logo
First Citizens BancShares Reports First Quarter 2025 Earnings

First Citizens BancShares Reports First Quarter 2025 Earnings

RALEIGH, N.C., April 24, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — First Citizens BancShares, Inc. ('BancShares') (Nasdaq: FCNCA) reported earnings for the first quarter of 2025.
Chairman and CEO Frank B. Holding, Jr. said: 'Our first quarter financial results were solid, including loan growth in the Commercial Bank and SVB Commercial segments, as well as deposit growth, primarily in the Direct Bank and throughout our Branch Network. Credit remained stable with net charge-offs declining from the fourth quarter. We maintained strong capital and liquidity positions which allowed us to return an additional $613 million of capital to our stockholders through share repurchases. We also successfully completed the issuance of $500 million of senior unsecured notes and $750 million of subordinated notes. While we acknowledge uncertainty in the current environment, we enter it from a position of strength and are excited about our prospects moving forward.'
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Measures referenced below 'as adjusted' or 'excluding PAA' (or purchase accounting accretion) are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to the Financial Supplement available at ir.firstcitizens.com or www.sec.gov for a reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Net income for the first quarter of 2025 ('current quarter') was $483 million compared to $700 million for the fourth quarter of 2024 ('linked quarter'). Net income available to common stockholders for the current quarter was $468 million, or $34.47 per common share, compared to $685 million, or $49.21 per common share, in the linked quarter. The decrease in net income available to common stockholders of $217 million was mainly due to an increase in income tax expense of $132 million as the linked quarter included a decrease in income tax expense from the revaluation of the deferred tax liability. The tax rate applied in the linked quarter declined after we filed our first income tax returns that included the SVBB Acquisition. Pretax income for the current quarter was $651 million compared to $736 million for the linked quarter, a decrease of $85 million.
Adjusted net income for the current quarter was $528 million compared to $643 million for the linked quarter. Adjusted net income available to common stockholders was $513 million, or $37.79 per common share, a $115 million decrease from $628 million, or $45.10 per common share, in the linked quarter.
Current quarter results included the following select items:
Acquisition-related expenses of $42 million,
Intangible asset amortization of $15 million, and
Net impact of $15 million for the tax effect of notable items.
NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN
Net interest income totaled $1.66 billion for the current quarter, a decrease of $46 million from the linked quarter. Net interest income related to PAA was $75 million compared to $82 million in the linked quarter, a decrease of $7 million. Net interest income, excluding PAA, was $1.59 billion compared to $1.63 billion in the linked quarter, a decrease of $39 million, primarily due to the following:
Interest income on loans decreased $86 million. Interest income on loans, excluding loan PAA, decreased $80 million as a result of a lower yield, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance.
Interest income on interest-earning deposits at banks decreased $57 million due to declines in the average balance and the federal funds rate.
Interest income on investment securities increased $37 million due to a higher average balance and a higher yield.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $64 million, mainly due to a lower rate paid, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance.
Interest expense on borrowings increased $4 million, primarily due to a higher average balance as we issued $500 million of senior unsecured notes and $750 million of subordinated notes during the current quarter.
Net interest margin ('NIM') was 3.26% compared to 3.32% in the linked quarter. NIM compression was mainly due to a decline in the yield on interest-earning assets (due primarily to decreases in the federal funds rate in the linked quarter), a mix shift from interest-earning deposits at banks to investment securities, and an increase in average interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and an increase in average loans. Lower PAA had a 1 basis point negative impact on NIM during the current quarter. NIM, excluding PAA, was 3.12% compared to 3.16% in the linked quarter.
The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.68%, a decrease of 15 basis points from the linked quarter, mainly due to declines in yields on loans and interest-earning deposits at banks, and slightly lower loan PAA, partially offset by a higher yield on investment securities.
The rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities was 3.22%, a decrease of 17 basis points from the linked quarter, primarily due to a lower rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance of interest-bearing deposits.
Interest income on loans decreased $86 million. Interest income on loans, excluding loan PAA, decreased $80 million as a result of a lower yield, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance.
Interest income on interest-earning deposits at banks decreased $57 million due to declines in the average balance and the federal funds rate.
Interest income on investment securities increased $37 million due to a higher average balance and a higher yield.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $64 million, mainly due to a lower rate paid, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance.
Interest expense on borrowings increased $4 million, primarily due to a higher average balance as we issued $500 million of senior unsecured notes and $750 million of subordinated notes during the current quarter.
