UCLA vows to brush off Game 1 Super Regional loss to South Carolina
The streak is over, but not the season.
UCLA softball's run of six consecutive victories in Super Regional games dating back to 2021 ended emphatically with a 9-2 loss to South Carolina in Game 1 of the Columbia Super Regional at Beckham Field.
Advertisement
'The opponent did a better job of executing the game plan today,' UCLA head coach Kelly Inouye-Perez said. 'The best part about postseason is it's a best two out of three. We look forward to getting back out there tomorrow.'
South Carolina (44-15) tagged UCLA (52-11) starting pitcher Kaitlyn Terry with five runs in the first two innings and added two apiece in the fifth and sixth off reliever Addisen Fisher.
Read more: UCLA softball defeats UC Santa Barbara to advance to NCAA Super Regionals
Catcher Lexi Winters opened the scoring by the thinnest of margins, hitting a two-run home run off the top of the wall. After Brooke Blankenship's RBI single tacked on one more run in the first, South Carolina star slugger Arianna Rodi delivered a two-run single in the second inning to knock Terry from the circle. South Carolina scored seven of its nine runs in the game with two outs, following on a streak of 11 consecutive two-out runs to end last week's regional.
Advertisement
'Patience and short, compact swings,' Inouye-Perez said when asked about the key to South Carolina's offense. 'At the end of the day, I think it's more about they did a great job of executing vs. us not being able to do what we do.'
UCLA put two runs back in the fourth off RBI hits by Alexis Ramirez and Sofia Mujica, knocking South Carolina starter Jori Heard from the game. Heard retired 26 of 27 batters she faced in the regional, but the Bruins finally created some pressure and forced South Carolina head coach Ashley Chastain Woodard to go to her bullpen.
'Credit to them making good pitches,' Ramirez said. 'But I do believe that we were having good at-bats, quality at-bats, putting good swings on pitches that we were prepared to hit, so it's just staying within ourselves and sticking to our plan.'
Reliever Sam Gress escaped the fourth inning, but allowed back-to-back singles leading off the fifth. Those hits brought UCLA's slugging duo of Jordan Woolery to the plate one swing away from tying the game, but Gress shut down the rally. She struck out both power hitters and induced a foul pop-up from Rylee Slimp, stranding both runners and ending UCLA's last big chance to get back in the game.
Advertisement
'I know for them it was big to be able to get past that,' Inouye-Perez said. 'But for us, we have great faith in the hitters that are behind them, and I think that's what we're going to need for postseason is we're not relying on just any one [hitter].'
Abigail Knight delivered the big blow off Fisher with a two-run double in the fifth, and the Gamecocks nearly ended the afternoon early on the run rule with the winning run reaching scoring position in the sixth. South Carolina has only allowed four total runs through four NCAA Tournament games, and Gress only allowed one hit over the final two innings to carry South Carolina to its first Super Regional victory in program history.
Read more: Bombs away: UCLA's Jordan Woolery, Megan Grant are a power duo unlike any other
This is just the fourth time in 15 Super Regional appearances UCLA has lost game one of the series. In all three instances UCLA at least won Game 2 and rallied to win the series during the past two appearances. UCLA took the final two games from Virginia Tech in 2021 and advanced to the Women's College World Series after losing Game 1 at Oregon in 2016, the only time the program has been in this situation away from home.
Advertisement
'We have a saying that you can only live in one time zone,' Inouye-Perez said. 'The past is as old as dirt and has no control over tomorrow. We have to be where our feet are. The plan was to come out and win two ballgames, and that plan hasn't changed.'
Game 2 of the series is scheduled for 10 a.m. PDT on Saturday and will air on ESPN.
Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Kyle Joseph Schwarber Player Props: June 5, Phillies vs. Blue Jays
Kyle Joseph Schwarber Player Props: June 5, Phillies vs. Blue Jays Kyle Joseph Schwarber's Philadelphia Phillies face the Toronto Blue Jays on June 5 at 3:07 p.m. ET, and will see starting pitcher Chris Bassitt on the mound. Schwarber put up one hit in his last game, going 1-for-4. Find odds, stats, and more below to make your Kyle Joseph Schwarber player prop bets. Kyle Schwarber paces the Phillies with 19 home runs and 44 runs batted in. Kyle Schwarber ranks fourth in homers and ninth in RBI among all batters in baseball. Watch tonight's Phillies game on Fubo! Kyle Joseph Schwarber Prop Bets and Odds Hits Prop: 0.5 hits (Over odds: -154) 0.5 hits (Over odds: -154) Home Runs Prop: 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +310) 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +310) RBI Prop: 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +150) 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +150) Runs Prop: 0.5 runs (Over odds: -105) 0.5 runs (Over odds: -105) Total Bases Prop: 0.5 total bases (Over odds: -161) 0.5 total bases (Over odds: -161) Stolen Bases Prop: 0.5 stolen bases (Over odds: +1250) How to Watch Philadelphia Phillies vs. Toronto Blue Jays Matchup: Philadelphia Phillies vs. Toronto Blue Jays Philadelphia Phillies vs. Toronto Blue Jays Time: 3:07 p.m. ET 3:07 p.m. ET Date: Thursday, June 5, 2025 Thursday, June 5, 2025 TV Channel: SNET and NBCS-PH SNET and NBCS-PH Live Stream: Fubo (Watch now! - Regional restrictions may apply) Kyle Joseph Schwarber vs. Chris Bassitt In his career versus Chris Bassitt, Kyle Joseph Schwarber is 5 for 13 with a double and two home runs. Against Chris Bassitt last season, Kyle Joseph Schwarber went 3 for 5 with a double and two home runs. Kyle Joseph Schwarber prop bet insights Kyle Joseph Schwarber has recorded a hit 43 times this season in 61 games played (70.5%), including 12 multi-hit games (19.7%). Out of the 61 games he has appeared in this season, he's gone yard in 18 contests (29.5%), leaving the ballpark in 7% of his trips to the dish. In 59.0% of his games this season (36 of 61), Kyle Joseph Schwarber has scored at least a run, and in eight of those games (13.1%) he recorded more than one run scored. He has notched at least one RBI in 45.9% of his games this season (28 of 61), with two or more RBI in 11 of those contests (18.0%). He has also driven in three or more of his team's runs in five contests. Kyle Joseph Schwarber has gone down on strikes in 70.5% of his 61 games this season, with more than one strikeout in 31.1% of them (19). MLB odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Thursday at 12:12 p.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. Kyle Joseph Schwarber stats against the Blue Jays Blue Jays starter: Chris Bassitt
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
John Paul Crawford Player Props: June 5, Mariners vs. Orioles
John Paul Crawford Player Props: June 5, Mariners vs. Orioles John Paul Crawford went hitless in his previous game (0 for 2), but will have another crack at it when the Seattle Mariners face Zach Eflin and the Baltimore Orioles on Thursday at 3:40 p.m. ET on ROOT Sports NW and MASN2. Find odds, stats, and more below to make your John Paul Crawford player prop bets. J.P. Crawford has racked up a team-high batting average of .279. He has hit five home runs and totaled 22 RBI. Watch tonight's Mariners game on Fubo! John Paul Crawford Prop Bets and Odds Hits Prop: 0.5 hits (Over odds: -208) 0.5 hits (Over odds: -208) Home Runs Prop: 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +825) 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +825) RBI Prop: 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +280) 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +280) Runs Prop: 0.5 runs (Over odds: +125) 0.5 runs (Over odds: +125) Total Bases Prop: 0.5 total bases (Over odds: -208) 0.5 total bases (Over odds: -208) Stolen Bases Prop: 0.5 stolen bases (Over odds: +1300) How to Watch Seattle Mariners vs. Baltimore Orioles Matchup: Seattle Mariners vs. Baltimore Orioles Seattle Mariners vs. Baltimore Orioles Time: 3:40 p.m. ET 3:40 p.m. ET Date: Thursday, June 5, 2025 Thursday, June 5, 2025 TV Channel: ROOT Sports NW and MASN2 ROOT Sports NW and MASN2 Live Stream: Fubo (Watch now! - Regional restrictions may apply) John Paul Crawford vs. Zach Eflin John Paul Crawford is 1 for 2 with a double in his career against Zach Eflin. John Paul Crawford prop bet insights John Paul Crawford has a hit in 66.7% of his games this year (38 of 57), with multiple base hits in 16 of them (28.1%). He has hit a long ball in 8.8% of his games this season (57 contests), leaving the ballpark in 2.1% of his plate appearances. In 40.4% of his 57 games this season, John Paul Crawford has scored (23 times). He's also notched four games with multiple runs in 2025 (7.0%). He has picked up an RBI in 22.8% of his 57 games this year, with more than one RBI in 12.3% of those contests (seven). He has also plated three or more runs in one contest. John Paul Crawford has struck out at least once 36 times this year in 57 tries (63.2%), including punching out on multiple occasions in 14.0% of games (eight times). MLB odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Thursday at 12:12 p.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. John Paul Crawford stats against the Orioles Orioles starter: Zach Eflin
