Youth Homelessness Advocate Says Budget Fails Most Vulnerable
The head of a group that helps the homeless fears proposed changes could push some young people into harm's way.
A youth homelessness advocate says this year's Budget delivered no support for young people, calling proposed changes to benefit access 'cold' and 'harsh'.
Manaaki Rangatahi Pou Arahi (chief executive) Bianca Johanson told RNZ she was hopeful the Budget would offer targeted relief for Māori and unemployed rangatahi (young people) – but that hope quickly faded.
'We knew there wasn't going to be a lot for Māori,' she said.
'But we were hopeful there'd be something for rangatahi, seeing that such a high rate of them are unemployed… but we didn't see any alleviation.'
Johanson said, 'Māori were ignored in this budget.'
'That has been disheartening.'
Manaaki Rangatahi is a national youth homelessness collective dedicated to ending youth homelessness in Aotearoa.
It was established in 2018 as a way of consolidating the mahi of different organisations who are also trying to tackle youth homelessness.
Johanson said the sector was seeing the impact of the cost of living crisis, particularly on youth facing housing insecurity – the majority of them Māori.
'For us at Manaaki Rangatahi, we see homelessness, we see a lot of the struggle. People are really hurting.'
A call for Manaakitanga
Minister for Social Development Louise Upston announced in this year's Budget that from July 2027, 18 and 19-year-olds would now have their Jobseeker and emergency benefits tested against their parents' incomes.
The policy is forecast to save the government about $163 million over four years, but the income levels parents would be tested against have not yet been decided by Cabinet.
Johanson said the proposed changes were likely to make things harder for the already most vulnerable.
'If the rangatahi is the one that has to do all that advocacy for themselves, go and get their parents' details – this is a very complex situation.
'There are so many people who are the 'working poor' having to support an 18 or 19-year-old on top of all their other expenses. It could actually drive rangatahi out of home.'
She fears the proposed changes could create more tension within households and push some youth into harm's way – such as crime and violence.
'I see a lot of these decisions as causing more harm and putting rangatahi and whānau into stressful situations which can create harm. There's no way that this is going to create any kind of unity in the whānau, or support whānau to be together.'
'[Māori] are the head of really terrible statistics in Aotearoa – so this Budget and many of the policies that the government have brought forward, aren't exactly addressing them.'
She believed kaupapa Māori principles, like manaakitanga, should be at the forefront of decisions made by the government.
'If we're looking at this government and the manaaki that they've shown to Māori, and to rangatahi, it's very absent,' Johanson said.
'We see culture as a solution and as a tool of healing. It is what heals our rangatahi in a lot of our youth housing programmes.'
'Rangatahi are our future'
Johanson said as it stood, New Zealand did not have a strategy dedicated to support those that were the most vulnerable – rangatahi impacted by homelessness.
'Rangatahi are our future and we're not investing in the future,' she said.
'We are damning our children and our rangatahi, the most vital, important people for our future as a country to what? Living on the streets? To be without work? To have really high mental health and suicide stats? I don't understand the logic.'
Upston previously said the purpose of the welfare system was to support those who needed it the most.
'With this announcement, we're clearly saying that 18- and 19-year-olds who don't study or work and can't support themselves financially, should be supported by their parents or guardians, not by the taxpayer.'
Johanson believed this response was out of touch.
'It's harsh, it's cold, 'she said.
'Most people in Aotearoa want to give others a fair go. But we've got kaumātua and kuia working into their 70s and 80s to survive. We've got rangatahi who've been born into homelessness, who don't know what it's like to have their own bedroom – and now we expect their parents to provide support too?'
In response, Upston said the government was 'taking steps to make sure work, training or study is the focus for all young people'.
'This government recognises that the welfare system should be available for those who most need it. However, we aren't willing to watch any young New Zealanders get stuck on the benefit,' she said.
'Recent forecasts show that people under the age of 25 on Jobseeker Support will spend an average of 18 or more years on a benefit over their lifetimes – 49 percent longer than in 2017. That's why I prioritised Welfare that Works in Budget 2025.'
