&w=3840&q=100)
India-Sri Lanka defence dialogue discusses enhancing maritime security
India and Sri Lanka explored ways to further expand their bilateral defence cooperation, especially in areas of maritime security, the island nation's defence ministry said.
The deliberations took place at the Sri Lanka-India Defence Dialogue held in Colombo on Thursday.
It was the first high-level meeting after India and Sri Lanka signed the first ever defence partnership on April 5.
A statement from the Defence Ministry said that the Sri Lankan delegation was led by Defence Secretary Air Vice Marshal Sampath Thuyacontha (Retd), while the visiting Indian Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh led the Indian delegation.
The high-level dialogue focused on strengthening bilateral defence cooperation, enhancing maritime security, and exploring new avenues for collaboration in training and strategic engagement, the statement said.
Senior officials from both sides participated in the discussions, reaffirming the longstanding defence partnership between Sri Lanka and India, it said.
The Indian Defence Secretary also met the Deputy Minister of Defence, Major General Aruna Jayasekara (Retd) and Thuyacontha separately.
On April 5, India and Sri Lanka signed the first-ever defence partnership agreement -- firmed up during talks between visiting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake -- signalling a major boost the the bilateral defence ties nearly four decades after the Indian Peace Keeping Force's intervention in the island nation strained the relations.
The agreement will institutionalise the existing military engagement and pave the way for more structured cooperation including potential collaboration in the defence industrial sector, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had said then.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistan govt responds to PM Modi speech on their involvement in Pahalgam attack. Here's what they said
Pakistan on Friday reacted to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech about Islamabad's involvement in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and said it was "dismayed". Addressing an event in Jammu and Kashmir's Katra, the PM said that the terror incident in Pahalgam was an at attack on the "insaniyat and Kashmiriyat", adding that it was aimed at triggering riots in India. 'Its intent was to incite riots in India and to disrupt the livelihood of the hardworking people of Kashmir. That is why Pakistan targeted the tourists," he added. PM Modi took a sharp jibe at Pakistan and said that Islamabad "intended to incite communal violence in India and cripple the earnings of hard working Kashmiris. Pakistan's foreign minister commented on PM Modi's remarks and said it 'firmly rejects the baseless and misleading' comments. 'We are deeply dismayed that the Indian prime minister has once again chosen to accuse Pakistan of involvement in the Pahalgam attack, without presenting a single piece of credible evidence,' it said in a statement. PM Modi also heaped praises on the people of Jammu and Kashmir for standing up against Pakistan's conspiracy. 'The youth of Jammu and Kashmir are now determined to give a strong response to terrorism. This is the same terrorism that burned down schools, destroyed hospitals in the Valley, and ruined generations," he added. Tensions escalated between the two nuclear-armed neighbours after terrorists opened fire at civilians, mostly tourists, at Baisaran near Pahalgam on April 22. At least 26 persons lost their lives during this attack. The following day, India imposed several measures against Pakistan as a response move to the terror attack, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. Two weeks later, on May 7, the Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor, striking nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Under this operation, more than 100 terrorists were killed. Following India's strike, Pakistan also tried to launch a retaliatory action against New Delhi. However, all its attempts, including the use of cross-border shelling, drones, and unarmed aerial vehicles, were foiled by the Indian forces. Amid the continued intense fighting, on the night of May 9-10, the Indian armed forces once again struck targets; this time, they were 13 Pakistani air bases and military installations. After four-days of cross-border fighting, on May 10, the director general of military operations of Pakistan contacted his Indian counterpart, seeking a cessation of all military actions against each other. The two nations arrived at an understanding and ceased all activities on each other.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistan writes multiple letters to India urging them to restore Indus Waters Treaty
Pakistani authorities have written to their Indian counterparts several times since April to reconsider the decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, people familiar with the matter said on Friday. India's decision to keep the six-decade-old Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance until Pakistan 'credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism' was part of punitive measures unveiled by New Delhi a day after the April 22 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. Also Read: Shehbaz Sharif seeks Donald Trump's mediation as India's delegation corners Pakistan in US Pakistan's water resources secretary Syed Ali Murtaza has sent a total of four letters to India's Jal Shakti ministry since then, urging a review of the decision to suspend the treaty. It wasn't immediately clear when the letters were sent, but a person aware of the matter said that three of the letters were written after Operation Sindoor. The Pakistani side has continued to claim that the treaty cannot be unilaterally suspended by India and that the suspension violates the pact's provisions, according to people familiar with the communications who spoke on condition of anonymity. Also Read: Who is Ishaan Tharoor? Shashi Tharoor's son who questioned Congress MP on Pakistan in US The letters were a response to a formal notification on April 24 from India's water resources secretary Debashree Mukherjee to her Pakistani counterpart about the decision to keep the treaty in abeyance. 