Grave concern across Europe over Middle East crisis
There is 'grave concern' across Europe over the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said.
Mr Harris was speaking after being in touch with European counterparts in relation to the crisis in the Middle East.
Advertisement
The Tánaiste said: 'There is grave concern across Europe at the extremely dangerous and ongoing escalatory situation in the Middle East.
'I reiterate my call on Israel and Iran to step back, to urgently de-escalate the situation, and to allow space for dialogue and diplomacy.
'Our embassy staff are in contact with Irish citizens in Israel and Iran and are providing advice.'
Mr Harris urged any Irish citizens in the region to make contact with embassy staff.
Advertisement
He said: 'Airspace across much of the region is currently closed.
'Our advice to Irish citizens in the region is to be vigilant, follow the advice of local authorities, including any orders to shelter in place.
'My key message is for our citizens to keep in very close contact with their nearest embassy staff, who are on standby at all times to provide whatever assistance they can.
'And I reiterate our very clear travel advice for no Irish citizen to travel to Iran or Israel at this time.'
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Wes Streeting thinks the private sector could help NHS
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he would consider a greater role for the private sector in the NHS to tackle waiting lists, which currently affect 7.39 million people. Streeting stated he would not be bound by 'outdated ideological battles' and that it would be 'foolish to turn away' from private healthcare, emphasising that treatment remains free at the point of use. He argued that utilising private sector capacity does not contradict NHS principles and is essential to provide timely care, drawing from his personal experience with cancer treatment. His comments are expected to spark controversy among Labour MPs on the left, with concerns about expanding the private sector's role in healthcare. The government stated that previous partnerships with the private sector have delivered more than 500,000 treatments, and the Patients Association welcomed the potential for increased private sector involvement to address the NHS backlog.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer's personal ratings are worst of any PM from the past four decades after 300 days in office... even outdoing Gordon Brown's grim numbers
Keir Starmer 's personal ratings are the worst for any PM for the past four decades, according to analysis. The Labour leader even outdid the grim numbers recorded by Gordon Brown after 300 days in office. Political research firm Britain Elects aggregated polling data on premiers since Margaret Thatcher. It found that when Sir Keir secured his election landslide last July he had a marginally positive score. However, that honeymoon quickly ended, with the winter fuel allowance cut, tax hikes, a summer of riots, and a donations row all taking their toll. At the 300 day mark Sir Keir was scoring around minus 33 - marginally below the minus 30 Mr Brown was averaging at the same point. The former PM did see his numbers plummet after that, while Sir Keir appears to have plateaued. Boris Johnson and Theresa May were both on plus 18 at this stage, while Tony Blair was on plus 46. Even Rishi Sunak was only on minus 22. Liz Truss was not included in the comparison as she was already out of Downing Street. Sir Keir is struggling to get his government back on track as the economy stalls and his backbenchers looking increasingly restive. However, fears are mounting that Rachel Reeves will be forced to hike taxes again this Autumn, with her spending plans under huge pressure.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows
Labour is cutting the farming budget in England by £100m a year, spending review figures show. Despite the decrease, the budget has been cautiously welcomed by nature and farming groups, as there were fears the Treasury had wanted to reduce the funding further. Farmers have felt squeezed by the Labour government's policies over recent months, with mass protests over the introduction of inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m. Extreme weather and rising input prices have increased financial pressures on the sector, which has meant that a cut to the budget could have serious impacts. Ministers have also indicated that larger farms could be ineligible for the nature-friendly farming fund in future. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs was recently forced to U-turn on a freeze to new applicants for the fund after the National Farmers' Union (NFU) threatened legal action. Previous research by the RSPB has found that a £100m a year cut would lead to 239,000 fewer hectares (590,580 acres) of nature-friendly farmland. Defra said the funding paid to farmers under of environment land management schemes (Elms) would 'skyrocket' from £800m in 2023-24 to £2bn in 2028-29. However, the NFU has called this 'misleading' because after Brexit, farmers were promised that their subsidies would be the same as they were under the EU and were promised a figure of £2.4bn a year. The Elms programme was devised by the conservatives after Brexit: the goal was that rather than being paid per acre, farmers should be paid for improving nature. While the programme was being put in place,the acreage payments known as basic payments schemes (BPS) were kept, and cut each year as Elms increased. BPS is due to be phased out entirely by 2028. Farmers currently get the £2.4bn a year in the two streams as well as a smaller amount of money in grants for things such as robotics trials. Going forward, the government has promised an average of £2.3bn a year up to 2028-29 for the farming budget. By the end of the spending period the budget will shrink to £2.25bn, with £2bn allocated for Elms and the rest paid in productivity grants. Sanjay Dhanda, the NFU's senior economist, has said Defra has been 'misleading' in its claims. He said: 'A key pillar of Defra's budget is the continued investment in Elms, with funding set to rise to £2bn by 2028-29, compared with the £1.8bn earmarked in the Autumn 2024 budget. While the government has framed this as a significant uplift from the £800m spent in 2023-24, this comparison is misleading as Elms was not fully operational at that point, and delinked payments [BPS] absorbed a large share of funding.' However, Defra sources pointed out that although the previous government allocated £2.4bn a year for Elms, the Tories in fact underspent it by about £100m a year. That government had, however, promised that by the end of the spending period, which was cut short by the general election, the full fund was ringfenced and would be allocated to farmers. Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president, said: 'While the Defra secretary of state has listened and managed to maintain the overall funding for farming and nature recovery, from what we can see so far, the £100 million cut to farming means farmers and growers will need to do more with less.' Mark Spencer, a former farming minister who was in charge of issuing the farming budget, said the amount spent on Elms would have been higher than £2bn at the end of the spending period, under the Tories. 'The 2.4bn was meant for Elms. It was always our intention and emphasis to reduce BPS and pour the money into Elms and for the vast majority of it to go to Elms,' he said. Reacting to the cut, Spencer added: 'A part of me is angry, a part of me is just so sad. We made such huge progress and now it is in jeopardy.' Nature groups have credited Steve Reed, the environment secretary, for protecting the majority of the budget. Hilary McGrady, the director general of the National Trust, said the chancellor Rachel Reeves had maintained the budget for nature-friendly farming, adding: 'Steve Reed deserves credit for securing this budget in challenging financial circumstances.' A Defra spokesperson said: 'Contrary to media reports that the farming budget would be slashed by £1.2bn over the next three years, the government is investing a record £5.9bn into nature friendly farming schemes.'
