Court rules against Metropolitan police crackdown on officers
Scotland Yard had used the scheme, which effectively dismisses officers by removing their vetting clearance, to get rid of scores staff – some of whom had faced allegations of sexual assault.
It was launched after a series of scandals which had sapped public confidence, including the kidnap and murder of Sarah Everard by serving Met officer Wayne Couzens in 2021.
But judges have ruled against the force after a challenge by the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents rank and file officers.
The Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, who has publicly vowed to clean up the force, has been left furious by the judgment and will consider an appeal. Rowley believes the process is a vital part of the effort to root out bad or suspect officers.
The Met now has to reinstate those removed from the force after their vetting status was withdrawn, and those who left could be eligible for back pay.
Under the scheme, if the Met received adverse information about an officer or staff member, their vetting would be reviewed. Vetting essentially clears them to access sensitive information and work in sensitive roles.
If vetting approval is withdrawn, the staff member attends a gross incompetence hearing and can be dismissed.
The Met says more than 100 officers and staff have left the force after their vetting was called into question.
More details soon …
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Protester arrested over ‘Plasticine Action' T-shirt: ‘How ridiculous is this?'
It was only after Miles Pickering arrived at Scotland Yard following his arrest that the police realised they had got things embarrassingly wrong. The T-shirt worn by the Brighton engineer did not express support for a proscribed terrorist group, instead the words on it read 'Plasticine Action' and inside the letter 'o' was an image of the stop-motion character Morph giving two thumbs up. Speaking to the Guardian, Pickering admitted it was designed to be an easy mistake to make, appearing to look like the logo of Palestine Action, the protest group banned under terrorism legislation last month, but text underneath the logo reads: 'We oppose AI-generated animation.' The arrest happened – one of 532 that day – at a protest in Parliament Square in London on 9 August, after a police officer glanced at his top. 'I'm like: 'Well, there you go, Plasticine Action.' He looked down and he said: 'Right, you're nicked.' And I thought: 'Oh, here we go,'' said Pickering. Outside the Met police headquarters at what essentially was a pop-up booking suite made from two gazebos dealing with the large volume of arrested people, a large group of protesters cheered as people were brought in by officers. 'They were all cheering us, and I was cheekily pointing to my T-shirt and going 'Plasticine Action!' to everyone, so they were taking photos of me, and everyone was laughing at how silly it was that I was getting arrested for being a plasticine terrorist,' Pickering said. He had been arrested under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which makes it an offence to wear anything supporting a proscribed organisation. A senior officer asked the arresting officer if he could arrest Pickering under section 12, which could have brought a more serious charge of supporting a proscribed group. '[The arresting officer] said: 'No, I can't.' And they said: 'Why not?' He said: 'Because he hasn't got Palestine Action written on him. He's got Plasticine Action written on him.'' About five minutes later, the arresting officer approached him again. 'He said: 'I've got good news and I've got bad news.' I said: 'What's the good news?' He said: 'I'm de-arresting you.' 'And I said: 'What's the bad news?' He said: 'It's going to be really embarrassing for me.' And then I walked free, while all the real heroes are the people that are actually getting arrested.' Pickering has made copies of the T-shirt, which he is selling to raise money for the charity Medical Aid for Palestinians. It has sold in 28 countries already and was the 14th most popular T-shirt sold on Amazon UK on Friday. 'So there's people getting on this one, because it kind of works, doesn't it?' he said. 'It's like we are just going to mock you for your ridiculous decision to proscribe a protest group. It's just so important that our rights to protest do not get diminished.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He said he expected there to be a number of people wearing the shirts on 6 September at the next organised protest against the ban on Palestine Action, and that he had been advised by the police that it could still be an arrestable offence. 'How ridiculous is this?' he said, adding: 'But if 1,000 people wander around the Palestinian march wearing a T-shirt that says Plasticine Action with a picture of Morph, what are they going to do?' In June, a Leeds man was arrested for holding up a printed out version of a joke from Private Eye, an incident that the satirical magazine's editor, Ian Hislop, called 'mind-boggling' . Pickering said that although he did care about AI ruining the animation industry, he was passionate about protesting for Gaza, and had seen support for the cause swell over this time. He said he felt the tide of public opinion was turning, with more national news organisations showing images and video of the famine Israel was inflicting on the people of Gaza. 'There's no justification for it, and we all know it. I do think we're winning. We're going to win this battle, and Palestine will ultimately – as we've been shouting at people for so long – be free.'
