Bacton sandscaping saves £3 million in flood damage
'The wind ruled our lives'
In 2018, the future of the village of Walcott hung in the balance. With no beach left because of coastal erosion it was at risk of being swept away by the sea. Pauline Porter, chair of the parish council, says people left the village after 70 properties were damaged during a storm and tidal surge in December 2013. "The wind ruled our lives. If there were high tides you stayed close to the village in case your needed to rescue your pets or valuables. It was a way of life."There was no beach. You had a good drop of 12 to 14ft most of the time and as fast as the steps were made longer to reach the beach, the faster the beach disappeared."We used to have three to five flood evacuations a year, but since sandscaping we haven't had one. "Had it not been for sandscaping the village would have been lost under the sea."
In 2019, two million cubic metres of sand were dredged and pumped ashore to raise beach levels by up to seven metres. The £19m project was mainly funded by the owners of Bacton gas terminal, which handles a third of the UK's natural gas supplies, with £5m coming from public funds. The sandscaping project has a 15 to 20 year design life. Six years on, the sand has moved up and down the coast as well as offshore, creating a small bar that dissipates the energy of the waves.
'I feared for the business'
For years the Kingfisher Cafe could not get flood insurance. Since the sandscaping it can once again. Owner Graham French says he used to wonder if he was going to lose the business."If it had not been for the gas terminal we would not have benefitted from the sandscaping scheme."We now feel we can invest in the business and customers have been coming back."
'£3 million of flood damage prevented'
A draft report prepared for the Crown Estate has found that between 2019 and 2023 the sandscaping has prevented serious flooding in the villages on at least one occasion, saving £3m in damage to properties. It also concluded that it is likely to have prevented erosion of the B1159, the main access road to the gas terminal. A survey of residents carried out by the University of East Anglia found mental health and investor confidence in the area had improved.
The project's designer says it has bought time. Jaap Flikweert from Royal HaskoningDHV says beaches from Mundesley to Happisburgh have built up more than they thought. "We expected the bulge of sand would erode quite rapidly but it has also moved elsewhere." He says the study for the Crown Estate has also put a value on the savings to the nation due to people not being out of work or needing to use the NHS services for poor mental health."In just a few years we estimate it has brought another £3-4m of benefit. It is really good to see that the scheme does its job."
'Nature-based solutions'
The man who co-ordinated the project says it is not a solution for all communities fighting coastal erosion. Rob Goodliffe, who is coastal transition manager at North Norfolk District Council, says it has demonstrated the benefits of nature-based solutions to sea level rise."Any scheme has to stack up economically but you cannot necessarily pick this up and drop it into another area."The owners of Bacton gas terminal were approached by the BBC but declined to comment.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
New King's Lynn library will be open by Christmas, builders say
A library will be relocated to a town centre by Christmas, the team behind the project have said.A total of £15.1m is being spent on turning the former Argos shop in King's Lynn into a library and adult education facility. The building was acquired by Norfolk County Council in 2021 but the Covid-19 pandemic delayed the manager Verity Bennett, who has been working on the renovation ever since, described the scheme as her "extra baby". It was originally scheduled to open in the autumn. Ms Bennett hopes the central location will mean more people use the library, something she said had happened in Great Yarmouth. "It's a beautiful part of town, lots of footfall. You don't have to come and read a book or do anything in particular. Just come and use the space."Jeannine de Souza, who is assistant director in construction and facilities management at the council, said the building had excellent environmental credentials - including solar panels and a state of the art heating said the project had been full of surprises: "One day the team rang me and said 'We've hit wood. We're metres down below the ground we shouldn't be hitting wood'."After stopping to consult old maps it was found they had been digging out the old river bed and their drill had hit what the team believed was an old boat. Ms de Souza said archaeologists were consulted before they continued. The Conservative leader of Norfolk County Council, Kay Mason Billi, said the building would be "more than just books". "It will be somewhere you take your children for playdates, somewhere to go to do adult learning and also they've got the training kitchen there so we can teach people how to cook."Library services will move from the current site in the historical Carnegie Library building in London Sims from Mace, the company carrying out the construction, said the building would be completed by Christmas, "if not before".He said locals had been sceptical about the project but he had noticed a growing excitement. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Union Pacific to reshape US freight rail with $85 billion deal for Norfolk
