logo
Bacton sandscaping saves £3 million in flood damage

Bacton sandscaping saves £3 million in flood damage

BBC News6 days ago

Six years since a pioneering coastal defence project was implemented on the Norfolk coast, local people say their lives have been transformed with improvements to mental health, tourism and property prices. The £19m sandscaping project was designed to stop Bacton gas terminal from falling into the sea. Enough sand to half-fill Wembley Stadium was dredged and pumped ashore to rebuild the beach. A new study has found it has already prevented £3m of flood damage in the villages of Bacton and Walcott.
'The wind ruled our lives'
In 2018, the future of the village of Walcott hung in the balance. With no beach left because of coastal erosion it was at risk of being swept away by the sea. Pauline Porter, chair of the parish council, says people left the village after 70 properties were damaged during a storm and tidal surge in December 2013. "The wind ruled our lives. If there were high tides you stayed close to the village in case your needed to rescue your pets or valuables. It was a way of life."There was no beach. You had a good drop of 12 to 14ft most of the time and as fast as the steps were made longer to reach the beach, the faster the beach disappeared."We used to have three to five flood evacuations a year, but since sandscaping we haven't had one. "Had it not been for sandscaping the village would have been lost under the sea."
In 2019, two million cubic metres of sand were dredged and pumped ashore to raise beach levels by up to seven metres. The £19m project was mainly funded by the owners of Bacton gas terminal, which handles a third of the UK's natural gas supplies, with £5m coming from public funds. The sandscaping project has a 15 to 20 year design life. Six years on, the sand has moved up and down the coast as well as offshore, creating a small bar that dissipates the energy of the waves.
'I feared for the business'
For years the Kingfisher Cafe could not get flood insurance. Since the sandscaping it can once again. Owner Graham French says he used to wonder if he was going to lose the business."If it had not been for the gas terminal we would not have benefitted from the sandscaping scheme."We now feel we can invest in the business and customers have been coming back."
'£3 million of flood damage prevented'
A draft report prepared for the Crown Estate has found that between 2019 and 2023 the sandscaping has prevented serious flooding in the villages on at least one occasion, saving £3m in damage to properties. It also concluded that it is likely to have prevented erosion of the B1159, the main access road to the gas terminal. A survey of residents carried out by the University of East Anglia found mental health and investor confidence in the area had improved.
The project's designer says it has bought time. Jaap Flikweert from Royal HaskoningDHV says beaches from Mundesley to Happisburgh have built up more than they thought. "We expected the bulge of sand would erode quite rapidly but it has also moved elsewhere." He says the study for the Crown Estate has also put a value on the savings to the nation due to people not being out of work or needing to use the NHS services for poor mental health."In just a few years we estimate it has brought another £3-4m of benefit. It is really good to see that the scheme does its job."
'Nature-based solutions'
The man who co-ordinated the project says it is not a solution for all communities fighting coastal erosion. Rob Goodliffe, who is coastal transition manager at North Norfolk District Council, says it has demonstrated the benefits of nature-based solutions to sea level rise."Any scheme has to stack up economically but you cannot necessarily pick this up and drop it into another area."The owners of Bacton gas terminal were approached by the BBC but declined to comment.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court halts Wretton houses sale over non-payment of levy
High Court halts Wretton houses sale over non-payment of levy

BBC News

time18 hours ago

  • BBC News

High Court halts Wretton houses sale over non-payment of levy

A court has put the sale of new houses on hold after a developer failed to make a cash contribution towards local infrastructure and Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council obtained the order over the non-payment of £118,00 of what is called Section 106 follows the construction of eight properties just outside the village of Wretton, near Downham company at the centre of the dispute, EAM Developments, has been approached for comment. The council said it had obtained an interim High Court order last month which was renewed on Friday. There will be a further hearing on 21 County Council is pursuing the same company over non-payment of money in relation to another development in the nearby village of documents show the conversion of an old mill was granted permission back in 2016.A spokesman for the county council said: "The funds due to Norfolk County Council to pay for local community infrastructure from the Whittington development remain unpaid, and efforts to recover these funds are ongoing." One of the properties at the centre of the Wretton court order is a four-bedroom detached house off Low Road which is on the market for £600, land is on the site of a former social Peter Clark and Emma Malvina Beaton from Weeting, on the Norfolk-Suffolk border, are listed as the people with significant control of EAM developments.A Companies House listing states that it was incorporated in 2014. Affordable housing Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is a legally binding agreement and usually involves a council and a ensures a contribution is made towards local infrastructure or services to make a development acceptable in planning to the House of Commons library, in 2022/23 almost half of all affordable homes built in England were at least partially funded through this the case of the amount owed to Norfolk County Council, it is understood the money was planned for schools and a library. Jim Moriarty, West Norfolk Council cabinet member for planning, said: "Section 106 agreements are put in place on certain developments where planning permission would not otherwise be granted."They are an important part of the contributions that developers make to mitigate the impact of their plans and support affordable housing."Indirectly, failure to pay Section 106 contributions impacts on local people and we, as the local planning authority, have a duty to pursue non-payment."He added: "We are continuing to work with Mr Clark to resolve this matter." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages
Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages

The developer of Britain's largest solar farm has told residents of three Norfolk villages that appear in the Domesday Book that their land may be 'required'. Dozens of villagers in Hempnall, Saxlingham and Tasburgh were sent letters warning them that their homes may be needed to create space for the East Pye Solar project. The development will cover 2,500 acres, an area the size of Chichester, in West Sussex, and it is 10 times bigger than the UK's current largest solar farm in Flintshire, Wales. Letters sent in the last two months asked villagers detailed questions about their mortgages. In total, residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss are believed to have been sent the letters, which state their land may be 'required'. If the East Pye Solar proposal goes ahead, it would deliver up to 500 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 115,000 homes annually. As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP), the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land. Farmers around the UK have been threatened with the possibility of compulsory purchase orders for solar farm development, but this is believed to be the first time homeowners have been approached. Residents of Hempnall, which has a population of 1,238, criticised the letter's 'impertinent' and 'unreasonable' line of questioning. Yvonne Davy, 89, is among dozens of residents who received letters from the developer's lawyers, Dalcour Maclaren. Ms Davy, who has lived in Hempnall since 1973, said she received three letters, dated April 9, May 2 and May 29, and an unwanted phone call. The great-grandmother, who has an electric car and solar panels on her roof, said: 'I thought that can't be right. They were asking about my finances and my mortgage. It is quite impertinent. I wasn't very pleased when they rang me at the seaside, and I told them what they're planning to do isn't very nice at all. I don't know how they got my number.' Developers would get her land 'over her dead body', she added, saying: 'They're putting these vast numbers of panels, and it's going to blight the countryside. Where I walk and where I live is going to be surrounded by solar panels the height of a house. It would be dreadful. 'I'm going to be 90 this year, and I'm happily settled. I don't want to lose my property.' Robert Eagle, 77, has also received multiple letters, with the first in early April, followed by three reminders to fill out the questionnaire. Mr Eagle, who has lived in Hempnall for 27 years, said he felt 'unreasonably' chased by the company for his financial information. He said: 'At first I was surprised to receive the letter because I didn't realise such detailed information would be needed at this stage. If I had to give up my home, I would certainly not be pleased. We've been here a long time and we'd like to remain here. 'The thing that really hits us is how unreasonable the project is in terms of scale.' David Hook, the chairman of Hempnall Parish Council, said it was 'extremely concerned' about the solar farm proposals. He said: 'The East Pye scheme, if permitted, would surround our village and cover in total 2,718 acres of South Norfolk countryside with solar panels. 'Our objection to these schemes is due primarily to the fact that their construction would result in the industrialisation of large areas of attractive, tranquil countryside with solar panels and security fences. 'The NSIP regime also provides developers with compulsory purchase powers and this is causing great concern to many local residents, in Hempnall and many other villages included in the scheme, who have received letters saying their home 'may be required'. Island Green Power said: 'As part the development consent order process, East Pye Solar will be undertaking land interest questionnaires to identify people and organisations that have a legal interest in land or property that may potentially be impacted by the scheme. 'This is a statutory obligation under the 2008 Planning Act, and is routine for helping to identify those with legal interest in land. 'Completing land referencing questionnaires allows these stakeholders to be consulted on the development consent order application and ensures they receive formal notification such as when the scheme is accepted for examination.' The Telegraph has contacted the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero

‘My house, farm and barn are all being double taxed – this is a wealth tax'
‘My house, farm and barn are all being double taxed – this is a wealth tax'

Telegraph

time3 days ago

  • Telegraph

‘My house, farm and barn are all being double taxed – this is a wealth tax'

A 77-year-old pensioner has been left with an £11,000 council tax bill after his house, farm and barn annexe were all deemed to be his second homes. George Easton, a retired chartered surveyor, has been left in a bizarre battle between two councils with neither authority acknowledging which of his homes is his main residence. Mr Easton, who owns a terraced house in Norwich and a farm cottage complete with a barn annexe 20 miles away in Eccles-on-Sea, has been charged double council tax bills on all three properties. Both Norwich City Council and North Norfolk District Council have assumed the property in its authority is a second home and applied a 100pc premium from April 1. It meant Mr Easton, who lives alone, is paying the equivalent of six council tax bills amounting to £11,314 a year. He told The Telegraph: 'Somewhere, there is a house with six people in it, and I am paying 36 times as much as one of them. They are sharing one council tax between the six, and I am a single person paying six council taxes. 'All it is is a wealth tax. Why they don't call it that, I don't know.' Norfolk has one of the highest proportions of second home owners in the country with one in 10 properties in North Norfolk being a second home.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store