
Death Toll From L.A. Fires Reaches 31 After Remains Are Found
Investigators with the office of the Los Angeles County medical examiner were called Monday to examine what appeared to be human remains at a home that had been destroyed by the fire. The medical examiner's office verified that the remains were from a victim of the Eaton fire and added to the death toll.
It was the first time since April that the medical examiner had determined that another person had died from the fires. The first 29 victims were confirmed in January.
Officials on Tuesday did not identify the remains, but in May, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department reported a missing 74-year-old man who lived on the same block as where the remains were discovered on Monday. He was last seen around 7 p.m. on the evening the Eaton fire broke out.
Officials have announced that 19 people died in the Eaton fire, and 12 in the Palisades fire in the Pacific Palisades section of Los Angeles. The Sheriff's Department did not immediately respond on Tuesday to a request for information on the remaining number of missing people or whether it was aware of additional reports of individuals who remained missing within the burn zones.
With a combined death toll of 31, the Los Angeles wildfires in January were the second deadliest wildfire disaster in California history, behind only the Camp fire, which killed 85 people and devastated the town of Paradise, Calif., in 2018.
Search and recovery efforts are often challenging for officials after natural disasters like wildfires. Little is left behind, making remains difficult to find and identify. After the Maui fire in August 2023, the death toll continued to rise almost a year later as officials discovered and identified additional remains.
More than six months after the Los Angeles firestorm, little construction has begun in Pacific Palisades and Altadena. The charred ruins of some businesses remain, but much of the debris has been removed from private residential lots.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Damning Report Proves Signal Messages Were Classified Despite Trump's Claims
A shock new report has revealed that the leaked Signal messages that Trump aides inadvertently sent to a journalist in March were classified, despite President Donald Trump claiming otherwise. An independent watchdog told The Washington Post that messages from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's Signal account disclosing a U.S. bomb campaign originated from a classified email labeled 'SECRET/NOFORN.' The reveal contradicts longstanding claims by Trump and his staff that no classified information was shared in the chat. The 'SECRET' classification showcases that the information was so classified that unauthorized disclosure could be a risk to national security. 'NOFORN' is a phrase that means it was not meant for anyone who is a foreign national, even allies. During a March press conference regarding the Signal chat, Trump said that no classified information was shared. The Post's new report says otherwise. The bombshell comes as the Defense Department inspector general's office conducts an inquiry into the messages, as requested by Republican and Democratic members of the Senate Armed Services Committee shortly after the scandal broke. The Pentagon denied the Post's report and maintained that the messages were declassified. 'This Signal narrative is so old and worn out, it's starting to resemble Joe Biden's mental state,' Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to the Daily Beast. 'The Department stands behind its previous statements: no classified information was shared via Signal. As we've said repeatedly, nobody was texting war plans and the success of the Department's recent operations—from Operation Rough Rider to Operation Midnight Hammer—are proof that our operational security and discipline are top notch.' The 'Signalgate' fiasco rocked the White House in March after now-ousted National Security Adviser Mike Waltz added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to the group chat. The chat was created on a commercial messaging app called Signal to discuss a bomb operation in Yemen. Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg exposed the administration in an article titled 'The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans.' Soon after, critics slammed the administration for the move and questioned why high-level officials would use such vulnerable modes of communication. The strike plans had been shared in a classified 'SECRET' email with more than a dozen defense officials by Gen. Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the top commander overseeing Middle East military operations in the Middle East. They were then shared via the Signal group chat by Hegseth's account on March 15, only moments before the U.S. struck Yemen. Kurilla sent his sensitive message over the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, a classified system. But the message later shared by Hegseth was not over the same highly guarded system—it was on a Signal group chat. Along with discussing the timing of the strikes, top Trump aides also used a number of emojis to celebrate the attack—including an American flag, flame, fist and bicep. The chat also included Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The shared messages included highly sensitive information: the day's strike plan, when the bombing was set to begin, what aircraft would be used, and what weapons would be involved. Trump fired Waltz from his post shortly after the public outrage that followed the scandal. But a number of Democrats and at least one Republican lawmaker have also called for Hegseth to be removed. Hegseth's time at the White House has been rocky and defined by frequent infighting and turnover. The findings of the Defense Department inspector general's office are expected to be released within a few months and may put Hegseth's job security at risk.


New York Times
19 hours ago
- New York Times
‘I Want to Clear My Name': Deported Migrant Takes First Step to Sue the U.S.
A Venezuelan migrant took the first step on Thursday toward suing the United States for what he says was his wrongful detention and removal to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel, 27, spent four months in the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, where he said he was beaten and abused. He filed an administrative claim on Thursday with the Homeland Security Department, accusing U.S. immigration agencies of removing him without due process. It is the first such claim to be filed by one of the 252 Venezuelan men who were expelled and sent to El Salvador in March, his lawyers said, and is a necessary step before taking legal action against the U.S. government in federal court. Mr. Rengel, who is seeking $1.3 million in damages, was released last week as part of a large-scale prisoner swap between Venezuela and the United States. He is now living in Venezuela. 'I want to clear my name,' he said in a phone interview late Wednesday from his home in the state of Miranda. 'I am not a bad person.' The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately comment on Mr. Rengel's claim. The detention of Venezuelan men in El Salvador in March was one of the first high-profile efforts to fulfill President Trump's campaign promise of mass deportations. His administration has accused the migrants of belonging to a Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, and his administration has used the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely invoked wartime law, to justify capturing and removing many of the men to El Salvador. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Bloomberg
19 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Ally Sues Powell Demanding FOMC Meeting Public Access
An investment firm headed by a supporter of President Donald Trump sued Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and other Fed officials demanding public access to monetary policy meetings. James Fishback's Azoria Capital said in a suit filed Thursday that the decades-old practice of holding Federal Open Market Committee meetings behind closed doors violates government transparency laws. The fund asked a federal court in Washington to require the Fed to open its July 29-30 meeting.