The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.68%, a decrease of 15 basis points from the linked quarter, mainly due to declines in yields on loans and interest-earning deposits at banks, and slightly lower loan PAA, partially offset by a higher yield on investment securities.
The rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities was 3.22%, a decrease of 17 basis points from the linked quarter, primarily due to a lower rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by the impact of a higher average balance of interest-bearing deposits.
NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE
Noninterest income was $635 million compared to $699 million in the linked quarter, a decrease of $64 million, which included a decline in the fair value adjustment on marketable equity securities of $15 million, as well as declines in gains on sales of loans of $8 million, leasing equipment of $6 million and marketable equity securities of $2 million.
Adjusted noninterest income was $479 million compared to $516 million in the linked quarter, a decrease of $37 million, primarily the result of a decline in other noninterest income of $28 million, mainly attributable to the negative impacts from fair value changes in customer derivative positions driven by changes in the rate environment, as well as the write-down of a held for sale asset. Additionally, decreases in adjusted rental income on operating lease equipment of $6 million and factoring commissions of $3 million were partially offset by an increase in wealth management services of $2 million.
Noninterest expense was $1.49 billion compared to $1.52 billion in the linked quarter, a decrease of $24 million. Acquisition-related expenses and capitalized software impairment decreased $20 million and $10 million, respectively, compared to the linked quarter.
Adjusted noninterest expense was $1.28 billion compared to $1.27 billion in the linked quarter, an increase of $9 million, primarily the result of the following:
An increase in total personnel cost of $17 million, mainly attributable to merit-based compensation increases, net staff additions, and seasonal increases in employee benefits and payroll taxes, as well as increases in marketing expense of $8 million mostly related to the Direct Bank, third-party processing of $6 million, and FDIC insurance expense of $5 million, partially offset by the following:
A decline in other noninterest expense of $20 million, reflecting decreases in non-income taxes, donations to support relief efforts for recent natural disasters, as well as a decrease in professional fees of $5 million.
An increase in total personnel cost of $17 million, mainly attributable to merit-based compensation increases, net staff additions, and seasonal increases in employee benefits and payroll taxes, as well as increases in marketing expense of $8 million mostly related to the Direct Bank, third-party processing of $6 million, and FDIC insurance expense of $5 million, partially offset by the following:
A decline in other noninterest expense of $20 million, reflecting decreases in non-income taxes, donations to support relief efforts for recent natural disasters, as well as a decrease in professional fees of $5 million.
A decline in other noninterest expense of $20 million, reflecting decreases in non-income taxes, donations to support relief efforts for recent natural disasters, as well as a decrease in professional fees of $5 million.
BALANCE SHEET SUMMARY
Loans and leases totaled $141.36 billion at March 31, 2025, an increase of $1.14 billion (3.3% annualized) compared to $140.22 billion at December 31, 2024. Loan growth was mostly attributable to the following:
Commercial Bank segment growth of $733 million (7.8% annualized) was mainly related to loans in our industry verticals, primarily Tech Media and Telecom and Healthcare.
SVB Commercial segment growth of $444 million (4.8% annualized) was mostly related to Global Fund Banking, partially offset by a decline in the investor dependent portfolio.
General Bank segment loans declined by $40 million as loan growth in Wealth was more than offset by declines in the Branch Network.
Total investment securities were $44.32 billion at March 31, 2025, an increase of $229 million since December 31, 2024. The increase was mainly attributable to purchases of approximately $1.86 billion short duration available for sale U.S. agency mortgage-backed and U.S. Treasury investment securities during the current quarter, partially offset by sales of approximately $1.20 billion of U.S. Treasury investment securities, as well as paydowns and maturities.
Deposits totaled $159.33 billion at March 31, 2025, an increase of $4.10 billion since December 31, 2024 (10.7% annualized growth). Deposit growth was attributable to the following:
Corporate deposits increased $2.76 billion, mostly due to growth in Direct Bank savings deposits.
General Bank segment deposits increased $1.35 billion, mainly due to growth in the Branch Network and Community Association Banking.
SVB Commercial segment deposits increased $496 million despite the strategic decision to move $2.4 billion in select cash sweep deposits to off-balance sheet client funds during the current quarter.
Commercial Bank segment deposits decreased $508 million.
Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 25.6% of total deposits as of March 31, 2025, compared to 24.9% at December 31, 2024. The cost of average total deposits was 2.32% for the current quarter, compared to 2.46% for the linked quarter.
Funding mix remained stable with 80.6% of total funding composed of deposits.
Commercial Bank segment growth of $733 million (7.8% annualized) was mainly related to loans in our industry verticals, primarily Tech Media and Telecom and Healthcare.
SVB Commercial segment growth of $444 million (4.8% annualized) was mostly related to Global Fund Banking, partially offset by a decline in the investor dependent portfolio.
