Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong 'high-stakes' court hearing
In a hearing this week, the DMV argued Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" technology is false advertising.
The DMV wants to suspend Tesla's license to manufacture and sell in the state for at least 30 days.
Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong court hearing that ended on Friday.
The company's terminology for its driver assistance technologies is under scrutiny.
California's Department of Motor Vehicles sued Tesla in 2022 and is seeking to suspend Tesla's ability to sell cars in the state for at least 30 days and award consumers monetary damages. Following the hearing, no final ruling has been made.
The DMV suit alleges that the company falsely advertised its " Full Self-Driving" and " Autopilot" driver assistance technologies, misleading consumers into thinking the cars were more autonomous than they were.
The hearing comes at a pivotal moment for the company. Its sales have slumped in the first half of 2025, and its brand took a hit earlier this year after CEO Elon Musk became the face of the White House DOGE Office. Protesters directed their anger at Tesla, organizing nationwide protests at Tesla dealerships in March.
Attorney Matthew Benedetto, a member of Tesla's legal team, told Administrative Judge Juliet E. Cox on Monday that the company never tried to conceal the fact that its vehicles cannot fully drive themselves and has always informed buyers that they "cannot fully rely" on FSD or Autopilot.
"Cars with Full Self-Driving capabilities are currently not capable of driving themselves," Benedetto said again on Tuesday while cross-examining a witness brought to the stand by DMV.
The DMV said in its complaint that Tesla's website advertised its driver assistance system on multiple occasions in 2021 and 2022 as being "designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat."
"From Home - All you will need to do is get in and tell your car where to go," the complaint says, quoting from Tesla's website.
"But vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not, at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," Ailene Short, branch chief for the licensing department at the California DMV, wrote in the complaint.
Melanie Rosario, commander-sergeant of the DMV Valley Area Command, was called as a witness by attorneys representing the DMV and told the judge she found "conflicting information" in Tesla's advertising of its FSD and Autopilot systems.
"To me, 'Autopilot' means it can drive itself or do things on its own," Rosario said. She added that the word "autopilot" is "contradictory" when placed alongside instructions in the fine print that ask the driver to be attentive and prepared to take over the car at any moment.
Bryant Walker Smith, a voting member of the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers, testified that the line separating driver assistance and automated driving features is "a dam that separates the land from the sea."
"Every driver needs to know without ambiguity or doubt or any confusion an answer to this basic question: am I driving?" Smith said.
A witness for Tesla, Stephen Nowlis, a professor of marketing at Washington University in St. Louis, took the stand on Friday to present a survey he conducted. He told the judge the survey found that consumers were "not confused" by Tesla's terminology.
The survey, which Tesla commissioned at a cost, did not take into account every person who may come into contact with a Tesla car.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who studies advertising law, told Business Insider that the DMV's lawsuit is "very high-stakes" for Tesla.
"Even if Tesla defeats this lawsuit, it's not in the legal clear — it's still going to have to answer in court for its claims elsewhere," Goldman said.
Tesla's driver assistance technologies are facing multiple other legal challenges.
A wrongful death complaint against Tesla in Florida says a Tesla driver was using Autopilot and briefly looked away when his vehicle T-boned a parked SUV, killing a 22-year-old woman. Tesla argued that the driver was responsible for the crash.
