
A quiet island experiment reveals a battle of the bees
Since 2018, honeybees have feasted on wildflowers across a remote Italian island called Giannutri every spring. But for the last four years, Lorenzo Pasquali had the unusual task of shutting the honeybee hives down and watching wild bees as they scrambled to claim the flowers, racing for every drop of nectar in the absence of their domesticated rivals.
Managed honeybees, often used in agriculture, and native bees feast on the same floral nectars and pollens. Ecologists have long suspected that honeybees may be pushing wild bees to the margins, but carrying out experiments in these wild insects has turned out to be tricky. Pasquali, an ecologist now at the University of Bialystok, Poland, and his colleagues turned the islet—just over half the size of New York's Central Park—into a living laboratory to test honeybees' impact.
The results, recently published in the journal Current Biology, suggest that wild bee numbers alarmingly dropped. With the temporary removal of honeybees, nectar and pollen levels surged, allowing wild bees to forage more and feed on nectar longer and altering their daily routines.
'It is surprising and a nice experiment,' says Alfredo Valido, an entomologist at the Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología in Spain, who was not involved in the research. The researchers designed a very clear experiment relating honeybees, flowers and wild bees, he adds.
(Native bees that pollinate many of our favorite foods.) A new honeybee (Apis mellifera) emerges from a brood cell to live for six short weeks. It spends that time foraging for food, making honey, and raising the next generation. Composite Photograph by Anand Varma, Nat Geo Image Collection The buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) was one of two wild species that saw a drop in numbers on Giannutri Island after honeybees were introduced. Photograph by Chris Gomersall, 2020VISION/Nature Picture Library
Beekeepers first brought honeybee queens to Giannutri to raise them in isolation. The island is part of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park, and in 2021, authorities asked Pasquali's advisor, entomologist Leonardo Dapporto of the University of Florence to investigate whether managed honeybees that were recently brought to the island might have an unexpected ecological fallout. Hiking the island with another colleague, Alessandro Cini of the University of Pisa, they noticed plenty of honeybees buzzing around, but just a few wild bees. From scuba diving to set-jetting
'What if tomorrow there are no honeybees on the island?' Dapporto wondered. 'How [would] the behavior of wild bees change?'
The team decided to use the island as a natural experiment. Every other morning, Pasquali would seal off the entrances to all 18 honeybee hives on alternating mornings, making sure the honeybees couldn't leave. Then, he and fellow researchers would observe the island's wild pollinators. The bees were kept inside until late afternoon—just long enough for researchers to observe how wild bees behaved in their absence.
'It was a unique experience. Never boring,' Pasquali says. 'I still remember every plant and rock on the island.'
For Pasquali and his teammates, identifying native wild bees was easy. The wild bees are bigger and darker with bright colors. The wild bees also fly with a distinct buzzing sound compared to the honeybees. The researchers tracked how often wild bees entered or exited plots of land, tracking how often they visited flowers, and how long they spent drinking nectar. Using delicate tubes, they also measured the volume of nectar available for the wild bees in presence or absence of honeybees.
The team found that when honeybees were locked in their hives, nectar volume increased by over 50 percent in some plants, while pollen level spiked by nearly 30 percent. Subsequently, the researchers found an increased level of searching behavior in wild bees and they also sucked in nectar for a longer time.
Over four years, as the team carried out surveys on the island to monitor wild bee populations, they found that Anthophora dispar, a solitary native bee species, and Bombus terrestris, a type of bumblebee, fell by nearly 80 percent compared to their population level at the start of the study in 2021.
While in the beginning of the experiment researchers expected to see some impacts to the wild bees, 'we didn't imagine that the impact was this strong,' Dapporto says. The dataset is still a correlation, he adds, but the fact that the wild bee population declined so significantly after the introduction of honeybees puts them on the prime focus compared to other factors. Commercial beekeeping, like this operation on a ranch in California, is extremely important for agriculture, but honeybees may threaten native wild species when they're introduced to protected areas. Photograph by Anand Varma, Nat Geo Image Collection
'We are not against beekeeping practice,' Dapporto adds. But when honeybees are introduced into protected areas, especially those home to rare, endangered, or native wild bee species, park authorities should exercise great caution and ecological assessment.
Wild bees on bigger islands and even in sensitive protected areas in mainland regions might be facing similar fates, if honeybees have been introduced without proper assessment, the team says. Wild bees face a range of threats, from habitat loss and climate change to pesticide exposure. But unlike many of these pressures, competition from honeybees is something humans can actively manage.