General Bank segment loans declined by $40 million as loan growth in Wealth was more than offset by declines in the Branch Network.
Corporate deposits increased $2.76 billion, mostly due to growth in Direct Bank savings deposits.
General Bank segment deposits increased $1.35 billion, mainly due to growth in the Branch Network and Community Association Banking.
SVB Commercial segment deposits increased $496 million despite the strategic decision to move $2.4 billion in select cash sweep deposits to off-balance sheet client funds during the current quarter.
Commercial Bank segment deposits decreased $508 million.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY
Provision for credit losses totaled $154 million for the current quarter compared to $155 million for the linked quarter. The current quarter provision for credit losses included a provision for loan and lease losses of $148 million and a provision for off-balance sheet credit exposure of $6 million.
The provision for loan and lease losses for the current quarter was $148 million compared to $158 million for the linked quarter. The $10 million decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses was mainly attributable to a decrease in net charge-offs of $16 million, partially offset by the impact of a $4 million reserve build in the current quarter compared to a $2 million reserve release in the linked quarter.
The $9 million increase in the provision for off-balance sheet credit exposure was mostly due to an increase in off-balance sheet credit exposure and modest deterioration in the macroeconomic forecast.
Net charge-offs were $144 million for the current quarter, representing 0.41% of average loans, compared to $160 million, or 0.46% of average loans, for the linked quarter. The $16 million decrease was primarily related to lower net charge-offs in the equipment finance portfolio.
Nonaccrual loans were $1.21 billion, or 0.85% of loans, at March 31, 2025, compared to $1.18 billion, or 0.84% of loans, at December 31, 2024.
The allowance for loan and lease losses totaled $1.68 billion, an increase of $4 million from the linked quarter, primarily due to modest deterioration in the macroeconomic forecast, as well as increases in loan volume, partially offset by the result of a mix shift from the investor dependent portfolio to the Global Fund Banking portfolio, which has a lower loss rate relative to our other loan portfolios, and lower specific reserves for individually evaluated loans. The reserve release of $2 million in the linked quarter was primarily due to lower specific reserves, partially offset by increases in loan volume. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans was 1.19% at March 31, 2025 compared to 1.20% at December 31, 2024.
The provision for loan and lease losses for the current quarter was $148 million compared to $158 million for the linked quarter. The $10 million decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses was mainly attributable to a decrease in net charge-offs of $16 million, partially offset by the impact of a $4 million reserve build in the current quarter compared to a $2 million reserve release in the linked quarter.
The $9 million increase in the provision for off-balance sheet credit exposure was mostly due to an increase in off-balance sheet credit exposure and modest deterioration in the macroeconomic forecast.
CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY
Capital ratios are well above regulatory requirements. The estimated total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios were 15.23%, 13.35%, 12.81%, and 9.75%, respectively, at March 31, 2025.
During the current quarter, we repurchased 302,683 shares of our Class A common stock for $613 million and paid a dividend of $1.95 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock. Shares repurchased during the current quarter represented 2.38% of Class A common shares and 2.21% of total Class A and Class B common shares outstanding at December 31, 2024. From inception of the Share Repurchase Program ('SRP') through March 31, 2025, we have repurchased 1,117,324 shares of our Class A common stock for $2.28 billion, representing 8.26% of Class A common shares and 7.69% of total Class A and Class B common shares outstanding as of June 30, 2024. The total capacity remaining under the SRP was $1.22 billion as of March 31, 2025.
Liquidity position remains strong as liquid assets were $62.79 billion at March 31, 2025, compared to $59.34 billion at December 31, 2024.
EARNINGS CALL/ WEBCAST DETAILS
BancShares will host a conference call to discuss the company's financial results on Thursday, April 24, 2025, at 9 a.m. Eastern time.
The call may be accessed via webcast on the company's website at ir.firstcitizens.com or through the dial-in details below:
North America: 1-833-470-1428All other locations: 1-929-526-1599Access code: 627829
Our earnings release, investor presentation, and financial supplement are available at ir.firstcitizens.com. In addition, these materials will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') on a Form 8-K and will be available on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. After the event, a replay of the call will be available via webcast at ir.firstcitizens.com.
ABOUT FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES
First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (Nasdaq: FCNCA), a top 20 U.S. financial institution with more than $200 billion in assets and a member of the Fortune 500TM, is the financial holding company for First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company ('First Citizens Bank'). Headquartered in Raleigh, N.C., First Citizens Bank has built a unique legacy of strength, stability and long-term thinking that has spanned generations. First Citizens offers an array of general banking services including a network of branches and offices nationwide; commercial banking expertise delivering best-in-class lending, leasing and other financial services coast to coast; innovation banking serving businesses at every stage; personalized service and resources to help grow and manage wealth; and a nationwide direct bank. Discover more at firstcitizens.com.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This communication contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans, asset quality, future performance, and other strategic goals of BancShares. Words such as 'anticipates,' 'believes,' 'estimates,' 'expects,' 'predicts,' 'forecasts,' 'intends,' 'plans,' 'projects,' 'targets,' 'designed,' 'could,' 'may,' 'should,' 'will,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'aims' or other similar words and expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on BancShares' current expectations and assumptions regarding BancShares' business, the economy, and other future conditions.
Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, they are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties, changes in circumstances and other factors that are difficult to predict. Many possible events or factors could affect BancShares' future financial results and performance and could cause actual results, performance or achievements of BancShares to differ materially from any anticipated results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, general competitive, economic (including the imposition of tariffs on trading partners), political (including the makeup of the U.S. Congress and Trump administration), geopolitical events (including conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East), natural disasters and market conditions, including changes in competitive pressures among financial institutions and the impacts related to or resulting from previous bank failures, the risks and impacts of future bank failures and other volatility in the banking industry, public perceptions of our business practices, including our deposit pricing and acquisition activity, the financial success or changing conditions or strategies of BancShares' vendors or customers, including changes in demand for deposits, loans and other financial services, fluctuations in interest rates, changes in the quality or composition of BancShares' loan or investment portfolio, actions of government regulators, including interest rate decisions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (the 'Federal Reserve'), changes to estimates of future costs and benefits of actions taken by BancShares, BancShares' ability to maintain adequate sources of funding and liquidity, the potential impact of decisions by the Federal Reserve on BancShares' capital plans, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions, including significant turbulence in the capital or financial markets, the impact of any sustained or elevated inflationary environment, the impact of any cyberattack, information or security breach, the impact of implementation and compliance with current or proposed laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including potential increased regulatory requirements, limitations, and costs, such as FDIC special assessments, increases to FDIC deposit insurance premiums and the proposed interagency rule on regulatory capital, along with the risk that such laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations may change, the availability of capital and personnel, and the risks associated with BancShares' previous acquisition transactions, including the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. (the 'SVBB Acquisition') and the previously completed merger with CIT Group Inc., or any future transactions.
BancShares' SRP allows BancShares to repurchase shares of its Class A common stock through 2025. BancShares is not obligated under the SRP to repurchase any minimum or particular number of shares, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time (subject to the terms of any Rule 10b5-1 plan in effect) without prior notice. The authorization to repurchase Class A common stock will be utilized at management's discretion. The actual timing and amount of Class A common stock that may be repurchased will depend on a number of factors, including the terms of any Rule 10b5-1 plan then in effect, price, general business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and alternative investment opportunities or capital needs.
Except to the extent required by applicable laws or regulations, BancShares disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments. Additional factors which could affect the forward-looking statements can be found in BancShares' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and its other filings with the SEC.
NON-GAAP MEASURES
Certain measures in this release, including those referenced as 'adjusted' or 'excluding PAA,' are 'non-GAAP,' meaning they are numerical measures of BancShares' financial performance, financial position or cash flows that are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. ('GAAP') because they exclude or include amounts or are adjusted in some way so as to be different than the most direct comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in BancShares' statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flows and also are not codified in U.S. banking regulations currently applicable to BancShares. BancShares management believes that non-GAAP financial measures, when reviewed in conjunction with GAAP financial information, can provide transparency about or an alternative means of assessing its operating results, financial position or cash flows to its investors, analysts and management. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, and not superior to or a substitute for, GAAP measures. Each non-GAAP measure is reconciled to the most comparable GAAP measure in the non-GAAP reconciliation. This information can be found in the Financial Supplement located in the Quarterly Results section of our website at https://ir.firstcitizens.com/financial-information/quarterly-results/default.aspx.
Contact:
Deanna Hart
Angela English
Investor Relations
Corporate Communications
919-716-2137
803-931-1854