Upston said the 'Welfare that Works' package included secure funding for two years of Community Coaches and bonus payments – 'giving Jobseekers under 25 years more coaching, an assessment of their needs, an individual plan and holding them accountable for achieving that plan.'
In terms of the specific policy settings for the 18-19-year-old initiative, final decisions on the parental assistance test will be made later this year, including settings for access to hardship and supplementary assistance.
'The design of the test is likely to take into account a range of considerations including (but not limited to) parents' income level, nature of relationship with the 18- or 19-year-old and circumstances such as whether the parent or guardian are in hospital or in prison.'
Minister for Māori Development and Associate Minister of Housing Tama Potaka said the government was investing in rangatahi Māori through education and housing initiatives.
'The government is investing in rangatahi Māori through the overall increase in education funding as well as the extra investment in Māori education specifically, which includes additional funding for kura, te reo Māori proficiency and training for kaiako [teachers].
'Our aspirations are the same as those shared by many parents across the motu: we want to see all rangatahi make the most of their talents. That's why we're saying 18 and 19-year-olds who aren't working or studying should be supported by their parents or guardians, not the taxpayer.'
He said it was 'wrong' to say the government did not care about housing for vulnerable young people.
'Our housing policy has lifted hundreds of Māori whānau and tamariki out of dire emergency housing and into better homes. That can mean a world of difference for young people in terms of better health, regular school attendance or maintaining employment.'
'Talk to us'
Johanson was calling for the government to engage with those directly affected.
'We always ask the government to come talk to us before they make some of these quite strange sanctions and expectations on whānau,' she said.
'We are the sector experts. Rangatahi are the experts. Come and talk to us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
National and Labour deputy leaders go head-to-head on Morning Report
Carmel Sepuloni and Nicola Willis go head-to-head on Morning Report's weekly political panel. Photo: RNZ The National and Labour deputy leaders are set to go head-to-head on Morning Report's weekly political panel. You can listen live above, on our app or on the radio . So far this week, there has been plenty to discuss, including buildings, ferries, and a tit-for-tat on the economy. The government has kept its AA+ credit rating, with ratings agency Fitch praising both National and Labour's emphasis on fiscal responsibility . But on Tuesday, Nicola Willis said the reminder of fiscal responsibility was a "warning shot" to Labour. She accused Labour leader Chris Hipkins of pretending the country's debt servicing costs were not something to worry about, despite the bill reaching almost $9 billion a year. "This kind of fiscal innumeracy is dangerous for New Zealand," she said. "Every New Zealander will pay the price if a Labour-Greens government puts our fiscal reputation at risk." In return, Hipkins scoffed at Willis' assessment, noting Labour had not yet released its full fiscal plan. "Nicola Willis is speculating on what our policy may or may not be. We haven't set out a policy yet," he said. "We've got to see how much more damage she'll do in the next 12 months before we can do that." The government began the week with an announcement it will change the liability settings in the Building Act to a proportionate system, in which parties are only liable for the work they carry out. It is a change from the 'joint and several' system, where liability is shared between all parties, regardless of cost or responsibility. Details on consumer protections, including whether the government will require mandatory professional indemnity insurance or warranties, are still to be worked through ahead of the legislation's introduction. Labour has said it is broadly supportive of the changes, but wants to see more work around those consumer protections so homeowners are not left out of pocket. Also recently in the news has been the money spent on cancelling the Cook Strait ferry contracts . A final $144 million payout to Hyundai Mipo shipyards in South Korea brought the total cost to $671m. Willis cancelled the iReX project shortly after the coalition came into power, saying the budget had blown out. New ferries are not due until 2029, with the Aratere sailing its final journey. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Te reo in schoolbooks: 'Govt has it the wrong way round'