As soon as Dapporto's team informed the national park about the results, the park immediately took action, halting the practice of beekeeping starting this year. That makes the results even more impressive, Valido says, commending the quick action. 'It's not logical to introduce [managed species] in an area where you want to preserve the flora and fauna,' he adds.
In addition to beekeeping, 'sometimes conservation areas have a variety of land uses for things like pasture cattle and sheep,' says Victoria Wojcik, Science Director at the Pollinator Partnership Canada, a non-profit dedicated for the conservation of pollinators. Even in these cases, conservationists should look at the ecosystem resources to avoid overstocking. But for an area designated as a critical habitat for an invertebrate species, specifically a bee, 'I would be really confused as to why someone would consider permitting honeybee keeping in that landscape,' she adds.
As for Dapporto and his team, they are continuing to track whether the native wild bees would change their behavior and bounce back in number as the honeybees are removed from the island. The team has already collected some data this year and is planning to continue observation for coming years.
'Then we could see if a longer absence of honeybees will produce a [major] effect on the behavior of wild bees,' he adds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
If Another Home For Humanity Is Out There, This Spaceship Could Get Us There
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Project Hyperion competition winners dreamed up Chrysalis, a starship and space habitat that could make it to the planet Proxima b in just 400 years (which is ridiculously fast). The spacecraft is designed to run on a fusion engine, create artificial gravity, and carry about a thousand people while flying at around a tenth of the speed of light. Though Chrysalis remains a concept (for now), it could end up launching something unprecedented in the future. Headed towards the Proxima Centauri system, the starship Chrysalis traverses a seemingly endless expanse of space as it soars toward its final destination—the potentially habitable planet Proxima b. There, over a thousand passengers who have been living in the airborne habitat (the descendants of a crew that launched from Earth four centuries ago) will build a new frontier for humanity. Chrysalis sounds as if it flew straight out of a scene in Isaac Asimov's Foundation. But despite its sci-fi features, this is an actual spacecraft concept that recently won the Project Hyperion design competition hosted by the Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4is). The craft is the brainchild of an interdisciplinary team of Italian researchers—Giacomo Infelise, Veronica Magli, Guido Sbrogio, Nevenka Martinello, and Federica Chiara Serpe—who were challenged to come up with a floating habitat that would eventually touch down on the closest exoplanet to Earth, Proxima b. 'The presentation is rich and visually engaging, drawing comparisons to iconic works like Rama, and showcasing a clear passion for both design and storytelling,' the competition jury said of Chrysalis in a recent press release. 'Its overall spacecraft design seems to take inspiration from the gigantic world ship concepts of the 1980s.' Each team that embarked on this conceptual journey needed at least one architectural designer, one engineer, and one social scientist. Their mission was to figure out how to accommodate a thousand (give or take 500) people over the centuries it would take for the spacecraft to reach its destination. Like the fictional starships it was inspired by, Chrysalis would to produce artificial gravity through a rotation system, in order to try and counteract the detrimental effects of microgravity on the human body. Designing support systems for food, water, waste, and an atmosphere—as well as coming up with ways to provide livable conditions and meet basic needs—were also mandatory parts of the contest. Additionally, there would need to be methods of transferring knowledge from generation to generations in order to both keep culture alive and retain (and advance) technology. The spacecraft would also have to trek through space at a maximum velocity of a tenth of the speed of light, and make it to Proxima b in as close to 250 years as possible. The fastest spacecraft to date is NASA's Parker Solar Probe, which recently zoomed past the Sun at a blazing 692,000 kmph (430,000 mph). But even Parker would still be short of one trillion miles (1.6 trillion km) after 224 years of travel, and still have over 24 trillion miles to go. If Chrysalis ever becomes a reality, it should make it to Proxima b in 400 years, after a year-long acceleration period. It would take another year to decelerate once it reached the planet. Proxima b is 4.24 light-years away, and one light-year equates to about 9.5 trillion km (6 trillion miles). So, the journey from here to Proxima b would cover 39 trillion km (25 trillion miles) through the void. Doing that in 400 years is certainly nothing to sneeze at. Much like the chrysalis of a moth or butterfly blown to epic proportions, Chrysalis was imagined as a 58,000-meter-long (63,430 yards), 2.4 billion-metric-ton (2.65 US tons) cylindrical structure. Its narrower front end would mitigate the risk of impacts from micrometeoroids, space junk, and anything else that could cause a damaging collision. The minimized front end is also meant to reduce stress on the spacecraft as it accelerates and decelerates. Powered by the nuclear fusion of helium and deuterium isotopes, its propulsion system would be a Direct Fusion Drive (DFD)—an engine that is still very much in the conceptual phase. It is supposed to give the spacecraft a simultaneous burst of electrical power and thrust. There is a reason that some floating off-earth habitats in science fiction are shown rotating in space. The front end of Chrysalis—which is imagined to function as the habitat—would have multiple levels in flexible modular shells that fit into each other and constantly rotate on one axis to maintain artificial gravity. From outer to inner, levels would be specialized for food production, ecosystems, communal spaces, housing, gardens, facilities, a warehouse, and the axial core. The Cosmo Dome at the front end is intended to be a bubble of microgravity that provides an incredible view to passengers as they experience weightlessness for a while. So, where do we go from here? Humans have yet to reach Mars (much less Proxima b), and whether such a massive concept can ever translate to reality remains to be seen. However, landing on the Moon was seen as an impossibility only a hundred years ago—the limits of humanity are possibly boundless. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?