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs
Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs

Daily Express

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Express

Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs

Published on: Sunday, June 08, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 08, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: Badly managed GLCs is one of the worst economic problems of Sabah. The GLCs have become a bottomless pit. No matter how much extra revenue the GRS Government can generate or how much more funding it can get from the Federal Government or how much more investments it can attract, Sabahans will remain poor. All these money cannot cover this ever-expanding hole by badly managed GLCs. Advertisement Singapore's GLCs [e.g. SIA, DBS, Capital Land] are big economic boosters, making profits in billions. Sabah's GLCs are big liabilities, losing billions over the years. Sabah's GLCs make outsiders rich, impoverish Sabahans. They practice 'Sabah for NON-Sabhans', NOT 'Sabah for Sabahans'. GRS Government has started the GLC Transformation. The GRS Government has started the GLC transformation because it has realized this bottomless GLC problem. It must be plugged or else Sabah will remain poor always. Advertisement Well known fact that Sabah's GLCs have: [1] Proliferated in number since the mid-1980s. [2] The increase in number has little economic logic or strategy. more for expediencies and political accommodation. Chairman appointments of big GLCs are special reserves for warlords. Senior management jobs for relatives and macai. [3] The number of GLCs has grown to more than 250. The Assistant Minister of Finance has confirmed this number in the press. [4] Big majority of GLCs have in total lost billions over the years, some are still heavily debt ridden, poorly managed and lack governance. [5] The GLCs have incurred huge liabilities for the many past lopsided agreements signed by GLCs and Malayan companies. [6] The GLCs have produced most failed and/or delayed JV projects with Malayan companies. There are 7 or 8 in KK alone as testimonies of the GLCs' failures. One GLC has failed to launch a major tourism project for more than 10 years. Sabah GLCs love Malayan companies, sideline Sabah companies. No love for 'Sabah for Sabahans.' They love 'Sabah for Malayans'. [7] Return on capital and assets are poor, mostly negative! [8]. The non-performing GLCs have not helped to build up Sabah's economy. Instead, they are destroying it. The GRS government, for the first time in Sabah's history, has initiated transformation after many public warnings by Hajiji and Masidi on the unsatisfactory and sad situation in the GLC. Already announced are these big moves. First, AG Brenndon and MOF Assistant Minister have confirmed the formation of the Oversight Committee. This is an important first step. Second, AG Brenndon has confirmed that all agreements to be signed by GLCs must be referred to and vetted by his Chambers before submission to the Cabinet. Knowing Brenndon, he would not tolerate any lopsided agreement at Sabah's expense. Many Sabahans are extremely concerned about the poor performance of GLCs. This is common talk among folks in Sabah. Not in complimentary tone. Reflective of this sentiment, more than 70, 000 viewers have visited the podcast by SABAR on GLCs in the Kopitiam Council's YouTube platform. It is very positive that Hajiji and Masidi have started to solve Sabah's GLC-massive-headache. Likewise, other leaders should consider offering their ideas/solution in the run up of the 2025 election. Better still, include their plan to transform the GLCs in their manifestos. The GLC problems, no doubt very tough, must be resolved because they are bleeding Sabah dry. GLCs dominate every important economic sector in Sabah. Simple logic. GLCs' combined failure to perform in these sectors has inflicted Sabah's overall economy like CANCEROUS CELLS. All Sabahans, especially the vulnerable B40 suffer. The GLCs are depriving future generations of their economic opportunities. Followings are some token samples: [1] GLCs are in control of Sabah's Financial Institutions [SDB, SCC]. [2] GLCs are in effective control of many natural resources: mining/minerals [SMM], timber and FMUs [Innoprise, SOFODA]. [3] GLCs hold many monopolistic rights: Cement [Sabah Cement Industries], Ports [Suria, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD], Water [Jetama]. Fishing landing rights [SAFMA]. [4] GLCs have been granted practically free and extremely prime land, most of them at RM1,000 premium. [Innoprise, SUDC of SEDCO, Suria, SICC, Sabah Energy, TAED.]