Drivers, beware: Delaware law bars driving in the left lane
It doesn't matter if we're going back and forth to the office or taking a long-overdue road trip – somehow, we always manage to run into them.
But, for Delaware drivers, camping out in the left lane isn't just a common annoyance – it's against the law.
Signed last year by then-Gov. John Carney, the law prohibits First Staters from driving in the left lane on portions of specific highways, in hopes of reducing the rate of aggressive driving and speed-related hazards on the road.
Here's what Delaware drivers need to know.
New rules of the road: Tolls are increasing on Delaware highways in August. So are some DMV fees in October
What's Delaware's left lane law?
Under this new state law, drivers are barred from traveling down the left lane on portions of Route 1 and Interstate 495, along with other express or limited access roads.
The exceptions to this rule include:
When passing another vehicle moving in the same direction.
When entering, exiting or continuing down the roadway.
When in response to emergency situations.
When necessary due to traffic, obstructions or congestion.
When complying with other rules or regulations.
Vehicles with a gross weight rating of over 26,000 pounds can only travel in the right-hand lane, except under those same circumstances.
Any failure to abide by this rule of the road will result in some pretty hefty fines.
For the first offense, drivers must pay a fine of 'no less than $25 nor more than $75.'
Any occurrence that comes after will lead to a civil penalty between $57.50 to $95.
Olivia Montes covers state government and community impact for Delaware Online/The News Journal. If you have a tip or a story idea, reach out to her at omontes@delawareonline.com.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Delaware law prohibits left-lane driving. What to know
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla facing potential major statewide ban on all sales: 'Not capable'
The California Department of Motor Vehicles moved one step closer to enacting a staggering 30-day ban on Tesla vehicle sales, vigorously arguing during a weeklong hearing that the company misled consumers over the capabilities of its "Full Self-Driving" and "Autopilot" technologies, with deadly results, Business Insider reported. "These labels and descriptions represent specifically that [Tesla]'s vehicles will operate as autonomous vehicles, which they could not and cannot do," said Rob Bonta, the California attorney general, per The News Wheel. What's happening? In 2022, the California DMV filed a formal accusation alleging that Tesla "made or disseminated statements that are untrue or misleading, and not based on facts, in advertising vehicles as equipped, or potentially equipped, with advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) features." Specifically, the DMV accused Tesla of using names and messaging that strongly indicate its cars can operate fully autonomously without the need for human monitoring or intervention. "But vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," the accusation said. After years of delay, in mid-July, the DMV finally got the chance to make its case before an administrative judge, arguing that Tesla advertised its driver-assist features as if they offered full autonomy while saying otherwise in the fine print. In making its case, the DMV cited Tesla's own ads, including one stating, "The system is designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat." "To me, 'Autopilot' means it can drive itself or do things on its own," testified Melanie Rosario, commander-sergeant of the DMV Valley Area Command, per Business Insider. Lawyers for Tesla argued that the company never claimed its vehicles could operate fully independently of a human operator. "Cars with Full Self-Driving capabilities are currently not capable of driving themselves," Matthew Benedetto, an attorney representing Tesla, said during the hearing, Business Insider reported. Do you think Tesla can bounce back from its recent struggles? Yes It depends on Elon's actions I don't think it's struggling Nope Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What would be the implications if Tesla sales are banned in California? The hearing came at a crucial time for Tesla, as the company's recent sales slump continued through the second quarter of 2025. In the period from April through June, the EV maker's net income dropped 16% compared to a year prior, The Wall Street Journal reported. As the nation's most populous state, California represents a crucial market for EV makers. With Tesla registrations in the state already dropping more than 20% during the first quarter of 2025, per the California Energy Commission, a 30-day ban on sales could be tough for Tesla to bounce back from. The outcome of the DMV's accusation also has broader implications for the future of self-driving technology, how it operates, and who is legally responsible when it fails. Bryan Walker Smith, a member of the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers who testified as an expert witness at the Tesla hearing, called the difference between driver-assistance technology