A 529 account can make saving for your child's future go farther
Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.
The cost of college has more than doubled in the past 20 years, and as a result, families are struggling to plan appropriately for their child's higher education goals.
According to research by the Society of Actuaries, 6 in 10 Americans have said they delayed their retirement to plan for a family member's education.
Though a lot of important factors determine the most realistic and cost-effective plan to pay for college, Tricia Scarlata, head of education planning at JPMorgan Asset Management, spoke on Yahoo Finance's Decoding Retirement podcast about how essential a 529 account can be in ensuring capital goals are met.
"My goal is to always talk about how if you're not investing and you're not potentially leveraging a 529 account, you're missing out on that tax-free growth and compounding over time," Scarlata said (see video above or listen below). "Cash is just not going to get you there. And so investing and leveraging that tax-free benefit is really what we try to encourage people to do."
This embedded content is not available in your region.
A 529 plan is a tax-advantaged savings account dedicated specifically to saving for future education expenses.
It's not just for college — these accounts can also be used to pay for trade schools or tuition for K-12 education, offering tax-free withdrawals for qualifying expenses. The money in the account is then invested, compounding with tax-deferred earnings to be used by the designated beneficiary.
"If you just look at the two accounts side by side, a taxable and a nontaxable account, all things being equal, you make a $10,000 contribution upfront, and then you subsequently put in $500 a month — at the end of 18 years, you have almost $42,000 more in the tax-free account," Scarlata explained, breaking down the difference a 529 account can make when saving for education. "That's a big amount."
Read more: How much should I save before going to college?
By adding education plans to your long-term savings goals, you can also avoid the temptation of borrowing against your own 401(k) to pay for a child's tuition.
"What we do find is a lot of [parents] are borrowing against their retirement to pay those tuition bills," Scarlata said. "And that's where I always get concerned, because when you start to borrow against your retirement or your 401(k), what we see is that most people then don't contribute. A lot of times they're missing out on that company's match, and that's free money."
She also explained that it's a common misconception that the money in the account won't be useful should the designated beneficiary decide not to go to college.
As long as the account has been open for 15 years, up to $7,000 can be rolled over into a Roth IRA for the beneficiary per year, with a lifetime rollover cap of $35,000.
"If you're able to do that $35,000 over five years, and starting when the adult is 23 — at 65, it's almost $400,000," she said.
Read more: How to open a savings account for a child
Though it may seem restrictive to plan in advance for a child's education, Scarlata emphasized that it's ultimately more effective for everyone in the long run to do so.
"It's a family decision," she said. "And what we have found is that parents do not jeopardize their college savings fund. They almost never take those dollars out early — they wait till that child goes to college and then they withdraw."
Each Tuesday, retirement expert and financial educator Robert Powell gives you the tools to plan for your future on Decoding Retirement. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Jamie Dimon says the markets feel 'complacent' right now — and he's not optimistic about a soft landing
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said people could be in for a surprise when they realize that the market is not doing as well as they think. Dimon was speaking to Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo for an interview filmed on Friday, which aired on Monday. During the sit-down, Bartiromo asked him about his thoughts on how the markets are doing. "Complacent. Prices are high. Things are going okay. Prices are kind of working to a soft landing. I hope that's true. I just think the odds of that are lower than other people think, and that they are gonna surprise," Dimon told Bartiromo. "There's so many things moving out there, from deficits to geopolitics, to trade. It's complex, and something can go wrong. And when things do, you usually get surprised," he continued. A representative for Dimon did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Dimon had made a similar warning when he spoke at the Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday. Dimon said the US is headed for a " crack in the bond market" because it "massively overdid" spending and quantitative easing during the COVID-19 pandemic. "It is going to happen," Dimon told forum attendees. "I just don't know if it's going to be a crisis in six months or six years, and I'm hoping that we change both the trajectory of the debt and the ability of market makers to make markets," he added. But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent disagreed with Dimon. "I've known Jamie a long time and for his entire career he's made predictions like this. Fortunately, none of them have come true," Bessent said in an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "That's why he's a banker, a great banker. He tries to look around the corner," Bessent continued. House Republicans passed President Donald Trump's " big beautiful bill" on May 22. GOP lawmakers hope the bill, which is now with the Senate, will be reach Trump's desk on July 4. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said the bill, in its current form, will increase the deficit by $2.5 trillion over the next 10 years. Bessent, however, said the Trump administration plans to reduce the deficit and "leave the country in great shape in 2028." "So the deficit this year is going to be lower than the deficit last year, and in two years it will be lower again. We are going to bring the deficit down slowly. We didn't get here in one year, and this has been a long process," he told CBS on Sunday. To be sure, Dimon isn't the only one who thinks the market has grown complacent. On Monday, "Big Short" investor Steve Eisman told CNBC's "Fast Money" that the market has "gotten pretty complacent" about tariffs. "I have one concern, and that's tariffs. That's it," Eisman said, adding that trade negotiations with Europe will be "incredibly complicated." "And I don't know what's going to happen with China. I just don't know how to handicap this because it's just too many balls in the air," he continued.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
‘Buy Wayfair and Best Buy Stocks,' Says Five-Star Analyst