National Geographic
7 days ago
- National Geographic
Eating too much of this favorite food could increase your diabetes risk
Not all potatoes are created equally, according to a new study that analyzed nearly four decades of health data to understand the potential links between potato intake and diabetes risk. Photograph by Gerd Ludwig, Nat Geo Image Collection You might want to think twice before you reach for that last french fry at the bottom of the bag. A new study from a team of researchers at Harvard University found that eating too many fries was associated with significantly higher risk for developing Type 2 diabetes. In the study published in BMJ, researchers analyzed nearly four decades worth of self-reported dietary data from 205,000 nurses and health professionals, making it one of the most comprehensive studies regarding potato intake and diabetes to date. The results showed those who ate three servings of boiled, mashed or baked potatoes a week had a marginally increased Type 2 diabetes risk of 1 percent. However, respondents who ate three servings of french fries a week had 20 percent risk. (It's possible to reverse diabetes—and even faster than you think.) 'The big takeaway? Not all potatoes are created equally,' says Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, the lead researcher and a postdoctoral research fellow in Harvard University's department of nutrition. If the findings make you a bit salty, fear not: There are some caveats that might put your mind at ease. So do you need to be worried if you only eat fries occasionally—or if you prefer the sweet potato kind? And if you're going to keep eating french fries anyway, is there anything you can do to modify diabetes risk? National Geographic put these questions to the experts. Scientists have suspected for years that white potatoes could increase our risk of Type 2 diabetes. That's because when our bodies break down potato starch, it quickly converts into glucose that enters our bloodstream and can cause our insulin to spike. To learn more about this relationship, Mousavi's team built upon a 2015 study that had previously looked at this question using the same survey data. This time however, the BMJ study followed participants for a longer period and included 7,000 respondents with new cases of Type 2 diabetes. Mousavi's study also conducted an additional meta-analysis of similar research worldwide. 'That allowed us to cut through the noise and show that the increased risk of diabetes really centers on French fries, not all potatoes,' Mousavi says. (Scientists finally know where potatoes come from—and the answer is very weird.) Pratik Pokharel, a postdoctoral fellow at the Danish Cancer Institute, who was not part of the study, says the research tracks with his team's own potato findings. 'Higher consumption of potato fries was associated with poorer glucose tolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity. These effects, over time, could increase the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.' A study published in The BMJ found that eating french fries three times a week increased a person's risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by up to 20 percent. The researchers noted that other forms of potato, such as boiled or baked potatoes did not show the same correlation. Photograph by Jimena Peck, The New York Times/Redux (Top) (Left) and Photograph by Matt Roth, The New York Times/Redux (Bottom) (Right) The study defined a serving of french fries as about 4 to 6 ounces, or roughly a medium to large McDonald's fries. Three servings a week is where scientists identified the 20 percent increase in diabetes risk. As we know, however, people don't always stick to recommended serving sizes—particularly in the United States. 'We supersize everything,' says Walter Willett, the study's co-author and a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. So if you're eating one heaping pile of fries once a week, you might still need to listen up. (Diet soda might be making you hungrier.) Portioning can help. Johanna Lampe, a registered dietician and experimental nutritionist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, argues potatoes may be easier than other foods to eyeball to make sure you have the right portion. 