Housing scheme with SBP's help: Rs5bn set aside for mark-up subsidy
The federal government has announced a number of incentives and positive measures for the construction sector and housing sector in the next fiscal year budget.
Previously, an affordable housing finance scheme titled 'Mera Pakistan Mera Ghar' was abruptly suspended in June 2022, by the federal government to cut the subsidy expenditures and since then, no new affordable housing initiative has been introduced.
Housing finance schemes: Pakistan govt ready to offer 100% guarantees to banks
Now, aimed to address the housing shortage in the country and support the housing and construction sector, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has announced a new housing scheme in the upcoming budget. As per the budget proposals for FY26, a proportionate tax credit will be given on the profit paid on loans obtained for the construction or acquisition of a house measuring up to 250 square yards or a flat with an area of 2,000 square feet or less.
Accordingly, an amount of Rs 5 billion has been allocated in the budget FY26 for mark-up subsidy for low-cost housing. In addition, Rs 1 billion has been allocated as subsidy to Naya Pakistan Housing Authority (NPHA).
Experts have warmly welcomed the initiatives announced in the federal budget aimed at revitalizing the housing and construction sector, calling them timely, progressive, and essential for Pakistan's economic revival.
Dr Anosh Ahmed, a US-based real estate consultant has applauded the government for recognizing the sector's critical role in national economic growth, employment generation, and industrial development.
He noted that the construction industry serves as a backbone for numerous allied industries, including cement, steel, electrical equipment, and home furnishings. 'A strong construction sector leads to stronger industrial output and job creation across multiple value chains,' he said.
He particularly praised the government decision to reduce the rate of withholding tax on property purchases from 4 percent to 2.5 percent, from 3.5 percent to 2 percent, and from 3 percent to 1.5 percent. He emphasized that these reductions will ease the financial burden on investors, builders, and homebuyers, making real estate transactions more viable and attractive.
In addition, he welcomed the proposed abolition of the 7 percent Federal Excise Duty on the transfer of commercial properties, plots, and houses, calling it a decisive step toward removing structural barriers and encouraging real estate investment. 'The introduction of tax credits schemes would support middle-income families and encourage the development of low-cost housing schemes,' he added.
He further endorsed the government's plan to promote mortgage financing through a comprehensive system, supported by a dedicated policy from the State Bank of Pakistan.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Putin demands Ukraine surrender Donbas and abandon NATO bid, sources say
Firefighters work at the site of a residential area hit by a Russian military strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Dobropillia, Donetsk region, Ukraine March 8, Reuters Vladimir Putin is demanding that Ukraine give up all of the eastern Donbas region, renounce ambitions to join NATO, remain neutral and keep Western troops out of the country, three sources familiar with top-level Kremlin thinking told Reuters. The Russian president met Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday for the first Russia-US summit in more than four years and spent almost all of their three-hour closed meeting discussing what a compromise on Ukraine might look like, according to the sources who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. Speaking afterwards beside Trump, Putin said the meeting would hopefully open up the road to peace in Ukraine - but neither leader gave specifics about what they discussed. Read More: Russia seeks say in Ukraine peace deal In the most detailed Russian-based reporting to date on Putin's offer at the summit, Reuters was able to outline the contours of what the Kremlin would like to see in a possible peace deal to end a war that has killed and injured hundreds of thousands of people. In essence, the Russian sources said, Putin has compromised on territorial demands he laid out in June 2024, which required Kyiv to cede the entirety of the four provinces Moscow claims as part of Russia: Dontesk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine - which make up the Donbas - plus Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south. Kyiv rejected those terms as tantamount to surrender. In his new proposal, the Russian president has stuck to his demand that Ukraine completely withdraw from the parts of the Donbas it still controls, according to the three sources. In return, though, Moscow would halt the current front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, they added. Russia controls about 88% of the Donbas and 73% of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, according to US estimates and open-source data. Moscow is also willing to hand over the small parts of the Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine it controls as part of a possible deal, the sources said. Putin is sticking, too, to his previous demands that Ukraine give up its NATO ambitions and for a legally binding pledge from the US-led military alliance that it will not expand further eastwards, as well as for limits on the Ukrainian army and an agreement that no Western troops will be deployed on the ground in Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force, the sources said. The district her village is in - Huairou - and neighbouring Miyun district, just on the outskirts of Beijing, received a year's worth of rain in a single week. Yet the two sides remain far apart, more than three years after Putin ordered thousands of Russian troops into Ukraine in a full-scale invasion that followed the annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014 and prolonged fighting in the country's east between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. Ukraine's foreign ministry had no immediate comment on the proposals. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly dismissed the idea of withdrawing from internationally recognised Ukrainian land as part of a deal, and has said the industrial Donbas region serves as a fortress holding back Russian advances deeper into Ukraine. "If we're talking about simply withdrawing from the east, we cannot do that," he told reporters in comments released by Kyiv on Thursday. "It is a matter of our country's survival, involving the strongest defensive lines." Joining NATO, meanwhile, is a strategic objective enshrined in the country's constitution and one which Kyiv sees as its most reliable security guarantee. Zelenskiy said it was not up to Russia to decide on the alliance's membership. The White House and NATO didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the Russian proposals. Political scientist Samuel Charap, chair in Russia and Eurasia Policy at RAND, a US-based global policy think-tank, said any requirement for Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas remained a non-starter for Kyiv, both politically and strategically. "Openness to 'peace' on terms categorically unacceptable to the other side could be more of a performance for Trump than a sign of a true willingness to compromise," he added. "The only way to test that proposition is to begin a serious process at the working level to hash out those