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Home Secretary: Palestine Action 'more than a regular protest group'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has labelled Palestine Action more than 'a regular protest group' as she defended the group's proscription as a terrorist organisation. She said protest and free speech remain a part of democracy, which will always be protected, but argued Palestine Action has carried out 'an escalating campaign'. Writing in The Observer, she said: 'Some may think it is a regular protest group known for occasional stunts. But that is not the extent of its past activities.' Cooper said counterterrorism intelligence showed the organisation passed the tests to be proscribed under the 2000 Terrorism Act with 'disturbing information' about future attacks. 'Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do,' she said. 'Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe.' She said only a tiny minority of people who had protested in support of Palestinian people since the start of the war with Israel had been arrested. 'That is why the proscription of this group is not about protest or the Palestinian cause,' she said. 'In a democracy, lawful protest is a fundamental right but violent criminality is not." The Metropolitan Police said on Friday more than 700 people have been arrested since the group was banned on July 5. The force said a further 60 people will be prosecuted for support of Palestine Action, while Norfolk Police said on Saturday 13 people were arrested at a protest in Norwich. Last week, the Met confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences under the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action. The three people charged were arrested at a protest in Parliament Square on July 5. More prosecutions are expected in the coming weeks, and arrangements have been put in place 'that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary', the Met said. From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Man guilty over gang shooting that left nine-year-old girl with bullet lodged in brain
A man has been found guilty over a gang shooting that left a nine-year-old girl with a bullet lodged in her brain in Hackney, London. The girl - who cannot be named for legal reasons - became a victim of rivalry between two Turkish gangs after being hit in the head by one of six bullets. The shots were fired by a man on a passing motorbike as the girl sat with her family at a restaurant on May 29 2024. She spent three months in hospital and will suffer with life-long physical and cognitive problems as the bullet remains stuck in her brain. Javon Riley, 33, from Tottenham, north London, was found guilty of causing grievous harm with intent after helping the gunman flee the scene. Riley was also found guilty of attempting to murder Mustafa Kiziltan, 35, Kenan Aydogdu, 45 and Nasser Ali, 44. The three men were said to be affiliated with the Hackney Turks organised crime gang, who had a rivalry with the Tottenham Turks, with whom Riley had links, the court heard. He checked the restaurant before the attack, scouted for potential targets and drove the gunman away in a stolen car, which was later burnt out. The injured girl's mother described the shooting as "brutal and inhumane". 'As parents, we are shattered, emotionally, physically, mentally, and financially," she wrote in a statement. 'Each day brings new challenges, from her slower growth on one side to the emotional and mental scars that cannot be seen. 'The world we once believed was safe for our child now feels frightening and uncertain. 'We live with this pain every day, knowing nothing will ever be the same for our family.' The jury at the Old Bailey deliberated for six hours and three minutes to convict Riley by a majority of ten to two. Judge Mark Lucraft KC remanded Riley into custody to be sentenced on September 12. He told him to expect a lengthy prison sentence, saying: 'You have clearly taken part in a shooting which has led to four people being injured, one of them particularly seriously.' Riley's connection with the Tottenham Turks gang was revealed in covert police recordings in the months after the shooting. During the three-week trial, Riley was repeatedly asked to identify the 'third party' who had recruited him for around £40,000. He refused to name the man or help to identify the gunman, claiming he feared for his life at that of his family. Detective Inspector Ben Dalloway, who led the investigation, said: 'Javon Riley's actions traumatically altered the trajectory of a little girl's life. While this outcome serves as a slither of justice, the dangerous individual responsible for pulling the trigger remains on our streets." 'Those who ordered this shooting are a highly sophisticated criminal organisation. We understand that people may be worried about talking to us because of this, but it is imperative we hear from anyone who can assist this investigation." 'Justice must be secured for this little girl and her family.' Scotland Yard has offered a reward of up to £15,000 for information that leads to the identification, arrest of and prosecution the man who fired the weapon.