Te Reo experts say the Government has got its approach back to front in removing Māori words from school texts. It was revealed last week that Education Minister Erica Stanford decided to cut Māori words, except for characters' names, from any new books in the Ready to Read Phonics Plus series. The concern was that Māori words were confusing for young readers learning English. However, two experts in te reo Māori and bilingualism told TVNZ's Marae programme nothing could be further from the truth. Watch the full discussion on TVNZ+. Dr Vincent Ieni Olsen-Reeder, research fellow at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington, said: 'It's because the reverse of what the ministry says is actually true. ADVERTISEMENT 'The more we expose our tamariki while their brains are well-geared to learning communication while they're still young, they are learning about patterns and phonetics and grammar in a really comprehensive way that doesn't require a lot of external teaching applied to it.' Olsen-Reeder's doctoral research looked at the effectiveness of bilingualism in revitalisation efforts, and the ways bilingualism could remove anxieties around te reo Māori use among its speakers. He said students in Māori-medium education like kura kaupapa Māori are examples of how kids can excel in literacy across both languages. He believes the Government has missed the mark and that not only does it look as if te reo is being taken away from 'the eyes and the minds' of tamariki, particularly Māori tamariki, but it only contributes to New Zealand's lower English proficiency. 'All these things taking the language away from how we speak every day, just doesn't make sense,' he said. Localised, homegrown structured literacy programme Instead, he said there would have been a 'real opportunity' for Aotearoa to create a localised structured literacy programme that's informed by the way New Zealanders actually read, write and speak, which he says has never been done. ADVERTISEMENT 'It's always been informed by overseas,' he said, 'and there was a real chance here to investigate how structured literacy programme from Aotearoa could have been built in a way that really make sense to how New Zealanders read and write and speak, and all those things.' (Source: 1News) He said resources could have been better utilised towards this goal and consideration of Pacific languages taken into account. The role teachers play Colleague Dr Awanui Te Huia, associate professor at Te Herenga Waka, is currently looking into the intergenerational use of te reo, exploring the findings from the country's largest longitudinal study of child health and wellbeing, Growing Up in New Zealand. She said as a 'position of authority' in the lives of tamariki, teachers play a big role in how children may value their language. 'When their teacher provides them with themselves, examples of themselves, examples of their language, the way that they're perhaps interacting with their ao hurihuri (ever-changing world) – outside of these confined kura environments… [for tamariki] it reinforces the fact that these institutions see our language as valuable. They see our whānau as valuable and the ways that we are culturally, as te iwi Māori, and all of our diversity.' ADVERTISEMENT She said it was important that it's compulsory in mainstream institutions because tamariki Māori tend to be in English medium schools. Teaching teachers te reo Consequently, this also requires quality teacher education, she said. 'If we go back to Te Ahu o Te Reo and all of the improvements we were saying in terms of teacher attitudes and the significant positive changes that that was having in our classrooms in terms of identity, and we've seen the research from that, that was totally clear.' Te Ahu o Te Reo was first piloted in 2019, offering free lessons to teachers to better integrate te reo Māori in the classroom. It was expanded in 2020 to help 10,000 more teachers learn te reo. The budget for the programme was cut in 2024 despite a glowing independent review commissioned by the ministry. Resourcing public libraries ADVERTISEMENT Te Huia said resourcing public places, like libraries, properly would help. 'Getting some form of integration of our whānau back into these public spaces so they can see themselves in libraries and participate in our language outside of the kāinga, as well as outside of the kura. 'So, seeing it all around our communities has a direct impact on how relevant, how cool, and how useful te reo Māori is - those were some of the three findings from some of our research.' For the full discussion, watch Marae on TVNZ+. Glossary tamariki - children ao hurihuri - ever-changing world ADVERTISEMENT kāinga - home(s)
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
How does the Reserve Bank set the OCR?