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
America's Newest Gamblers Are Playing a Dangerous Game
Gambling has swallowed American sports culture whole. Until early 2018, sports betting was illegal under federal law; today, it's legal in 39 states and Washington, D.C. (and easy enough to access through backdoor channels even in the states where it isn't). During NFL games, gambling commercials air more often than ads for beer. Commentators analyze not just whether a team can win, but if they might win by at least the number of points by which they're favored on betting apps. Nearly half of men younger than 50 now have an account with an online sports book, and Americans spent about $150 billion on sports wagers last year. I regularly get ads on my phone offering me a complimentary $200 in sports bets, as long as I gamble $5 first. As betting has overrun American sports, other forms of gambling are also on the rise. According to industry data, American casinos are more popular now than at any point on record. The age of their average patron had been crawling upward for years, but since sports betting was legalized at the federal level, it has plummeted by nearly a decade, to approximately 42. Some signs point to gambling problems increasing, too. No centralized entity tracks gambling addiction, but if its scale comes even close to matching the new scale of sports betting, the United States is unequipped to deal with it. In its power to ruin and even end lives, gambling addiction is remarkably similar to drug dependency. Imaging studies show that pathological gamblers and people with substance addictions share patterns of brain activity. They are more likely to experience liver disease, heart disease, and sleep deprivation, whether it originates in the anxiety of concealing a gambling addiction or because someone is up wagering on contests, such as cricket and table tennis, that happen in faraway time zones. The best national survey available, which dates to well before the rise of sports betting, found that 2 million to 4 million Americans will experience a gambling disorder at some point in their life; one in six people with a gambling disorder attempts suicide. Even if their death certificate says differently, 'I've had several patients who died because of the emotional pain from their gambling disorder,' Timothy Fong, a psychiatrist specializing in addiction treatment and a co-director of UCLA's gambling-studies program, told me. Fong, like the other researchers I spoke with, said that rapid forms of gambling, especially those that allow you to place multiple bets at one time, tend to be especially addictive. For decades, sports betting mostly involved wagers on who'd win a match, by how much, and total points scored—outcomes resolved over the course of hours. Now apps offer endless in-game bets decided in seconds. Last year, I watched the Super Bowl with a friend who bet on the national anthem lasting less than 90.5 seconds—the smart money, according to the analysts. He lost when Reba McEntire belted the song's last words twice. The ability to place one bet after another encourages a hallmark behavior of problem gamblers—when deep in the red, instead of walking away, they bet bigger. 'Viewing sports gambling as a way to make money is likely to end badly,' Joshua Grubbs, a gambling researcher at the University of New Mexico, told me. 'Gamblers that think that gambling is a way toward economic success or financial payouts almost always have far more problem-gambling symptoms.' And some apps actively blur the already hazy line between betting and other financial activities. For instance, the financial platform Robinhood, where millions of people trade meme stocks and manage their retirement accounts, began offering online sports 'events contracts' (a type of investment whose payout depends on traders' correctly predicting the outcome of a specified event) during March Madness this year through a partnership with the financial exchange Kalshi. (A Robinhood spokesperson told me this 'emergent asset class' differs significantly from sports betting because users, not the house, set the prices, and can more easily exit their positions. But the experience of 'investing' in an events contract is virtually indistinguishable from betting.) Financial markets have recently started offering services like this even in states where sports betting is illegal. State gambling regulators have called foul, but the federal government has so far made no