July 29 (Reuters) - Union Pacific (UNP.N), opens new tab said on Tuesday it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern (NSC.N), opens new tab in an $85 billion deal to create the first U.S. coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. If approved, the deal would be the largest ever buyout in the sector and combine Union Pacific's stronghold in the western two-thirds of the United States with Norfolk's 19,500-mile network that primarily spans 22 eastern states. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. The $320-per-share price implies a premium of 18.6% for Norfolk from its close on July 17, when reports of the merger first emerged. The companies said on Thursday they were in advanced discussions for a possible merger. The deal will face lengthy regulatory scrutiny amid union concerns over potential rate increases, service disruptions and job losses. The 1996 merger of Union Pacific and Southern Pacific had temporarily led to severe congestion and delays across the Southwest. The deal reflects a shift in antitrust enforcement under U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. Executive orders aimed at removing barriers to consolidation have opened the door to mergers that were previously considered unlikely. Surface Transportation Board Chairman Patrick Fuchs, appointed in January, has advocated for faster preliminary reviews and a more flexible approach to merger conditions. Even under an expedited process, the review could take from 19 to 22 months, according to a person involved in the discussions. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing that such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. "We will weigh in with the STB (regulator) and with the Trump administration in every way possible," said Jeremy Ferguson, president of the SMART-TD union's transport division, after the two companies said they were in advanced talks last week. "This merger is not good for labor, the rail shipper/customer or the public at large," he said. The SMART-TD union's transport division is North America's largest railroad operating union with more than 1,800 railroad yardmasters. The companies said they expect to file their application with the STB within six months. The North American rail industry has been grappling with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability, factors that could further complicate the merger. Union Pacific and Norfolk's shares were down about 3% each. The proposed deal had also prompted competitors BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab, and CSX (CSX.O), opens new tab, to explore merger options, people familiar with the matter said. The Union Pacific merger would create a railroad with the largest market share across most commodities, according to Jason Miller, interim chair of the department of supply-chain management at Michigan State University's business college. "I can't help but think this would create pressure for BNSF Railway and CSX to explore a merger possibility." Agents at the STB are already conducting preparatory work, anticipating they could soon receive not just one, but two megamerger proposals, a person close to the discussions told Reuters on Thursday. If both mergers are approved, the number of Class I railroads in North America would shrink to four from six, consolidating major freight routes and boosting pricing power for the industry. The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen raised concerns over safety, transparency, and employee treatment after the deal announcement, saying it would push for safeguards as regulators review the deal. The last major deal in the industry was the $31 billion merger of Canadian Pacific ( opens new tab and Kansas City Southern that created the first and only single-line rail network connecting Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. That deal, finalized in 2023, faced heavy regulatory resistance over fears it would curb competition, cut jobs and disrupt service, but was ultimately approved. Union Pacific is valued at nearly $136 billion, while Norfolk Southern has a market capitalization of about $65 billion, according to data from LSEG.
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
Is Greggs about to go the same way as Starbucks?