Separately, Tesla is facing a class-action lawsuit and an ongoing investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the phenomenon known as " phantom braking," which is when the vehicle suddenly slams on the brakes for no reason, often at high speeds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Firefly Aerospace to price US IPO as it sets sights on a positive liftoff
By Pritam Biswas and Arasu Kannagi Basil (Reuters) -Northrop Grumman-backed Firefly Aerospace, the buzzy space technology startup that put a lander on the moon, is set to price its U.S. IPO later on Wednesday. In a nascent but rapidly growing commercial space industry, Firefly's IPO has attracted investor attention because it successfully landed its uncrewed Blue Ghost spacecraft on the moon in its first attempt in March. Cedar Park, Texas-based Firefly Aerospace is set to sell 16.2 million shares of its stock, priced between $41 and $43 apiece. This range was raised earlier this week, signaling strong demand. U.S. President Donald Trump's focus on commercializing space technology and safeguarding the national interests in space has attracted venture capital firms and billionaires. Elon Musk's SpaceX — the most valuable private company in the world — has become a critical part of the U.S. satellite network, even prompting a need across the government to look for more contractors. The U.S. government is betting that diversifying its contractor base will foster innovation and cut the huge costs of sending rockets to space, as well as reduce over-reliance on a single provider for critical missions. NASA's procurement process now includes new entrants such as Firefly Aerospace and Sierra Space, alongside legacy companies, leveraging commercial partnerships for lunar landers, space station modules and cargo deliveries. While space-related IPOs have been scarce in recent years, the tide is starting to turn in 2025. Firefly's listing comes on the heels of the successful New York flotations of space and defense firms Karman, AIRO Group and Voyager. As of Tuesday's close, shares of Karman have more than doubled from their offer price, while Voyager has gained 10%. "Given Firefly and the success of Voyager, I think you are going to see several more space-related companies test the waters of a public offering," said Ross Carmel, partner at law firm Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel. TO THE MOON Formed in 2017, Firefly designs and manufactures small- to medium-lift launch vehicles, lunar landers and orbital vehicles. It had a backlog of roughly $1.1 billion and over 30 planned launches under contract as of March 31. While Houston-based Intuitive Machines' Odysseus lander was the first private lander to reach the moon last year, it made a lopsided touchdown, landing mostly intact but dooming many of its onboard instruments. Firefly's was the second, but its Blue Ghost spacecraft landed safely, reaching the moon's surface a month and a half after launching atop a SpaceX rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Last month, Firefly secured a $176.7 million contract to deliver five NASA payloads to the Moon's South Pole in 2029. Firefly was valued at more than $2 billion in a 2024 funding round. The company's backers include aerospace-focused private investment firm AE Industrial Partners. U.S. defense contractor Northrop Grumman, which invested $50 million into Firefly to aid the production of their jointly developed rocket, is one of three suppliers of solid rocket motors (SRMs) to the United States. Firefly is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "FLY" on Thursday.
CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
Firefly Aerospace prices shares at $45, above the expected range
Firefly Aerospace priced shares in its IPO at $45 on Wednesday, above its expected range. The Texas-based rocket maker will debut on the Nasdaq Thursday under the ticker symbol "FLY." The offering raised $868 million and values the company at about $6.3 billion. Firefly filed its initial prospectus in July and upped its IPO range this week to $41 to $43 a share, from an initial range of $35 to $39. The space technology sector has seen rising investor interest over the last few years as billionaire investors such as Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos put their money behind SpaceX and Blue Origin, respectively. So far this year, space technology companies Voyager Technology and Karman Holdings have gone public. The broader IPO landscape has also seen major public debuts this year from Figma, CoreWeave and Circle as the market for public offerings reopens following a prolonged drought. Firefly creates lunar landers, rockets and space technology, and won a $177 million contract with NASA last month. Earlier this year, the company successfully landed its lunar lander known as Blue Ghost on the moon. The company has worked with key defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and L3Harris. Northrop Grumman invested $50 million in Firefly earlier this year. For the quarter that ended in March, Firefly reported a net loss of about $60.1 million, widening from $52.8 million in the year-ago period. Revenue jumped sixfold to $55.9 million from $8.3 million. Its backlogged totaled about $1.1 billion.
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Former Tesla Executives Start Automotive AI Company DensityAI
Former leaders of Tesla Inc. 's supercomputer program have started a new artificial intelligence company focused on the automotive industry, according to people familiar with the matter. DensityAI, which is poised to come out of stealth soon, is in talks to raise hundreds of millions of dollars, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is private. The startup was founded by Ganesh Venkataramanan — the former head of Tesla's Dojo team — and ex-Tesla employees Bill Chang and Ben Floering.