and fully autonomous self-driving "a dam that separates the land from the sea." "Every driver needs to know without ambiguity or doubt or any confusion an answer to this basic question: am I driving?" Smith testified, per Business Insider. In the San Francisco Bay Area alone, Tesla autonomous-driving technology has been involved in several major incidents, including at least one fatal wreck. In 2018, Walter Huang, an engineer for Apple, died after his Tesla operating in Autopilot mode crashed in Mountain View, California. Later investigations revealed that Huang had complained about the Autopilot's performance prior to the crash, according to ABC-affiliate KGO. Another example came in 2022, when a Tesla came to an abrupt stop while driving at highway speeds on the Bay Bridge connecting San Francisco and Oakland, resulting in an eight-car pileup. The driver said the Tesla had been operating in "Full Self-Driving" mode at the time of the incident, per KGO. What's being done about the safety of autonomous vehicles? Tesla has made some improvements in the time since the aforementioned accidents, though improvements do not change whether the company was liable for those cases. With Tesla already having rolled out a test fleet of autonomous robotaxis in Austin, Texas, and seeking to soon do the same in San Francisco, observers of autonomous-vehicle technology are watching the California proceedings closely. In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation, autonomous vehicles in the U.S. largely have been regulated on a state-by-state basis, according to the law firm Frost Brown Todd. This patchwork regulatory framework is bad for companies, which require clear, consistent guidelines that they can design their technologies to comply with. It is also bad for consumers, many of whom may lack a clear understanding of what these technologies are capable of and what risks they entail. To help fill this regulatory void, you can use your voice and contact your elected representatives in Washington, telling them that you think developing federal safety standards for autonomous vehicles should be a top priority. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong 'high-stakes' court hearing
The California DMV sued Tesla, accusing the company of misleading consumers about its technology. In a hearing this week, the DMV argued Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" technology is false advertising. The DMV wants to suspend Tesla's license to manufacture and sell in the state for at least 30 days. Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong court hearing that ended on Friday. The company's terminology for its driver assistance technologies is under scrutiny. California's Department of Motor Vehicles sued Tesla in 2022 and is seeking to suspend Tesla's ability to sell cars in the state for at least 30 days and award consumers monetary damages. Following the hearing, no final ruling has been made. The DMV suit alleges that the company falsely advertised its " Full Self-Driving" and " Autopilot" driver assistance technologies, misleading consumers into thinking the cars were more autonomous than they were. The hearing comes at a pivotal moment for the company. Its sales have slumped in the first half of 2025, and its brand took a hit earlier this year after CEO Elon Musk became the face of the White House DOGE Office. Protesters directed their anger at Tesla, organizing nationwide protests at Tesla dealerships in March. Attorney Matthew Benedetto, a member of Tesla's legal team, told Administrative Judge Juliet E. Cox on Monday that the company never tried to conceal the fact that its vehicles cannot fully drive themselves and has always informed buyers that they "cannot fully rely" on FSD or Autopilot. "Cars with Full Self-Driving capabilities are currently not capable of driving themselves," Benedetto said again on Tuesday while cross-examining a witness brought to the stand by DMV. The DMV said in its complaint that Tesla's website advertised its driver assistance system on multiple occasions in 2021 and 2022 as being "designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat." "From Home - All you will need to do is get in and tell your car where to go," the complaint says, quoting from Tesla's website. "But vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not, at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," Ailene Short, branch chief for the licensing department at the California DMV, wrote in the complaint. Melanie Rosario, commander-sergeant of the DMV Valley Area Command, was called as a witness by attorneys representing the DMV and told the judge she found "conflicting information" in Tesla's advertising of its FSD and Autopilot systems. "To me, 'Autopilot' means it can drive itself or do things on its own," Rosario said. She added that the word "autopilot" is "contradictory" when placed alongside instructions in the fine print that ask the driver to be attentive and prepared to take over the car at any moment. Bryant Walker Smith, a voting member of the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers, testified that the line separating driver assistance and automated driving features is "a dam that separates the land from the sea." "Every driver needs to know without ambiguity or doubt or any confusion an answer to this basic question: am I driving?" Smith said. A witness for Tesla, Stephen Nowlis, a professor of marketing at Washington University in St. Louis, took the stand on Friday to present a survey he conducted. He told the judge the survey found that consumers were "not confused" by Tesla's terminology. The survey, which Tesla commissioned at a cost, did not take into account every person who may come into contact with a Tesla car. Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who studies advertising law, told Business Insider that the DMV's lawsuit is "very high-stakes" for Tesla. "Even if Tesla defeats this lawsuit, it's not in the legal clear — it's still going to have to answer in court for its claims elsewhere," Goldman said. Tesla's driver assistance technologies are facing multiple other legal challenges. A wrongful death complaint against Tesla in Florida says a Tesla driver was using Autopilot and briefly looked away when his vehicle T-boned a parked SUV, killing a 22-year-old woman. Tesla argued that the driver was responsible for the crash. Separately, Tesla is facing a class-action lawsuit and an ongoing investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the phenomenon known as " phantom braking," which is when the vehicle suddenly slams on the brakes for no reason, often at high speeds.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla Deliveries Could Hit Yet Another Speed Bump
Key Points Tesla is facing another lawsuit regarding its self-driving claims. The California DMV is trying to suspend Tesla's dealer license for 30 days. The EV maker has also launched a new round of buyer incentives. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) sure can't catch a break right now. The electric vehicle (EV) maker is dealing with declining deliveries in major markets and facing consumer backlash after CEO Elon Musk's dive into politics. Despite the ongoing issues facing Tesla, the automaker was banking on a solid third quarter for deliveries due to demand being pulled forward from the inevitable end of the federal incentive for EVs. Unfortunately, the newest potential problem could put a major kink in third-quarter deliveries as the automaker might not be able to sell EVs in California for a month. Here's what's going on. License revoked? There's the potential that the automaker could lose its license to sell vehicles in California due to a false-advertising lawsuit brought by the state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The department wants to suspend its sales in the nation's largest EV market for 30 days because it has been in a legal dispute with the company over the advertising language for its Autopilot and full self-driving (FSD) capability. This suit has been brewing for some time. The state DMV started investigating Tesla for possible misleading advertising in 2021 and then sent an official inquiry to the automaker roughly a year later. Now, things are taking another step forward with a court holding a five-day hearing on the case this week and with the DMV pushing to get the manufacturer's dealer license suspended for a full month, which would deal a devastating blow to the company's third quarter. California is easily the most valuable EV market in the U.S. Tesla is all in This would be a huge setback because management was essentially preparing to go all in during the third quarter, which was expected to be the last strong quarter for EV sales in the near term, as the markets slowly digest tariffs, rising prices, and the removal of the federal tax credit for EVs. In fact, the company just launched a long list of new discounts and incentives to boost deliveries of its EVs in the U.S. All new vehicles carry a $7,500 lease incentive with delivery by Sept. 30; $1,000 off for members of the military, first responders, students, and teachers; a free one-month trial of supervised FSD; a free transfer of supervised FSD from a buyer's current Tesla; and a trial of its Premium Connectivity for 30 days for the Model 3 and Y and one year for the Model S, X, and Cybertruck. Tesla even took it a step further with added discounts on specific models that can be combined with incentives for all models. Management is certainly banking on the third quarter to move some product. What it all means Tesla hasn't been catching many breaks in 2025, and investors would be wise to pay close attention to its lawsuit in California, which could deal a devastating blow to the company's third-quarter deliveries and financials. If Tesla manages to avoid having its sellers license suspended, the company's incentives and discounts should drive a stronger quarter, which would finally be a bit of good news for investors. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $450,583!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,580!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $636,774!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Tesla Deliveries Could Hit Yet Another Speed Bump was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
