slack-Smith said even with the buffer zone it would be a case of 'buyer beware'. I've got sti 'It could be a good solution for getting into a first home, and having a lovely experience — but when they come to sell, it's probably going to negatively impact their selling price,' Ms Slack-Smith said. 'The public perception is the thing that causes the worst situation here. Even though the reality is that we need the quarry to build the homes.' The property investment expert said she had finished her explosives career about 20 years ago, after starting as one of the first two women handling detonations in NSW coal mines in 1989. As she was transferring to a career in property investment advisory, her former industry was beginning to use sophisticated digital blasting technology that could effectively direct which way shockwaves from explosives travel — to the extent that certain blasting could be done 'in your backyard' without most people noticing. Ms Slack-Smith she believed the technology had come a long way since then. 'That could minimise blast noise and vibrations,' she said. 'But a homeowner about to buy in a housing estate, they don't know that. 'You talk to someone about explosives and the only stories that people know are the big bangs. 'So there's always a worry that there will be buyer expectations around buying in the area.' And it's unlikely the first homebuyers heading into the estate will be able to wait out the quarry, which is slated for operation through to 2052. Most homebuyers live in a residence for seven to 11 years. The quarry is likely to also create dust and noise, with expectations the operators will be taking steps to address these where possible. The approval of the quarry has frustrated existing local residents who had been fighting against its establishment for about four years — including two prior rejections by Mitchell Shire Council, who had warned of impacts on traffic, air quality and potentially the health and wellbeing of current and future residents. The 1279ha wider Beveridge North West Precinct Structure Plan that the quarry and homes will be part of will also pave the way for eight schools, four town halls and shopping centres, a series of parks and reserves and is ultimately expected to house 47,000 people. The approval was announced on Tuesday by Victorian planning minister Sonya Kilkenny who said there would be a staged rollout of the schools and other amenities — while the quarry was essential for building many of the homes and could lead to reduced construction costs. 'There is a quarry in this PSP that has been there, identified in the plan for many years, and part of that is ensuring that when you've got supply of materials, local construction, materials that are close to demand, it also means you can reduce the cost of the housing, reduce the cost of construction, which ultimately makes the homes cheaper to build and cheaper then to buy,' Ms Kilkenny said. Housing Industry Association Victorian executive director Keith Ryan said it was likely increased materials for civil works would allow for more rapid delivery of the infrastructure needed to support new homes and potentially home features like driveways. In the absence of economic modelling, Mr Ryan was not sure how much of a benefit this would provide to the homebuyers, but said there would be wide benefits from the creation of a new quarry — though there might still be questions of labour availability. He added that with a number of quarries already operating near homes around Victoria, and having done so historically, there was a prospect home values might not suffer. 'When people look at these homes in the future, they might not know the quarry is there unless they drive right past it,' Mr Ryan said. It won't be the first time explosives and new housing have been mixed, with developer Stockland laying 600m of underground explosives to precision blast in sewerage lines for a Truganina housing estate in 2019. In the span of 10 seconds the detonations prepared the ground for the infrastructure for a section of the 138ha Grandview estate, expected to house about 4500 residents — a fraction of what is to come in the new precinct at Beveridge.

ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
Wurundjeri elder Aunty Joy to attend Melbourne Storm NRL match despite ongoing issues with board
Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung elder Aunty Joy Murphy Wandin has said she will attend Thursday night's Melbourne Storm home game despite ongoing concerns with the club's board. The Storm announced this week that an Acknowledgement of Country would be held prior to their match with the Brisbane Broncos, marking the NRL's Indigenous Round. The club also apologised to Aunty Joy for the cancellation of a Welcome to Country before to the Storm's Anzac Day match, where the Wurundjeri elder had been at the stadium to perform. Ahead of Thursday's match, Aunty Joy said she would attend in support of players, staff and community, despite a resolution not being reached with the club's board after Anzac Day. "This is about the board, not the game. This is about setting a standard not just for Melbourne Storm but across all sporting codes," Aunty Joy said. "I will always stand strong beside community and as a leader take responsibility to care for those who hurt badly." Melbourne said at the time that the club's "board had not approved for it to be held on Anzac Day". The cancellation came hours after Bunurong and Gunditjmara man Uncle Mark Brown was booed and heckled by members of the crowd at the dawn service at Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. The Storm said its decision was not related to the booing earlier in the day, but Aunty Joy said she was told it was. Aunty Joy said Wurundjeri people wanted to continue their association with the Melbourne Storm, but highlighted they "cannot safely undertake formal ceremonies" due to one board member's reported links with lobby group Advance Australia. "I carry a deep responsibility to community and will not compromise my integrity as a proud Aboriginal woman and community elder," she said. "We cannot support an organisation that has associations with any group that incites racial vilification and division. "We are willing to continue to work with Melbourne Storm to address the deep community concerns but cannot endorse any official functions or cultural work until measures are put in place to ensure cultural respect and safety for all." Wurundjeri woman and Djirri Djirri dancer Ky-Ya Nicholson was due to perform at the Anzac Day game before the Welcome to Country was cancelled. In a statement, she said Djirri Djirri would not associate with the club "until there is meaningful change at board level". "Our decision to end our long-standing relationship with Melbourne Storm comes as a result of the disrespect shown towards Aunty Joy on Anzac Day, which was a lost opportunity to honour her veteran father and First Peoples servicemen and women who fought alongside Australian soldiers," Nicholson said. "We as a community feel very disrespected by the actions of Melbourne Storm's board, as a Welcome to Country ceremony is a tradition of unity and goodwill. Which has been completely disregarded, this shows their tokenistic approach and lack of understanding to this symbol of unity."

ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
CSIRO could be facing hundreds more job cuts this year, union warns
There are fears hundreds more Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) jobs could be axed this year, the union has warned. The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) issued a statement on Thursday morning saying that Australia's national science agency was enduring its "biggest job cuts in a decade". Last year, 440 positions were slashed, and the CPSU said "approximately 200 contract jobs were left to expire, with hundreds more cuts expected to be made to research units later this year". The union said it had made a submission to the Economic Reform Roundtable, warning the nation's capacity for productivity and innovation was being "actively undermined". The union is calling for the federal government to intervene to prevent further proposed cuts. CSIRO Staff Association section secretary Susan Tonks said there was a "clear disconnect between the government's talk about boosting productivity and their failure to support the very institution that helps deliver it". "But deep job cuts at the CSIRO are directly undermining Australia's ability to innovate, compete and grow. And this will continue to be the case as long as this government sits on its hands while hundreds of staff at the CSIRO are shown the door with little to no explanation. "If this government is serious about productivity, it must step in, stop the cuts, and back our country's peak science institution." The CSIRO has been contacted for comment. Ms Tonks said concern among staff was high. "If you're looking at the May budget papers and the workshops … there's workshops coming up to assess what science will be done, and what research will continue in September," she said. "And looking at all the numbers and everything that's coming up, it's looking highly likely that there will be similar numbers [to last year's cuts] coming across the research portfolio. "There's still assessments to be done, but given what we've just come out of, the anxiety and the concern and anger from staff is high." She said it was "hard to say" which areas within the CSIRO would be targeted. "But I think everything's going to be looked at," she said. "Looking at recent conversations with staff in preparation for some of those that are going to go through, there's quotes like, 'We need to be simpler as an organisation, we need to exit some areas and do fewer things better.'" She said it was "unsettling" for staff who had already been through recent changes, and warned some might not remain at the CSIRO if uncertainty lingered. "It's worth noting, public investment in research and development is what delivers innovation, it increases productivity," Ms Tonks said. "The CSIRO's been behind some of the most important scientific innovations that we've had in Australia. "We need to make sure that we back it."