The official cash rate is now set by a monetary policy committee. Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank will update the official cash rate (OCR) on Wednesday. But have you ever wondered how it goes about making the decision? John McDermott is now executive director of Motu Economic and Public Policy Service but was previously assistant governor and head of economics at the Reserve Bank. He spoke to RNZ this week about how the process works. The OCR is now set by a monetary policy committee, made up of three members of the Reserve Bank's staff - current governor Christian Hawkesby, assistant governor Karen Silk and chief economist Paul Conway. They are joined by external members professor Bob Buckle, economist Carl Hansen and professor Prasanna Gai. McDermott said the way the OCR was set had changed a little with the introduction of the formal committee. It was introduced in 2018, the year before McDermott left the bank. Before that, the Reserve Bank governor was the sole decision maker. Now, the committee aims for a consensus decision but sometimes goes to a vote. But McDermott said the overall approach would be broadly the same. He said there would be three key stages: Looking at what was happening overseas, assessing the situation in New Zealand and thinking about how the decision could be communicated with the right impact. He said the process would usually take about a week. "Staff will have been working on it for a lot longer than that. They'll put together a whole bunch of information on it for the committee to digest." There would normally be two days of "information pooling" meetings, and two days of deliberation meetings, with decision meetings after the deliberation meeting, according to the committee handbook. McDermott said attention would turn first to what was happening in the rest of the world. "What are the key conditions with our trading partners? How's that affecting New Zealand? Probably a lot of detail on the US, a lot of detail on China … probably an equal amount of detail on Australia." He said the committee would then look at financial markets. "Bond markets, equity markets, how does that flow over to New Zealand's access to capital? "It's important to get that setting, once that's established it'll be looking at New Zealand in detail." He said the second day of deliberations would look at recent data. "The minutiae of the data. What's going on with concrete sales or electronic car transactions … hopefully there will be some discussion of what's going on with businesses." He said that would usually involve looking at the results of interviews with various businesses about what they were experiencing. "When you look at the political elements, does that match with what businesses are telling you?" He said the committee would also need to look at banks' willingness to lend and the ability of firms to access capital. "Once you've gone though that it's all about what's happened and what's the environment when we're in. What does that mean for the future? How do you project forward given this is what's happening? What do we expect for inflation output and interest rates …. That will be the core element of the forecasts." He said different members of the committee would bring different experience and judgment, and opinions on what elements should be given more weight. Reserve Bank governor Christian Hawkesby. Photo: "After that process the committee is probably asking the staff, whom they've been leaning on heavily during the week, to not be there. The committee itself will ask what do we think about that, what are the risks? This is what the forecast looks like, this is the decision we think kind of makes sense." He said the committee would consider what the markets would do in response to a decision, and whether they would be shocked by anything that was decided. "What will that do to the prices that matter? And in interest rates, are we going to get the kind of reaction we want? "You should see the results of that in the press conference - this is what we did, this is why we did it ... trying to shape expectations and manage how that is delivered to the country." He said markets had sometimes "got it wrong" and priced in things that the Reserve Bank did not expect to happen. In that case, it would need to clarify the way it saw things. "But by the same token, if you think the financial markets have got it right and you want to validate those expectations you have to be careful not to say something stupid where the markets misunderstand you … you don't want to shock the markets by accident." The handbook said the decision about the appropriate monetary policy settings would be made the morning of the release so that there was less risk of sensitive information being leaked. McDermott said the committee would have to decide which data it needed to pay attention to and what it could set aside as not relevant. If data was volatile, it could sometimes set it aside and decide to come back to it for the next update. Something like a movement in the oil price would have an impact in the short term but then prove immaterial in the medium term. The bank would need to communicate that price increases as a result of something like an oil spike were not going to persist, he said. "With the increase in goods and services tax, prices will go up but they'll go up one time - that's not inflation - so we're going to look through that. But every time the bank or the monetary committee looks through something, it is really important that it explains that it is looking through something." McDermott said the geopolitical environment made rate setting hard at the moment. "There's tariffs that are playing out. What are they doing? Who's paying them? How are they affecting supply chains? Are they going to be the same next week as this week? There's a lot of noise and so you've got to be very disciplined in how you work through that." He said it was also important to be upfront when a judgment was wrong. "It's really important that central banks, when they've made a mistake, just front up and say 'look we made this judgment. We were clear on the judgment we made and it hasn't panned out that way so we're changing how we view things'. I think there's been a reluctance to do that in recent times … and I think that's a shame because it really is important." The Reserve Bank said, when the economic outlook could be at a turning point, the committee might use a "hawks and doves" exercise. "One MPC adviser would play the role of the 'Hawk', presenting all analysis that would support contractionary monetary policy, and then another would play the role of the 'Dove', presenting all analysis that would support expansionary monetary policy. This exercise aims to challenge the status quo and encourage wider deliberations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