. [5] GLCs have been granted vast acreage of valuable agriculture land for free or at nominal premium. [Sawit Kinabalu, KPD, Sabah Softwood.] [6] GLCs have been granted cheap and valuable land for industrial park [KKIP, SOGIP, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD, ASEAN Supply Base in Labuan] [7] GLCs have been granted concession rights in oil and gas, river and sea sand [Sabah Energy, Sabah Gas, SMJ Energy, SEDCO]. [8] GLCs are in hotels, resorts and jungle resorts [Innoprise, SEDCO and Sabah Air] [9] GLCs have been granted exclusive JV preference mostly with Malayan companies. Summary: you name it, GLCs are in it. GLCs control it. GLCs are the preferred choice for almost every economic activity in Sabah. GLCs are given priority in any new business, depriving opportunities for Sabahan businessmen. Despite of all the huge advantages, most of them are doing very badly. The GLCs are in competition Sabah's private sector in the most unfair manners. They are killing our Sabahan investors, entrepreneurs, and even small SMEs. Chairmen, Directors, Senior Management would have been sacked in the Private Sector. All business conglomerates would NOT have tolerated the bad governance/management of the board of directors, senior management of Sabah's GLCs. They would have been sacked long time ago. The shareholders would not tolerate such persistent non-performance and abuses. The GLCs can afford to continue with their perennial state of abuses, bad-performances, losses and giving perks away is because Sabahans, you and me, our future generations are paying for their perpetual good lives. Does Sabah need 250 GLCs? How may officers and staff needed by GLCs Pertinent questions. I would not venture to guess. However, one thing is certain, a great number of them are existing to give jobs, perks and political accommodation or favours. Will not surprise if majority of them would not be able to justify their existence in a proper revamp exercise. As can be seen in the list above, badly managed monopolies, special concessions granted by the government, land given for free, duplication, competition against each other are common features among these GLCs. Pertinent question 2. After years and years of losses, the iron rice bowl mentality is as strong as ever. Petronas has reduced 10% of its work force because petroleum prices are dropping. No iron rice bowl in Petronas. A thorough revamp, transformation and rationalization is long overdue. Let the leaders in this election answer this question. Good leaders will give you the right and logical answer. Solve the GLCs Problems, 50% economic Sabah's problems are Solved. Why is this? Because the GLCs are burdening down, big liabilities in almost all the sectors of Sabah's economy. If the GLCs can be transformed to perform, all the sectors that they are in will create an economic boom in Sabah. Imagine: [1] If each GLC, on average, can create 100 jobs, 25,000 Sabahans will have employment. Sabah's unemployed graduates will be over. [2] If each GLC, on average can make RM10m, total will be RM2.5b, RM20m, it will be RM5b. Given all the freebies like land, monopolies, concessions and no capital cost, such profits can be within easy reach. SMJ Energy's profit is already RM250m in 3rd year of existence. KPJ Hospital [Johor SEDCO] makes RM350m a year. [3] Sabah GLCs should emulate KPJ Hospital, expand beyond Sabah or go international. This is possible when there is a proper Board of Directors and good senior management. Hajiji and Masidi have appointed the right people in some GLCs already. Vast improvements in their performance. 3 myths that must be dispelled. First: Sabah does not have the right people to manage the GLCs properly. Not true. Remove the useless ones, good Sabahans can be found. Second: GLCs cannot be turned around. Appointing right chairmen, directors and senior management, the turn-arounds will be possible. Examples: [1] SDB is being revamped. Lim Haw Kuang, former Executive Chairman of Shell in China and Director BNM has been appointed as Executive Chairman. The Board of Directors are credible people. No political interference. RAM has just given SDB top rating! [2] SMJ Energy is performing exceptional well with a highly regarded Board of Directors and well qualified senior management team. Its profit in 2024 is RM250m. [3] Sabah Energy Corporation, Sabah Credit Corporation are being managed professionally. They are doing very well. SEC may become the biggest gas aggregator in Malaysia! SCC has proven that it can do some social financing and be profitable! [4] Hajiji has appointed James Wong as GGM to revamp SEDCO. [5] POIC LD has been turned around with Yong Teck Lee as Chairman and Fredian Gan CEO. It is now undertaking a major expansion that will make POIC LD a marine hub for Sabah. POIC LD is showing the way that it can monetize its landed assets, FZ approval from Federal MOF and its deepest ports in this region. [6] Innoprise has been transformed, vastly improved by forward looking executive chairman Jasnih and a professional team. Thirdly, GLCs can make sizeable profit [in hundreds of millions of RM]. E.g. SMJ Energy. GLCs in plantations, GLCs with monopolies and GLCs give free land have potential to make a lot more. Let's pray Leaders of all Parties will Focus on GLC Transformation. Yes, Sabahans better pray hard that Sabah leaders will focus on transformation of GLCs. Successful GLC transformation will mean prosperity. Failure? Continue poverty. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]