details." Trump: Putin wants to see it ended Russian forces currently control a fifth of Ukraine, an area about the size of the American state of Ohio, according to U.S. estimates and open-source maps. The three sources close to the Kremlin said the summit in the Alaskan city of Anchorage had ushered in the best chance for peace since the war began because there had been specific discussions about Russia's terms and Putin had shown a willingness to give ground. "Putin is ready for peace - for compromise. That is the message that was conveyed to Trump," one of the people said. The sources cautioned that it was unclear to Moscow whether Ukraine would be prepared to cede the remains of the Donbas, and that if it did not then the war would continue. Also unclear was whether or not the United States would give any recognition to Russian-held Ukrainian territory, they added. A fourth source said that though economic issues were secondary for Putin, he understood the economic vulnerability of Russia and the scale of the effort needed to go far further into Ukraine. Also Read: US Treasury official slams India for 'profiteering' off cheap Russian oil Trump has said he wants to end the "bloodbath" of the war and be remembered as a "peacemaker president". He said on Monday he had begun arranging, opens new tab a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, to be followed by a trilateral summit with the US president. "I believe Vladimir Putin wants to see it ended," Trump said beside Zelenskiy in the Oval office. "I feel confident we are going to get it solved." Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday that Putin was prepared to meet Zelenskiy but that all issues had to be worked through first and there was a question about Zelenskiy's authority to sign a peace deal. Putin has repeatedly raised doubts about Zelenskiy's legitimacy as his term in office was due to expire in May 2024 but the war means no new presidential election has yet been held. Kyiv says Zelenskiy remains the legitimate president. The leaders of Britain, France and Germany have said they are sceptical that Putin wants to end the war. Security guarantees for Ukraine Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff was instrumental in paving the way for the summit, and the latest drive for peace, according to two of the Russian sources. Witkoff met Putin in the Kremlin on August 6 with Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. At the meeting, Putin conveyed clearly to Witkoff that he was ready to compromise and set out the contours of what he could accept for peace, according to two Russian sources. If Russia and Ukraine could reach an agreement, then there are various options for a formal deal - including a possible three-way Russia-Ukraine-U.S. deal that is recognised by the UN Security Council, one of the sources said. Another option is to go back to the failed 2022 Istanbul agreements, where Russia and Ukraine discussed Ukraine's permanent neutrality in return for security guarantees from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, the sources added. "There are two choices: war or peace, and if there is no peace, then there is more war," one of the people said.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
21 countries sign joint statement condemning Israel's West Bank settlement project
LONDON: Britain and France were among 21 countries to sign a joint statement Thursday calling Israel's approval of a major settlement project in the West Bank 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12-square-kilometre (five-square-mile) parcel of land known as E1 just east of occupied Jerusalem on Wednesday. 'We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms,' said the statement of foreign ministers, whose signatories also included Australia, Canada and Italy. Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden also signed the statement, as did the European Commission's foreign affairs chief. Israel pounds Gaza City as military takes first steps in offensive The statement noted that Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the plan 'will make a two-state solution impossible by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem'. 'This brings no benefits to the Israeli people,' the foreign ministers said. 'Instead, it risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace. 'The government of Israel still has an opportunity to stop the E1 plan going any further. We encourage them to urgently retract this plan,' they added. The plan seeks to build around 3,400 homes on the ultra-sensitive tract of land, which lies between Jerusalem and the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) has slammed the latest move, which has also been criticised by UN chief Antonio Guterres. Britain on Thursday summoned Israeli ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely to the foreign ministry to protest the decision. 'If implemented, these settlement plans would be a flagrant breach of international law and would divide a future Palestinian state in two, critically undermining a two-state solution,' the foreign office said in a statement.
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SECP introduces ‘Angel Fund' for startups in Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has introduced 'Angel Fund' a new category of Venture Capital Fund which invests primarily in unlisted securities or financial assets of early-stage startup companies. The SECP has issued a notification here on Monday to amend the Private Fund Regulations, 2015. According to the SECP, the 'Angel Fund' means a sub-category of Venture Capital Fund established in a closed-end Structure which invests primarily in unlisted securities or financial assets of early-stage start-up companies other than Hedge Funds. The 'Eligible Investor' included an individual who has earned an income of at least Rs. 5 million in the preceding financial year or who has net assets of at least Rs. 15 million excluding the value of personal residence and who furnishes a declaration to the Private Fund Management Company that he understands the risks of investment in a Private Fund; a qualified Institutional buyer. Under the revised regulations, 'Financial Close' means the stage when all investment and financing arrangements have been made, funds have been received and the process for commencement of active investment out of Private Fund initiated in accordance with the investment policy as provided in the constitutive documents. The 'Fund of Funds' means a sub-category of a Private Fund established in a close-end structure or open-end structure which invests primarily in units of other Private Funds. The 'Hedge Fund' means a Private Fund established in either open-end or closed-end structure which employs diverse trading strategies and primarily invests and trades in Portfolio Securities and other financial Assets and 'Impact Fund' means a sub-category of a Private Fund established in a closed-end structure which invests primarily in Unlisted Securities or financial assets other than derivatives of socially responsible companies focusing on environmental, social and governance issues. The 'Infrastructure Fund' means a sub-category of Private Fund established in a closed-end structure which invests primarily in Unlisted Securities or financial assets other than derivatives of companies engaged in or formed for the purpose of operating, developing or holding infrastructure projects including transportation, utilities, and energy etc, SECP added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