'The obligation to honour a treaty in good faith is fundamental to a treaty. However, what we have seen instead is sustained cross-border terrorism by Pakistan targeting the Indian Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir,' Mukherjee had written. There has been no Indian response to Pakistan's letters so far, with people familiar with the matter saying India 'remains firm on its decision.' External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal reiterated on April 29 that the country would not engage in talks with Pakistan until the neighbour 'credibly and irrevocably abjures cross-border terrorism.' The Indian side has stopped sharing all data related to the flows of the western rivers – Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab – that were allocated to Pakistan under the 1960 treaty. Also Read: Malaysia rejects Pakistan's 'Islamic solidarity' attempt to derail Indian delegation's visit: Report The water sharing arrangement under the treaty stands at 80:20 in favour of Pakistan, making the South Asian nation heavily dependent on the Indus waters system for its economy and agriculture. Former Union water resources secretary Shashi Shekhar said Pakistan is 'desperate' because about a quarter of its gross domestic product depends on the Indus waters. 'The consequences of the treaty's abeyance would be fairly serious I would assume because it can stoke civil unrest too,' Shekhar said. Shekhar revealed that he had recommended suspending or pulling out of the treaty in 2016 as the top water resources bureaucrat. 'But Prime Minister Narendra Modi said water resources should be for benefit of all, but he had warned then that water and flood can't flow together. And when the Pahalgam attacks took place, the room for talks or tolerance ceased,' he said. Pakistani leaders have responded with strong rhetoric, saying any reduction of water flows allowed under the Indus Waters Treaty will be seen as an 'act of war.' The Indus Waters Treaty has survived four wars between India and Pakistan since its signing in 1960, making this the first time the pact has been suspended. Even before the Pahalgam attacks, India had been asking for the treaty to be mutually reworked, citing natural changes in the Indus river basin that had diminished India's share amid a burgeoning population.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Columbia Crisis: Trump's crackdown sends chill through Indian students
New Delhi: A recent notification by the Trump administration that Columbia University failed to meet the standards for accreditation could have far-reaching consequences for students, particularly international students, many of whom are from India, experts said. Loss of accreditation could mean that securing a visa for studying at Columbia will not be possible. Students may become ineligible for scholarships and grants, and those graduating could struggle for jobs as their degrees would lose recognition. The US Department of Education announced on Wednesday that it formally notified the Middle States Commission on Higher Education , Columbia's accrediting body, that the university may have violated federal anti-discrimination laws by allegedly failing to protect Jewish students on campus. The move, which comes after Trump's order restricting Harvard University from enrolling international students, suggests the US administration is escalating its scrutiny of elite universities. Indians form the second largest student community at Columbia University. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Comfortably: 60 m² Prefab Bungalow for Seniors in Denliko Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo In the 2024-25 academic year, 1,241 Indian students were enrolled at Columbia. While the latest US action may face legal obstacles, as in the case of Harvard, it does raise uncertainty, said study-abroad experts. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Live Events "This sends a chilling message to Indian students and families," said Adarsh Khandelwal, cofounder of Collegify, a college-admissions consultancy. "These students are not just numbers; they represent dreams, aspirations, and significant investments." Sukanya Raman, country head at immigration law firm Davies & Associates, explained the risks in stark terms. "Accreditation is a prerequisite for issuing student visas and serves as a foundational eligibility criterion for participation in federal financial aid programmes. Should an institution lose its accredited status, international students may become ineligible for scholarships, grants, or financial assistance that require enrolment in an accredited academic institution." The absence of institutional accreditation may render academic degrees unrecognised by employers, professional licensing authorities and other educational institutions, said Raman. "This lack of recognition can materially impair a student's ability to pursue gainful employment or advanced academic study, thereby affecting long-term professional and educational outcomes." Columbia may challenge the threat legally, arguing it undermines academic freedom and institutional autonomy, said experts. On Thursday, a federal judge in Boston granted a temporary restraining order on Trump's directive banning US entry of foreign nationals seeking admission at Harvard for six months. In her order, US District Judge Allison Burroughs said Harvard would face "immediate and irreparable injury" if the proclamation were to go into effect. A hearing has been scheduled for June 16, giving the university a narrow legal window to push back. Judge Burroughs had last month blocked another Trump order prohibiting Harvard from enrolling international students. Despite the uncertainty, education consultants are urging students not to panic. "We have come across some natural questions and concerns around visa validity," said Manisha Zaveri, joint managing director at education consultancy Career Mosaic. "We are reassuring them that such proclamations often undergo legal review and clarification, and universities typically step up support mechanisms when such uncertainty arises." Many US institutions are already reaching out to students, clarifying their visa status, providing legal assistance where needed, and even exploring credit transfers or deferral options, she said.