On World Oceans Day 2025, POWERCHINA Highlights Commitment to Ocean Sustainability
On World Oceans Day 2025, POWERCHINA Highlights Commitment to Ocean Sustainability

Malaysian Reserve

time10 hours ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

On World Oceans Day 2025, POWERCHINA Highlights Commitment to Ocean Sustainability

BEIJING, June 8, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Power Construction Corporation of China ('POWERCHINA' or 'the Company')reaffirms its long-term commitment to protecting marine ecosystems and promoting sustainable water resource development in recognition of World Oceans Day on June 8, themed, 'Wonder: Sustaining What Sustains Us.' A global leader in desalination and ecological construction, the Company integrates ocean stewardship into its projects and responsible corporate practices to support a healthier, more resilient planet. The ocean is a vital support for life on Earth. However, it is now facing increasingly severe threats. Meanwhile, the access to clean water is also becoming a common challenge faced by the world, and the importance of seawater desalination technology to human health and economic growth is becoming more and more prominent. POWERCHINA has developed some of the world's largest and most advanced desalination projects, including the 900,000-ton Taweelah Desalination Plant in Abu Dhabi, which is the largest reverse osmosis seawater desalination facility globally to date. The plant supplies drinking water to nearly 2 million people, using cutting-edge technology to boost efficiency while minimising ecological disruption. As the world's largest seawater desalination engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractor, POWERCHINA has built a strong technological foundation and a comprehensive system in desalination. The Company has completed several major projects across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Dubai, converting seawater into clean drinking water and helping to meet surging demand in arid regions. POWERCHINA has provided clean water to millions in the Middle East and North Africa, easing regional water shortages and supporting sustainable development. POWERCHINA integrates marine conservation into all project phases, from early-stage environmental impact assessments to biodiversity protection measures. Along coastal areas, the Company schedules construction to avoid sensitive periods like sea turtle nesting seasons and carries out marine plant relocation when needed. These actions are complemented by public education initiatives and stakeholder engagement campaigns that foster awareness and local support for marine sustainability. At a marine ecosystem public welfare activity organized by POWERCHINA, Major Ali, the president of EMEG said: 'Watching marine conservation films and listening to expert lectures have made me realize the crucial role that mangroves play in protecting the marine ecological environment, promoting carbon sequestration, and mitigating climate change. I have also come to understand the importance of protecting marine species such as sea turtles, as well as the specific methods for protecting marine ecosystems. Every action we take can make a difference, and participating in this activity is a way for me to express my commitment to protecting the ocean.' POWERCHINA sees marine protection as central to its global sustainable development strategy, answering calls to restore ocean health and biodiversity. The Company invests in green infrastructure and marine resilience to help balance human activity with vital ecosystems. As a global leader in clean, low-carbon energy construction, POWERCHINA is committed to sustainable, green development. It actively assumes environmental responsibilities and contributes to building a healthier, more beautiful environment in the communities where it operates. Photo – View original content:

RBGLY Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC Securities Fraud Lawsuit
RBGLY Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Malaysian Reserve

time18 hours ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

RBGLY Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC Securities Fraud Lawsuit

NEW YORK, June 7, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of American Depositary Shares ('ADSs') of Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY) between January 13, 2021 through July 28, 2024, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 4, 2025. For more information, submit a form, email attorney Phillip Kim, or give us a call at 866-767-3653. So What: If you purchased Reckitt ADSs you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. What to do next: To join the Reckitt class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 4, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants failed to warn investors and consumers: (1) that preterm infants were at an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis ('NEC') by consuming Reckitt's cow's milk-based formula, Enfamil; (2) of the attendant impact on Reckitt's sales of Enfamil and Reckitt's exposure to legal claims; and (3) as a result of the above, defendants' positive statements about Reckitt's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reckitt action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 case@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store