As anyone who binged on Christmas chocolate as a child with predictably messy results can testify: you can have too much of a good thing. This appears not to have occurred to high street baker Greggs, which now sells more than 1m of its iconic sausage rolls a day. The company opened 226 new outlets last year, a number that falls to 145 net after factoring in closures and the relocation of existing stores – but it's still wildly impressive for our supposedly stagnant high streets. A similar number of new stores is planned for this year. The chain has its roots in the north, so it has been targeting the south, as well as transport hubs: train stations, airports and the like. But might its runaway popularity be a problem? The Greggs estate now amounts to more than 2,600 stores, some of which are within a very short walk of each other. This can create the sort of problems familiar to American owners of fast-food franchises, sold by the likes of McDonalds or Subway. This bunching-up, sometimes referred to as the ' Starbucks overreach ', can boost brand visibility and increase impulse buys. But when overdone, it risks cannibalising sales. In our bigger cities, you're never far from a frappuccino served in a cup with the mermaid trade mark – but who needs a high-street branch every 100 metres? It doesn't make business sense. Just for fun, I checked out the number of Greggs outlets in the Norfolk and Suffolk market towns I yomped around as a cub reporter for the Eastern Daily Press using the company's website. King's Lynn, a town with a population of a shade under 50,000 people, has three Greggs, the closest pair of which are separated by a mere 240 metres. Over the border in Suffolk, Lowestoft (population 71,000) boasts the same number. So, funnily enough, does Thetford, with a population of just over 25,000. Lowestoft must be feeling short-changed on a per head of population basis. All that extra space helped Greggs break the £2bn revenue barrier last year. But the company has slowed down markedly in terms of sales growth, falling from 52 per cent in 2021 to 11 per cent last year. And even that comes with a caveat. Same-store sales, which strips out the impact of new openings and closures with the aim of assessing the performance of the underlying business, increased by just 5.5 per cent. However, the company admitted its sales growth declined to an almost pedestrian 2.5 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2024 in company managed stores, and to just 1.7 per cent in the first nine weeks of 2025. Could the board spell 'saturation' for me? Scepticism about where Greggs goes from here is reflected in the shares, which have found themselves on an end-of-day discount. Over the last 12 months, the company, which holds a place in the second tier FTSE 250 index, has shed roughly £1.2bn of value on the London Stock Exchange. An investment of £100 a year ago would today be worth £57. If you had invested that same £100 in the FTSE 100, it would be worth nearly £110, both excluding dividends. I'm not knocking the brand, which remains much-loved. The first thing I had after a road accident led to me suffering through more than three months of hospital food was a Gregg's sausage roll. Perhaps not unconnected, I am also currently researching a new book, a history of the sausage. But Greggs is about far more than its iconic pastry-wrapped product. It has proved itself to be a nimble business, capable of updating its concept on the fly. It was once a pure bakery, selling freshly baked bread and the like. It looks very different today, with that focus on takeout and a healthier product line-up to suit modern tastes, not to mention the political climate. The vegan version of those sausage rolls have proven a huge hit. All very well, but if the group hasn't reached saturation point, it can't be far from it. Which begs the question: after, I don't know, opening a fourth branch in Lowestoft, isn't it time to look at the export market? You can understand why the board might feel a little twitchy about that. A brief foray into Belgium was less than successful, with the group ultimately pulling the plug on the loss-making venture. British retailers have a long and unhappy history of trying – and failing – overseas. Even Tesco, which has the largest market share among UK supermarkets, taking one in every four pound from grocery shoppers, has retreated from international markets to focus on the UK and Ireland. But more recently, there have been some notable exceptions. The 'undisputed king of trainers', JD, is now in 50 countries, using a mix of directly owned stores, franchises and joint ventures, including nearly 300 US branches. Primark and Sports Direct have also taken their concepts abroad. True, Greggs is a particularly British brand, catering to British tastes, much more so than those other three selling pricey trainers, cheap clothes and discount sports gear. But perhaps the bigger issue for it is whether its backers are willing to let it try. UK investors have proved reluctant to fund the sort of overseas expansion their American counterparts have happily poured money into. They've much preferred safe, steady but decidedly dull dividend payers. This reluctance holds back the UK market, and has young companies with their eyes on growth running for Wall Street, where shareholders are much more willing to roll the dice, and have been rewarded for doing so. If Greggs is guilty of myopia – and it's easy to make the case with three branches in Thetford – it's hardly alone.