'French fries, typically eaten as a discrete component, may be even more accurately quantified,' she says. While no number is 'safe' Mousavi says, it's clear 'the more you eat, the steeper that risk gets.' Are sweet potato fries still safe? While the study didn't focus on sweet potatoes specifically, mixed research suggests they do likely have a lower glycemic index. When we break down low glycemic index foods, the glucose enters our bloodstream more gradually. Still, they're carbohydrates, and might increase diabetes risk if eaten in large quantities, Willett says. Oil, fat, and salt also play a role in risk. Overall, more research is needed. Knowing how much the potato is revered—it's the third-most consumed crop, according to the International Potato Center—researchers wanted to provide people with healthy alternatives. And it turns out, Willett says, 'the choices make a big difference.' They found that replacing baked, mashed, or boiled potatoes with whole grains could decrease diabetes risk by 4 percent, while replacing french fries with whole grains decreases risk by 19 percent. (Your body needs whole grains. Here's how to find the most effective ones.) One surprise in their findings? Swapping out boiled, baked or mashed potatoes for rice actually increased diabetes risk, likely due to the food's high glycemic index. If you're not drooling over whole grains, you can start slow, says Hilary Seligman, the director of the Food Policy, Health, and Hunger Research Program at University of California, San Francisco. 'Just substitute them for refined grains in the two or three products you find most palatable to start,' Seligman says. Whole grain crackers, cereal, or bread are all great options. One caveat is that during the time the study was conducted, french fries were mostly cooked using trans fat oils, 'many which are banned now,' Mousavi says. So, the topic should be revisited. When it comes to potatoes, 'the focus should be on healthier preparation,' Pokharel says. Think baked french fries with olive oil. What about air-frying? Mousavi says, 'While we didn't compare air-frying directly, it likely poses a lower risk than traditional deep-frying—but more studies are needed.' Or start with baby steps. Get a side salad with your burger next time. And opt for smaller portions, Mousavi advises. 'The big takeaway is that small everyday choices really do add up.'


Hamilton Spectator
31-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
Vatican strikes solar farm deal to become the world's first carbon-neutral state
ROME (AP) — Italy agreed Thursday to a Vatican plan to turn a 430-hectare (1,000-acre) field north of Rome, once the source of controversy between the two, into a vast solar farm that the Holy See hopes will generate enough electricity to meet its needs and turn Vatican City into the world's first carbon-neutral state. The agreement stipulates that the development of the Santa Maria Galeria site will preserve the agricultural use of the land and minimize the environmental impact on the territory, according to a Vatican statement. Details weren't released, but the Vatican will be exempt from paying Italian taxes to import the solar panels, but won't benefit from the financial incentives that Italians enjoy when they go solar. Italy, for its part, can use the field in its accounting for reaching European Union clean energy targets. Any excess electricity generated by the farm beyond the Vatican's needs would be given to the local community, officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the agreement was not public. Vatican officials have estimated it will cost under 100 million euros ($114 million) to develop the solar farm, and that once it is approved by the Italian parliament, the contracts to do the work could be put up for bids. Vatican foreign minister Archbishop Paul Gallagher signed the agreement with Italy's ambassador to the Holy See, Francesco Di Nitto. The Italian parliament must approve the arrangement since it has financial implications for the territory, which holds extraterritorial status in Italy. The Santa Maria Galeria site has long been the source of controversy because of electromagnetic waves emitted by Vatican Radio towers located there since the 1950s. The once-rural site some 35 kilometers (20 miles) north of Rome is dominated by two dozen short- and medium-wave radio antennae that transmit news from the Catholic Church in dozens of languages around the globe. Over the years as the area became more developed, residents began complaining of health problems, including instances of childhood leukemia which they blamed on the electromagnetic waves generated by the towers. The Vatican denied there was any causal link but cut back the transmissions. Pope Francis last year asked the Vatican to study developing the area into a vast solar farm, hoping to put into practice his preaching about the need to transition away from fossil fuels and find clean, carbon-neutral energy sources. Pope Leo XIV visited the site in June and affirmed that he intended to see Francis' vision through. Leo has strongly taken up Francis' ecological mantle , recently using a new set of prayers and readings inspired by Pope Francis' environmental legacy . In the 1990s at the height of the controversy over the radio towers, residents sued Vatican Radio officials, claiming the emissions exceeded the Italian legal limit, but the court cleared the transmitter. In 2012, the Vatican announced it was cutting in half the hours of transmission from the site, not because of health concerns but because of cost-saving technological advances in internet broadcasting. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.