move to stop the companies. As the courts sort out whether any of this is legal, Robinhood decided to let customers trade on the Indy 500 and the French Open. Several recent trends suggest that problem gambling might be on the rise in the U.S. Calls to state gambling helplines have increased. (This might be partly explained by advocacy groups marketing their helplines more aggressively than ever; gambling companies also tack the numbers onto their ubiquitous ads.) Fong said that he was recently invited to speak to a consortium of family lawyers, whose divorce clients have started asking, 'How do I protect my children from the damage of their father's gambling?' Researchers and counselors are especially worried about single young men who play in fantasy sports leagues, bet on sports, day trade, and consider gambling a good way to make money. Gamblers Anonymous is rolling out groups for young people. 'I'm treating guys who would never be caught dead in a casino,' James Whelan, a clinical psychologist who runs treatment clinics for gambling addiction in Tennessee, told me. These imperfect proxy measures, along with incomplete data trickling out of a few states, are the best indicators that researchers have about the extent of gambling addiction. Experts are also unsure how long any increase in problem gambling might last: Some studies suggest that the prevalence of gambling problems tends to equalize after a spike, but those findings are usually limited to physical casinos and remain debated within the field. According to researchers I spoke with, no study has established the prevalence of gambling addiction in the U.S. since sports betting became widespread. Federal agencies dedicated to alcoholism and substance abuse allocate billions of research dollars to American universities every year. Yet for decades, the federal government—the largest funder of American research—has earmarked zero dollars for research on gambling activity or addiction specifically, despite collecting millions annually from gambling taxes. (The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which collects national data on behavioral health and funds research into it, declined to comment.) Gambling-addiction treatment is '50 years behind where we are with drugs or alcohol or any other substance,' Michael Sciandra, the executive director of the Nebraska Council on Problem Gambling, told me. Doctors and therapists, even those who specialize in treating addiction, rarely screen for issues with gambling, he said. Among the handful of dedicated gambling-addiction treatment providers around the country, many deploy cognitive behavioral therapy, which studies suggest can at least temporarily improve patients' quality of life and reduce the severity of their gambling problem. But discrepancies in treatment approaches and tiny trial sizes make it difficult to say exactly how many patients the therapy helps. Two medications used to treat alcoholism and opioid addiction have also been found to reduce the severity of gambling addiction across a handful of small clinical trials. But the evidence needed for FDA approval would require large and expensive clinical trials that no one seems eager to fund, Marc Potenza, the director of Yale's Center of Excellence in Gambling Research, told me. Because the federal government doesn't fund gambling-addiction treatment, each state decides what resources to make available. A Tennessee caller to the national helpline 1-800-GAMBLER might be put through to their state's helpline and then connected to the network of government-subsidized clinics Whelan runs across the state. But in states with bare-bones offerings, workers typically refer callers to peer-support groups such as Gamblers Anonymous, or to online resources on budgeting, says Cole Wogoman, a director at the National Council on Problem Gambling, which runs the helpline. Studies have found that each of these strategies is less effective than therapy. Charles Fain Lehman: Legalizing sports gambling was a huge mistake Texas could be an example of how unprepared the U.S. is to deal with any increase in problem gamblers. The state's gambling laws are among the strictest in the country, and yet it still sends the second-highest number of callers (behind California) to 1-800-GAMBLER. This November, Texans might vote on a constitutional amendment to allow sports betting. The state of more than 30 million has no funding for gambling treatment and only three certified gambling counselors, according to Carol Ann Maner, who is one of them. The state's official hub for gambling help, which Maner leads, was founded just this spring. Once they find the money, Maner and her colleagues plan to finally set up the state's own helpline. But first, they need to recruit and train more therapists for a job that, thanks to a lack of state and federal funding, might require turning away uninsured clients. That's a daunting task. Finding the apps Texans can use to get around gambling restrictions is easy.