JPMorgan analysts, led by five-star rated Christopher Horvers, believe that Best Buy (BBY) and Wayfair (W) present a good balance of risk and reward, even if they aren't among the safest retail investments. Indeed, in a research note published on Monday, the firm said that both companies are 'worth the risk' and may offer solid upside potential despite current challenges facing the retail sector. As a result, JPMorgan has Buy ratings on both stocks. Confident Investing Starts Here: For Best Buy, the firm is expected to see a boost in June as pre-orders for the new Nintendo Switch (NTDOY) are recognized in its financials. Furthermore, this momentum is likely to continue into July due to back-to-school shopping, especially in categories like laptops, tablets, and phones. Interestingly, though, JPMorgan noted that while tariffs have already been factored into Best Buy's guidance, there's still some risk, particularly in non-computer categories. Nevertheless, the analysts believe that the stock is attractively priced at current levels. At the same time, Wayfair, which focuses on home goods through an online platform, is also seen as undervalued. In fact, JPMorgan believes that investors may be misjudging how tariffs will affect the company since Wayfair doesn't operate like a traditional brick-and-mortar retailer. Although its stock is trading just above $41 and is down nearly 7% in 2025, the bank suggests that there is the potential for a recovery as tariff concerns ease and sentiment improves. Which Retail Stock Is the Better Buy? Overall, out of the two stocks mentioned above, analysts think that BBY stock has more room to run than W. In fact, BBY's price target of $80.53 per share implies almost 18% upside versus W's 43.42%.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll
There's new evidence that the Democratic Party's reputation is in a bad place. That doesn't mean the party is doomed, electorally speaking. There's plenty of reason to doubt that, given lots of history and its performance in the 2025 elections thus far — but it is a complicating factor for the party's path forward. And a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS provides insights into the party's problems. It's worth a breakdown. The poll, which was released Sunday, asked a battery of questions about how people view both parties. Perhaps most striking was that people were more likely to view the Republicans than Democrats as the party with strong leaders (40% to 16%) and even the 'party of change' (32% to 25%). Neither party won close to a majority in either category. But the former is notable because there is such a gulf between the two parties. And the latter is notable because the party that's out of power is usually viewed as the party of change. Not this time. So what can we read into these findings? The 'strong leaders' question might be the most troublesome finding for Democrats. Only about 1 in 6 Americans said Democrats have stronger leaders than Republicans. As remarkably, only 39% of Democrats said that. We've seen hints of this in previous polls. A March CNN poll found about 3 in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters couldn't name a single leader who best reflected the party's core values. An AP-NORC poll last month showed just 35% of Democrats said they were at least 'somewhat' optimistic about the future of their party, compared with 55% of Republicans for their party. This might not seem too surprising. We just said goodbye to a Democratic president (Joe Biden) who was a diminished figure even when he was still in office. And the Democratic nominee who replaced him (Kamala Harris) wasn't exactly viewed as the future of the party when she took over the ticket in the 2024 race — and then lost. But there was a time when Democrats were at a somewhat similar crossroads, and the numbers weren't as dismal. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll asked the same question in 2006 — after John Kerry's unsuccessful emergence as Democrats' 2004 presidential candidate — and found a smaller 14-point advantage for Republicans. Back then, 63% of Democrats said their party had stronger leaders than Republicans — 24 points higher than today. One reason for the difference is that the 2025 and 2006 polls asked the question in a slightly different way, partly because one was conducted entirely by phone and the other mostly online. Today's poll gave people an explicit 'neither' option, which the 2006 poll didn't (though some people volunteered that option back then). Nearly half of Democrats in the new poll (48%) chose that option. That's still a remarkable finding. Combined with the 13% of Democrats who said Republicans have the stronger leaders, that's 6 in 10 Democrats this year who don't think their side has stronger leaders than a party led by a president whom a huge majority of them revile. The other notable finding is on which party is the 'party of change.' Americans chose Republicans, 32% to 25%. That's not a big gap, but it is counterintuitive given Republicans swept the House, Senate and White House last fall. Historically speaking, it's almost always the party that's out of power that's viewed as the party of change. Before the 2006 election, the same CNN-ORC poll mentioned above showed Democrats had a huge, 56% to 29% lead on this measure. Then, as now, Democrats didn't hold the presidency or either chamber of Congress. But the numbers are very different today. Not only do Democrats trail on this measure, but only a slight majority of Democrats themselves — 51% — say their party is the party of change. And only 18% of independents say that. It's likely this is, in part, about Democrats' failure to position themselves as change agents, but also about what President Donald Trump is doing — and about people not necessarily seeing 'change' as a good thing. However you feel about the changes Trump is making, there is no question he is pushing lots of them. You see that in his and the Department of Government Efficiency's rapid overhaul of the federal government and in Trump's historic efforts to expand executive power — in ways that are often being halted by the courts because they go too far, too fast. It's possible that people just see Trump changing lots of things, whether for good or ill in their opinions, so the 'party of change' mantle doesn't mean what it usually does. We already saw during the 2024 campaign that people's definitions of 'change' were somewhat jumbled by unusual circumstances — i.e., Harris replacing Biden, and a former president running as the challenger. But it's also pretty clear that Democrats have failed to make themselves into a viable and attractive alternative to the party in power. The new CNN poll also asked which party people viewed as the 'party that can get things done.' Republicans led on this by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, 36% to 19%. Only 49% of Democrats and 11% of independents picked the Democratic Party as the more formidable one. There's also, of course, Republicans' big edge on the 'strong leaders' question. None of this means Democrats are sunk in the 2026 elections — or anything close to it. History shows the party that doesn't hold the White House almost always wins midterm elections, in large part because they're viewed as a check on the president. Democrats and liberal candidates have also been doing well in special elections and other races held since the 2024 election. In other words, being not-Trump could be good enough to at least reclaim a very closely split House. But if the Democratic Party wants to run up the score in 2026 and really chart a path for the 2028 election, it has some real work to do on its branding.
